1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 杨凌,陕西,712100
3. 陕西地建土地工程技术研究院有限责任公司,西安,710000
[ "涂坤(1995—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要从事土壤结构稳定性与侵蚀研究。E-mail: tukun12342021@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
涂坤, 胡斐南, 许晨阳, 等. 小麦秸秆及其生物炭添加对黄绵土表面电化学性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):360-367.
TU Kun, HU Feinan, XU Chenyang, et al. Effect of Wheat Straw and Its Biochar Addition on Surface Electrochemical Characteristics of Loessal Soil[J]. 2022, 36(1): 360-367.
涂坤, 胡斐南, 许晨阳, 等. 小麦秸秆及其生物炭添加对黄绵土表面电化学性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):360-367. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.046.
TU Kun, HU Feinan, XU Chenyang, et al. Effect of Wheat Straw and Its Biochar Addition on Surface Electrochemical Characteristics of Loessal Soil[J]. 2022, 36(1): 360-367. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.046.
土壤表面电化学性质是土壤具有肥力的重要基础
研究小麦秸秆及其生物炭添加对黄绵土表面电化学性质的影响
可为黄绵土耕地质量的提升及可持续利用、减少土壤侵蚀提供重要的理论及实践依据。通过室内恒温培养试验
设置对照(CK)、1%秸秆(J1)、3%秸秆(J3)、5%秸秆(J5)、7%秸秆(J7)、10%秸秆(J10)和1%生物炭(S1)、3%生物炭(S3)、5%生物炭(S5)、7%生物炭(S7)、10%生物炭(S10)11个处理。培养10个月后采集土壤样品
采用物质表面性质联合测定法测定表面电化学参数
包括表面电荷数量(SCN)、比表面积(SSA)、表面电荷密度(σ0)、表面电位(φ0)、表面电场强度(E0)
并通过冗余分析的方法解析了表面电化学性质与土壤基本理化性质之间的关系。结果表明: (1)施用秸秆和生物炭后
土壤碳酸盐含量下降
有机碳(SOC)、电导率、全氮(TN)及碳氮比(C/N)增加。添加秸秆会降低黄绵土的pH
而生物炭则会增加土壤的pH。(2)随着秸秆施用量的增加
Zeta电位下降
施用生物炭后
各个处理的Zeta电位都小于CK
但总体上随生物炭施用量的增加Zeta电位增加。(3)随着秸秆和生物炭施用量的增加
土壤的比表面积(SSA)和表面电荷数量(SCN)均增大。与CK相比
J10和S10的SSA分别提高114.0%和98.1%
SCN提高80.8%和88.3%。施用秸秆能够降低土壤表面电荷密度(σ0)
与CK相比
施用秸秆的土壤σ0降低幅度可达5.5%~15.5%。总体上
随生物炭施用量的增加σ0减小
当添加量超过5%后
施用生物炭土壤的σ0小于CK。(4)冗余分析结果显示
有机碳是影响土壤表面电化学性质的最主要因素
其解释量在秸秆和生物炭添加处理中分别占88.1%和89.5%。施用秸秆和生物炭会显著提高黄绵土的有机碳含量
改善土壤基本理化性质。土壤的比表面积和表面电荷数量随秸秆和生物炭添加量的增加而增加
但表面电荷密度总体上呈下降趋势。有机碳含量是影响黄绵土表面电化学性质变化的主控因素。
Soil surface electrochemical characteristics are important basis for soil fertility. Studies on the effect of wheat straw and its biochar addition on the soil surface electrochemical properties can provide important theoretical and practical basis for improving the quality of cultivated land
sustainable utilization and reducing soil erosion. Through indoor constant temperature culture experiment
11 treatments were set up: control (CK)
1% straw (J1)
3% straw (J3)
5% straw (J5)
7% straw (J7)
10% straw (J10)
1% biochar (S1)
3% biochar (S3)
5% biochar (S5)
7% biochar (S7)
10% biochar (S10). Soil samples were collected after 10 months
then determined for surface electrochemical parameters by the method of combined analysis of surface properties
including surface charge number (SCN)
specific surface area (SSA) and surface charge density(σ0)
surface potential (φ0)
and surface electric field intensity (E0). The relationships between surface electrochemical properties and soil physical and chemical properties were analyzed by redundancy analysis. The results showed that: (1) After applying straw and biochar
soil carbonate content decreased
while soil organic carbon (SOC)
electrical conductivity
total nitrogen (TN) and carbon nitrogen ratio (C/N) increased. The addition of straw could reduce the pH of loessal soil
while increase the pH. (2) With the increase of straw application rates
Zeta potential decreased. After applying biochar
Zeta potential of each treatment was lower than that of CK
but Zeta potential increased with the increase of biochar application rates in general. (3) The SSA and SCN of soils increased with the increase of straw and biochar application rates. Compared with CK
the SSA of J10 and S10 increased by 114.0% and 98.1%; and SCN of J10 and S10 increased by 80.8% and 88.3%
respectively. Application of straw could reduce the surface charge density of soils. The σ0 for straw-added soils was reduced by 5.5%~15.5% compared with that in CK. A small amount of biochar application could increase soil σ0 compared with that in CK. On the whole
the σ0 decreased with the increase of biochar application rates. When the amount of biochar was more than 5%
σ0 for biochar-added soils was less than CK. (4) The results of redundancy analysis showed that SOC was the most important factor affecting the soil surface electrochemical properties and the explained amounts were 88.1% and 89.5% for straw and biochar addition
respectively. The application of straw and biochar could significantly increase the content of organic carbon and improve the basic physical and chemical properties of the Loessal soil. The SSA and SCN of soils increased while the surface charge density decreased with the increase of straw and biochar application rates. The content of organic carbon was the main controlling factor of the surface electrochemical properties.
马任甜, 胡斐南, 刘婧芳, 等. 黄土高原植被恢复过程土壤表面电化学性质演变特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(2): 392-402.
Yu Z H, Zhang J B, Zhang C Z, et al. The coupling effects of soil organic matter and particle interaction forces on soil aggregate stability [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2017, 174: 251-260.
Li S, Li H, Xu C Y, et al. Particle interaction forces induce soil particle transport during rainfall [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2013, 77(5): 1563-1571.
Anning D K, Qiu H Z, Zhang C H, et al. Maize straw return and nitrogen rate effects on potato(
solanum tuberosum
L. ) performance and soil physicochemical characteristics in Northwest China[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(10): 5508-5508.
路怡青, 朱安宁, 张佳宝, 等. 免耕和秸秆还田对土壤酶活性和微生物群落的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(1): 85-90.
王娇, 王鸿斌, 赵兴敏, 等. 添加秸秆对不同有机含量土壤酸度及缓冲性能的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6): 361-368.
王秋菊, 常本超, 张劲松, 等. 长期秸秆还田对白浆土物理性质及水稻产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(14): 2748-2757.
高洪军, 彭畅, 张秀芝, 等. 秸秆还田量对黑土区土壤及团聚体有机碳变化特征和固碳效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(22): 4613-4622.
王碧胜, 于维水, 武雪萍, 等. 不同耕作措施下添加秸秆对土壤有机碳及其相关因素的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(6): 1176-1187.
Xu Q, Huang Q Q, Liu Y Y, et al. Effects of sepiolite and biochar on microbial diversity in acid red soil from southern China[J]. Chemistry and Ecology, 2019, 35(9): 846-860.
戴静, 刘阳生. 生物炭的性质及其在土壤环境中应用的研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44(6): 1520-1525.
Fellet G, Marchiol L, Delle V, et al. Application of biochar on mine tailings: Effects and perspectives for land reclamation [J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 83(9): 1262-1267.
Kinney T J, Masiello C A, Dugan B, et al. Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, 41: 34-43.
Cox D, Bezdicek D, Fauci M, et al. Effects of compost, coal ash, and straw amendments on restoring the quality of eroded Palouse soil [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soil, 2001, 33(5): 365-372.
陈心想, 何绪生, 耿增超, 等. 生物炭对不同土壤化学性质、小麦和糜子产量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(20): 6534-6542.
Liu J F, Wang Z L, Hu F N, et al. Soil organic matter and silt contents determine soil particle surface electrochemical properties across a long-term natural restoration grassland [J]. Catena, 2020, 190: e104526.
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
徐仁扣, 赵安珍, 肖双成, 等. 农作物残体制备的生物质炭对水中亚甲基蓝的吸附作用[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(1): 142-146.
Li H, Hou J, Liu X M, et al. Combined determination of specific surface area and surface charge properties of charged particles from a single experiment [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011, 75(6): 21-28.
张红雪, 赵壮, 王晓朋, 等. 生物炭对亚热带红壤水稳性团聚体及其碳、氮分布的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(6): 27-33.
侯建伟, 邢存芳, 邓晓梅, 等. 不同秸秆生物炭对黄壤理化性质及综合肥力的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2019, 47(11): 49-59.
姜军, 徐仁扣. 离子强度对3种可变电荷土壤表面电荷和Zeta电位的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(2): 422-426.
杨美红, 李志雄, 刘雨嫣, 等. 天然有机质和不同pH环境对纳米黑炭的迁移行为影响及作用机制[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(1): 113-120.
李琪瑞, 许晨阳, 耿增超, 等. 纳米生物炭的制备方法比较及其特性研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(7): 3124-3134.
Aabid H, Ghulam R, Mumtaz A, et al. Biochar for sustainable soil health: A review of prospects and concerns[J]. Pedosphere, 2015, 25(5): 639-653.
杨彩迪, 卢升高. 秸秆直接还田和炭化还田对红壤酸度、养分和交换性能的动态影响[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(9): 4246-4252.
Cao Y, Gao Y M, Qi Y B. et al. Biochar-enhanced composts reduce the potential leaching of nutrients and heavy metals and suppress plant-parasitic nematodes in excessively fertilized cucumber soils [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2018, 25(8): 7589-7599.
刘均阳, 周正朝, 苏雪萌, 等. 植物根系对土壤团聚体形成作用机制研究回顾[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3): 267-273.
Liang B J, Lehmann D, Solomon J, et al. Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2006, 70(5): 1719-1730.
陈颖, 刘玉学, 陈重军, 等. 生物炭对土壤有机碳矿化的激发效应及其机理研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1): 314-320.
黄兆琴, 胡淋潮, 祁本武, 等. 老化生物炭表面性质的变化及其对土壤吸附Cu(Ⅱ)的影响[J]. 有色金属(冶炼部分), 2020, 10(12): 80-88.
盛明, 龙静泓, 雷琬莹, 等. 秸秆还田对黑土团聚体内有机碳红外光谱特征的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2020, 9(4): 355-366.
Hu F N, Xu C Y, Ma R T, et al. Biochar application driven change in soil internal forces improves aggregate stability: Based on a two-year field study [J]. Geoderma, 2021, 403: e115276.
0
浏览量
991
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621