1. 江西省红壤研究所江西省红壤耕地保育重点实验室, 江西 进贤,331717
2. 安徽师范大学生态与环境学院, 皖江流域退化生态系统的恢复与重建省部共建协同创新中心,安徽,芜湖,241002
3. 南昌工程学院,南昌,330099
[ "郜茹茹(1992—), 女, 硕士, 主要从事土壤改良研究。E-mail: 2757805702@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
郜茹茹, 周际海, 冯今萍, 等. 红薯藤及其生物质炭还田对旱地红壤微生物活性及养分含量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):346-351.
GAO Ruru, ZHOU Jihai, FENG Jinping, et al. Effects of Sweet Potato Vines and Their Biochar Returning on Soil Microbial Activity and Nutrient Contents of Dryland Red Soil[J]. 2022, 36(1): 346-351.
郜茹茹, 周际海, 冯今萍, 等. 红薯藤及其生物质炭还田对旱地红壤微生物活性及养分含量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):346-351. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.044.
GAO Ruru, ZHOU Jihai, FENG Jinping, et al. Effects of Sweet Potato Vines and Their Biochar Returning on Soil Microbial Activity and Nutrient Contents of Dryland Red Soil[J]. 2022, 36(1): 346-351. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.044.
为探究红薯藤及其生物质炭还田对旱地红壤微生物活性及养分含量的影响
通过田间定位试验
设置5个处理: (1)常规处理(CK); (2)3 000 kg/hm2红薯藤还田(S1);(3)6 000 kg/hm2红薯藤还田(S2);(4)1 000 kg/hm2红薯藤生物质炭还田(BC1);(5)2 000 kg/hm2红薯藤生物质炭还田(BC2)
研究不同剂量红薯藤及其生物质炭还田对红壤微生物活性和养分含量的影响。结果表明: 与CK相比
在0—10 cm土层中
BC1的土壤基础呼吸增加17.93%
S1、S2、BC2的土壤基础呼吸分别减少20.33%
10.10%
2.66%;在10—20 cm土层中
S2、BC1的土壤基础呼吸分别增加17.29%
0.41%
S1、BC2的土壤基础呼吸分别减少13.61%
16.93%;在20—30 cm土层中
S1、S2、BC1、BC2的土壤基础呼吸分别增加8.26%
48.94%
50.21%
38.59%。与CK相比
在0—10 cm土层中
S1、S2、BC1、BC2的土壤微生物量碳分别增加1.30%
6.09%
28.52%
39.64%;在10—20 cm土层中
S1、S2、BC1、BC2的土壤微生物量碳分别增加9.76%
16.72%
24.20%
54.32%;在20—30 cm土层中
S1、S2、BC1、BC2的土壤微生物量碳分别增加22.34%
39.27%
54.06%
84.09%。红薯藤及其生物质炭对土壤基础呼吸和土壤微生物量碳含量在一定程度上表现为促进作用
促进了土壤FDA水解酶和土壤脲酶活性
对土壤蔗糖酶活性的影响较小
生物质炭还田抑制了土壤FDA水解酶和土壤脲酶活性
对土壤蔗糖酶活性则表现为促进作用; 红薯藤还田提高了土壤有机碳含量
而生物质炭还田降低了土壤有机碳含量; 红薯藤及生物质炭还田均提高了土壤中水解氮、有效磷含量
在一定程度上可有效改善土壤理化性质、微生物活性
对提升土壤生态系统的稳定性具有重要意义。研究结果可为秸秆和生物质炭合理还田提供理论依据。
In order to study the effects of different doses of sweet potato vine and their biochar returning to the field on microbial activity and nutrient contents of dryland red soil
field positioning experiment was conducted. In the experiment
five treatments were set up
which were conventional management (CK)
3 000 kg/hm2 sweet potato vine returning (S1)
6 000 kg/hm2 sweet potato vine returning (S2)
1 000 kg/hm2 sweet potato vine biochar returning (BC1) and 2 000 kg/hm2 sweet potato vine biochar returning (BC2). The results showed that compared with CK
in the 0—10 cm soil layer
soil basal respiration of BC1 increased by 17.93%
while that of S1
S2 and BC2 decreased by 20.33%
10.10% and 2.66%
respectively. In the 10—20 cm soil layer
the soil basal respiration of S2 and BC1 increased by 17.29% and 0.41%
respectively
while that of S1 and BC2 decreased by 13.61% and 16.93%
respectively. In the 20—30 cm soil layer
the basal respiration of S1
S2
BC1 and BC2 increased by 8.26%
48.94%
50.21% and 38.59%
respectively. Compared with CK
the soil microbial biomass carbon of S1
S2
BC1 and BC2 treatment increased about 1.30%
6.09%
28.52% and 39.64% in the 0—10 cm soil layer
respectively. In the 10—20 cm soil layer
soil microbial biomass carbon of S1
S2
BC1 and BC2 increased by 9.76%
16.72%
24.20% and 54.32%
respectively. In the 20—30 cm soil layer
soil microbial biomass carbon of S1
S2
BC1 and BC2 increased by 22.34%
39.27%
54.06% and 84.09%
respectively. It showed that sweet potato vines and their biochar could promote the soil basal respiration and soil microbial biomass carbon content to a certain extent. Sweet potato vine returning promoted the activities of soil FDA hydrolase and soil urease
but had little effect on soil sucrase activity. Returning biochar to the field inhibited the activities of soil FDA hydrolase and soil urease
and promoted soil sucrase activity. Sweet potato vine returning increased the content of soil organic carbon
while biochar returning reduced that. Sweet potato vine and biochar returning both increased the contents of hydrolyzed nitrogen and available phosphorus in the soil. The results showed that the addition of sweet pototo vine and biochar could effectively improve the soil physical and chemical properties and soil microbial activity
which was of great significance to improve the stability of soil ecosystem. The results provided a theoretical basis for the rational return of straw and biomass carbon to the field.
中华人民共和国生态环境部, 国家统计局, 中华人民共和国农业农村部. 第二次全国污染源普查公报[EB/OL]. [2020-06-08]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/home/ztbd/rdzl/wrypc/zlxz/202006/t20200616_784745.html.
王永洁, 史健峰, 崔虎, 等. 秸秆还田对土壤理化性质和玉米产量的影响[J]. 科技通报, 2019, 35(7): 97-103.
杨滨娟, 钱海燕, 黄国勤, 等. 秸秆还田及其研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2012, 2(5): 1-4, 28.
宋宪青. 秸秆还田对农田土壤有机质提升的探索研究[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2019(7): 139.
Ding X L, Zhang X D, He H B, et al. Dynamics of soil amino sugar pools during decomposition processes of corn residues as affected by inorganic N addition[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010, 10(4): 758-766.
张功臣, 陈建美, 赵征宇, 等. 生物质炭对设施连作土壤性质及黄瓜生长和产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(3): 659-666.
陈重军, 凌学林, 邢龙, 等. 减肥条件下生物质炭施用对水稻田土壤细菌多样性的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(3): 385-392.
Hamer U, Marschner B, Brodowski S, et al. Interactive priming of black carbon and glucose mineralization[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2004, 35(7): 823-830.
Pietikainen J, Kiikkila O, Fritze H. Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effects on the microbial community of the underlying humus[J]. Oikos, 2000, 89: 231-242.
刘元生, 刘方, 陈祖拥, 等. 生物质炭对旱作土壤生物性状及养分有效性的调控效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(3): 166-171, 178.
程坤, 周际海, 金志农, 等. 土壤微生物活性对石油原油、铅镉及其复合污染的响应[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37(5): 1976-1982.
周际海, 陈晏敏, 袁颖红, 等. 秸秆与生物质炭施用对土壤温室气体排放的影响差异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4): 248-254.
郑宪志, 张星星, 林伟盛, 等. 不同树种对土壤可溶性有机碳和微生物生物量碳的影响[J]. 福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 34(6): 86-93.
顾惠敏, 陈波浪, 王庆惠. 施磷对不同质地棉田土壤磷素有效性及磷肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(3): 100-108.
温超, 单玉梅, 晔薷罕, 等. 氮和水分添加对内蒙古荒漠草原放牧生态系统土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(1): 80-92.
周际海, 陈晏敏, 吴雪艳, 等. 黑麦草与施肥对石油-铅-镉复合污染土壤微生物活性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(1): 334-339.
潘孝晨, 唐海明, 肖小平, 等. 不同土壤耕作方式下稻田土壤微生物多样性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(23): 51-57.
Islam M R, Chauhan P S, Kim Y, et al. Community level functional diversity and enzyme activities in paddy soils under different long-term fertilizer management practices[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2011, 47(5): 599-604.
宿兵兵, 程宏波, 柴守玺, 等. 旱地小麦根际土壤酶活性及微生物生物量对覆盖方式的响应[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(6): 714-721.
黄荣霞, 周际海, 田胜尼, 等. 石油污染与食细菌线虫对土壤微生物活性及石油降解的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37(11): 4322-4328.
李冰, 李玉双, 陈琳, 等. 沈北新区不同利用类型土壤脲酶活性及其影响因素分析[J]. 生态科学, 2019, 38(3): 1-8.
刘宇彤, 霍璐阳, 李志国, 等. 不同处理方式对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2019, 35(2): 21-26.
程曼, 解文艳, 杨振兴, 等. 黄土旱塬长期秸秆还田对土壤养分、酶活性及玉米产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(10): 1528-1536.
张祎, 李鹏, 肖列, 等. 黄土高原丘陵区地形和土地利用对土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(5): 1-12.
0
浏览量
1003
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621