不同改良剂施用对污染土壤养分转化及砷和铅生物有效性的影响

杨冰霜; 陈翰博; 杨兴; 吴小莲; 陈俊辉; 王海龙

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.042

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同改良剂施用对污染土壤养分转化及砷和铅生物有效性的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 不同改良剂施用对污染土壤养分转化及砷和铅生物有效性的影响
- Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Nutrient Transformation and Bioavailability of Arsenic and Lead in Contaminated Soil
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第1期页码：332-339
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 浙江农林大学环境与资源学院,杭州,311300
  2. 沈阳农业大学农学院,沈阳,110000
  3. 佛山科学技术学院环境与化学工程学院,广东,佛山,528000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "杨冰霜(1994—), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要从事农业(土地)资源开发与利用研究。E-mail: yangbingshuang@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(21876027);佛山市科技创新团队项目(1920001000083)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.042
  中图分类号： X131.32
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨冰霜, 陈翰博, 杨兴, 等. 不同改良剂施用对污染土壤养分转化及砷和铅生物有效性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):332-339.

YANG Bingshuang, CHEN Hanbo, YANG Xing, et al. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Nutrient Transformation and Bioavailability of Arsenic and Lead in Contaminated Soil[J]. 2022, 36(1): 332-339.
杨冰霜, 陈翰博, 杨兴, 等. 不同改良剂施用对污染土壤养分转化及砷和铅生物有效性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):332-339. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.042.

YANG Bingshuang, CHEN Hanbo, YANG Xing, et al. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Nutrient Transformation and Bioavailability of Arsenic and Lead in Contaminated Soil[J]. 2022, 36(1): 332-339. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.042.

摘要

为比较不同小龙虾壳基土壤改良剂对砷、铅复合污染土壤的修复效果

通过盆栽试验

探究施用1%(w/w)小龙虾壳粉(CSP)、甲壳素(CT)、小龙虾壳炭(CSB)及甲壳素-小龙虾壳炭配施(CT-CSB

CT∶CSB为1∶1)对土壤养分、酶活性、重金属生物有效性及青菜生长的影响。结果表明

不同改良剂施用均可显著提高土壤pH和阳离子交换量

降低土壤中有效态铅的含量

施用CSB对降低土壤中有效态铅含量的效果最显著

较对照降低了35.3%;添加CT、CSB和CT-CSB均可降低土壤中有效态砷的含量

其中

CT-CSB处理较对照降低77.2%。CT、CSB、CT-CSB处理显著提高土壤中ɑ-葡萄糖苷酶、纤维二糖水解酶、β-木糖苷酶、β-N-乙酰基氨基葡萄糖苷酶和酸性磷酸酶的活性。土壤酶活性与重金属有效态含量的相关性分析表明

施加改良剂可降低重金属胁迫

提高土壤酶活性。添加不同土壤改良剂均可降低青菜可食部分对砷和铅的积累

提高青菜对氮、磷和钾的吸收量

从而促进植物生长

CT-CSB处理的青菜可食部分生物量较对照提高190.9%。综上

CT、CSB、CT-CSB在砷铅复合污染土壤修复方面均有较大应用潜力

CSB综合效果最为明显

可以作为土壤砷、铅原位钝化修复的一种新材料。2

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to compare the remediation effects of different soil amendments derived from crawfish shell on an arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) contaminated soil. Soil amendments

including crawfish shell powder (CSP)

chitin (CT)

crawfish shell biochar (CSB) and CT-CSB combination (CT-CSB

CT∶CSB is 1∶1)

were employed to assess the influence of their applications (1%) on the availability of nutrients

activities of enzymes

bioavailability of As and Pb

as well as growth of pak choi (Brassica chinensis). The results indicated that all treatments significantly increased the pH and cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil. Concentrations of available Pb decreased in all treatments

and the maximum reduction was found in the CSB treatment

which was 35.3% lower than control. Application of CT

CSB and CT-CSB decreased the concentrations of available As

and the maximum reduction was found in the CT-CSB treatment

which was 77.2% lower than control. The activities of soil enzymes including α-glucosidase

cellobiohydrolase

xylosidase

acetyl glucosaminidase and acid phosphatase were enhanced after the addition of CT

CSB and CT-CSB. Correlations analysis between soil enzyme activity and the concentrations of available Pb and As indicated that the application of different amendments could alleviate the stress of As and Pb in the soil

and thus enhance soil enzyme activities. Application of all amendments decreased the uptake of As and Pb in the edible part of pak choi

and increased the phytoavailability of nitrogen

phosphorus and potassium

thus promoting plant growth. The biomass of the edible part of pak choi increased by 190.9% in the CT-CSB treatment

compared with the control. In conclusion

application of CT

CSB and CT-CSB

in particular CSB

had superior potential for promoting plant growth and remediating soil polluted by As and Pb

offering a new approach for the in-situ remediation of soil co-contaminated with As and Pb.

关键词

Keywords

references

Chen H B, Yang X, Wang H L, et al. Animal carcass-and wood-derived biochars improved nutrient bioavailability, enzyme activity, and plant growth in metal-phthalic acid ester co-contaminated soils: A trial for reclamation and improvement of degraded soils[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 261: e110246.

环境保护部, 国土资源部. 全国土壤污染状况调查公报[J]. 国土资源通信, 2014(8): 26-29.

胡雪芳, 田志清, 梁亮, 等. 不同改良剂对铅镉污染农田水稻重金属积累和产量影响的比较分析[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(7): 3409-3417.

马士龙, 包学太, 杨琦, 等. 小龙虾虾壳研究与应用现状分析[J]. 饲料研究, 2019, 42(6): 95-97.

Vootla S, Richert J C, Hardaway C J, et al. Investigation of crawfish (procambrus clarkii) shells for uptake and removal of lead in water[J]. Analytical Letters, 2011, 44: 2229-2243.

蒋小姝, 莫海涛, 苏海佳, 等. 甲壳素及壳聚糖在农业领域方面的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(6): 170-174.

Da S L, Masotti, A. Chitin and chitosan as multipurpose natural polymers for groundwater arsenic removal and As

delivery in tumor therapy[J]. Marine Drugs, 2010, 8(5): 1518-1525.

孙涛, 孙约兵, 贾宏涛, 等. 虾壳生物炭对Cd-As复合污染土壤修复效应以及可溶性有机碳含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(8): 1675-1685, 1606.

鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.

包建平, 袁根生, 董方圆, 等. 生物质炭与秸秆施用对红壤有机碳组分和微生物活性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(3): 209-217.

刘晶晶, 杨兴, 陆扣萍, 等. 生物质炭对土壤重金属形态转化及其有效性的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(11): 3679-3687.

Kamari A, Pulford I D, Hargreaves J S J. Chitosan as a potential amendment to remediate metal contaminated soil-A characterisation study[J]. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2011, 82(1): 71-80.

陈翰博. 生物质炭对Cd-DEHP复合污染土壤中污染物生物有效性和作物生长的影响[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2019.

杨兴, 黄化刚, 王玲, 等. 烟秆生物质炭热解温度优化及理化性质分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(2): 245-255.

陈红霞, 杜章留, 郭伟, 等. 施用生物炭对华北平原农田土壤容重, 阳离子交换量和颗粒有机质含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(11): 2930-2934.

孔爱辉, 耿玉清, 余新晓. 北京低山区栓皮栎林和油松林土壤酶活性研究[J]. 土壤, 2013, 45(2): 264-270.

刘玮晶, 刘烨, 高晓荔, 等. 外源生物质炭对土壤中铵态氮素滞留效应的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(5): 962-968.

欧巧菁, 杨悦, 梁伟杰, 等. 薇甘菊叶片水提液对土壤钾素活化及酶活性的影响[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 52(1): 63-69.

Schneider F, Haderlein S B. Potential effects of biochar on the availability of phosphorus-mechanistic insights[J]. Geoderma, 2016, 277: 83-90.

Xiao Y L, Xue Y W, Gao F, et al. Sorption of heavy metal ions onto crayfish shell biochar: effect of pyrolysis temperature, pH and ionic strength[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2017, 80: 114-121.

Pan H, Yang X, Chen H B, et al. Pristine and iron-engineered animal- and plant-derived biochars enhanced bacterial abundance and immobilized arsenic and lead in a contaminated soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 763: e144218.

吴永军. 利用纤维素酶降解水溶性壳聚糖的研究[J]. 荆楚理工学院学报, 2011, 26(5): 5-9.

黎森, 王敦球, 于焕云. 铅-砷交互作用影响小白菜生长及铅砷积累的效应研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(1): 170-180.

连娟, 郭再华, 贺立源. 砷胁迫下磷用量对不同磷效率水稻苗生长、磷和砷吸收的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3): 273-279.

中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. GB 2762—2017食品中污染物限量[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.

浏览量

1076

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

生物炭-秸秆隔层协同改良对盐碱土壤水分入渗过程的影响

施用生物炭对果园土壤氮磷时空分布与流失阻控的影响

生物炭结合藓类植物对土壤稳定性的影响

生物炭配施硝化/脲酶抑制剂及秸秆覆盖对红壤茶园氮磷淋失影响