微咸水与再生水混灌对土壤特性的影响与灌溉效应评估

刘春成; 崔丙健; 胡超; 吴海卿; 高峰

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.033

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

微咸水与再生水混灌对土壤特性的影响与灌溉效应评估

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 微咸水与再生水混灌对土壤特性的影响与灌溉效应评估
- Effect of Mixed Irrigation of Brackish Water and Reclaimed Water on Soil Properties and Irrigation Effect Evaluation
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第1期页码：255-262
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国农业科学院农田灌溉研究所,河南,新乡,453002
  2. 中国农业科学院研究生院,北京,100081
  3. 中国农业科学院河南新乡农业水土环境野外科学观测试验站, 农业水资源高效安全利用重点开放实验室,河南,新乡,453000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "刘春成(1986—), 男, 安徽界首人, 助理研究员, 博士研究生, 主要从事非常规水资源安全利用研究。E-mail: liuchuncheng986@sohu.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0403503-2, 2017YFC0403302-1);河南省重点研发与推广专项(202102110264);河南省自然科学基金项目(202300410552);中央级科研院所基本科研业务费专项(FIRI202001-02, FIRI20210302, FIRI2019-04-02)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.033
  中图分类号： S154.3;S155.4
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘春成, 崔丙健, 胡超, 等. 微咸水与再生水混灌对土壤特性的影响与灌溉效应评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):255-262.

LIU Chuncheng, CUI Bingjian, HU Chao, et al. Effect of Mixed Irrigation of Brackish Water and Reclaimed Water on Soil Properties and Irrigation Effect Evaluation[J]. 2022, 36(1): 255-262.
刘春成, 崔丙健, 胡超, 等. 微咸水与再生水混灌对土壤特性的影响与灌溉效应评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):255-262. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.033.

LIU Chuncheng, CUI Bingjian, HU Chao, et al. Effect of Mixed Irrigation of Brackish Water and Reclaimed Water on Soil Properties and Irrigation Effect Evaluation[J]. 2022, 36(1): 255-262. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.033.

摘要

为了探讨淡水资源不足地区微咸水的合理利用方式。通过盆栽试验

以清水灌溉为对照

研究不同比例微咸水与再生水混合灌溉对水盐、水溶性离子、滴水穿透时间WDPT、有机质以及酶活性的影响

并利用第二代生物综合响应指数法(IBRv2)对微咸水与再生水混灌效应进行评价。结果表明: (1)与再生水灌溉(T1)相比

随着混合溶液中微咸水比重的升高

土壤含水率和含盐量逐渐升高且差异显著(P＜0.05)。(2)与T1处理相比

随着混合溶液中微咸水比重的升高

土壤K+、Ca2+含量呈降低趋势

Na+、Cl-含量显著升高

SO42-含量显著降低

Mg2+含量无明显变化规律。(3)与CK2(清水灌溉)相比

T1处理土壤WDPT和有机质含量差异不显著; 与T1处理相比

随着混合液中微咸水比重的进一步提高

土壤WDPT和有机质含量总体上呈升高趋势。(4)不同比例微咸水—再生水混合灌溉对土壤酶活性的影响不同。土壤蔗糖酶活性以T2处理(微咸水—再生水1∶2灌溉)最高

土壤脲酶以T3处理(微咸水—再生水1∶1灌溉)最高但和其他处理差异不显著。(5)基于IBRv2指数法

T2处理IBRv2最小

为6.89。因此

综合考虑土壤环境质量指标

在淡水资源匮乏地区利用微咸水(5 g/L)灌溉时

可以考虑用再生替代清水与微咸水配合使用

微咸水—再生水混灌比例以1∶2为宜。

Abstract

This study was carried out to explore the reasonable utilization of brackish water in areas irrigated with brackish water and freshwater is short. This study set four treatments

including

reclaimed water irrigation(T1)

mixed irrigation of 1∶2 with brackish water-reclaimed water (T2)

mixed irrigation of 1∶1 with brackish water-reclaimed water (T3) and brackish water irrigation (T4)

and took tap water irrigation (CK2)

bare land irrigation with tap water (CK1) and bare land irrigation with 1∶1 with brackish water-reclaimed water (CK3) as the control

of which the saline degree of brackish water was 5 g/L. Based on the pot experiments

we measured the data of soil water content

soil salt content

water drop penetration time (WDPT)

soil organic matter content

and soil enzyme activities including soil sucrase (S-SC)

soil alkaline phosphatase (S-AKP/ALP)

soil urease (S-UE)

soil polyphenol oxidase (S-PPO)

and analyzed the their responses to the mixed irrigation with different ratios of brackish water to reclaimed water. Finally

the index of integrated biological response version 2 was used to evaluate the impact of mixed irrigation on soil. The results indicated that: (1) Compared to T1

soil water content and soil salt content gradually increased significantly with the increase of the proportion of brackish water in the mixed solution on the whole. (2) Compared to T1

soil contents of K+ and Ca2+ had slight descending trend

soil contents of Na+ and Cl- increased obviously

soil SO42- content improved significantly

and soil Mg2+ content changed with no obvious trend with the increase of the proportion of brackish water in the mixed solution. (3) There were no significant differences in soil WDPTs and soil organ matter contents between T1 and CK2. Compared to T1

soil WDPTs and organic matter content had the ascending trend with the increase of the proportion of brackish water in the mixed solution. (4) The responses of different soil enzyme activities to different mixed irrigation with brackish water and reclaimed water were different. S-SC activity in T2 was the highest

S-UE activity in T3 was the highest but had no obvious differences from other treatments

and S-PPO activity in T4 was the highest following by T3 and no significant difference between them. (5) The index of IBRv2 in T2 was the lowest

and the value was 6.89. Therefore

considering soil environmental indexes and the limits of reclaimed water

reclaimed water could be used as an alternative source of fresh water in combination with brackish water

and mixed irrigation of 1∶2 with brackish water-reclaimed water is recommended based on the index of IBRv2 in short fresh water resource and areas irrigated with brackish water.

关键词

Keywords

references

Yuan C F, Feng S Y, Huo Z L, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation with saline water on soil water-salt distribution and water use efficiency of maize for seed production in arid Northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 212: 424-432.

Loy S, Assi A T, Mohtar R H, et al. The effect of municipal treated wastewater on the water holding properties of a clayey, calcareous soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 643: 807-818.

Bustan A, Cohen S, Malach Y D, et al. Effects of timing and duration of brackish irrigation water on fruit yield and quality of late summer melons[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2005, 74(2): 123-134.

Liu B X, Wang S Q, Kong X L, et al. Modeling and assessing feasibility of long-term brackish water irrigation in vertically homogeneous and heterogeneous cultivated lowland in the North China Plain[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 211: 98-110.

Tahtouh J, Mohtar R, Assi A, et al. Impact of brackish groundwater and treated wastewater on soil chemical and mineralogical properties[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 647: 99-109.

冯棣, 张俊鹏, 孙池涛, 等. 长期咸水灌溉对土壤理化性质和土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(3): 171-176.

刘春成, 李毅, 郭丽俊, 等. 微咸水灌溉对斥水土壤水盐运移的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(8): 39-45.

Álvarez-García M, Urrestarazu M, Guil-Guerrero J L, et al. Effect of fertigation using fish production wastewater on Pelargonium x zonale growth and nutrient content[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 223: e105726.

Perulli G D, Bresilla K, Manfrini L, et al. Beneficial effect of secondary treated wastewater irrigation on nectarine tree physiology[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 221: 120-130.

Pedrero F, Camposeo S, Pace B, et al. Use of reclaimed wastewater on fruit quality of nectarine in Southern Italy[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 203: 186-192.

Chi Y B, Yang P L, Ren S M, et al. Effects of fertilizer types and water quality on carbon dioxide emissions from soil in wheat-maize rotations[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 698: e134010.

郑顺安, 陈春, 郑向群, 等. 再生水灌溉对土壤团聚体中有机碳、氮和磷的形态及分布的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2012, 32(11): 2053-2059.

胡廷飞, 王辉, 胡传旺, 等. 灌溉水质和灌水方式对红壤斥水性及其理化性质的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(8): 651-655, 661.

中华人民共和国生态环境部. GB 5084-2021, 农田灌溉水质标准[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.

鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.

Dekker L W, Jungerius P D. Water repellency in the dunes with special reference to the Netherlands[J]. Catena, 1990, 18: 173-183.

杨培岭, 王瑜, 任树梅, 等. 咸淡水交替灌溉下土壤水盐分布与玉米吸水规律研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(6): 273-281.

陈黛慈, 王继华, 关健飞, 等. 再生水灌溉对土壤理化性质和可培养微生物群落的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(5): 1304-1311.

韩洋, 齐学斌, 李平, 等. 再生水和清水不同灌水水平对土壤理化性质及病原菌分布的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(8): 32-38.

商艳玲, 李毅, 朱德兰. 再生水灌溉对土壤斥水性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(21): 89-97.

Doerr S H, Shakesby R A, Walsh R P D. Soil water repellency: Its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 2000, 51(1): 33-65.

任长江, 赵勇, 龚家国, 等. 妫水河流域土壤斥水性分布与影响因素研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(10): 237-244.

Ndour N Y B, Baudoin E, Guissé A, et al. Impact of irrigation water quality on soil nitrifying and total bacterial communities[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2008, 44(5): 797-803.

潘能, 侯振安, 陈卫平, 等. 绿地再生水灌溉土壤微生物量碳及酶活性效应研究[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(12): 4081-4087.

张彦, 张惠文, 苏振成, 等. 污水灌溉对土壤重金属含量、酶活性和微生物类群分布的影响[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2006, 6(6): 44-50.

郭晓明, 马腾, 崔亚辉, 等. 污灌时间对土壤肥力及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(4): 750-756.

浏览量

862

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

微咸水与再生水混灌对作物生理特性的影响

不同钠钾比微咸水对土壤水盐特性和冬小麦生长的影响

再生水灌溉对土壤理化性质影响的试验研究

再生水灌溉对草坪土壤速效养分及盐碱化的效应

再生水灌溉对土壤理化性质影响的试验研究