1. 山东农业大学水利土木工程学院,山东,泰安,271018
2. 中国农业大学水利与土木工程学院,北京,100083
[ "亓波(1997-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事盐碱土改良研究。E-mail:18853856293@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
亓波, 李靖江, 高崧, 等. 掺沙对盐渍土土块崩解和土壤盐分淋洗的影响机理[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):369-375.
QI Bo, LI Jingjiang, GAO Song, et al. Influence Mechanism of Sand Mixing on Soil Clod Disintegration and Soil Salt Leaching of Saline Soil[J]. 2021, 35(6): 369-375.
亓波, 李靖江, 高崧, 等. 掺沙对盐渍土土块崩解和土壤盐分淋洗的影响机理[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):369-375. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.049.
QI Bo, LI Jingjiang, GAO Song, et al. Influence Mechanism of Sand Mixing on Soil Clod Disintegration and Soil Salt Leaching of Saline Soil[J]. 2021, 35(6): 369-375. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.049.
黄河三角洲地区的土壤入渗性能差,且盐分含量高,掺沙可以加速盐渍土块崩解,改良土壤质地与结构,从而改善入渗性能和水盐在土壤运移过程。以黄河三角洲地区盐渍土土块为研究对象,采用室内土柱模拟试验,设置3种掺沙比例:CK (0)、S1(20%)、S2(50%),土块组成:<1 mm (20%),1~2 mm (28%),2~5 mm (34%),5~10 mm (18%)研究积水入渗条件下掺沙比例对相继2次入渗过程中盐渍土土块崩解及其对水盐运移的影响,从而明确掺沙对盐渍土的改良效果。结果表明,在第1次灌水淋洗和水分再分布后,用干筛法和湿筛法测量得到S1和S2土壤> 0.25 mm的土块含量,较对照组分别降低17.92%,15.50%和51.45%,32.00%;不同掺沙比例下,同一时刻的湿润锋和累计入渗量均表现为S2 > S1 > CK,且S1和S2的稳定入渗率在第1次和第2次入渗过程中,较对照组分别增加60.00%,66.67%和400.00%,900.00%;同一土层深度的脱盐率随掺沙比例增加,掺沙比例为50%时,脱盐深度比20%和对照组分别增加33.3%和45.45%,脱盐量分别提高1.19%~19.01%和4.21%~77.52%。综上,盐渍土掺沙可以有效促进盐渍土块崩解,提高入渗速率和洗盐效率。研究结果可为盐碱地改良提供参考依据。
The soil in the Yellow River Delta is featured with poor infiltration and high salinity. Sand incorporation into saline soil can promote disintegration of saline soil clods and improve the soil texture and structure
so as to improve soil infiltration and soil water and salt movement in the soil profile. This study used the saline soil clod in the Yellow River Delta as the experimental materials to investigate the effect mechanism of sand incorporation into saline soil on soil clod disintegration and soil salt leaching under three sand incorporation rates: CK (0)
S1 (20% sands)
S2 (50% sands)
with soil clod composition <1 mm (20%)
1~2 mm (28%)
2~5 mm (34%)
and 5~10 mm (18%). The effects of sand incorporation rates on the disintegration of saline soil and its effect on water and salt transports during two consecutive infiltrations were studied. The contents of > 0.25 mm soil clods in S1 and S2 soils were obtained by dry and wet sieving methods. The results indicated that the contents decreased by 17.92%
15.50% and 51.45%
32.00%
in S1 and S2 soils respectively
compared with the control group. Under different sand incorporation rates
the wetting front and cumulative infiltration were in the order of S2 > S1 > CK. And the stable infiltration rates of S1 and S2 during the first and second infiltration processes increased by 60.00%
66.67% and 400.00%
900.00%
respectively
compared with the control group. The salt leaching rate of the same soil depth increased with the sand incorporation rates. When the sand incorporation rate was 50%
the leaching depth increased by 33.3% and 45.45% compared with 20% incorporation rate and the control group
respectively. The salt leaching amount increased by 1.19%~19.01% and 4.21%~77.52%. In a word
saline soil mixed with sand can effectively promote the salt leaching of saline soil to improve the infiltration rate and salt leaching efficiency. This study can provide a reference basis for saline-alkali soil improvement.
Zhang H X, Irving L J, McGill C, et al. The effects of salinity and osmotic stress on barley germination rate:Sodium as anosmotic regulator[J].Annals of Botany, 2010, 106(6):1027-1035.
张宇航, 高佩玲, 张晴雯, 等.中度盐碱土掺沙对土壤水盐运移和夏玉米生长的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2019(2):83-90.
赵宣, 韩霁昌, 王欢元, 等.盐渍土改良技术研究进展[J].中国农学通报, 2016, 32(8):113-116.
邵雪娟.盐碱地改良技术研究综述[J].种子科技, 2021, 39(6):71-72.
王健, 李傲瑞.我国盐碱地改良技术综述[J].现代农业科技, 2019(21):182-183, 185.
蔺亚莉, 李跃进, 陈玉海, 等.碱化盐土掺砂对土壤理化性状和玉米产量影响的研究[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2016(1):119-123.
刘旋旋, 董晓华, 郭梁锋, 等.非充分供水表层掺砂土壤水分入渗及再分布试验研究[J].节水灌溉, 2018(12):24-28, 32.
Mandal U K, Rao K V, Mishra P K, et al. Soil infiltration, runoff and sediment yield from a shallow soil with varied stone cover and intensity of rain[J].European Journal of Soil Science, 2005, 56(4):435-443.
Germann P F, Beven K. Kinematic wave approximation to infiltration into soils with sorbing macropores[J].Water Resources Reseach, 1985, 21(7):990-996.
黄永超.紫色土区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 2018.
朱庭芸, 何守成.滨海盐渍土的改良和利用[M].北京:农业出版社, 1985.
杨晓华, 张莎莎, 刘伟, 等.粗颗粒盐渍土工程特性研究进展[J].交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(5):22-40.
范云涛, 雷廷武, 蔡强国.湿润速度对土壤表面强度和土壤团聚体结构的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2008, 24(5):46-50.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
Liu C X, Li K S, Ma D P, et al. Construction and engineering application of salt-discharging model for local saline-alkali soil with compact structure in the Yellow River Delta[J].Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2020(s2):1-8. DOI:10.1155/2020/2906747.
雷志栋, 杨诗秀, 谢森传.土壤水动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 1988.
王乃江, 高佩玲, 赵连东, 等.咸淡水分配比例对盐碱土壤水分入渗特征与脱盐效果的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(6):100-105.
Munshower F F. Acid producing metalliferous waste reclamation by material reprocessing and vegetative stabilization[R].Manhattan:Hazardous Substance Research Center, Kansas State University, 1995.
张婧.土壤入渗与优先流测量方法研究[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2017.
周利颖, 李瑞平, 苗庆丰, 等.河套灌区不同掺沙量对重度盐碱土壤水盐运移的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36(10):116-123.
黄锦文, 唐莉娜, 曾文龙, 等.不同土壤处理对烤烟根际土壤生物学特性的影响[J].中国烟草学报, 2016, 22(2):75-83.
蔡庆生.植物生理学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2011.
白一茹, 赵云鹏, 王幼奇, 等.宁夏砂田不同砾石覆盖厚度土壤入渗过程及模型分析[J].水土保持学报, 2017, 31(4):81-85.
迟春明, 王志春.碱化盐土饱和导水率特征与影响因素研究[J].土壤通报, 2014, 45(3):601-607.
周道玮, 田雨, 王敏玲, 等.覆沙改良科尔沁沙地-松辽平原交错区盐碱地与造田技术研究[J].自然资源学报, 2011, 26(6):910-918.
Rengasamy P, Olsson K A. Sodicity and soil structure[J].Soil Research, 1991, 29:935-952.
Shaygan M, Reading L P, Baumgartl T. Effect of physical amendments on salt leaching characteristics for reclamation[J].Geoderma, 2017, 292:96-110.
潘旭东, 塔伊尔, 贾俊平, 等.复垦盐渍化弃耕地客土改良初探[J].安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(25):13754-13755, 13779.
0
浏览量
723
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621