不同时间尺度下气象干旱向水文干旱传播过程

杨铭珂; 贺中华; 张浪; 皮贵宁; 游漫

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.047

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同时间尺度下气象干旱向水文干旱传播过程

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 不同时间尺度下气象干旱向水文干旱传播过程
- Propagation Process of Meteorological Drought to Hydrological Drought in Different Time Scales
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第6期页码：350-360
- 作者机构：
  
  贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院,贵阳,550025
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "杨铭珂(1994-),女,贵州锦屏人,硕士研究生,主要从事喀斯特水文水资源与遥感研究。E-mail:mingke_yang@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（u1612441，41471032）贵州省水利厅自然科学基金项目（KT201402）贵州师范大学2015年博士科研启动项目
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.047
  中图分类号： P349
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨铭珂, 贺中华, 张浪, 等. 不同时间尺度下气象干旱向水文干旱传播过程[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):350-360.

YANG Mingke, HE Zhonghua, ZHANG Lang, et al. Propagation Process of Meteorological Drought to Hydrological Drought in Different Time Scales[J]. 2021, 35(6): 350-360.
杨铭珂, 贺中华, 张浪, 等. 不同时间尺度下气象干旱向水文干旱传播过程[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):350-360. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.047.

YANG Mingke, HE Zhonghua, ZHANG Lang, et al. Propagation Process of Meteorological Drought to Hydrological Drought in Different Time Scales[J]. 2021, 35(6): 350-360. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.047.

摘要

利用黔中地区1970—2016年逐月降水以及径流计算标准化降水指数（SPI）和标准化径流指数（SSI），分别表征气象、水文干旱，采用游程理论等方法分析了该地区不同时间尺度的气象水文干旱动态变化特征，并以交叉关联函数以及干旱传播阈值等方法探求不同时间尺度上气象干旱向水文干旱传播时间。结果表明：（1）黔中地区气象水文干旱化态势以上升趋势为主，重度和极端干旱发生的频数增加，长时间尺度上，气象与水文干旱特征具有一定的同步性。（2）不同季节上干旱传播时间（PT）不同，春季PTs在1~5个月，夏季PTs在1~3个月，秋季PTs在1~4个月，冬季PTs为1~3个月。（3）在地形地貌影响下，不同时间尺度的PTs不同。3个月时间尺度下，阳长、高车和麦翁的PTs为1.36，2.00，1.58个月；6个月时间尺度下，PTs为2.75，2.55，3.00个月；12个月时间尺度下，PTs为3.33，2.56，7.17个月。

Abstract

The standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized runoff index (SSI) were calculated using the monthly precipitation and runoff from 1970 to 2016 in central Guizhou

that characterize meteorological and hydrological droughts respectively. The dynamic characteristics of meteorological and hydrological drought in different time scales were analyzed by using run theory

the propagation time of meteorological drought to hydrological drought on different time scales was explored by using cross correlation function and drought propagation threshold. The results showed that: (1) In the past 47 years

the trend of meteorological and hydrological aridity in central Guizhou has been on the rise. The frequency of severe and extreme drought increased

and the characteristics of meteorological and hydrological drought were synchronous in a long time scale; (2) Drought propagation time (PT) was different in different seasons. PTs in spring were 1 to 5 months

PTs in summer were 1 to 3 months

PTs in autumn were 1 to 4 months

and PTs in winter were 1 to 3 months. (3) Under the influence of topography and geomorphology

the PTs of different time scales were different. On the 3-month time scale

the PTs of Yangchang

Gaoche

and Maiweng were 1.36

2.00

and 1.58 months; on the 6-month time scale

the PTs were 2.75

2.55

and 3.00 months; on the 12-month time scale

PTs were 3.33

2.56

and 7.17 months.

关键词

Keywords

references

Charusombat U, Niyogi D. A hydroclimatological assessment of regional drought vulnerability:A case study of indiana droughts[J].Earth Interact, 2011, 15(26):1-65.

Leng G Y, Tang Q H, Rayburg S. Climate change impacts on meteorological, agricultural and hydrological droughts in China[J].Global and Planetary Change, 2015, 126:23-34.

Huang S Z, Huang Q, Chang J X, et al. The response of agricultural drought to meteorological drought and the influencing factors:A case study in the Wei River Basin, China[J].Agricultural Water Management, 2015, 159:45-54.

Huang S Z, Chang J X, Huang Q, et al. Spatio-temporal changes and frequency analysis of drought in the Wei River Basin, China[J].Water Resources Management, 2014, 28(10):3095-3110.

Dracup J A, Lee K S, Paulson J E G. On the definition of droughts[J].Water Resources Research, 1980, 16(2):297-302.

Cui H, Zhang J H, Yao F M, et al. Combination of multi-sensor remote sensing data for drought monitoring over Southwest China[J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2015, 35:270-283.

Xu K, Qin G X, Niu J, et al. Comparative analysis of meteorological and hydrological drought over the Pearl River basin in southern China[J].Hydrology Research, 2019, 50:301-318.

Barker L J, Hannaford J, Chiverton A, et al. From meteorological to hydrological drought using standardised indicators[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 20(6):2483-2505.

Li J Z, Zhou S H, Hu R. Hydrological drought class transition using SPI and SRI time series by Loglinear Regression[J].Water Resources Management, 2016, 30(2):669-684.

Cheraghalizadeh M, Ghameshlou A N, Bazrafshan J, et al. A copula-based joint meteorological-hydrological drought index in a humid region (Kasilian basin, North Iran)[J].Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2018, 11(12):1-13.

López-Moreno J I, Vicente-Serrano S M, Zabalza J, et al. Hydrological response to climate variability at different timescales:A study in the Ebro basin[J].Journal of hydrology, 2013, 477:175-188.

蒋忆文, 张喜风, 杨礼箫, 等.黑河上游气象与水文干旱指数时空变化特征对比分析[J].资源科学, 2014, 36(9):1842-1851.

Sattar M N, Lee J Y, Shin J Y, et al. Probabilistic characteristics of drought propagation from meteorological to hydrological drought in South Korea[J].Water Resources Management, 2019, 33(7):2439-2452.

Wu J F, Chen X H, Yao H X, et al. Multi-timescale assessment of propagation thresholds from meteorological to hydrological drought[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 765:e144232.

Huang S Z, Li P, Huang Q, et al. The propagation from meteorological to hydrological drought and its potential influence factors[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 547:184-195.

Duan K, Mei Y D. Comparison of meteorological, hydrological and agricultural drought responses to climate change and uncertainty assessment[J].Water Resources Management, 2014, 28(14):5039-5054.

张克新, 王娟娟, 彭娇婷, 等.贵州省降水集散程度时空变化及其影响因素分析[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(2):10-18.

McKee T B, Doesken N J, Kleist J. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales[C]//Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology. California, USA:American Meteorological Society, 1993.

Sergio M V, Juan I L, Santiago B, et al. Accurate computation of a streamflow drought index[J].Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2012, 17(2):318-332.

Anurag M, Anil K, Rajesh P S. Application of heuristic approaches for prediction of hydrological drought using multi-scalar streamflow drought index[J].2019, 33(11):3985-4006.

张强, 邹旭恺, 肖风劲, 等.中华人民共和国国家标准:气象干旱等级(GB/T 20481-2006)[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2006.

周扬, 李宁, 吉中会, 等.基于SPI指数的1981-2010年内蒙古地区干旱时空分布特征[J].自然资源学报, 2013, 28(10):1694-1706.

Zarei A R, Shabani A, Mahmoudi M R. Susceptibility assessment of winter wheat, barley and rapeseed to drought using generalized estimating equations and cross-correlation function[J].Environmental Processes, 2021, 8(1):163-197.

Yevjevich V. An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts[J].Journal of Hydrology, 1969, 7(3):353.

王晓峰, 张园, 冯晓明, 等.基于游程理论和Copula函数的干旱特征分析及应用[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(10):206-214.

许怡然, 鲁帆, 谢子波, 等.潮白河流域气象水文干旱特征及其响应关系[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(2):220-228.

吴清林, 梁虹, 熊康宁, 等.喀斯特地区水土漏失监测方法评述[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(3):30-38.

苏俊磊, 罗为群, 谷佳慧, 等.岩溶峰丛洼地水土漏失过程、机理及综合防治研究进展[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 37(2):16-22.

浏览量

880

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

气象干旱-水文干旱传播过程特征及其影响因素——以贵州黔中水利工程区为例

1982—2020年黄河流域多时间尺度气象干旱对植被影响

西南地区植被NPP对多尺度气象干旱的响应

2000-2020年昌吉州东部平原区地下水位埋深对土地利用及干旱时空演变的动态响应