荒漠草原不同覆被类型土壤水分动态及其对降水的响应

陈娟; 宋乃平; 陈林; 王兴; 王启学

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.027

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

荒漠草原不同覆被类型土壤水分动态及其对降水的响应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 荒漠草原不同覆被类型土壤水分动态及其对降水的响应
- Soil Moisture Dynamics and Its Response to Precipitation in Different Cover Types of Desert Steppe
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第6期页码：198-206
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 宁夏大学农学院,银川,750021
  2. 宁夏大学西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室, 西北土地退化与生态恢复国家重点实验室培育基地,银川,750021
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "陈娟(1993-),女,博士研究生,主要从事草地生态学研究。E-mail:chenjuan923@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  宁夏回族自治区重点研发项目（2019BFG02022）国家自然科学基金项目（31901367）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.027
  中图分类号： S152.7
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈娟, 宋乃平, 陈林, 等. 荒漠草原不同覆被类型土壤水分动态及其对降水的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):198-206.

CHEN Juan, SONG Naiping, CHEN Lin, et al. Soil Moisture Dynamics and Its Response to Precipitation in Different Cover Types of Desert Steppe[J]. 2021, 35(6): 198-206.
陈娟, 宋乃平, 陈林, 等. 荒漠草原不同覆被类型土壤水分动态及其对降水的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):198-206. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.027.

CHEN Juan, SONG Naiping, CHEN Lin, et al. Soil Moisture Dynamics and Its Response to Precipitation in Different Cover Types of Desert Steppe[J]. 2021, 35(6): 198-206. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.027.

摘要

干旱、半干旱区植被恢复与重建对降雨具有高度的依赖性，降雨格局的任何细微变化对其生态系统均会产生影响。以宁夏盐池县荒漠草原3种主要覆被类型（浮沙地、天然草地和柠条林地）为研究对象，使用自动气象站、土壤水分仪连续监测2015—2017年降水量和土壤水分数据，分析了3种覆被类型0—250 cm土层的土壤水分动态及其对不同量级降水的响应。结果表明：浮沙地土壤水分从表层至深层为增长趋势，天然草地和柠条林地为增加—减少—增加趋势；水分季节变化分为土壤水分稳定期（12月至翌年2月）、土壤水分积累期（3—5月）、土壤水分消退期（6—8月中旬）和土壤水分恢复期（8月下旬至11月）。5 mm以下的小降水事件对土壤水分几乎无影响；中等降水事件（5~25 mm）和大降水事件（25~40 mm）对0—20 cm或浮沙地0—40 cm土层土壤水分有补给作用；40—100 cm土层的水分补充需要特大降水事件。浮沙地对降水响应最敏感，柠条林地次之，天然草地最滞后。降水量、降水强度、雨前土壤含水量和土壤物理性质均是影响土壤水分入渗的因素，而在降水一致时，土壤类型是决定土壤水分动态的重要因素，植被对土壤剖面水分具有再分配的作用，这在干旱区生态系统中尤为重要，决定了植被类型与土壤类型的对应关系。

Abstract

Vegetation restoration and reconstruction in arid and semi-arid areas are highly dependent on precipitation

and any slight change in precipitation pattern will have an impact on its ecosystem. Taking three main cover types of desert steppe in Yanchi County of Ningxia

floating sand land

native grassland and Caragana woodland as research objects

the precipitation and soil moisture from 2015 to 2017 were continuously observed by automatic weather station and soil moisture meter

the soil moisture dynamics of 0—250 cm soil layer and the responses to different levels of precipitation were analyzed. The results showed that the soil moisture of floating sand land increased from the surface to the deep layers

and the native grassland and Caragana woodland had the increasing-decreasing-increasing trends; seasonal changes in water content were divided into stable soil moisture period (December to February of the following year)

soil moisture accumulation period (March to May)

soil moisture decay period (June to mid-August) and soil moisture recovery period (late August to November). Small precipitation events less than 5 mm had almost no effect on soil moisture; moderate precipitation events (5~25 mm) and heavy precipitation events (25~40 mm) could supplement soil moisture in 0—20 cm soil layer or 0—40 cm soil layer in floating sand land. Extra-large precipitation event was needed for the water supplement of 40—100 cm soil layer. Floating sand land was the most sensitive to precipitation

followed by Caragana woodland

and native grassland was the most lagging. Precipitation amount

precipitation intensity

soil water content before precipitation and soil physical properties all affected soil water infiltration. When precipitation was consistent

soil type was the important factor determining soil moisture dynamics. Vegetation could redistribute soil profile moisture

which is particularly important in arid region ecosystem

and determines the corresponding relationship between vegetation types and soil types.

关键词

Keywords

references

陈军, 王玉辉.1956-2009年内蒙古苏尼特左旗荒漠草原的降水格局[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(22):6925-6935.

赵文智, 刘鹄.干旱、半干旱环境降水脉动对生态系统的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2011, 22(1):243-249.

邱扬, 傅伯杰, 王军, 等.土壤水分时空变异及其与环境因子的关系[J].生态学杂志, 2007, 26(1):100-107.

Loik M E, Breshears D D, Lauenroth W K, et al. A multi-scale perspective of water pulses in dryland ecosystems:Climatology and ecohydrology of the western USA[J].Oecologia, 2004, 141(2):269-281.

Yahdjian L, Sala O E. Vegetation structure constrains primary production response to water availability in the Patagonian steppe[J].Ecology, 2006, 87(4):952-962.

黄奕龙, 傅伯杰, 陈利顶.生态水文过程研究进展[J].生态学报, 2003, 23(3):580-587.

Reynolds J F, Kemp P R, Ogle K, et al. Modifying the ‘pulse-reserve’ paradigm for deserts of North America:Precipitation pulses, soil water, and plant responses[J].Oecologia, 2004, 141(2):194-210.

Ribolzi O, Hermida M, Karambiri H, et al. Effects of aeolian processes on water infiltration in sandy Sahelian rangeland in Burkina Faso[J].Catena, 2006, 67(3):145-154.

李衍青, 孙英杰, 张铜会, 等.小叶锦鸡儿灌丛下土壤水分对降雨的响应[J].生态学杂志, 2013, 32(5):1097-1103.

王正宁, 王新平, 刘博.荒漠灌丛内降雨和土壤水分再分配[J].应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3):755-760.

Berndtsson R, Chen H. Variability of soil water content along a transect in a desert area[J].Arid Environment, 1994, 27(2):127-139.

邹慧, 高光耀, 朱斌, 等.黄土高原恢复草地土壤水分对降水响应及模拟[J].干旱区研究, 2020, 37(4):890-898.

王新平, 康尔泗, 李新荣, 等.荒漠地区土壤初始状况对水平入渗的影响[J].地球科学进展, 2003, 18(4):592-596.

王博, 段玉玺, 王伟峰, 等.油蒿灌丛群落浅层土壤水分对不同降雨格局的响应[J].应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5):1571-1578.

刘冰, 赵文智, 常学向, 等.黑河流域荒漠区土壤水分对降水脉动响应[J].中国沙漠, 2011, 31(3):716-722.

李裕元, 邵明安.降雨条件下坡地水分转化特征实验研究[J].水利学报, 2004, 35(4):48-53.

魏雅芬, 郭柯, 陈吉泉.降雨格局对库布齐沙漠土壤水分的补充效应[J].植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6):1346-1355.

常昌明, 牛建明, 王海, 等.小针茅荒漠草原土壤水分动态及其对降雨的响应[J].干旱区研究, 2016, 33(2):206-265.

宋乃平, 杨明秀, 王磊, 等.荒漠草原区人工柠条林土壤水分周年动态变化[J].生态学杂志, 2014, 33(10):2618-2624.

陈敏玲, 张兵伟, 任婷婷, 等.内蒙古半干旱草原土壤水分对降水格局变化的响应[J].植物生态学报, 2016, 40(7):658-668.

郭柯, 董学军, 刘志茂.毛乌素浮沙地沙丘土壤含水量特点:兼论老固定沙地上油蒿衰退原因[J].植物生态学报, 2000, 24(3):275-279.

陈娟, 陈林, 宋乃平, 等.荒漠草原不同土壤类型水分入渗特征[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(4):18-23.

赵景波, 陈颖, 曹军骥, 等.青海湖西北部土壤入渗规律研究[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(3):90-96.

邹慧, 高光耀, 傅伯杰.干旱半干旱草地生态系统与土壤水分关系研究进展[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(11):3127-3136.

赵娜娜, 于福亮, 李传哲, 等.降水入渗及土壤水分变化对产流过程影响研究进展[J].南水北调与水利科技, 2014, 12(2):111-115.

Gao Q, Reynolds J F. Historical shrub-grass transitions in the northern Chihuahuan Desert:Modeling the effects of shifting rainfall seasonality and event size over a landscape gradient[J].Global Change Biology, 2003, 9(10):1475-1493.

Ma S M, Zhou T J, Dai A G, et al. Observed changes in the distributions of daily precipitation frequency and amount over China from 1960 to 2013[J].Journal of Climate, 2015, 28(17):6960-6978.

Ryel R J, Leffler A J, Peek M S, et al. Water conservation in Artemisia tridentata through redistribution of precipitation[J].Oecologia, 2004, 141(2):335-345.

张彬, 朱建军, 刘华民, 等.极端降水和极端干旱事件对草原生态系统的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2014, 38(9):1008-1018.

张景光, 王新平, 李新荣, 等.荒漠植物生活史对策研究进展与展望[J].中国沙漠, 2005, 25(3):306-314.

浏览量

709

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

荒漠草原不同土地利用类型土壤水分对降水的响应

基于电阻层析成像技术的黄土区多土地利用类型土壤水分反演

暴雨强度与过程对渭北旱塬塬边土壤水分亏缺的调控机制

丛枝菌根真菌接种对喀斯特石漠化人工林土壤特性的影响

雷达探测分析广西丘陵坡耕地整地措施对土壤水分的影响