1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 山西吉县森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,北京,100083
3. 水土保持国家林业局重点实验室(北京林业大学),北京,100083
4. 北京市水土保持工程技术研究中心(北京林业大学),北京,100083
5. 林业生态工程教育部工程研究中心(北京林业大学),北京,100083
[ "云慧雅(1995-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与林业生态工程研究。E-mail:15130579329@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
云慧雅, 毕华兴, 王珊珊, 等. 不同林分类型土壤理化特征及其对土壤入渗过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):183-189.
YUN Huiya, BI Huaxing, WANG Shanshan, et al. Soil Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Different Forest Types and Their Effects on Soil Infiltration Process[J]. 2021, 35(6): 183-189.
云慧雅, 毕华兴, 王珊珊, 等. 不同林分类型土壤理化特征及其对土壤入渗过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):183-189. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.025.
YUN Huiya, BI Huaxing, WANG Shanshan, et al. Soil Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Different Forest Types and Their Effects on Soil Infiltration Process[J]. 2021, 35(6): 183-189. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.025.
利用双环入渗法对黄土残塬沟壑区主要林分类型(刺槐林、油松林、刺槐×油松混交林、山杨栎类天然次生林)进行土壤入渗试验,分析4种林分类型土壤理化特征及其对土壤入渗过程的影响。结果表明:(1)研究区不同林分类型土壤理化特征存在一定差异,山杨栎类天然次生林的土壤理化性质总体最好,刺槐×油松混交林优于刺槐林和油松林;(2)0~90 min测试时间内,不同林分类型的土壤入渗速率随时间的变化规律均表现为迅速递减(0~5 min)、逐渐递减(5~60 min)和趋于稳定(60~90 min)的过程;4种林分的土壤初始入渗速率、稳定入渗速率和平均入渗速率由大到小依次为山杨栎类天然次生林、刺槐×油松混交林、刺槐林、油松林;(3)4种常见土壤入渗模型(Kostiakov模型、Horton模型、Philip模型和通用经验模型)中,通用经验模型对研究区不同林分类型土壤入渗过程拟合效果最好,拟合精度均在0.990以上;(4)相关性分析结果表明,不同林分类型的土壤入渗指标与土壤容重呈现极显著负相关(P<0.01),与非毛管孔隙度、> 0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量、砂粒含量以及有机质含量呈现极显著正相关(P<0.01);通过通径分析并计算主要影响因子的决定系数表明,对土壤初始入渗速率影响程度最大的因子是土壤容重(0.309),对土壤稳定入渗速率影响程度最大的因子是>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量(0.251),对土壤平均入渗速率影响程度最大的因子是有机质(0.408)。研究结果为研究区营造水土保持林树种的选择与水土保持功能评价提供一定参考。
The soil infiltration test was carried out under the main forest types (Robinia pseudoacacia Linn.
Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.
Robinia pseudoacacia×Pinus tabulaeformis mixed forest
and Populus davidiana and Pinus communis natural secondary forest) in the gully region of the Loess Plateau by the double-ring infiltration method
and the soils were analyzed for physical and chemical characteristics to analyze their influence on the process of soil infiltration. The results showed that: (1) There were certain differences in soil physical and chemical characteristics of different forest types in the study area
and the soil physical and chemical properties of the natural secondary forest of Populus davidiana and Pinus communis were generally the best. The mixed forest of Robinia pseudoacacia×Pinus tabulaeformis was better than that of Robinia pseudoacacia Linn. and Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.; (2) Within the test period of 0~90 min
the soil infiltration rate of different forest types showed a rapid decrease (0~5 min) and a gradual decrease (5~60 min) over time
and the process of stabilization (60~90 min); the initial soil infiltration rate
stable infiltration rate and average infiltration rate of the four forests in descending order were as follows: Populus davidiana and Pinus communis natural secondary forests
Robinia pseudoacacia×Pinus tabulaeformis mixed forest
Robinia pseudoacacia Linn.
and Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.; (3) Among the four common soil infiltration models (Kostiakov model
Horton model
Philip model and general empirical model)
the general empirical model had the best fit for the soil infiltration process under different forest types in the study area
the fitting accuracy was above 0.990; (4) Correlation analysis results showed that the soil infiltration indices under different forest types were significantly negatively correlated with soil bulk density (P<0.01)
and were positively related to non-capillary porosity
> 0.25 mm water-stable aggregate content
sand content and the organic matter content (P<0.01); through path analysis and calculation of the determination coefficient of the main influencing factors
the results showed that the factor that had the greatest influence on the initial soil infiltration rate was the soil bulk density (0.309). The factor that had the greatest influence on the stable soil infiltration rate was > 0.25 mm water-stable aggregate content (0.251)
and the factor that had the greatest influence on the average soil infiltration rate was organic matter (0.408). These research results could provide a certain reference for the selection of tree species and the evaluation of soil and water conservation functions in the study area to build soil and water conservation forests.
Zhang Y, Cao F, Huang L, et al. Comparative study and simulation of soil infiltration performance in open green space[J].Tehni[SX(B-*2]ˇ[]c[SX)]kiVjesnik, 2020, 27(3):812-818.
周巧稚.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林水土保持功能评价[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2019.
林佳慧.不同林分类型土壤水分及物理性质对比研究[D].广州:华南农业大学, 2016.
陈丽华, 余新晓.晋西黄土地区水土保持林地土壤入渗性能的研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 1995, 17(1):42-47.
张晓霞, 杨宗儒, 查同刚, 等.晋西黄土区退耕还林22年后林地土壤物理性质的变化[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(2):416-424.
张恒硕, 查同刚, 张晓霞.晋西黄土区退耕年限对土壤物理性质的影响[J].北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(6):123-133.
肖婧, 王兵.黄土丘陵区不同坡度撂荒草地入渗特征影响因素试验研究[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):136-142.
Sun G, Zhou G Y, Zhang Z Q, et al. Potential water yield reduction due to forestation across China[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 328(3):548-558.
Wang Y, Yu P, Feger K H, et al. Annual runoff and evapotranspiration of forestlands and non-forestlands in selected basins of the Loess Plateau of China[J].John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011, 4(2):277-287.
茹豪.晋西黄土区典型林地水文特征及功能分析[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2015.
陈家林, 孔玉华, 裴丙, 等.太行山低山丘陵区不同植被类型土壤渗透特性及影响因素[J].水土保持研究, 2016, 23(4):60-65.
杨振奇, 秦富仓, 李旻宇, 等.砒砂岩区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗性能及其影响因素研究[J].生态环境学报, 2020, 29(4):733-739.
胡建朋, 杨吉华, 罗明达, 等.山东石灰岩山地不同林分类型土壤入渗特征研究[J].水土保持学报, 2011, 25(3):54-58.
王珊珊, 毕华兴, 刘俊, 等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5):231-237.
陈文媛, 张少妮, 华瑞, 等.黄土丘陵区林草恢复进程中土壤入渗特征研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(1):62-69.
席彩云, 余新晓, 徐娟, 等.北京密云山区典型林地土壤入渗特性[J].北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(5):42-47.
李永涛, 魏海霞, 王振猛, 等.黄河三角洲不同林分类型对土壤水分物理特性的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(8):106-112.
蒋平海.黄土丘陵区典型植被覆盖下土壤入渗特征及影响因素研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学, 2019.
安倩.吕梁方山不同土地利用类型土壤入渗性能对比研究[D].山西太谷:山西农业大学, 2015.
阿茹·苏里坦, 常顺利, 张毓涛.天山林区不同群落土壤水分入渗特性的对比分析与模拟[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(24):9111-9118.
Zhu P Z, Zhang G H, Wang H X, et al. Soil infiltration properties affected by typical plant communities on steep gully slopes on the Loess Plateau of China[J/OL].Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125535
王意锟, 金爱武, 方升佐.浙西南毛竹林覆盖对土壤渗透性及生物特征的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5):1431-1440.
魏曦.晋西黄土区典型人工林分结构与水土保持功能耦合关系研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2018.
Xie C K, Cai S Z, Yu B Q, et al. The effects of tree root density on water infiltration in urban soil based on a Ground Penetrating Radar in Shanghai, China[J/OL].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2020, 50. DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126648.
冯娜, 刘冬冬, 赵荣存, 等.岩溶山地植被恢复中碳酸盐岩红土入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):162-169.
李卓, 刘永红, 杨勤.土壤水分入渗影响机制研究综述[J].灌溉排水学报, 2011, 30(5):124-130.
李平, 王冬梅, 丁聪, 等.黄土高寒区典型植被类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(5):1610-1620.
0
浏览量
784
下载量
14
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621