1. 河海大学农业科学与工程学院,南京,211100
2. 中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "黄萱(1992-),女,讲师,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:xuan@hhu.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
黄萱, 丁继辉, 邹钰文, 等. 黄河中游河龙区间侵蚀产沙对景观特征的非线性响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):88-94.
HUANG Xuan, DING Jihui, ZOU Yuwen, et al. Nonlinear Responses of Sediment Yield Modulus to Watershed Landscape Characteristics in Hekouzhen Longmen Section of the Middle Reaches of Yellow River[J]. 2021, 35(6): 88-94.
黄萱, 丁继辉, 邹钰文, 等. 黄河中游河龙区间侵蚀产沙对景观特征的非线性响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):88-94. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.013.
HUANG Xuan, DING Jihui, ZOU Yuwen, et al. Nonlinear Responses of Sediment Yield Modulus to Watershed Landscape Characteristics in Hekouzhen Longmen Section of the Middle Reaches of Yellow River[J]. 2021, 35(6): 88-94. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.013.
为明确退耕还林(草)工程期间景观特征变化对侵蚀产沙过程的非线性影响机制,以2006—2016年黄河流域河龙区间33个水文站控制子流域为研究对象,采用增强回归树方法分析了河龙区间子流域产沙模数时空差异的景观驱动因子,定量评价了各景观特征与产沙模数的非线性关系。结果表明,林地和耕地面积比例对产沙模数变异贡献最大,分别贡献22.0%和16.9%的变异;林地面积的增加和耕地面积的减少可以减少产沙模数,但当林地面积>15%,耕地面积<20%时,对产沙模数的影响减弱;增加林地和草地的植被覆盖度对水土流失的减缓作用也存在阈值,草地和林地植被覆盖度的阈值分别为0.5和0.3,当超过该阈值后,其对侵蚀产沙过程的减缓作用趋于弱化;适当减少边界密度数量有利于控制流域土壤侵蚀,当边界密度<60 m/100 hm2时,边界密度对产沙模数影响不大,当超过阈值后,产沙模数随着边界密度的增加急剧增大。当边界密度维持在60 m/100 hm2之内时,可以达到适宜的水土流失防治效果。研究结果揭示了河龙区间流域尺度上景观因子对侵蚀产沙过程的阈值效应,可以为黄河流域植被合理恢复提供重要参考。
To clarify the non-linear influence mechanism of landscape feature on the sediment yield during the "Grain for Green" project
our study selected 33 hydrological station-controlled sub-basins in the in Hekouzhen Longmen Section of the middle reaches of Yellow River during 2006—2016. We used the boosting regression tree method to analyze the non-linear relationships between landscape drivers and sediment yield modulus of the selected sub-basin. The results showed that the proportion of forest and agricultural land contributed the most to the variation of the sediment yield modulus
which contributing 22.0% and 16.9% respectively. Increasing the proportion of forest land or decreasing the proportion of agricultural land can reduce the sediment yield modulus
but when the proportion of forest land area exceeds 15% or the agricultural land area is less than 20%
the increasing rate of sediment yield modulus becomes stable. Increasing the vegetation coverage of forest land and grass land also has a threshold for mitigating soil erosion
and the threshold value of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in grass land and forest land is 0.5 and 0.3 respectively. When the NDVI value below the threshold
the sediment yield modulus decreases rapidly with increase in NDVI
but the effect of vegetation improvement in grass land and forest land on sediment yield modulus is stable when exceeded the thresholds. Reducing the number of edge density (ED) appropriately is conducive to controlling soil erosion
when the ED maintained at 60/100 hectares can achieve the prevention and control of soil erosion effect. The research reveals the non-linear relationships between landscape characteristics and sediment yield at watershed scale
which can provide an important reference for the reasonable vegetation restoration in the Yellow River.
刘宇, 吕一河, 傅伯杰.景观格局:土壤侵蚀研究中景观指数的意义解释及局限性[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(1):267-275.
傅伯杰.地理学综合研究的途径与方法:格局与过程耦合[J].地理学报, 2014, 69(8):1052-1059.
史志华, 王玲, 刘前进, 等.土壤侵蚀:从综合治理到生态调控[J].中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2):198-205.
de Vente J, Poesen J, Verstraeten G, et al. Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales:Where do we stand?[J].Earth-Science Review, 2013, 127:16-29.
刘晓燕, 党素珍, 高云飞, 等.黄土丘陵沟壑区林草变化对流域产沙影响的规律及阈值[J].水利学报, 2020, 51(5):505-518.
高照良, 付艳玲, 张建军, 等.近50年黄河中游流域水沙过程及对退耕的响应[J].农业工程学报, 2013, 29(6):99-105.
冯舒, 赵文武, 陈利顶, 等.2010年来黄土高原景观生态研究进展[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(12):3957-3966.
赵安周, 张安兵, 刘海新等.退耕还林(草)工程实施前后黄土高原植被覆盖时空变化分析[J].自然资源学报, 2017, 32(3):449-460.
宋敏敏, 张青峰, 吴发启, 等.基于NDVI的延河流域时空演变分析[J].水土保持研究, 2017, 24(4):6-11.
刘国彬, 上官周平, 姚文艺, 等.黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J].中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(1):11-19.
Ouyang W, Hao F H, Skidmore A K, et al. Soil erosion and sediment yield and their relationships with vegetation cover in upper stream of the Yellow River[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 409:396-403.
Wang L, Huang X, Fang N F, et al. Selective transport of soil organic and inorganic carbon in eroded sediment in response to raindrop sizes and inflow rates in rainstorms[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 575:42-53.
胡春宏, 张晓明.黄土高原水土流失治理与黄河水沙变化[J].水利水电技术, 2020, 51(1):1-11.
Lamine S, Petropoulos G P, Singh S K, et al. Quantifying land use/land cover spatio-temporal landscape pattern dynamics from Hyperion using SVMs classifier and FRAGSTATS©[J].Geocarto International, 2018, 33(8):862-878.
高玄娜, 肖培青, 张攀, 等.复合侵蚀作用下砒砂岩坡面侵蚀泥沙颗粒特征[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1):44-49.
山仑, 徐炳成.新时期黄土高原退耕还林(草)有关问题探讨[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 39(6):295-297.
Zhao G J, Mu X M, Wen Z, et al. Soil erosion, conservation, and eco-environment changes in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Land Degradation and Development, 2013, 24:499-510.
刘宇.景观指数耦合景观格局与土壤侵蚀的有效性[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(15):4923-4935.
Zhou Z X, Li J. The correlation analysis on the landscape pattern index and hydrological processes in the Yanhe watershed, China[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 524:417-426.
Shi Z H, Ai L, Li X, et al. Partial least-squares regression for linking land-cover patterns to soil erosion and sediment yield in watersheds[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 498:165-176.
Liu J B, Gao G Y, Wang S, et al. The effects of vegetation on runoff and soil loss:Multidimensional structure analysis and scale characteristics[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28:59-78.
0
浏览量
781
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621