藏东南高寒土坡面细沟水流输沙能力变化特征

喻武; 任德智; 张鹏; 姚甜甜; 万丹; 程街亮

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

藏东南高寒土坡面细沟水流输沙能力变化特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 藏东南高寒土坡面细沟水流输沙能力变化特征
- Variation Characteristics of Sediment Transport Capacity of Rill Flow in Alpine Soil in Southeast Tibet
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第6期页码：76-82
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西藏农牧学院资源与环境学院,西藏,林芝,860000
  2. 西藏农牧学院高寒水土保持研究中心,西藏,林芝,860000
  3. 成都市农林科学院林业研究所,成都,611130
  4. 西藏农牧学院植物科学学院,西藏,林芝,860000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "喻武(1981-),男,副教授,主要从事高寒区土壤侵蚀机理及其生态恢复研究。E-mail:yuwu4270@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  西藏自治区科技厅重点项目（XZ 2018ZR G-34（Z））国家自然科学地区基金项目（32060370）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.011
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
喻武, 任德智, 张鹏, 等. 藏东南高寒土坡面细沟水流输沙能力变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):76-82.

YU Wu, REN Dezhi, ZHANG Peng, et al. Variation Characteristics of Sediment Transport Capacity of Rill Flow in Alpine Soil in Southeast Tibet[J]. 2021, 35(6): 76-82.
喻武, 任德智, 张鹏, 等. 藏东南高寒土坡面细沟水流输沙能力变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):76-82. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.011.

YU Wu, REN Dezhi, ZHANG Peng, et al. Variation Characteristics of Sediment Transport Capacity of Rill Flow in Alpine Soil in Southeast Tibet[J]. 2021, 35(6): 76-82. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.011.

摘要

为探究高寒土坡面细沟侵蚀过程机理，建立科学的坡面细沟输沙能力因子模型，服务高寒坡面水土流失治理工作，以藏东南高寒土壤为研究对象，采用室内径流放水冲刷试验，探讨不同流量和坡度条件下细沟水流输沙能力特征。结果表明：（1）高寒土坡面细沟水流输沙能力的临界坡长随输沙能力的增加而变短，范围为3.27~8.31 m；坡度在15°~25°时，临界坡长大约稳定在5.0 m；（2）不同坡度下，高寒土细沟水流输沙能力与流量表现为明显的线性正相关关系（Tc=Aq）；小坡度的输沙能力受流量的影响程度大于大坡度；（3）高寒土细沟水流输沙能力与坡度可以用指数方程较好地表示（Tc=-ae（-S/b）+c），输沙能力随坡度的增大先快速增大，后逐渐过渡到平稳，当坡度达到15°时增幅平缓；（4）坡面细沟水流输沙能力可以用二元幂函数方程Tc=1697.83S0.491q1.043表示。通过本模型与其他模型的比较分析，ANSWERS模型在计算高寒土的坡面细沟水流输沙能力还值得商榷，本试验模型、Lei模型与Gao模型均能较好地模拟高寒区细沟侵蚀输沙能力。

Abstract

In order to explore the mechanism of rill erosion process on alpine soil slope in Southeast Tibet

establish the factor model of sediment transport capacity

and provide scientific basis for controlling soil and water loss on slope surface

this paper took the alpine soil in the Tibet Plateau as the research object

and carried out an indoor runoff scouring experiment. The results showed that: (1) The critical slope length of sediment transport capacity decreased with the increase of sediment transport capacity

ranging from 3.27 m to 8.31 m. When the slope was 15°~25°

the critical slope length was about 5.0 m. (2) Under different slopes

the sediment transport capacity increased with the increase of discharge

which could be well described by a linear equation (Tc=Aq). The influence of the same discharge on small slope was greater than that on large slope. (3) The sediment transport capacity and slope could be well expressed by an exponential equation (Tc=-ae(-S/b)+c). With the increase of slope

the sediment transport capacity increased rapidly at first

and then gradually leveled off

and increased gently when the slope reached 15°. (4) The sediment transport capacity could be expressed by a two-dimensional power function equation Tc=1697.83S0.491q1.043. Compared with other models

ANSWERS model was not suitable for calculating sediment transport capacity of Alpine soil

but the performance of Zhang model

Gao model and Lei model were as good as this model.

关键词

Keywords

references

Nearing M A, Norton L D, Bulgakov D A, et al. Hydraulics and erosion in eroding rills[J].Water Resources Research, 1997, 33(4):865-876.

张光辉.土壤分离能力测定的不确定性分析[J].水土保持学报, 2017, 31(2):1-6.

Lal R. Soil erosion impact on agronomic productivity and environment quality[J].Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 1998, 17(4):319-464.

Ali M, Sterk G, Seeger M, et al. Effect of hydraulic parameters on sediment transport capacity in overland flow over erodible beds[J].Hydrology Earth System Science, 2012, 16:591-601.

Heathcote A J, Filstrup C T, Downing J A. Watershed sediment losses to lakes accelerating despite agricultural soil conservation efforts[J].PLoS One, 2013, 8(1):e53554.

高晨烨, 张宽地, 杨明义.基于无量纲水流强度指标的坡面流输沙能力计算方法[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(17):134-142.

罗利芳, 张科利, 孔亚平, 等.青藏高原地区水土流失时空分异特征[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18(1):58-62.

Govers G. Empirical relationships for the transport formulae of overland flow[J].Erosion, Transport and Deposition Processes, 1990, 189:45-63.

Yu B, Rose C W, Ciesiolka C A A, et al. Toward a framework for runoff and soil loss prediction using GUEST technology[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1997, 35(5):1191-1212.

Morgan R P C, Govers R E, Auerswald J W A, et al. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM):Documentation and user guide[M].United Kingdom:Silsoe College Cranfield University, 1998:89.

De Roo A P J, Wesseling C G, Ritsema C J. LISEM:A single-event physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. I:Theory, input and output[J].Hydrological Processes, 1996, 10(8):1107-1117.

Bealsy D B, Huggins L F. ANSWERS (Areal Nonpoint Source Watershed Environment Simulation)-User's Manual[M].West Lafayette, Indiana:Purdue University, 1980:1-59.

陈超, 雷廷武, 班云云, 等.东北黑土坡耕地不同水力条件下坡长对土壤细沟侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2019, 35(5):155-162.

王爱娟, 符素华, 冯克义, 等.放水冲刷条件下紫色土细沟侵蚀特征[J].中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(5):23-28.

刘笑妍, 张卓栋, 张科利, 等.不同尺度下冻融作用对东北黑土区产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2017, 31(5):45-50.

王爱娟, 符素华, 朱小立.土壤侵蚀物理模型中紫色土细沟侵蚀参数研究[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(6):96-99, 105.

姜义亮, 郑粉莉, 温磊磊, 等.降雨和汇流对黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响试验研究[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(24):8207-8215.

Wan D, Li F H, Yu W, et al. Sediment delivery of partially-unfrozen loam soil rill by snow/glacier meltwater flow[J].Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):e3954.

吉律.西藏林芝色季拉山季风期降水日变化特征[J].西藏科技, 2010(2):54-59.

徐凤翔.西藏高原森林生态研究[M].沈阳:辽宁大学出版社, 1995.

万丹, 梁博, 聂晓刚, 等.西藏色季拉山土壤物理性质垂直地带性[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(3):1065-1074.

张晴雯, 雷廷武, 潘英华, 等.细沟侵蚀可蚀性参数及土壤临界抗剪应力的有理(实验)求解方法[J].中国科学院研究生院学报, 2004, 21(4):468-475.

Mancilla G A, Chen S. A field study on sediment transport capacity on rills[C].ASAE Annual International Meeting Sponsored by ASAE.Tampa, Florida, 2005.

王莎, 王占礼, 袁殷, 等.黄土坡面细沟水流输沙能力变化特征[J].水土保持学报, 2012, 26(4):104-107.

罗帮林.紫色土细沟侵蚀水动力学特征及与黄绵土对比研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 2016.

雷廷武, 张晴雯, 闫丽娟.细沟侵蚀物理模型[M].北京:科学出版社, 2009.

赵宇.黄土细沟侵蚀过程冲刷试验研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 2015.

丁琳桥.紫色土细沟侵蚀输沙能力研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 2016.

Foster G R, Meyer L D. Mathematical simulation of upland erosion by fundamental erosion mechanics[C]//USDA-ARS. Present and prospective technology for predicting sediment yields and sources. Sedimentation Lab., Oxford, Middiddippi:USDA-ARS, 1975:190-207.

高鹏宇, 詹振芝, 蒋芳市, 等.坡度和流量对崩积体坡面细沟水流输沙能力的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(3):68-73.

Wu B, Wang Z, Shen N, et al. Modelling sediment transport capacity of rill flow for loess sediments on steep slopes[J].Catena, 2016, 147:453-462.

袁殷.黄土坡面细沟水流输沙能力试验研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2011.

Beasley D B, Huggins L F, Monke E J. Modeling sediment yields from agricultural watersheds[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1982, 37(2):113-117.

Zhang G H, Liu Y M, Han Y F, et al. Sediment transport and soil detachment on steep slopes:I. Transport capacity estimation[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2009, 73(4):1291-1297.

Govers G, Rauws G. Transporting capacity of overland flow on plane and on irregular beds[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1986, 11(5):515-524.

Mahmoodabadi M, Ghadiri H, Rose C, et al. Evaluation of GUEST and WEPP with a new approach for the determination of sediment transport capacity[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 513:413-421.

浏览量

738

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

坡度和流量对崩积体坡面细沟水流输沙能力的影响

冻融作用下高寒土细沟侵蚀过程与输沙能力经验模型

河床质对浑水入渗-堵塞过程影响与入渗模型改进

黄土高原土壤细沟输沙能力对坡度和流量的响应

黄绵土坡面细沟侵蚀剥蚀能力试验