植被恢复过程土壤基质改良对湘南紫色土抗蚀性的影响

范世才; 方晰; 王振鹏; 陈金磊

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

植被恢复过程土壤基质改良对湘南紫色土抗蚀性的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 植被恢复过程土壤基质改良对湘南紫色土抗蚀性的影响
- Effect of Soil Matrix Improvement Measure on Erosion Resistance of Purple Soil During Vegetation Restoration in Southern Hunan Province, China
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第6期页码：22-30
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中南林业科技大学生命科学与技术学院,长沙,410004
  2. 湖南会同杉木林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 湖南会同,438107
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "范世才(1997-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事生态系统生态学研究。E-mail:fscfzm@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（31971455，31670448）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.004
  中图分类号： S157.9
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
范世才, 方晰, 王振鹏, 等. 植被恢复过程土壤基质改良对湘南紫色土抗蚀性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):22-30.

FAN Shicai, FANG Xi, WANG Zhenpeng, et al. Effect of Soil Matrix Improvement Measure on Erosion Resistance of Purple Soil During Vegetation Restoration in Southern Hunan Province, China[J]. 2021, 35(6): 22-30.
范世才, 方晰, 王振鹏, 等. 植被恢复过程土壤基质改良对湘南紫色土抗蚀性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):22-30. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.004.

FAN Shicai, FANG Xi, WANG Zhenpeng, et al. Effect of Soil Matrix Improvement Measure on Erosion Resistance of Purple Soil During Vegetation Restoration in Southern Hunan Province, China[J]. 2021, 35(6): 22-30. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.004.

摘要

为评价植被恢复过程土壤基质改良对紫色土抗蚀性的影响，在湖南南部耒阳山地紫色土进行土壤基质改良试验，测定土壤基质未经处理（对照地）、表层与底层土置换（土层置换地）、表层与底层土置换并添加有机物改良剂（基质改良地）的紫色土0—10，10—20 cm土层13个抗蚀性评价指标，运用相关性分析和主成分分析方法筛选影响紫色土抗蚀性的主要指标，建立综合评价模型评价紫色土不同土壤基质处理后的抗蚀性。结果表明：（1）与对照地相比，基质改良地0—10，10—20 cm土层有机碳含量、抗蚀指数、> 0.25 mm湿筛团聚体、> 0.5 mm湿筛团聚体、<0.002 mm黏粒含量、湿筛团聚体平均重量直径、湿筛团聚体几何平均直径、结构性颗粒指数、团聚状况分别增加69.19%~99.81%，9.72%~46.86%，41.69%~50.80%，47.26%~58.98%，73.82%~194.35%，47.96%~57.01%，49.06%~68.97%，74.23%~183.25%，14.62%~20.16%，土壤容重、湿筛团聚体分形维数、结构破坏率分别降低10.53%~16.26%，4.64%~7.58%，39.22%~54.64%；（2）土壤容重、有机碳含量、湿筛团聚体含量及其稳定性是影响紫色土抗蚀性的主要因子；（3）与对照地相比，基质改良地0—10，10—20 cm土层抗蚀性综合指数分别提高524.14%，146.99%，土层置换地分别提高93.10%，42.17%，表明植被恢复过程中土壤基质改良不仅提高土壤有机碳含量，也显著提高土壤抗蚀性，可作为治理湖南南部紫色土水土流失的有效措施。

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effect of soil matrix improvement on soil erosion resistance during vegetation restoration of purple soil

relevant experiments were carried out in the purple soil area of Leiyang in south Hunan Province

China. Three soil matrix types were chosen in our study

including the untreated purple soil matrix (control land)

the purple soil of interchanging topsoil with subsoil (soil replacement land)

and the one added organic improver based on the soil replacement land (soil matrix improved land). Thirteen erosion resistance evaluation indexes were determined

the important indexes were screened out and an evaluation model was established to study the change of erosion resistance of purple soil substrate after soil matrix improvement

using the correlation analysis and the principal component analysis. The results showed that: (1) Compared with the control land

the organic carbon content

erosion resistant index

> 0.25 mm wet sieve aggregate content

> 0.5 mm wet sieve aggregate content

<0.002 mm clay percentage content

mean weight diameter of wet sieve aggregate

geometric mean diameter of wet sieve aggregate

structural granular index and aggregation condition in 0—10 and 10—20 cm soil layer increased by 69.19%~99.81%

9.72%~46.86%

41.69%~50.80%

47.26%~58.98%

73.82%~194.35%

47.96%~57.01%

49.06%~68.97%

74.23%~183.25%

and 14.62%~20.16% in the soil matrix improved land

respectively. On the contrary

soil bulk density

fractal dimension of wet sieve aggregate and structural failure rate decreased by 10.53%~16.26%

4.64%~7.58%

and 39.22%~54.64%

respectively. (2) Soil bulk density

organic carbon content and wet sieve aggregate content and stability were the main factors affecting the erosion resistance of purple soil. (3) Compared with the control land

the composite index of soil erosion resistance in 0—10 and 10—20 cm soil layer in the soil matrix improved land was significantly increased by 524.14% and 146.99%

respectively

and the one in the soil replacement land was increased by 93.10% and 42.17%

respectively. The results showed that the soil matrix improvement during vegetation restoration not only increased the organic carbon content of purple soil

but also significantly improved the soil erosion resistance

and this method can be used as an effective measure to control soil erosion in purple soil.

关键词

Keywords

references

《中国水土保持》刊讯.水利部发布2019年全国水土流失动态监测结果[J].中国水土保持, 2020(9):4.

刘川.严重侵蚀退化地植被恢复对土壤抗冲抗蚀性影响研究[D].福州:福建师范大学, 2018.

Chen J J, He B H, Wang X Y, et al. The effects of

Herba andrographitis

hedgerows on soil erodibility and fractal features on sloping cropland in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(10):7063-7070.

刘定辉, 李勇.植物根系提高土壤抗侵蚀性机理研究[J].水土保持学报, 2003, 17(3):34-37, 117.

吕刚, 魏忠平, 高英旭, 等.不同土地利用类型植物根系与土壤抗蚀性关系研究[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(2):111-115.

Fernando S F, Antonio M G, Carmelo Á Z, et al. Comparison of methods for evaluating soil quality of semiarid ecosystem and evaluation of the effects of physico-chemical properties and factor soil erodibility (Northern Plateau, Spain)[J].Geoderma, 2019, 354(11):e113872.

王文艳, 张丽萍, 刘俏, 等.黄土中主要矿物构成对土壤抗蚀性的影响及空间变异[J].水土保持学报, 2013, 27(4):7-11.

王针针, 刘枭宏, 谌芸, 等.紫色土区植物篱篱前淤积带与篱下土坎土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5):61-67.

Chen Z X, Guo M M, Wang W L. Variations in soil erosion resistance of gully head along a 25-year revegetation age on the Loess Plateau[J/OL].Water, 2020, 12(12). DOI:10.3390/w12123301.

Chang E H, Li P, Li Z B, et al. The impact of vegetation successional status on slope runoff erosion in the Loess Plateau of China[J/OL].Water, 2019, 11(12):2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122614.

谢庭生, 何英豪.湘中紫色土丘岗区水土流失规律及土壤允许侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持研究, 2005, 12(1):87-90.

史晓梅.紫色土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性特征研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 2008.

黄新君.紫色土坡耕地耕层结构稳定性及对抗蚀性影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2017.

吕宸, 宫渊波, 车明轩, 等.川西高寒山地灌丛草甸土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):9-17.

张华渝, 王克勤, 宋娅丽.滇中尖山河流域不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5):50-57.

Armstrong J S. Derivation of theory by means of factor analysis or tom swift and his electric factor analysis machine[J]. The American Statistician, 2012, 21(5):17-21.

史东梅, 吕刚, 蒋光毅, 等.马尾松林地土壤物理性质变化及抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19(6):37-41.

周冉冉, 陈佩, 郭世荣, 等.醋糟和菇渣基质改良剂对连作障碍土壤理化性质及栽培黄瓜的影响[J].中国蔬菜, 2021, 385(3):57-64.

任霞, 严宁珍, 程永毅, 等.重庆溶洼-丘峰区土地利用类型对土壤抗蚀性的影响[J].中国岩溶, 2020, 39(6):829-835.

王培, 郭天雷, 高强, 等.不同生物埂模式对川中丘陵区坡耕地土壤抗蚀性的影响[J].水土保持研究, 2018, 25(1):7-11.

Hou X Q, Li R, Jia Z K, et al. Effect of rotational tillage on soil aggregates, organic carbon and nitrogen in the Loess Plateau Area of China[J].Pedosphere, 2013, 23(4):542-548.

姜爱国, 万福绪, 胡菲.南京紫金山灵谷寺不同林地土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持研究, 2018, 25(1):12-16.

郑子成, 张锡洲, 李廷轩, 等.玉米生长期土壤抗蚀性特征及其影响因素分析[J].农业工程学报, 2014, 30(4):100-108.

浏览量

867

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

模拟降雨下植物篱-草沟系统茎秆直径对紫色土区泥沙粒径与氮磷迁移的影响

海涂围垦区土壤孔隙特征与强度特性原位试验

基于MDS的滇池流域5种典型林分土壤质量评价

低分子量有机酸浸提对紫色土金属阳离子

1990—2020年滇中城市群耕地非农化时空变化特征及驱动机制