1. 北京林业大学水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室,北京,100083
2. 塞北林场,河北,张家口,076550
[ "武娟娟(1996-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:1977168557@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
武娟娟, 邱云霄, 王渝淞, 等. 坝上地区不同退化程度小叶杨细根分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):242-248.
WU Juanjuan, QIU Yunxiao, WANG Yusong, et al. Fine Roots Distribution Characteristics of[J]. 2021, 35(5): 242-248.
武娟娟, 邱云霄, 王渝淞, 等. 坝上地区不同退化程度小叶杨细根分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):242-248. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.033.
WU Juanjuan, QIU Yunxiao, WANG Yusong, et al. Fine Roots Distribution Characteristics of[J]. 2021, 35(5): 242-248. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.033.
为了研究坝上地区不同退化程度小叶杨的细根分布特征,使用土柱法对比了未退化、中度退化和重度退化小叶杨的细根在水平和垂直方向的根系参数的分布规律以及差异,并分析了根系参数在不同土层中的占比。结果表明:(1)随着林地土壤含水率逐渐减小,小叶杨的退化程度加重,细根在表层的占比逐渐增加,在深层的占比逐渐减小。(2)在垂直方向上,3种退化程度小叶杨的细根生物量在0—20 cm土层显著高于其他土层(P<0.05),并随土层加深而出现细根的根长密度、根表面积密度、根体积密度的较明显下降趋势。在0—20,20—40,40—60,60—80,80—100 cm土层,细根的根表面积密度和根体积密度均表现为未退化>中度退化>重度退化。(3)在离开树干的水平方向上,未退化和中度退化小叶杨的细根的根长密度呈现出先增加后减小的变化趋势,而重度退化在0—50,50—100,100—150 cm处相差不大,在150—200 cm处显著增加并达到最大(0.465 7 cm/cm3)(P<0.05)。细根的根表面积密度和根体积密度在4个水平距离上均表现为未退化>中度退化>重度退化,未退化小叶杨的细根生物量均为最大(19.53,15.74,14.17,14.20 g)。根体积密度整体上随水平距离增加而逐渐减小。研究结果可为探索防护林的细根分布格局和退化原因以及为指导坝上高原地区的植被恢复与重建提供科学参考。
In order to study the distribution characteristics of the fine roots of Populus simonii with different degradation degrees in Bashang area
this paper used soil column method to compare the distribution rules and difference of fine root parameters in horizontal and vertical directions in P. simonii stands with different degradation degrees (no degradation
moderate degradation and severe degradation)
and analyzed the proportion of root parameters in different soil layers. The results showed that:(1) With the decreasing of soil moisture content
the degradation degree of P. simonii increased
the proportion of fine roots in the surface layer increased
and its proportion in the deep layer decreased. (2) In the vertical direction
the fine root biomass of P. simonii in 0-20 cm soil layer was significantly higher than that in other soil layers (P < 0.05)
and the root length density
root surface area density and root volume density decreased significantly with the deepening of soil layer. In 0-20
20-40
40-60
60-80 and 80-100 cm soil layers
the root surface area density and root volume density of fine roots followed the order of no degradation>moderately degradation>severely degradation. (3) In the horizontal direction away from the trunk
the root length density of fine roots increased at first and then decreased in no degeneration and moderately degeneration stands
while there was no significant difference among 0-50
50-100 and 100-150 cm soil layers in severely degenerated P. simonii stand
and that increased significantly in 150-200 cm soli layer and reached the maximum (0.465 7 cm/cm3) (P < 0.05). The root surface area density and root volume density of fine roots all followed the order of no degradation>moderately degradation>severely degradation at four horizontal distances. The fine root biomasses of no degraded P. simonii were all the largest (19.53
15.74
14.17 and 14.20 g). The root volume density decreased with the increasing of horizontal distance. The results of this study could provide a scientific reference for exploring the fine root distribution pattern and degradation reasons of shelterbelts
and for guiding the vegetation restoration and reconstruction in Bashang plateau.
郑春雅, 许中旗, 马长明, 等.冀西北坝上地区退化防护林的土壤性质[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(1):203-207.
邢海富.坝上杨树防护林死亡原因浅析[J]. 河北林业科技, 2015(1):76-77.
苗博, 孟平, 张劲松, 等.基于稳定同位素和热扩散技术的张北杨树水分关系差异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(7):2111-2118.
张欢, 曹俊, 王化冰, 等.张北地区退化杨树防护林的水分利用特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(5):1381-1388.
Qiu S, Xu M, Li R Q, et al. Climatic information improves statistical individual-tree mortality models for three key species of Sichuan Province, China[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2015, 72(4):443-455.
Toledo J, Magnusson W E, Castilho C V, et al. How much variation in tree mortality is predicted by soil and topography in Central Amazonia[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 262(3):331-338.
韦景树, 李宗善, 冯晓玙, 等.黄土高原人工刺槐林生长衰退的生态生理机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(7):2433-2444.
孜尔蝶·巴合提, 贾国栋, 余新晓, 等.基于稳定同位素分析不同退化程度小叶杨水分来源[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6):1807-1816.
郑春雅, 许中旗, 马长明, 等.冀西北坝上地区杨树防护林退化的影响因素[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018(1):9-15, 147.
Barigah T S, Charrier O, Douris M, et al. Water stress-induced xylem hydraulic failure is a causal factor of tree mortality in beech and poplar[J]. Annals of Botany, 2013, 112(7):1431-1437.
李晓航, 刘晓龙.干旱导致防护林衰退死亡研究进展[J]. 防护林科技, 2016(12):59-60.
孙守家, 李春友, 何春霞, 等.基于树轮稳定碳同位素的张北杨树防护林退化原因解析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(7):2119-2127.
Jackson M B, Ricard B. Physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology of plant root systems subjected to flooding of the soil[M]. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2003, 168:193-213.
邸楠.毛白杨根系性状时空变异及土壤水分吸收利用特征与机制[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2019.
史凯航."三北"防护林退化及指标分析[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2015(5):57-59.
赵佳宁, 梁韵, 柳莹, 等.森林生态系统细根周转规律及影响因素[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(3):308-317.
Claus A, George E. Effect of stand age on fine-root biomass and biomass distribution in three european forest chronosequences[J]. NRC Research Press Ottawa, Canada, 2005, 35(7):1617-1625.
井家林.极端干旱区绿洲胡杨根系空间分布特征及其构型研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2014.
Liu Y H, Xu Z, Duffy R, et al. Analyzing relationships among water uptake patterns, rootlet biomass distribution and soil water content profile in a subalpine shrubland using water isotopes[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2011, 47:380-386.
安书超.建平县防护林退化成因及对策[J]. 防护林科技, 2016(2):80, 84.
董玉峰, 姜岳忠, 王卫东, 等.大汶河流域杨树根系的生物量组成和空间分布[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2014, 12(5):30-35.
李盼盼.杨树人工林细根的空间分布特征及其季节动态[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学, 2012.
燕辉, 苏印泉, 朱昱燕, 等.秦岭北坡杨树人工林细根分布与土壤特性的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 33(2):85-89.
张治军, 王彦辉, 于澎涛, 等.不同优势度马尾松的生物量及根系分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 51(4):71-75.
代永欣, 王林, 万贤崇.干旱导致树木死亡机制研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(11):3228-3236.
0
浏览量
1083
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621