贵州大学林学院,贵阳,550025
[ "邓志豪(1994-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事生态水文与土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:857135523@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
邓志豪, 杨静, 戴全厚, 等. 喀斯特区土地利用方式对石灰土团聚体稳定性及其有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):114-121.
DENG Zhihao, YANG Jing, DAI Quanhou, et al. Effects of Land Use Patterns on Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon of Calcareous Soil in Karst Area[J]. 2021, 35(5): 114-121.
邓志豪, 杨静, 戴全厚, 等. 喀斯特区土地利用方式对石灰土团聚体稳定性及其有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):114-121. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.017.
DENG Zhihao, YANG Jing, DAI Quanhou, et al. Effects of Land Use Patterns on Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon of Calcareous Soil in Karst Area[J]. 2021, 35(5): 114-121. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.017.
通过野外采样与室内分析试验,探究桂西北喀斯特区土地利用方式对石灰土土壤结构与肥力的影响。基于长期定位观测小区,分析比较刈割草地(CD)、乡土树种(XT)、落叶果园(GY)、种植牧草(MC)、种植玉米(YM)5种常见土地利用方式在石灰土表层(0—10 cm)和亚表层(10—20 cm)土壤的团聚体稳定性及其有机碳赋存特征。结果表明:5种土地利用方式下土壤机械稳定性团聚体含量均随粒级减小而减小,水稳性团聚体含量随粒级减小表现为先减小后增大,并且干湿筛团聚体粒级配比均以>1 mm粒径为主,其范围分别为67.04%~90.11%,66.83%~84.65%。干筛下的团聚体稳定性指标平均重量直径(MWD)与几何平均直径(GMD)在表层和亚表层均为XT>MC≈GY≈YM>CD,湿筛下的MWD与GMD在表层差异明显(P<0.05),表现为XT和MC较高,CD与YM相对较低。就全土有机碳含量而言,表层均高于亚表层,在表层土壤MC、CD、XT显著高于GY和YM (P<0.05),在亚表层土壤仅CD较高。5种土地利用方式下各级土壤团聚体有机碳含量与其全土有机碳含量相近。此外,各土地利用方式团聚体有机碳贡献率总体上随团聚体粒级减小而减小,XT和MC土壤团聚体稳定性与有机碳含量均较高,研究结果以期为该区域土地利用结构调整提供理论支撑。
Through field sampling and laboratory analysis
the effects of land use patterns on soil structure and fertility of calcareous soil in karst area of Northwest Guangxi were investigated. Based on the long-term observation plots
we selected five common land use patterns
including mowing grassland (CD)
native tree species (XT)
deciduous orchard (GY)
planted pasture (MC) and planted maize (YM). The stability of soil aggregates and the characteristics of organic carbon in the surface (0-10 cm) and sub-surface (10-20 cm) soil of the five land use patterns were analyzed and compared. The results showed that the content of soil mechanical stable aggregates of the five land use patterns all decreased with the decreasing of particle size
and the content of water-stable aggregates decreased first and then increased with the decreasing of particle size. In addition
the soil aggregates measured by both dry and wet sieve methods were dominated by the aggregates that bigger than 1 mm
and their ratio ranged from 67.04% to 90.11% and from 66.83% to 84.65%
respectively. The mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) were employed to evaluate the stability of soil aggregates. Under the dry sieve method
MWD and GMD of both surface and subsurface soil followed the order of XT>MC≈GY≈YM>CD. Under the wet sieve method
MWD and GMD were significantly (P<0.05) different in surface soil
which were relatively higher in XT and MC
and relatively lower in CD and YM. The total soil organic carbon content was higher in surface soil than that in sub-surface soil
and it was significantly (P<0.05) higher in MC
CD and XT than those in GY and YM in surface soil
but only relatively higher in sub-surface soil in CD. The organic carbon content of soil aggregates at all levels was similar to the total soil organic carbon content under each land use patterns. In addition
the contribution rate of organic carbon of aggregates generally decreased with the decreasing of aggregated size under different land use patterns. The stability of soil aggregates and the organic carbon content were relatively higher in XT and MC. The results of this study could provide theoretical support for the adjustment of land use structure in this area.
陈洪松, 冯腾, 李成志, 等.西南喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀特征研究现状与展望[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):10-16.
陈高起, 傅瓦利, 沈艳, 等.岩溶区不同土地利用方式对土壤有机碳及其组分的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3):123-129.
An S S, Mentler A, Mayer H, et al. Soil aggregation, aggregate stability, organic carbon and nitrogen in different soil aggregate fractions under forest and shrub vegetation on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2010, 81(3):226-233.
王丽, 李军, 李娟, 等.轮耕与施肥对渭北旱作玉米田土壤团聚体和有机碳含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(3):759-768.
Tang Y Q, Li J, Zhang X H, et al. Fractal characteristics and stability of soil aggregates in karst rocky desertification areas[J]. Natural Hazards:Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2013, 65(1):563-579.
李玮, 郑子成, 李廷轩, 等.不同植茶年限土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(21):6326-6336.
张新荣, 刘林萍, 方石, 等.土地利用、覆被变化(LUCC)与环境变化关系研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(12):2013-2021.
Dorji T, Field D J, Odeh I O A. Soil aggregate stability and aggregate-associated organic carbon under different land use or land cover types[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2020, 36(2):308-319.
Kabir E B, Bashari H, Mosaddeghi M R, et al. Soil aggregate stability and organic matter as affected by land-use change in central Iran[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2017, 63(13):1823-1837.
王进, 刘子琦, 鲍恩俣, 等.喀斯特石漠化区林草恢复对土壤团聚体及其有机碳含量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):249-256.
魏亚伟, 苏以荣, 陈香碧, 等.人为干扰对喀斯特土壤团聚体及其有机碳稳定性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(4):971-978.
鲍仕旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 3版.北京:中国农业出版社, 1999:42-50.
刘艳, 马茂华, 吴胜军, 等.干湿交替下土壤团聚体稳定性研究进展与展望[J]. 土壤, 2018, 50(5):853-865.
胡乐宁, 苏以荣, 何寻阳.桂西北喀斯特地区典型土壤在不同筛分强度下团聚体的稳定性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014, 34(3):236-241.
俞月凤, 卢凌霄, 杜虎, 等.不同类型森林石灰土的团聚体组成及其有机碳分布特征[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(5):1011-1019.
任娇娇, 周运超, 刘兵, 等.石灰岩发育土壤团聚体形成机制研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(5):722-728.
刘均阳, 周正朝, 苏雪萌.植物根系对土壤团聚体形成作用机制研究回顾[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3):267-273, 298.
任荣秀, 杜章留, 孙义亨, 等.华北低丘山地不同土地利用方式下土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(19):6991-6999.
徐香茹, 汪景宽.土壤团聚体与有机碳稳定机制的研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2017, 48(6):1523-1529.
Kuzyakov Y. Priming effects:Interactions between living and dead organic matter[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42(9):1363-1371.
董起广, 曲少东, 黎雅楠, 等.碎石风化物对土壤理化性质及稳定性的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2020, 14(16):20-23.
王秀丽, 张凤荣, 朱泰峰, 等.北京山区土壤有机碳分布及其影响因素研究[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(6):1152-1158.
Wei X R, Li X Z, Jia X X, et al. Accumulation of soil organic carbon in aggregates after afforestation on abandoned farmland[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2013, 49(6):637-646.
白怡婧, 刘彦伶, 李渝, 等.长期不同轮作模式对黄壤团聚体组成及有机碳的影响[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(1):161-167.
王兴, 钟泽坤, 韩新辉, 等.长期撂荒恢复土壤团聚体组成与有机碳分布关系[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(5):2416-2424.
0
浏览量
674
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621