1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 山西吉县森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,山西,临汾,042200
3. 黄河水利委员会山东水文水资源局,济南,250100
[ "刘畅(1997-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:liu97chang@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
刘畅, 张建军, 张海博, 等. 晋西黄土区退耕还林后土壤入渗特征及土壤质量评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):101-107.
LIU Chang, ZHANG Jianjun, ZHANG Haibo, et al. Characteristics of Soil Infiltration and Soil Quality Evaluation After Conversion of Farmland to Forest in Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province[J]. 2021, 35(5): 101-107.
刘畅, 张建军, 张海博, 等. 晋西黄土区退耕还林后土壤入渗特征及土壤质量评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):101-107. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.015.
LIU Chang, ZHANG Jianjun, ZHANG Haibo, et al. Characteristics of Soil Infiltration and Soil Quality Evaluation After Conversion of Farmland to Forest in Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province[J]. 2021, 35(5): 101-107. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.015.
为研究晋西黄土区退耕还林后不同植被覆盖下土壤的入渗特征及土壤质量评价,采用野外双环入渗法测定土壤的入渗特征,并测定不同地类土壤的容重、孔隙度、有机质、全氮等指标,使用相关性分析研究不同类型植被覆盖下土壤的入渗性能及其与土壤理化性质的相关关系,并将各地类的土壤理化性质进行主成分分析。结果表明:(1)植被类型对于土壤渗透速率影响较大,表现为天然次生林>刺槐×油松混交林>刺槐纯林>油松纯林>灌木林地>苹果园地>荒草地>农田(玉米地)。(2)退耕还林后,不同植被类型的土壤理化性质差异显著(P<0.05),随着森林逐渐恢复,土壤容重下降,孔隙度及有机质等含量增加,土壤理化性质得以改善,入渗性能也有明显提高。土壤入渗特征与总孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度、有机质和全氮含量呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与容重呈极显著负相关(P<0.01),与速效磷呈显著负相关(P<0.05)。(3)综合土壤入渗性能和土壤理化性质作为土壤评价指标,晋西黄土区退耕还林后不同植被类型土壤质量从高到低依次为次生林>刺槐×油松混交林>刺槐纯林>油松纯林>灌木林地>苹果园地>荒草地>农田。
In order to study the soil infiltration characteristics and soil quality evaluation under different vegetation cover after returning farmland to forest in the loess region of Western Shanxi Province
the field double-ring infiltration method was developed for the determination of soil water infiltration characteristics. The soil bulk density
porosity
organic matter
and total nitrogen were studied. Correlation analysis was used to study the relationships between soil infiltration capability and the physical and chemical properties of soil. Principal component analysis was also used on the soil physical and chemical properties. The results showed that:(1) Vegetation type had a great influence on soil permeability rate
which was as follows natural secondary forest > Mixed forest of Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabulaeformis > Robinia pseudoacacia forest > Pinus tabulaeformis forest > Shrub > Malus pumila > waste grassland > farmland. (2) After the conversion of farmland to forest
the soil physical and chemical properties of different types of vegetation had significant differences. With the better degree of forest restoration
the soil bulk density decreased
and the contents of porosity and organic matter increased
the soil physical and chemical properties was also gradually improved. Soil infiltration characteristics were significantly positively correlated with total porosity
non-capillary porosity
organic matter and total nitrogen content (P < 0.01)
significantly negatively correlated with bulk density (P < 0.01)
and significantly negatively correlated with available phosphorus (P < 0.05). With the conversion from farmland to waste grassland
shrub and arboreal forest
soil physical and chemical properties were improved and soil permeability was also gradually enhanced. (3) Soil infiltration performance and soil physical and chemical properties were used as soil evaluation indexes. The order of soil quality of different vegetation types from high to low was as follows natural secondary forest > Mixed forest of Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabulaeformis > Robinia pseudoacacia forest > Pinus tabulaeformis forest> Shrub > Malus pumila > waste grassland > farmland.
刘国彬, 上官周平, 姚文艺, 等.黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(1):11-19.
宿婷婷, 马红彬, 周瑶, 等.黄土丘陵典型草原土壤理化性质对生态恢复措施的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(4):34-46.
黄婷, 刘政鸿, 王钰莹, 等.陕北黄土丘陵区不同立地条件下刺槐群落的土壤质量评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(3):476-485.
金晶炜, 苏纪帅, 白于, 等.宁南山区土壤质量对人工植被恢复模式的响应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(16):283-289.
李叶鑫, 吕刚, 王道涵, 等.露天煤矿排土场复垦区不同植被类型土壤质量评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(4):850-856.
魏强, 凌雷, 张广忠, 等.甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型土壤渗透性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2013, 41(3):57-62.
谭学进, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 等.黄土区植被恢复对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(2):713-722.
彭舜磊, 梁亚红, 陈昌东, 等.伏牛山东麓不同植被恢复类型土壤入渗性能及产流预测[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013, 20(4):29-33.
曾江敏, 何丙辉, 李天阳, 等.喀斯特槽谷区不同林草恢复模式下土壤入渗特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4):58-64.
李平, 王冬梅, 丁聪, 等.黄土高寒区典型植被类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(5):1610-1620.
Tang B Z, Jiao J Y, Yan F C, et al. Variations in soil infiltration capacity after vegetation restoration in the hilly and gully regions of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2019, 19(3):1456-1466.
陈家林, 郭二辉, 杨果果, 等.太行山低山丘陵区不同水土保持林地土壤渗透性能及其影响因素研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(10):34-40.
胡阳, 邓艳, 蒋忠诚, 等.岩溶坡地不同植被类型土壤水分入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(3):597-604.
崔艳红, 毕华兴, 侯贵荣, 等.晋西黄土残塬沟壑区刺槐林土壤入渗特征及影响因素分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(1):77-87.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 3版.北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
王珊珊, 毕华兴, 刘俊, 等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5):231-237, 243.
张晓霞, 杨宗儒, 查同刚, 等.晋西黄土区退耕还林22年后林地土壤物理性质的变化[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(2):416-424.
葛楠楠, 石芸, 杨宪龙, 等.黄土高原不同土壤质地农田土壤碳、氮、磷及团聚体分布特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5):1626-1632.
Shao Q, Baumgartl T. Field evaluation of three modified infiltration models for the simulation of rainfall sequences[J]. Soil Science, 2016, 181(2):45-56.
阿茹·苏里坦, 常顺利, 张毓涛.天山林区不同群落土壤水分入渗特性的对比分析与模拟[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24):9111-9118.
公博, 师忱, 何会宾, 等.冀北山区6种人工林的林地水源涵养能力[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(3):165-170.
Li X Y, Contreras S, Solé-Benet A, et al. Controls of infiltration-runoff processes in Mediterranean karst rangelands in SE Spain[J]. Catena, 2011, 86:98-109.
林代杰, 郑子成, 张锡洲, 等.不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(1):33-36.
王晓荣, 胡文杰, 庞宏东, 等.湖北省主要森林类型土壤理化性质及土壤质量[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(11):156-166.
姚小萌, 牛桠枫, 党珍珍, 等.黄土高原自然植被恢复对土壤质量的影响[J]. 地球环境学报, 2015, 6(4):238-247.
0
浏览量
796
下载量
21
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621