大桥水库消落带不同水位高程柳树林地土壤团聚体组成与分形特征

宋娇; 郑晓岚; 鲍玉海; 李进林; 韦杰

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.013

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

大桥水库消落带不同水位高程柳树林地土壤团聚体组成与分形特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 大桥水库消落带不同水位高程柳树林地土壤团聚体组成与分形特征
- Composition and Fractal Features of Soil Aggregates inWillow Forest Lands at Different Elevations in the Water Level Fluctuation Zone of the Daqiao Reservoir
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第5期页码：87-93
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆,401331
  2. 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室,成都,610041
  3. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "宋娇(1996-),女,四川峨眉山人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:18483223398@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41977075）国家自然科学基金联合基金项目（U2040207）重庆英才计划项目（CQYC201905009）重庆市教委科技重点项目（KJZD-K201800502）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.013
  中图分类号： S152.4;S157.2
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
宋娇, 郑晓岚, 鲍玉海, 等. 大桥水库消落带不同水位高程柳树林地土壤团聚体组成与分形特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):87-93.

SONG Jiao, ZHENG Xiaolan, BAO Yuhai, et al. Composition and Fractal Features of Soil Aggregates inWillow Forest Lands at Different Elevations in the Water Level Fluctuation Zone of the Daqiao Reservoir[J]. 2021, 35(5): 87-93.
宋娇, 郑晓岚, 鲍玉海, 等. 大桥水库消落带不同水位高程柳树林地土壤团聚体组成与分形特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):87-93. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.013.

SONG Jiao, ZHENG Xiaolan, BAO Yuhai, et al. Composition and Fractal Features of Soil Aggregates inWillow Forest Lands at Different Elevations in the Water Level Fluctuation Zone of the Daqiao Reservoir[J]. 2021, 35(5): 87-93. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.013.

摘要

为研究植被恢复对水库消落带土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响，利用干筛和湿筛法，测定了大桥水库消落带不同水位高程下柳树林地土壤团聚体组成分布，并基于分形理论分析了土壤团聚体分形特征。结果表明：（1）消落带柳树林地土壤>0.25 mm非水稳定性团聚体和水稳性团聚体分别为73.13%~93.69%和47.62%~82.06%，较对照无植被样地土壤均有所增加，但两者差异不明显；消落带土壤大团聚体含量随水位高程升高而降低，随土层深度增加而减少，但在不同水位高程和不同土层间均无显著性差异（p>0.05）。（2）消落带柳树林地土壤水稳性团聚体分形维数（D）为2.51~2.82，平均值为2.67，低于对照的2.75；土壤水稳性团聚体分形维数（D）在不同水位高程和不同土层间均无显著性差异（p>0.05），整体呈现出随水位高程升高而降低的趋势，且0—10 cm土层D值低于10—20 cm土层。（3）消落带柳树林地土壤MWD、GMD平均值分别为0.81，0.24 mm，高于对照的0.71，0.15 mm，柳树林地土壤团聚体稳定性高于对照；土壤团聚体稳定性在消落带内部具有一定空间差异，MWD与GMD均表现为高水位（2 016~2 019 m）>中水位（2 010~2 013 m）>低水位（2 007 m），且0—10 cm土层MWD与GMD大于10—20 cm土层的，但不同水位高程和不同土层间均无显著性差异（p>0.05）。综上，大桥水库消落带植被恢复对土壤团粒结构有一定程度改善，且随淹水深度的增加，消落带柳树林地土壤团聚体稳定性降低。

Abstract

In order to study the effects of vegetation restoration on the composition and stability of soil aggregates in the water-level-fluctuation zone

dry screening and wet screening methods were used to determine the composition and distribution of soil aggregates in willow forest under different water levels and elevations in the water-level-fluctuation zone of Daqiao Reservoir

and fractal characteristics of soil aggregates were analyzed based on fractal theory. The results showed as follows:(1) The contents of non-water-stable aggregates and water-stable aggregates that greater than 0.25 mm in willow forest land in the water-fluctuation zone were 73.13%~93.69% and 47.62%~82.06%

respectively

which were higher than those of control plots without vegetation

but the difference between them was not significant. The content of macro-aggregates in water-level-fluctuation zone decreased with the increasing of water level elevation and depth of soil layer

however

there was no significant difference between different water levels and soil layers (p>0.05). (2) The fractal dimension (D) of soil water-stable aggregates in willow forest in the water-level-fluctuation zone ranged from 2.51 to 2.82

with an average of 2.67

which was lower than that of the control (2.75). The fractal dimension (D) of soil water-stable aggregates showed no significant difference between different water level elevations and different soil layers (p>0.05)

and it decreased with the increasing of water level

and the D value of 0-10 cm soil layer was lower than that of 10-20 cm soil layer. (3) The average values of soil MWD and GMD of willow forest in water-level-fluctuation zone were 0.81 and 0.24 mm

respectively

which were higher than those of the control (0.71 and 0.15 mm). The stability of soil aggregates in willow forest was higher than control. The stability of soil aggregates had a certain spatial difference in the water-level fluctuation zone. Both MWD and GMD followed the order of high water level (2 016~2 019 m) > medium water level (2 010~2 013 m) > low water level (2 007 m)

and the MWD and GMD in the 0-10 cm soil layer were both greater than those in the 10-20 cm soil layer. However

there was no significant difference between different water levels and different soil layers (p>0.05). In conclusion

vegetation restoration in the water-level-fluctuation zone of Daqiao Reservoir could improve soil aggregate structure to a certain extent

and the stability of soil aggregate in willow forest land in the water-level-fluctuation zone decreased with the increasing of flooding depth.

关键词

Keywords

references

赵鹏, 史东梅, 赵培, 等.紫色土坡耕地土壤团聚体分形维数与有机碳关系[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22):137-144.

侯高礼.土壤团粒结构及其促进形成[J]. 西北园艺(果树), 2013(1):52-53.

王清奎, 汪思龙.土壤团聚体形成与稳定机制及影响因素[J]. 土壤通报, 2005, 36(3):415-421.

王轶浩, 耿养会, 黄仲华.三峡库区紫色土植被恢复过程的土壤团粒组成及分形特征[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18):5493-5499.

赵世伟, 苏静, 杨永辉, 等.宁南黄土丘陵区植被恢复对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2005, 12(3):27-28, 69.

杨培岭, 罗远培, 石元春.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J]. 科学通报, 1993, 38(20):1896-1899.

Guo Y F, Fan R Q, Zhang X P, et al. Tillage-induced effects on SOC through changes in aggregate stability and soil pore structure[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 703:e134617.

Guo L K, Shen J, Li B, et al. Impacts of agricultural land use change on soil aggregate stability and physical protection of organic C[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 707:e136049.

魏守才, 谢文军, 夏江宝, 等.盐渍化条件下土壤团聚体及其有机碳研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1):369-376.

吴梦瑶, 陈林, 庞丹波, 等.贺兰山不同海拔植被下土壤团聚体分布及其稳定性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(2):210-216.

朱元皓, 黄云, 盛储望, 等.赣南经济林种植对土壤团聚体及有机碳的影响[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(5):213-220.

甘凤玲, 王涛, 何丙辉, 等.汶川震区不同植被下土壤组成及其分型特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(1):84-91.

张强, 周正朝, 姚小萌.植被恢复过程中土壤团聚体分形特征研究[J]. 河南科学, 2017, 35(1):94-100.

张淑娟, 贺秀斌, 鲍玉海, 等.三峡水库消落带不同水位高程土壤团聚体变化特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(1):25-30.

雷蕾, 谢新生, 雷庆.浅谈大桥水库主坝坝体变形反演分析[J]. 地下水, 2017, 39(6):104-105.

鲍玉海, 郭丰, 胡保生, 等.西南干旱河谷区水库消落带柳树造林效果评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(5):216-219.

封磊, 洪伟, 吴承祯, 等.杉木-观光木混交林不同经营模式土壤团粒结构的分形特征[J]. 山地学报, 2004, 22(3):315-320.

陈正发, 史东梅, 谢均强, 等.紫色土旱坡地土壤团聚体稳定性特征对侵蚀过程的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(13):2721-2729.

He X B, Bao Y H, Nan H W, et al. Tillage pedogenesis of purple soils in southwestern China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2009, 6(2):205-210.

陆铸畴, 包忻怡, Liu X, 等.应用Le Bissonnais法研究三峡库区消落带土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(5):115-120.

邬静淳, 欧阳, 熊兴政, 等.三峡库区消落带2种树木林下土壤的物理性质比较[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(4):157-164.

张淑娟, 贺秀斌, 鲍玉海, 等.三峡水库消落带土壤团聚体微结构变化特征[J]. 山地学报, 2020, 38(3):360-370.

李占斌, 朱冰冰, 李鹏.土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):802-809.

丁文峰, 李占斌.土壤抗蚀性的研究动态[J]. 水土保持科技情报, 2001(1):36-39.

区晓琳, 陈志彪, 姜超, 等.植被恢复对亚热带侵蚀红壤团聚体养分分布的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(6):230-238.

浏览量

2344

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

耕作措施对吉林省坡耕地玉米土壤团聚体腐殖质分布的影响

东北黑土区林草地开垦为农田70 a后对土壤性质和土壤可蚀性的影响

氮磷添加对常绿阔叶林土壤团聚体

三峡水库消落带生境特征与植被恢复模式

子午岭植被恢复过程中土壤团聚体有机碳含量的变化