1. 华中农业大学水土保持研究中心,武汉,430070
2. 上海勘测设计研究院有限公司,上海,200335
[ "郭振勇(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与环境生态研究。E-mail:zy_guo@webmail.hzau.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
郭振勇, 李朝霞, 周怡雯, 等. 三峡库区消落带典型草被对氮磷污染物迁移的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):31-36.
GUO Zhenyong, LI Zhaoxia, ZHOU Yiwen, et al. Effects of Typical Grass Cover on Transport of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollutants in Water Level Fluctuating Zone of Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. 2021, 35(5): 31-36.
郭振勇, 李朝霞, 周怡雯, 等. 三峡库区消落带典型草被对氮磷污染物迁移的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):31-36. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.005.
GUO Zhenyong, LI Zhaoxia, ZHOU Yiwen, et al. Effects of Typical Grass Cover on Transport of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollutants in Water Level Fluctuating Zone of Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. 2021, 35(5): 31-36. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.005.
为明确三峡库区消落带草被对农业面源污染防治的作用,采用野外放水冲刷试验,分析草带对地表径流中氮磷的拦截率和冲刷前后氮磷含量在土壤内的空间变化,研究消落带典型草被对氮磷污染物迁移的影响。结果表明:(1)草带拦截污染物的效率总体较好,对NO3--N的拦截率最高,达93.5%~99.3%。拦截率与草带宽度成正比,与冲刷强度成反比。(2)冲刷前后TN、TP、NO3--N和NH4+-N污染物含量的变化率最大值分别为2.30,1.96,5.01,4.75,均出现在小区下坡。随着草带宽度增加以及冲刷强度的减弱,污染物含量的变化率增大。(3)各氮磷污染物在0—10 cm土层的变化率较大,变化范围为0.91~5.01。TN、TP和NH4+-N在10—30 cm土层的变化率普遍接近1,而NO3--N在该土层依然存在较大的变化率。(4) RDA结果显示,影响冲刷前后污染物变化最大的因子是土层深度,其次是坡位、草带宽度、冲刷强度。综上,消落带草被能够有效拦截污染物并促进其向土壤内部迁移,在消落带草本植物恢复及面源污染防治过程中应注意增加消落带草被覆盖宽度,减小高强度降雨径流的影响,促进污染物在上坡位被拦截并进一步向土壤内部迁移,降低污染物向上覆水释放的风险,为三峡库区消落带草本植被恢复及农业面源污染防治提供理论依据。
In order to clarify the effect of grass cover in water level fluctuating zone (WLFZ) on agricultural non-point source pollution control in the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR)
the field scouring experiment was conducted to analyze the interception rate of nitrogen and phosphorus in surface runoff and the spatial change of nitrogen and phosphorus content in soil before and after scouring
and the effects of the typical grass cover on the transport of nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants in WLFZ were studied. The results showed that:(1) Grass buffer zone intercepted pollutants with a good overall efficiency
and interception rate for nitrate nitrogen was the highest
ranging from 93.5%~99.3%. The interception rate was directly proportional to the width of grass buffer zone and inversely proportional to the scouring intensity. (2) The maximum change rates of TN
TP
NO3--N and NH4+-N before and after scouring were 2.30
1.96
5.01 and 4.75
respectively
which all appeared in the lower slope position of the plot. With the increasing of grass buffer zone width and the decreasing of scouring intensity
the change rate of pollutant content increased. (3) The variation rates of nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants in 0-10 cm soil layer were larger
and the variation range was 0.91~5.01. The change rates of TN
TP and NH4+-N in 10-30 cm soil layer were generally close to 1
while the change rate of NO3--N in this soil layer was still large. (4) RDA analysis results showed that the most important factor affecting the change rate of pollutants content was the soil depth
followed by the slope position
the width of the grass buffer zone
and the scouring intensity. In conclusion
the grass buffer of the WLFZ could effectively intercept pollutants and promote their migration to the soil interior. In the process of restoration of herbaceous plants of the WLFZ and the prevention and control of non-point source pollution in the TGR
attention should be paid to increasing the coverage width of grass buffer
reducing the influence of high-intensity rainfall and runoff
promoting the pollutants to be intercepted on the up-slope and migrating to the soil
thus reducing the risk of pollutants being released into the overlying water. It could provide a theoretical basis for the restoration of herbaceous vegetation in the WLFZ and the prevention and control of agricultural non-point source pollution in the TGR.
Edmonds R L. The sanxia (three gorges) project:The environmental argument surrounding china's super dam[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 1992, 2(4):105-112.
贺秀斌, 鲍玉海.三峡水库消落带土壤侵蚀与生态重建研究进展[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(4):160-168.
Bao Y H, Gao P, He X B. The water-level fluctuation zone of three gorges reservoir:A unique geomorphological unit[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2015, 150:14-24.
Lei J S, Chen J Z, Yin W. Retention efficiency of vegetative filter strips for nitrogen in danjiangkou reservoir area, central china[J]. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S-chemia I Inzynieria Ekologiczna S, 2019, 26(2):279-297.
白宝伟, 王海洋, 李先源, 等.三峡库区淹没区与自然消落区现存植被的比较[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(5):119-122, 126.
程瑞梅, 刘泽彬, 肖文发, 等.三峡库区典型消落带土壤化学性质变化[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(2):19-25.
郭燕, 杨邵, 沈雅飞, 等.三峡水库消落带现存植物自然分布特征与群落物种多样性研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(12):4255-4265.
简尊吉, 裴顺祥, 郭泉水, 等.三峡水库峡谷地貌区消落带土壤氮磷钾、有机质含量和pH值的时空动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(9):2778-2786.
Wang T, Zhu B, Zhou M H, et al. Nutrient loss from slope cropland to water in the riparian zone of the three gorges reservoir:Process, pathway, and flux[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2020, 302:e107108.
肖丽微, 朱波.水环境条件对三峡库区消落带狗牙根氮磷养分淹水浸泡释放的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(11):4580-4588.
林俊杰, 曲衍桦, 陈茜, 等.干湿循环对消落带狗牙根磷释放的影响[J]. 生态科学, 2019, 38(4):7-12.
姜世伟, 何太蓉, 汪涛, 等.三峡库区消落带农用坡地氮素流失特征及其环境效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(8):1159-1168.
王正, 肖丽微, 谭秋霞, 等.三峡水库消落带优势草本植物对土壤氮磷的吸收富集特征[J]. 山地学报, 2019, 37(2):151-160.
孙嘉成.草皮缓冲带对农田径流面源污染物的去除效果研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学, 2018.
段诚.典型库岸植被缓冲带对陆源污染物阻控能力研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学, 2014.
Yang F, Liu W W, Wang J, et al. Riparian vegetation's responses to the new hydrological regimes from the Three Gorges Project:Clues to revegetation in reservoir water-level-fluctuation zone[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(2):89-98.
张爱英, 熊高明, 樊大勇, 等.三峡水库蓄水对长江干流河岸植物组成的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(1):145-156.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
闫建梅, 何丙辉, 田太强, 等.施肥水平与耕作模式对紫色土坡耕地地表径流磷素流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(1):132-136.
李晓娜, 张国芳, 武美军, 等.不同植被过滤带对农田径流泥沙和氮磷拦截效果与途径[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3):39-44, 50.
Barbosa F T, Bertol I, Wolschick N H, et al. The effects of previous crop residue, sowing direction and slope length on phosphorus losses from eroded sediments under no-tillage[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 206:e104780.
王甜, 黄志霖, 曾立雄, 等.三峡库区柑橘园施肥量对土壤氮淋失及残留量的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(3):1468-1474.
刘金辉.三峡库区紫色土坡耕地壤中流与氮磷运移过程的模拟研究[D].重庆:重庆大学, 2018.
Morris C. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using canoco 5, 2nd edition[J]. African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 2015, 32(4):289-290.
0
浏览量
763
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621