陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,西安,710119
[ "王佩佩(1995-),女,在读博士研究生,主要从事水土资源评价与规划研究。E-mail:wangpp@snnu.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
王佩佩, 苏雪萌, 周正朝, 等. 黄土丘陵区典型植被群落坡面土壤优先流特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):16-23.
WANG Peipei, SU Xuemeng, ZHOU Zhengchao, et al. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Preferential Flow on Slope of Typical Vegetation Communities in Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2021, 35(5): 16-23.
王佩佩, 苏雪萌, 周正朝, 等. 黄土丘陵区典型植被群落坡面土壤优先流特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(5):16-23. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.003.
WANG Peipei, SU Xuemeng, ZHOU Zhengchao, et al. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Preferential Flow on Slope of Typical Vegetation Communities in Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2021, 35(5): 16-23. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.003.
以黄土丘陵区3种典型植被群落(白羊草、铁杆蒿和杠柳)为研究对象,并以退耕1年的撂荒地作为对照(CK),采用原位染色示踪和实验室分析相结合,对比分析不同植被群落斑块格局下的土壤优先流特征,探究植物根系、土壤理化性质对优先流的影响。结果表明:相较CK,植被恢复提高了优先流发育程度;对于各植被斑块,铁杆蒿植被斑块具有最高的染色面积比(45.62%)、最大染色深度(30.30 cm)、优先流比(39.76%)和长度指数(475.90%),杠柳次之,白羊草最小;而对于同一植被群落,除白羊草群落外,其他群落优先流发育程度表现为植被斑块大于裸地斑块;通过结构方程模型发现,优先流染色面积比主要受到土壤总孔隙度、团聚体稳定性、根系生物量密度和有机质含量的直接影响,解释方差可达70%。因此,植被的自然恢复通过其根系发育影响土壤性质,进而改善土壤优先流发育程度,提高土壤入渗能力。
Taking three typical vegetation communities (Bothriochloa ischaemum
Artemisia gmelinii and Periploca sepium) in the loess hilly region as research objects
and the abandoned land for one year as the control (CK)
the characteristics of soil preferential flow under different vegetation community patch patterns were analyzed based on in-situ dye-tracer and laboratory experiment methods
and the effects of plant roots and soil physicochemical properties on preferential flow were explored. The results showed that vegetation restoration improved the development of preferential flow in comparison with the CK. For each vegetation patch
the highest dye coverage (45.62%)
maximum staining depth (30.30 cm)
preferential flow proportion (39.76%) and the length index (475.90%) were found in A. gmelinii vegetation patch
followed by P. sepium and B. ischaemum. For the same vegetation community
the development degree of preferential flow was higher in vegetation patches than that in bare patches
except for the B. ischaemum community. Furthermore
the structural equation model indicated that the dyeing area ratio of preferential flow was directly affected by soil total porosity
aggregate stability
root mass density and soil organic matter content
and which could explain 70% of the total variance. Therefore
the natural vegetation restoration could affect soil properties through roots development
thereby improving the development degree of soil preferential flow and soil infiltration capacity.
Wu G L, Liu Y, Yang Z, et al. Root channels to indicate the increase in soil matrix water infiltration capacity of arid reclaimed mine soils[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 546:133-139.
Sun D, Yang H, Guan D X, et al. The effects of land use change on soil infiltration capacity in China:A meta-analysis[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 626:1394-1401.
Zhang Y H, Zhang M X, Niu J Z, et al. The preferential flow of soil:A widespread phenomenon in pedological perspectives[J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2016, 49(6):661-672.
Shao W, Bogaard T A, Bakker M, et al. Quantification of the influence of preferential flow on slope stability using a numerical modelling approach[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2015, 19(5):2197-2212.
Khan M R, Koneshloo M, Knappett P S K, et al. Megacity pumping and preferential flow threaten groundwater quality[J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7(1):e12833.
杜建会, 严平, 董玉祥.干旱地区斑块状植被格局形成的水分驱动机制及其研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(8):2137-2144.
李小军, 汪君, 高永平.荒漠化草原植被斑块分布对地表径流、侵蚀及养分流失的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011, 31(5):1112-1118.
李小雁.干旱地区土壤-植被-水文耦合、响应与适应机制[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2011, 41(12):1721-1730.
程竞萱, 程金花, 郑欣, 等.不同植被覆盖下土壤优先流特征及影响因素[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2018, 52(6):973-982.
张建中, 姚晶晶, 张成梁, 等.排矸场植被恢复初期不同植被类型土壤优先流特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(4):165-172.
陈晓冰, 严磊, 李振东, 等.耕作方式对岩溶区甘蔗地土壤优先流特征的影响[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(4):786-794.
Pérès G, Cluzeau D, Menasseri S, et al. Mechanisms linking plant community properties to soil aggregate stability in an experimental grassland plant diversity gradient[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 373(1/2):285-299.
Jiang X J, Liu W, Chen C, et al. Effects of three morphometric features of roots on soil water flow behavior in three sites in China[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 320:161-171.
Huang Z, Tian F P, Wu G L, et al. Legume grasslands promote precipitation infiltration better than gramineous grasslands in arid regions[J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2016, 28(1):309-316.
Tang B Z, Jiao J Y, Yan F C, et al. Variations in soil infiltration capacity after vegetation restoration in the hilly and gully regions of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018, 19(3):1456-1466.
Liu Y, Guo L, Huang Z, et al. Root morphological characteristics and soil water infiltration capacity in semi-arid artificial grassland soils[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 235:e106153.
Guo L, Fan B, Zhang J, et al. Occurrence of subsurface lateral flow in the Shale Hills Catchment indicated by a soil water mass balance method[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 69(5):771-786.
Hao H X, Wei Y J, Cao D N, et al. Vegetation restoration and fine roots promote soil infiltrability in heavy-textured soils[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 198:e104542.
曹丹妮, 邸涵悦, 郭忠录, 等.演替梯度下土壤优先流特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(2):99-107.
Shein E V. Soil hydrology:Stages of development, current state, and nearest prospects[J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2010, 43(2):158-167.
Ghestem M, Sidle R C, Stokes A. The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow:Implications for slope stability[J]. BioScience, 2011, 61(11):869-879.
Bogner C, Trancón Y W B, Lange H. Characterising flow patterns in soils by feature extraction and multiple consensus clustering[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2013, 15:44-52.
Zhang Y H, Niu J Z, Zhang M X, et al. Interaction between plant roots and soil water flow in response to preferential flow paths in Northern China[J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2017, 28(2):648-663.
0
浏览量
885
下载量
11
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621