1. 浙江大学环境与资源学院, 浙江省农业资源与环境重点实验室,杭州,310058
2. 浙江省耕地质量与肥料管理总站,杭州,310020
[ "王剑(1996-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事污染土壤生态修复、植物营养与食品安全等研究。E-mail:21814149@zju.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
王剑, 杨婷婷, 朱有为, 等. 田间条件下施用石灰石及调理剂降低土壤镉可提取性的效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):334-340.
WANG Jian, YANG Tingting, ZHU Youwei, et al. Effects of Limestone and Conditioner on Reducing Soil Cd Extractability Under Field Conditions[J]. 2021, 35(4): 334-340.
王剑, 杨婷婷, 朱有为, 等. 田间条件下施用石灰石及调理剂降低土壤镉可提取性的效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):334-340. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.046.
WANG Jian, YANG Tingting, ZHU Youwei, et al. Effects of Limestone and Conditioner on Reducing Soil Cd Extractability Under Field Conditions[J]. 2021, 35(4): 334-340. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.046.
原位钝化是镉污染稻田土壤修复的主要方法之一,钝化剂的选择对修复效果十分关键。通过3个田间试验和示范区对比调查研究了施用石灰石及主要调理剂对稻田土壤镉的钝化效应,并提出有效的技术措施。结果表明,施用足量石灰石(≥3.75 t/hm2,试验Ⅰ)、钙镁磷肥(3.75 t/hm2,试验III)和生物质炭(9.00 t/hm2,试验II;7.50 t/hm2,试验III)、石灰(3.00 t/hm2,试验III)碱性调理剂均能显著提高土壤pH,降低土壤Cd提取率(P<0.05);施用硅藻土(8.25 t/hm2)和羟基磷灰石(3.75 t/hm2)也能降低土壤Cd提取率。其中施用石灰石11.25 t/hm2能使Cd提取率降低21个百分点;施用硅藻土8.25 t/hm2(试验Ⅱ)、生物质炭9.00 t/hm2(试验Ⅱ)可以显著降低土壤Cd提取率(P<0.05),分别降低10,19个百分点。试验Ⅲ中与对照相比,施用石灰3.00 t/hm2、钙镁磷肥3.75 t/hm2、生物质炭7.50 t/hm2处理的土壤pH显著提高(P<0.05),石灰、钙镁磷肥、生物质炭、羟基磷灰石3.75 t/hm2处理的土壤Cd提取率显著降低(P<0.05);同时发现,石灰处理土壤pH显著高于钙镁磷肥、生物质炭、羟基磷灰石3个处理,而土壤Cd提取率则显著小于后三者。对比调查的相关性分析结果表明,Cd提取率与土壤pH呈显著负相关,与土壤有效态Cd含量呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。聚类分析得出,可将不同调理剂对土壤镉的钝化效应分为5类,钝化效应较大的为石灰6.00,9.00 t/hm2和GSA-4 6.00,9.00 t/hm2,可优先用于实际的钝化修复,而钝化效应不显著的有海泡石4.50 t/hm2、沸石4.50 t/hm2、腐殖质4.50 t/hm2和羟基磷灰3.00 t/hm2,则不予以推荐。
In-situ passivation is one of the important methods for the remediation of cadmium-contaminated paddy soil
and the selection of passivation agent is critical for efficient remediation. This paper studied the inactivation effect of cadmium in paddy soil by applying limestone and main conditioning agents with three field trials and comparative investigations in demonstration plots
and the effective technical measures was discussed. The results showed that sufficient amount of limestone (≥3.75 t/hm2
experiment I)
calcium-magnesium phosphate fertilizer (3.75 t/hm2
experiment III) and biomass charcoal (9.00 t/hm2
test II; 7.50 t/hm2
test III))
lime (3.00 t/hm2
test III) and other alkaline conditioners can significantly increase soil pH and reduce soil Cd extraction rate (P<0.05); application of diatomaceous earth (8.25 t/hm2) and hydroxyapatite stone (3.75 t/hm2) can also reduce the soil Cd extraction rate. Among them
the application of limestone 11.25 t/hm2 could reduce the Cd extraction rate by 21%; the application of diatomaceous earth 8.25 t/hm2 (experiment II) and biomass charcoal 9.00 t/hm2 (experiment II) could significantly reduce the soil Cd extraction rate (P<0.05) by 10% and 19% respectively; compared with the control in Experiment III
the pH of the soil treated with lime 3.00 t/hm2
calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer 3.75 t/hm2
and biomass charcoal 7.50 t/hm2 increased significantly (P<0.05). The Cd extraction rate of soil treated with lime
calcium magnesium phosphate
biomass charcoal
and hydroxyapatite 3.75 t/hm2 was significantly reduced (P<0.05)
and it was found that the pH value of soil treated with lime was significantly higher than that of calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer
biomass charcoal
hydroxyapatite
and other three treatments
while the soil Cd extraction rate was significantly less than the latter three. Correlation analysis results based on comparative investigations showed that the extraction rate of Cd was significantly negatively correlated with pH
and was significantly positively correlated with effective Cd content (P<0.05). The cluster analysis showed that the passivation effects of different conditioners on soil cadmium can be divided into five categories. The most passivation effects were lime 6.00
9.00 t/hm2 and GSA-4 6.00
9.00 t/hm2
which can be used first. For the actual passivation repair
the sepiolite 4.50 t/hm2
zeolite 4.50 t/hm2
humus 4.50 t/hm2
and hydroxyapatite 3.00 t/hm2 with insignificant effects are not recommended.
陈奕云,唐名阳,王淑桃,等.基于文献计量的中国农田土壤重金属污染评价[J].土壤通报,2016,47(1):219-225.
Su C, Jiang L Q, Zhang W J. A review on heavy metal contamination in the soil worldwide:Situation, impact and remediation techniques[J].Environmental Skeptics and Critics,2014,3(2):24-38.
Li S, Islam E, Peng D L. Accumulation and localization of cadmium in moso bamboo (
Phyllostachys pubescens
) grown hydroponically[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2015,37(3):1-7.
Yang Q Q, Li Z Y, Lu X N, et al. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China:Pollution and risk assessment[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018, 642:690-700.
Li S, Chen J R, Ejazul I, et al. Cadmium-induced oxidative stress, response of antioxidants and detection of intracellular cadmium in organs of moso bamboo (
Phyllostachys pubescens
) seedlings[J].Chemosphere,2016,153:107-114.
Li Y, Gou X, Wang G, et al. Heavy metal contamination and source in arid agricultural soil in central Gansu Province, China[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2008,20(5):607-612.
Chen Z, Tang Y T, Yao A J, et al. Mitigation of Cd accumulation in paddy rice (
Oryza sativa
L.) by Fe fertilization[J].Environmental Pollution,2017,231:549-559.
Yu H, Wang J L, Fang W, et al. Cadmium accumulation in different rice cultivars and screening for pollution-safe cultivars of rice[J].Science of the Total Environment,2006,370(2/3):302-309.
Xue D W, Jiang H, Deng X X, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis provides new insights into cadmium accumulation in rice grain under cadmium stress[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2014,280:269-278.
赵其国,骆永明.论我国土壤保护宏观战略[J].中国科学院院刊,2015,30(4):452-458.
宋伟,陈百明,刘琳.中国耕地土壤重金属污染概况[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(2):293-298.
Zhang X Y, Chen D M, Zhong T Y, et al. Assessment of cadmium (Cd) concentration in arable soil in China[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2015,22(7):4932-4941.
Liu X, Tian G, Jiang D, et al. Cadmium (Cd) distribution and contamination in Chinese paddy soils on national scale[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2016,23(18):1-12.
Luo L, Ma Y B, Zhang S Z, et al. An inventory of trace element inputs to agricultural soils in China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90(8):2524-2530.
Hao H T, Sun B, Zhao Z H. Effect of land use change from paddy to vegetable field on the residues of organochlorine pesticides in soils[J].Environmental Pollution,2008,156(3):1046-1052.
Wang R Y, Shafi M, Ma J W, et al. Effect of amendments on contaminated soil of multiple heavy metals and accumulation of heavy metals in plants[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2018,25:28695-28704.
刘杏梅,赵健,徐建明.污染农田土壤的重金属钝化技术研究:基于web of science数据库的计量分析[J].土壤学报,2021,58(2):445-455.
喻华,罗婷,冯文强,等.石灰性物质连续培养及添加镁对土壤pH及镉有效性的影响[J].西南农业学报,2017,30(1):169-175.
王建乐,谢仕斌,涂国权,等.多种材料对铅镉污染农田土壤原位修复效果的研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(2):325-332.
Shi R Y, Hong Z N, Li J Y, et al. Mechanisms for increasing the pH buffering capacity of an acidic Ultisol by crop residue-derived biochars[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2017,65:8111-8119.
Rees F, Simonnot M O, Morel J L. Short-term effects of biochar on soil heavy metal mobility are controlled by intra-particle diffusion and soil pH increase[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2014,65(1):149-161.
曹胜,周卫军,罗思颖,等.酸碱度调节剂对稻田土壤中有效态镉的影响研究[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(30):97-102.
赵莎莎,肖广全,陈玉成,等.不同施用量石灰和生物炭对稻田镉污染钝化的延续效应[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):334-340.
孙聪,陈世宝,宋文恩,等.不同品种水稻对土壤中镉的富集特征及敏感性分布(SSD)[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(12):2384-2394.
骆文轩,宋肖琴,陈国安,等.田间施用石灰和有机肥对水稻吸收镉的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):232-237.
0
浏览量
3220
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621