微咸水与再生水混灌对作物生理特性的影响

刘春成; 崔丙健; 胡超; 吴海卿; 马欢欢; 崔二苹; 马天; 刘源; 李中阳; 樊向阳; 李浩; 高峰

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.045

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

微咸水与再生水混灌对作物生理特性的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 微咸水与再生水混灌对作物生理特性的影响
- Mixed Irrigation of Brackish Water and Reclaimed Water Affects Crop Physiological Characteristics
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第4期页码：327-333
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国农业科学院农田灌溉研究所,河南,新乡,453002
  2. 中国农业科学院研究生院,北京,100081
  3. 中国农业科学院河南新乡农业水土环境野外科学观测试验站, 农业水资源高效安全利用重点开放实验室,河南,新乡,453000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "刘春成(1986-),男,安徽界首人,助理研究员,博士研究生,主要从事非常规水资源安全利用研究。E-mail:liuchuncheng986@sohu.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0403503-2，2017YFC0403302-1）河南省重点研发与推广专项（202102110264，202102110279）河南省自然科学基金项目（202300410552）中央级科研院所基本科研业务费专项（FIRI202001-02，FIRI202002-03，FIRI20210302）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.045
  中图分类号： S154.3;S155.4
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘春成, 崔丙健, 胡超, 等. 微咸水与再生水混灌对作物生理特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):327-333.

LIU Chuncheng, CUI Bingjian, HU Chao, et al. Mixed Irrigation of Brackish Water and Reclaimed Water Affects Crop Physiological Characteristics[J]. 2021, 35(4): 327-333.
刘春成, 崔丙健, 胡超, 等. 微咸水与再生水混灌对作物生理特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):327-333. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.045.

LIU Chuncheng, CUI Bingjian, HU Chao, et al. Mixed Irrigation of Brackish Water and Reclaimed Water Affects Crop Physiological Characteristics[J]. 2021, 35(4): 327-333. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.045.

摘要

为了探讨淡水资源匮乏地区微咸水与再生水的安全合理利用，通过盆栽上海青试验，以清水灌溉为对照，设置再生水灌溉（T1）、微咸水—再生水1∶2灌溉（T2）、微咸水—再生水1∶1灌溉（T3）、微咸水灌溉（T4）4种灌溉方式，研究了不同比例微咸水与再生水混合灌溉对土壤水盐、作物生物量（地上部和地下部）、叶片叶绿素含量、可溶性蛋白含量、丙二醛（MDA）含量、过氧化氢酶（CAT）活性、超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）活性、过氧化物酶（POD）活性的影响。结果表明：（1）上海青收获后，不同比例微咸水与再生水混合灌溉处理土壤含水率和含盐量较清水灌溉（CK）均有所升高，其中T1、T2、T3处理土壤含水率与CK差异不显著，T4处理土壤含水率较CK差异显著（P<0.05），而各处理土壤含盐量与CK均差异显著；与T1处理相比，随着灌溉水中微咸水比重的升高，土壤含水率逐渐升高，且至T4处理时差异显著。（2）微咸水与再生水混灌对上海青地上部鲜重有一定影响，而对地上部干重以及地下部生物量无显著影响。与T1相比，T2、T3、T4处理上海青地上部鲜重均显著降低（P<0.05），降幅为24.78%~26.36%，地上部干重亦均降低，但差异不显著，降幅为19.14%~24.54%，地下部鲜重和干重无显著性变化。（3）微咸水与再生水混灌对上海青生理指标（叶绿素含量、可溶性蛋白含量、MDA含量、POD活性、CAT活性）没有显著影响，对SOD活性具有显著的提升作用。与T1相比，T2、T3、T4处理叶绿素a含量分别降低4.98%，3.82%和9.26%，叶绿素b含量分别降低10.88%，8.20%和13.46%，叶绿素总量分别降低9.76%，6.12%和10.15%，CAT活性分别提高8.51%，8.51%和-19.15%，POD活性分别提高1.92%，17.24%和-2.87%，SOD活性分别提高104.07%，62.20%和41.67%。随着混合液中微咸水比重的升高，上海青可溶性蛋白含量先降低后升高，MDA含量先升高后降低。（4）基于第二代综合生物响应指数（integrated biological response version 2，IBRv2），综合考虑土壤水盐、作物生理指标以及再生水资源本身的局限性，在淡水资源匮乏地区利用微咸水灌溉时，可以考虑用再生水作为替代清水水源与微咸水配合使用，微咸水—再生水混灌比例以1∶1为宜。研究结果可为淡水不足地区利用微咸水（3 g/L）灌溉提供参考。

Abstract

It is an effective way to alleviate the scarcity of fresh water resources to use unconventional water resources. In areas rich in brackish water

the freshwater resources are generally inadequate

but there are abundant reclaimed water resources. In order to explore the reasonable utilization of brackish water and reclaimed water in areas where freshwater was scarce

by using Shanghai green pot experiment

this research studied the soil salt-water dynamics

crop biomass including aboveground biomass and underground biomass

and crop physiological characteristics such as chlorophyll content of leaves

soluble protein content

malondialdehyde (MDA) content

activities of catalase(CAT)

superoxide dismutase (SOD)

and peroxidase (POD) under mixed irrigation of brackish water and reclaimed water at different ratios. There were four treatments

including reclaimed water irrigation (T1)

mixed irrigation of brackish water and reclaimed water at 1∶2 (T2)

mixed irrigation of brackish water and reclaimed water at 1∶1 (T3) and brackish water irrigation (T4)

taking the fresh water irrigation (CK) as control. The saline degree of brackish water was 3 g/L. The results indicated that: (1) Both soil water content and soil salt content were improved under different mixed irrigation compared with CK

among which

the difference of soil water content under T4 and CK reached a significant level (P<0.05)

and no difference between T1

T3 and CK. While

soil salt contents in all mixed irrigation treatments had significant differences with CK. Compared with T1

soil water content and soil salt content (except T2 and T3) gradually increased significantly with the increase of brackish water proportion in the mixed solution. (2) Mixed irrigation with brackish water and reclaimed water affected aboveground fresh weight of crop while mixed irrigation had no obvious effects on aboveground dry weight and underground biomass. Compared with T1

aboveground fresh weights under T2

and T4 decreased by 24.78% to 26.36% significantly

aboveground dry weights reduced by 19.14% to 24.54% insignificantly

and the fresh and dry weight of underground changed slightly. (3) Mixed irrigation with brackish water and reclaimed water promoted the activity of SOD significantly

but had no obvious effects on crop physiological characteristics including chlorophyll content

soluble protein content

MDA content

POD activity and CAT activity. Compared with T1

chlorophyll-a content decreased by 4.98%

3.82% and 9.26%

chlorophyll-b content reduced by 10.88%

20% and 13.46%

total chlorophyll content decreased by 9.76%

6.12% and 10.15%

CAT activity improved by 8.51%

8.51% and -19.15%

POD activity increased by 1.92%

17.24% and -2.87%

and SOD activity improved by 104.07%

62.20% and 41.67% respectively under T2

T3 and T4. The soluble protein content decreased first and then increased while MDA content increased first and then decreased with the increase of brackish water proportion in mixed solution. Therefore

considering soil water-salt dynamic

crop physiological characteristics and the limits of reclaimed water

it could be used as an alternative source of fresh water to mix with brackish water (3 g/L)

the suitable mixed proportion would be 1∶1 based on the integrated biological response version 2 (IBRv2). The research results could provide the reference for the utilization of brackish water in the areas where fresh water is short.

关键词

Keywords

references

中华人民共和国水利部.水利部关于非常规水源纳入水资源统一配置的指导意见(水资源司[2017] 274号[Z].北京,2017.

胡雅琪,吴文勇.中国农业非常规水资源灌溉现状与发展策略[J].中国工程科学,2018,20(5):69-76.

国家发展改革委,水利部,住房城乡建设部,农业部,工业和信息化部,科技部,教育部,国家质检总局,国家机关事务管理局.关于印发《全民节水行动计划》的通知(发改环资[2016] 2259号)[Z], 2016.

Petousi I, Daskalakis G, Fountoulakis M S, et al. Effects of treated wastewater irrigation on the establishment of young grapevines[J].Science of The Total Environment,2019,658:485-492.

Pedrero F, Camposeo S, Pace B, et al. Use of reclaimed wastewater on fruit quality of nectarine in Southern Italy[J].Agricultural Water Management,2018,203:186-192.

韩洋,李平,齐学斌,等.再生水不同灌水水平对土壤酶活性及耐热大肠菌群分布的影响[J].环境科学,2018,39(9):4366-4374.

郭魏,齐学斌,李平,等.不同施氮水平下再生水灌溉对土壤细菌群落结构影响研究[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(1):280-287.

Lesser L E, Mora A, Moreau C, et al. Survey of 218 organic contaminants in groundwater derived from the world's largest untreated wastewater irrigation system:Mezquital Valley, Mexico[J].Chemosphere,2018,198:510-521.

Lu S B, Zhang X L, Liang P. Influence of drip irrigation by reclaimed water on the dynamic change of the nitrogen element in soil and tomato yield and quality[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,139:561-566.

Yuan C F, Feng S Y, Huo Z L, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation with saline water on soil water-salt distribution and water use efficiency of maize for seed production in arid Northwest China[J].Agricultural Water Management,2019,212:424-432.

Tahtouh J, Mohtar R, AssiSSI A, et al. Impact of brackish groundwater and treated wastewater on soil chemical and mineralogical properties[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,647:99-109.

Cucci G, Lacolla G, Boari F,et al. Effect of water salinity and irrigation regime on maize (

Zea mays

L.) cultivated on clay loam soil and irrigated by furrow in Southern Italy[J].Agricultural Water Management,2019,222:118-124.

刘春成,李毅,郭丽俊,等.微咸水灌溉对斥水土壤水盐运移的影响[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(8):39-45.

Buatan A, Cohen S, Malach Y D, et al. Effects of timing and duration of brackish irrigation water on fruit yield and quality of late summer melons[J].Agricultural Water Management,2005,74(2):123-134.

Liu B X, Wang S Q, Kong X L, et al. Modeling and assessing feasibility of long-term brackish water irrigation in vertically homogeneous and heterogeneous cultivated lowland in the North China Plain[J].Agricultural Water Management,2019,211:98-110.

朱进.NaCl胁迫对不同生育时期小白菜的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2012,51(19):4278-4279,4283.

生态环境部.GB 5084-2005农田灌溉水质标准[S].北京:中国环境出版社,2005.

杨培岭,王瑜,任树梅,等.咸淡水交替灌溉下土壤水盐分布与玉米吸水规律研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(6):273-281.

Yang G, Liu S H, Yan K, et al. Effect of drip Irrigation with brackish water on the soil chemical properties for a typical desert plant (

Haloxylon Ammodendron

) in the Manas River Basin[J].Irrigation and Drainage,2020,69(3):460-471.

Zhang A Q, Zheng C L, Li K J, et al. Responses of soil water-salt variation and cotton growth to drip irrigation with saline water in the low plain near the Bohai Sea[J].Irrigation and Drainage,2020,69(3):448-459.

吴文勇,许翠平,刘洪禄,等.再生水灌溉对果菜类蔬菜产量及品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):36-40.

王璐璐,田军仓,徐桂红,等.再生水滴灌对黄瓜叶绿素、光合、产量及品质的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(5):18-25.

张继峯,王振华,张金珠,等.滴灌下氮盐交互对加工番茄荧光特性及产量品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2020,53(5):990-1003.

冯棣,朱玉宁,周婷,等.咸水灌溉对基质栽培甜脆豌豆生长及营养品质的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(2):27-31.

雷琼,李辉.城市二级污水灌溉对3种草坪草生理特性及土壤性状的影响[J].西南农业学报,2020,33(11):2545-2551.

闫利军,米福贵,郭郁频, 等.草地早熟禾幼苗对矿井再生水灌溉的生理响应[J].草地学报,2014,22(5):1031-1037.

李丹,万书勤,康跃虎,等.滨海盐碱地微咸水滴灌水盐调控对番茄生长及品质的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(7):39-50.

李强,王秀萍,刘雅辉,等.微咸水灌溉对油葵生长和生理生化特性的影响[J].河北农业科学,2016,20(1):30-33.

浏览量

1091

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

微咸水与再生水混灌对土壤特性的影响与灌溉效应评估

增温和放牧对河西盐渍化草地土壤理化性质及酶活性的影响

栗子坪自然保护区林分类型对土壤化学计量特征、微生物及其季节动态响应

不同钠钾比微咸水对土壤水盐特性和冬小麦生长的影响

不同耕作模式和生物炭添加对黑土区土壤氮磷转化及玉米生长的调控