元谋干热河谷冲沟发育区植被恢复对土壤碳氮的影响

文孝丽; 董一帆; 杨己; 段兴武

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.039

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

元谋干热河谷冲沟发育区植被恢复对土壤碳氮的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 元谋干热河谷冲沟发育区植被恢复对土壤碳氮的影响
- Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Gully Development Area of Yuanmou Dry-hot Valley
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第4期页码：282-288
- 作者机构：
  
  云南大学国际河流与生态安全研究院,昆明,650091
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "文孝丽(1998-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:15239913067@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（U2002209，41671288）第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目（2019QZKK0307）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.039
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
文孝丽, 董一帆, 杨己, 等. 元谋干热河谷冲沟发育区植被恢复对土壤碳氮的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):282-288.

WEN Xiaoli, DONG Yifan, YANG Ji, et al. Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Gully Development Area of Yuanmou Dry-hot Valley[J]. 2021, 35(4): 282-288.
文孝丽, 董一帆, 杨己, 等. 元谋干热河谷冲沟发育区植被恢复对土壤碳氮的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):282-288. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.039.

WEN Xiaoli, DONG Yifan, YANG Ji, et al. Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Gully Development Area of Yuanmou Dry-hot Valley[J]. 2021, 35(4): 282-288. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.039.

摘要

冲沟侵蚀是一种剧烈的土壤侵蚀过程，导致冲沟发育区地表形态处于显著变化的非稳定状态。通过封禁使植被自然恢复是元谋干热河谷冲沟治理的主要模式之一，但在沟道植被持续恢复与冲沟显著发育的综合作用下，沟道土壤碳氮含量的变化趋势仍有待明晰。选择元谋干热河谷1条典型冲沟，在沟内随机布设81个1 m×1 m的样方，分别在2012年和2017年的旱季初期，监测81个样方的植被指数、侵蚀/沉积过程引起的地表高程变化，以及冲沟土壤理化性质。结果表明：（1）2017年沟道内植被状况明显好于2012年，且沟床表面径流冲刷范围内的植被变化最为明显，其盖度、株数、株高分别增加313.61%，94.29%，33.33%。（2）5年间冲沟发育区以沉积为主，侵蚀样方和沉积样方的比例分别为22.22%和77.78%。随着植被盖度的增加，土壤砂粒含量呈下降趋势，粉粒含量呈增加趋势。（3）封禁期间虽然植被恢复显著，但土壤碳氮并没有明显改善。土壤碳氮不仅与植被盖度和粉粒百分比呈显著正相关，还与样方点高程变化呈显著负相关。冲沟内地形起伏的剧烈程度显著高于坡面侵蚀，并对冲沟表层土壤碳氮产生显著影响。研究有助于查明植被恢复及冲沟发育对土壤碳氮的综合影响，并为干热河谷冲沟退化生态系统的修复提供理论支持。

Abstract

Gully erosion is a kind of intense soil erosion process

which leads to the surface morphology of gully development area in an unstable state of significant change. Natural restoration of vegetation through prohibition is one of the main modes of gully management in Yuanmou Dry-hot valley. However

under the comprehensive effect of continuous restoration of gully vegetation and significant development of gully

the changing trend of soil carbon and nitrogen content in gully remains to be clearly defined. In this study

a typical gully in Yuanmou Dry-hot valley was selected

and 81 samples of 1 m×1 m were randomly arranged. The vegetation index

elevation changes caused by the erosion/sedimentation process

and soil physical and chemical properties of the 81 samples were measured at the beginning of the dry season in 2012 and 2017

the results showed that: (1) The vegetation conditions in the gully in 2017 were significantly better than that in 2012

and the vegetation changes within the range of runoff erosion on the surface of the gully bed were the most obvious

and the vegetation cover

number

and height increased by 313.61%

94.29%

and 33.33%

respectively. (2) During the five years

the gully development area was dominated by sedimentation

and the proportions of erosion and sedimentation were 22.22% and 77.78%

respectively. With the increase of vegetation cover

the sand content of the soil showed a decreasing trend

and the silt content showed an increasing trend. (3) Although the vegetation recovered significantly during the period of prohibition

the soil carbon and nitrogen did not improve significantly. Soil carbon and nitrogen were not only significantly positively correlated with vegetation cover and soil particle-size

but also significantly negatively correlated with elevation changes of quadrate points. The severity of topographical changes in the gully was significantly higher than that of surface erosion

and it had a significant impact on the carbon and nitrogen of the surface soil of the gully. This study will help to identify the comprehensive effects of vegetation restoration and gully development on soil carbon and nitrogen

and provide support for the restoration of the degraded gully ecosystem in Dry-hot valley.

关键词

Keywords

references

Wang T, Kang F F, Cheng X Q, et al. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks under different land uses in a hilly ecological restoration area of North China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2016,163:176-184.

Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security[J].Science,2004,304(5677):1623-1627.

Saikawa E, Prinn R G, Dlugokencky E, et al. Global and regional emissions estimates for N

O[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2014,14(9):4617-4641.

Wang D, Wu G L, Zhu Y J, et al. Grazing exclusion effects on above- and below-ground C and N pools of typical grassland on the Loess Plateau (China)[J].Catena,2014,123:113-120.

Lal R. Soil erosion and the global carbon budget[J].Environment International,2003,29(4):437-450.

Zhang B, Yang Y S, Zepp H. Effect of vegetation restoration on soil and water erosion and nutrient losses of a severely eroded clayey Plinthudult in southeastern China[J].Catena,2004,57:77-90.

巩杰,陈利顶,傅伯杰,等.黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用和植被恢复对土壤质量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(12):2292-2296.

冯志珍,郑粉莉,易祎.薄层黑土微生物生物量碳氮对土壤侵蚀-沉积的响应[J].土壤学报,2017,54(6):1332-1344.

阎百兴.中国水土流失防治与生态安全[M].东北黑土卷.北京:科学出版社,2010.

Castillo C, Gomez J A. A century of gully erosion research:Urgency, complexity and study approaches[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2016,160:300-319.

校亮,熊东红,张宝军,等.干热河谷冲沟侵蚀劣地坡积区土体性质与裂缝形态发育特征[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(6):81-86.

南岭,郭芬芬,王小丹,等.云南元谋干热河谷区典型植被恢复模式的水土保持效应[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(9):5168-5171.

刘琳,熊东红,张闻多,等.元谋干热河谷平沟建园土地治理工程效益及生态风险[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(4):251-258.

聂小军,张建辉,刘刚才,等.金沙江干热河谷侵蚀陡坡植被恢复对土壤质量的影响[J].生态环境,2008,17(4):1636-1640.

翁伯琦,郑祥洲,丁洪,等.植被恢复对土壤碳氮循环的影响研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(12):3610-3616.

Wu G L, Liu Y, Tian F P, et al. Legumes functional group promotes soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage by increasing plant diversity[J].Land Degradation and Development,2017,28(4):1336-1344.

Dong Y F, Xiong D H, Su Z A, et al. Effects of vegetation buffer strips on concentrated flow hydraulics and gully bed erosion based on in situ scouring experiments[J].Land Degradation and Development,2018,29(6):1672-1682.

Vannoppen W, Vanmaercke M, De Baets S, et al. A review of the mechanical effects of plant roots on concentrated flow erosion rates[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2015,150:666-678.

Dong Y F, Xiong D H, Su Z, et al. The distribution of and factors influencing the vegetation in a gully in the Dry-hot Valley of southwest China[J].Catena,2014,116:60-67.

唐国勇,高成杰,李昆.植被恢复对干热河谷退化土壤改良的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(15):5157-5167.

袁勇,熊东红,校亮,等.元谋干热河谷冲沟不同部位土壤质量评价[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(10):2165-2172.

张素,熊东红,杨丹,等.干热河谷不同活跃度冲沟土体抗剪强度分异及理化性质[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):124-129.

赵文启,刘宇,罗明良,等.黄土高原小流域植被恢复的土壤侵蚀效应评估[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):89-94.

Li S X, Wang Z H, Li S Q, et al. Effect of plastic sheet mulch, wheat straw mulch, and maize growth on water loss by evaporation in dryland areas of China[J].Agricultural Water Management,2013,116:39-49.

校亮,熊东红,张宝军,等.干热河谷冲沟沟岸葛藤不同覆被状况及土壤性质差异分析[J].生态学报,2018,38(14):5047-5055.

杜兰兰,王志齐,王蕊,等.模拟条件下侵蚀-沉积部位土壤CO

通量变化及其影响因素[J].环境科学,2016,37(9):3616-3624.

Al-Kaisi M M, Grote J B. Cropping systems effects on improving soil carbon stocks of exposed subsoil[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2007,71(4):1381-1388.

姜敏.衡南县土壤肥力空间变异及对土壤侵蚀的响应[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2016.

陈利顶,王军,傅伯杰.我国西南干热河谷脆弱生态区可持续发展战略[J].中国软科学,2001,1(6):95-99.

Li Z W, Liu C, Dong Y T, et al. Response of soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks to soil erosion and land use types in the Loess hilly-gully region of China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2017,166:1-9.

浏览量

1069

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土丘陵沟壑区植物根系对土壤优先流的影响机理

采煤沉陷裂缝不同距离下植被类型对土壤蒸渗特征的影响

京津风沙源治理工程区土壤有机碳密度分布特征

红壤丘陵区植被恢复对土壤分离能力的影响及机制

黄土高原切沟汇水区植被恢复模式对土壤饱和导水率的影响及机制