苗期干旱胁迫下施氮对玉米氮素吸收和土壤生物化学性质的影响

朱琳; 李玉玺; 王寅; 王缘怡; 张馨月; 陈安吉; 侯文峰; 高强

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.037

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

苗期干旱胁迫下施氮对玉米氮素吸收和土壤生物化学性质的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 苗期干旱胁迫下施氮对玉米氮素吸收和土壤生物化学性质的影响
- Effects of Nitrogen Application on Maize Nitrogen Uptake and Soil Biological and Chemical Properties Under Drought Stresses at Seedling Stage
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第4期页码：267-274
- 作者机构：
  
  吉林农业大学资源与环境学院, 吉林省商品粮基地土壤资源可持续利用重点实验室,长春,130118
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "朱琳(1996-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事作物养分管理研究。E-mail:15754368685@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金青年项目（31501829）吉林省优秀青年人才基金项目（20180520036JH）国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFD0200101）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.037
  中图分类号： Q945.78
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱琳, 李玉玺, 王寅, 等. 苗期干旱胁迫下施氮对玉米氮素吸收和土壤生物化学性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):267-274.

ZHU Lin, LI Yuxi, WANG Yin, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Maize Nitrogen Uptake and Soil Biological and Chemical Properties Under Drought Stresses at Seedling Stage[J]. 2021, 35(4): 267-274.
朱琳, 李玉玺, 王寅, 等. 苗期干旱胁迫下施氮对玉米氮素吸收和土壤生物化学性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):267-274. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.037.

ZHU Lin, LI Yuxi, WANG Yin, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Maize Nitrogen Uptake and Soil Biological and Chemical Properties Under Drought Stresses at Seedling Stage[J]. 2021, 35(4): 267-274. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.037.

摘要

研究苗期干旱胁迫下施氮对东北春玉米氮素吸收利用和土壤生物化学性质的影响，为区域玉米养分管理与逆境调控提供依据。研究设置水、氮二因素盆栽试验，土壤水分包括3个水平：田间持水量的30%（W0），50%（W1）和70%（W2）；施氮量包括2个水平：不施氮（N0）和施氮0.24 g/kg（N1），测定不同水氮条件下玉米苗期的植株干重和氮素吸收、根际和非根际土壤的化学性质、微生物量碳、氮（MBC、MBN）及土壤酶活性。结果表明：干旱胁迫显著降低玉米苗期植株干重和氮素吸收量，其中W0条件降幅最大（分别为51.1%，43.8%）。施氮促进各水分条件下植株生长，且与水分存在显著交互作用，W2条件下施氮后植株干重和氮素吸收量的增幅最高（分别为53.7%，83.2%）。干旱胁迫提高植株的水分利用效率，但降低氮肥利用效率。施氮显著提高W2条件植株的水分利用效率，但干旱条件下则无显著影响。水、氮及其交互作用对土壤性质的影响较为复杂。总体上，苗期干旱胁迫暂时提高了根际和非根际土壤pH，显著增加根际土壤的铵态氮和硝态氮含量。MBC、MBN对干旱胁迫的响应在根际与非根际土壤之间存在相反趋势，根际土壤随干旱程度增加而提高，非根际土壤则随之下降。土壤酶活性方面，干旱胁迫显著影响根际土壤的硝酸还原酶和亚硝酸还原酶活性。施氮增加所有水分条件下根际和非根际土壤的pH和铵态氮、硝态氮含量，其中根际土壤的增幅高于非根际土壤。施氮显著增加各水分条件下根际和非根际土壤的MBC、MBN、脲酶和硝酸还原酶活性，但显著降低根际和非根际土壤亚硝酸还原酶活性。水氮交互作用显著影响根际土壤的亚硝酸还原酶、非根际土壤的脲酶、亚硝酸还原酶和FDA水解酶活性。根际、非根际土壤各生物化学性质之间均存在显著的相关关系，而且根际土壤除土壤亚硝酸还原酶外的各指标均与植株氮素吸收和氮肥利用效率呈正相关。苗期干旱显著抑制玉米植株生长和氮素吸收，并对土壤生物、化学性质造成显著影响。施氮对植株和土壤性质的影响在不同水分条件下存在差异，而且植株表现与土壤生物、化学性质之间存在显著相关关系。

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the effects of nitrogen application on spring maize nitrogen uptake and soil biological and chemical properties under drought stresses at seedling stage in Northeast China. The results might provide a basis for regional maize nutrient management and adversity regulation. In this study

a pot experiment was conducted with two factors of water and nitrogen. The soil water level included 30%

50% and 70% of field capacity (W0

W1 and W2)

respectively

and nitrogen application included 0 and 0.24 g/kg soil (N0 and N1)

respectively. The shoot dry matter and nitrogen uptake of maize at the seedling stage

soil chemical properties

microbial biomass carbon

nitrogen (MBC

MBN) and soil enzymes activities in the rhizosphere and bulk soil were measured in different water and nitrogen conditions. The results showed that drought stresses significantly reduced maize shoot dry matter and nitrogen uptake at seedling stage

and W0 condition decreased the most (51.1%

43.8% respectively). Nitrogen application promoted plant growth under different water conditions and had significant interaction with water. The increase in shoot dry matter and nitrogen uptake was the highest (53.7%

83.2% respectively) under W2 condition. Drought stresses increased water use efficiency (WUE)

but decreased nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Nitrogen application significantly increased WUE under W2 condition

but had no significant effect under drought conditions. The effects of water

nitrogen and their interaction on soil properties were complex. In general

drought stresses at seedling stage temporarily increased the pH value in rhizosphere and bulk soil

and significantly increased the contents of ammonium and nitrate nitrogen (NH4+ and NO3-) in[PJ] rhizosphere soil. The responses of MBC and MBN to drought stresses were opposite between rhizosphere and bulk soil. Rhizosphere soil increased with the increase of drought degree

while bulk soil decreased. In terms of soil enzyme activity

drought stresses significantly affected nitrate reductase (NR) and nitrite reductase (NiR) activities in rhizosphere soil. Nitrogen application increased the pH

NH4+ and NO3- contents in rhizosphere and bulk soils under all water conditions

and the increase rate of rhizosphere soil was higher than that of bulk soil. Nitrogen application significantly increased MBC

MBN

urease (UR) and NR activities in rhizosphere and bulk soil under various water conditions

but significantly reduced NiR activity in rhizosphere and bulk soils. The interaction of water and nitrogen significantly affected NiR activity in rhizosphere soil

NR and FDA activities in bulk soil. There was a significant correlation between the biological and chemical properties in rhizosphere and bulk soil

and the indexes of rhizosphere soil except NiR activity were positively correlated with plant nitrogen uptake and NUE. Drought at seedling stage significantly inhibited maize plant growth and nitrogen uptake

and significantly affected soil biological and chemical properties. The effects of nitrogen application on plant and soil properties were different under different water conditions

and there was a significant correlation between plant performance and soil biological and chemical properties.

关键词

Keywords

references

中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2020.

杨晓晨,明博,陶洪斌,等.中国东北春玉米区干旱时空分布特征及其对产量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(6):758-767.

徐昆,朱秀芳,刘莹,等.气候变化下干旱对中国玉米产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(11):149-158.

Murugan R, Parama V R R, Madan B, et al. Short-term effect of nitrogen intensification on aggregate size distribution, microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a semi-arid soil under different crop types[J].Pedosphere,2019,29(4):483-491.

Cai S M, Wang J J, Lv W G, et al. Nitrogen fertilization alters the effects of earthworms on soil physicochemical properties and bacterial community structure[J/OL].Applied Soil Ecology,2020,150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103478.

Wang Y, Zhang X Y, Chen J, et al. Reducing basal nitrogen rate to improve maize seedling growth, water and nitrogen use efficiencies under drought stress by optimizing root morphology and distribution[J].Agricultural Water Management,2019,212:328-337.

Khan K S, Mack R, Castillo X, et al. Microbial biomass, fungal and bacterial residues, and their relationships to the soil organic matter C/N/P/S ratios[J].Geoderma,2016,271:115-123.

Preece C, Farré-armengol G, Peñuelas J. Drought is a stronger driver of soil respiration and microbial communities than nitrogen or phosphorus addition in two Mediterranean tree species[J/OL].Science of the Total Environment,2020,735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139554.

Kocsis M, Dunai A, Makó A, et al. Estimation of the drought sensitivity of Hungarian soils based on corn yield responses[J].Journal of Maps,2020,16(2):148-154.

Nannipieri P, Trasar-cepeda C, Dick R P. Soil enzyme activity:A brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2018,54:11-19.

Li F S, Yu J M, Nong M L, et al. Partial root-zone irrigation enhanced soil enzyme activities and water use of maize under different ratios of inorganic to organic nitrogen fertilizers[J].Agricultural Water Management,2010,97(2):231-239.

Zhou S M, Zhang M, Zhang X W, et al. Effects of reduced nitrogen and suitable soil moisture on wheat (

Triticum aestivum

L.) rhizosphere soil microbiological, biochemical properties and yield in the Huanghuai Plain, China[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2020,19(1):234-250.

Mickan B S, Abbott L K, Fan J W, et al. Application of compost and clay under water-stressed conditions influences functional diversity of rhizosphere bacteria[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2018,54(5):55-70.

申鹏举.补充灌溉和雨养条件下施氮对玉米碳氮转运分配的影响[D].南宁:广西大学,2020.

石柯,董士刚,申凤敏,等.小麦播量与减氮对潮土微生物量碳氮及土壤酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(15):2646-2663.

唐海明,李超,肖小平,等.有机肥氮投入比例对双季稻田根际土壤微生物生物量碳、氮和微生物熵的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(4):1335-1343.

田幼华,吕光辉,杨晓东,等.水盐胁迫对干旱区植物根际土壤酶活性的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(3):158-163.

Kivlin S N, Treseder K K. Soil extracellular enzyme activities correspond with abiotic factors more than fungal community composition[J].Biogeochemistry,2014,117(1):23-37.

梁国鹏, Albert H A,吴会军,等.施氮量对夏玉米根际和非根际土壤酶活性及氮含量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(6):1917-1924.

闫丽娟,王海燕,李广,等.黄土丘陵区4种典型植被对土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):190-196,204.

张馨月,王寅,陈健,等.水分和氮素对玉米苗期生长、根系形态及分布的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(1):34-44.

Gheysari M, Mirlatifi S M, Bannayan M, et al. Interaction of water and nitrogen on maize grown for silage[J].Agricultural Water Management,2009,96(5):809-821.

万文亮,郭鹏飞,胡语妍,等.调亏灌溉对新疆滴灌春小麦土壤水分、硝态氮分布及产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):166-174.

Zhang M Y, Riaz M, Zhang L, et al. Response of fungal communities in different soils to biochar and chemical fertilizers under simulated rainfall conditions[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,691(15):654-663.

Ma W J, Li J, Gao Y, et al. Responses of soil extracellular enzyme activities and microbial community properties to interaction between nitrogen addition and increased precipitation in a semi-arid grassland ecosystem[J/OL].Science of the Total Environment,2020,703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134691.

Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J].Science,2010,327:1008-1010.

韩希英,宋凤斌.干旱胁迫对玉米根系生长及根际养分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):170-172.

Xiao L, Huang Y M, Zhao J F, et al. Effects of planting structure on soil water-stable aggregates, microbial biomass and enzyme activity in a catchment of Loess Plateau terraces, China[J/OL].Applied Soil Ecology,2021,159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103819.

Guo W, Andersen M N, Qi X B, et al. Effects of reclaimed water irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on the chemical properties and microbial community of soil[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2017,16(3):679-690.

王宁,罗佳琳,赵亚慧,等.不同麦秸还田模式对稻田土壤微生物活性和微生物群落组成的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2020,39(1):125-133.

江晶,武均,张仁陟,等.碳氮添加对雨养农田土壤全氮、有机碳及其组分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):215-220,227.

边雪廉,赵文磊,岳中辉,等.土壤酶在农业生态系统碳、氮循环中的作用研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(4):171-178.

周芙蓉,王进鑫,杨楠,等.水分和铅胁迫对土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2013,21(3):479-484.

孙瑞莲,赵秉强,朱鲁生,等.长期定位施肥田土壤酶活性的动态变化特征[J].生态环境,2008,17(5):2059-2063.

邢肖毅,黄懿梅,黄海波,等.黄土丘陵区子午岭不同植物群落下土壤氮素及相关酶活性的特征[J].生态学报,2012,32(5):1403-1411.

马星竹.长期施肥土壤的FDA水解酶活性[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2010,36(4):451-455.

浏览量

1525

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

干旱胁迫对玉米根系生长及根际养分的影响

不同质地土壤玉米秸秆还田配施腐熟剂效应的研究

东北黑土区不同覆盖作物对土壤酶活性的影响及调控机制探究

耕作措施对吉林省坡耕地玉米土壤团聚体腐殖质分布的影响