陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,西安,710119
[ "李子(1995-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事生态、遥感方面的研究。E-mail:1436052688@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
李子, 张艳芳. 基于InVEST模型的渭河流域干支流生态系统服务时空演变特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):178-185.
LI Zi, ZHANG Yanfang. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Services in the Main and Tributaries of Weihe River Basin Based on InVEST Model[J]. 2021, 35(4): 178-185.
李子, 张艳芳. 基于InVEST模型的渭河流域干支流生态系统服务时空演变特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):178-185. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.025.
LI Zi, ZHANG Yanfang. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Services in the Main and Tributaries of Weihe River Basin Based on InVEST Model[J]. 2021, 35(4): 178-185. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.025.
渭河作为黄河的最大支流,是生态保护建成区重点之一,对其生态系统服务研究有利于实现流域内高质量发展和生态保护之间的平衡关系,保持流域生态系统服务功能,促进流域生态系统恢复。基于InVEST模型分析渭河流域2000—2018年5期土地利用和干支流生态系统服务时空动态变化,采用相关性分析水源涵养、土壤保持和生物多样性之间的权衡和协同。结果表明:19年间,研究区土地利用情况主要以耕地、草地和林地为主,占总面积的95%以上。流域内水源涵养呈现"先上升后下降"趋势,平均栅格单元产水量542.9 mm,渭河流域干流水源涵养量最高,为6.88×108 m3,其次为北洛河和泾河流域,分别为3.36×108,5.04×108 m3。土壤保持呈斑块状分布,流域整体土壤侵蚀状况为微度侵蚀,且渭河流域干流实际土壤侵蚀量总量最高为6.67×108 t,其次为北洛河和泾河流域,分别为6.22×108,3.13×108 t。生物多样性表现为生境质量高区集中分布在生态较好的森林生态保护区,人类活动较为密集地区生境质量较差。研究期间,渭河流域水源涵养与土壤保持、生态质量之间为高度协同关系,其他生态系统服务不显著,不同的土地利用类型对生态系统服务之间权衡和协同贡献值不一致。
Weihe River basin
as the largest tributary of the Yellow River basin
is one of the key ecological protection built-up areas. The study on ecosystem services is conducive to the realization of the balance between high-quality development and ecological protection in the basin
to the maintenance the ecosystem service function of the basin
and to the promotion the restoration of the basin ecosystem. Based on the InVEST model
this paper analyzed the spatial-temporal dynamic changes of land use and ecosystem services of main and tributaries in the Weihe River basin from 2000 to 2018
and used correlation analysis to analyze the trade-offs and synergies among the balance of water conservation
soil conservation
and biodiversity. The results showed that the land use in the study area was mainly cultivated land
grassland
and forest land
accounting for more than 95% of the total area. Water conservation in the basin showed a trend of "increasing first and then decreasing"
with an average grid unit yield of 542.9 mm. The water conservation in the Weihe River basin was higher than that in Jing River basin and Beiluo River basin
which were 6.88×108
5.04×108
3.36×108 m3. The soil in the basin remained patchy and the overall soil erosion status of the basin was slight. Moreover
the soil erosion in the main stream of Weihe River basin was greater than that in Jing River basin and Beiluo River basin
which were 6.67×108
3.13×108
6.22×108 t. The biodiversity showed that the areas with high habitat quality were concentrated in the forest ecological protection areas with good ecology and the habitat quality was poor in the areas with dense human activities. During the study period
there was a highly synergistic relationship between water conservation
soil conservation
and ecological quality in Weihe River basin
while other ecosystem services were not significant. It can be seen from the correlation that different land use types have different values of tradeoffs and collaborative contributions to ecosystem services.
Lars S, Stephanie N, Mathias S, et al. The impact of bioengineering techniques for riverbank protection on ecosystem services of riparian zones[J/OL].Ecological Engineering,2020,158.DOI:10.1016/J.ECOLENG.2020.106040.
Taffarello D, Bittar M S, Sass K S, et al. Ecosystem service valuation method through grey water footprint in partially-monitored subtropical watersheds[J/OL].Science of the Total Environment,2020,738.DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139408.
傅伯杰.我国生态系统研究的发展趋势与优先领域[J].地理研究,2010,29(3):383-396.
赵水霞,王文君,全栋,等.黄河干流头道拐水文站水沙运动特征及影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):125-131.
Yu Y Y, Li J, Zhou Z X, et al. Response of multiple mountain ecosystem services on environmental gradients:How to respond, and where should be priority conservation?[J/OL].Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278.DOI:10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.123264.
Xing L, Hu M S, Wang Y. Integrating ecosystem services value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment:A case study of Hubei Province, Central China[J/OL].Science of the Total Environment,2020,740.DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140126.
葛俸池,许明祥.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同退耕模式的土壤水文性质影响对比.[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):154-160,168.
Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2009,7(1):4-11.
Mansoor D K L, Matlock M D, Cummings E C, et al. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2013,165(15):6-18.
包玉斌,李婷,柳辉,等.基于InVEST模型的陕北黄土高原水源涵养功能时空变化[J].地理研究,2016,35(4):664-676.
王秀明,刘谞承,龙颖贤,等.基于改进的InVEST模型的韶关市生态系统服务功能时空变化特征及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):381-388.
张琨,吕一河,傅伯杰,等.黄土高原植被覆盖变化对生态系统服务影响及其阈值[J].地理学报,2020,75(5):949-960.
傅伯杰,吕一河.黄河流域要发展加强统筹是保障[N].中国科学报,2020-01-07(001).
邓礼强,王飞,韩剑桥,等.渭河关中段水系演变及其对城镇化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(4):256-261.
雷斯越,郭晋伟,何亮,等.黄土丘陵区退耕坡面草地恢复与土壤物理性质空间分异特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):256-261.
周旗,张海宁,任源鑫.1961-2016年渭河流域极端降水事件研究[J].地理科学,2020,40(5):833-841.
张渝萌,李晶,曾莉,基于OWA多属性决策的生态系统服务最优保护区选择研究:以渭河流域(关天段)为例[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(12):2114-2127.
谢巍.基于DEM数据的渭河子流域水文信息提取[J].西部大开发(土地开发工程研究),2019,4(2):1-5.
侯青青,裴婷婷,陈英,等.1986-2019年黄土高原干旱变化特征及趋势[J].应用生态学报,32(2):649-660.
仲俊涛,王蓓,米文宝,等.基于InVEST模型的宁夏盐池县禁牧草地生态补偿标准空间识别[J].地理科学,2020,40(6):1019-1028.
姜凯斯,刘正佳,李裕瑞,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型村域土地利用变化及对区域乡村转型发展的启示[J].地理科学进展,2019,38(9):1305-1315.
刘宥延,刘兴元,张博,等.基于InVEST模型的黄土高原丘陵区水源涵养功能空间特征分析[J].生态学报,2020,40(17):6161-6170.
曹叶琳,宋进喜,李明月,等.陕西省生态系统水源涵养功能评估分析[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):217-223.
陈骏宇,刘钢,白杨.基于InVEST模型的太湖流域水源涵养服务价值评估[J].水利经济,2016,34(2):25-29,84.
刘铮,杨金贵,马理辉,等.黄土高原草地净初级生产力时空趋势及其驱动因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(1):113-122.
郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡-协同关系[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):64-78.
杨薇,靳宇弯,孙立鑫,等.基于生产可能性边界的黄河三角洲湿地生态系统服务权衡强度[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(12):2516-2528.
刘春芳,王韦婷,刘立程,等.西北地区县域生态系统服务的供需匹配:以甘肃古浪县为例[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(9):2177-2190.
程鹏,匡丕东,王东高,等.基于InVEST模型的安徽省芜湖市生境质量对土地覆被变化的响应[J].安徽科技,2020(4):37-43.
高艳丽,李红波,侯蕊.汉江流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(7):1619-1630.
中华人民共和国水利部.(SL 190-2007)土壤侵蚀分类标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
0
浏览量
1063
下载量
30
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621