1. 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,成都,610041
2. 四川农业大学水利水电学院,四川,雅安,625014
3. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
[ "唐永发(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤水文过程研究。E-mail:tangyongfa@stu.sicau.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
唐永发, 张宝军, 熊东红, 等. 雅江河谷防沙治沙生态工程实施年限对沙地持水性能的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):55-63.
TANG Yongfa, ZHANG Baojun, XIONG Donghong, et al. Effects of Different Implementation Period of the Vegetation Ecological Projects on the Water Holding Capacity of Aeolian Sandy Land in the Yarlung Zangbo River Valley[J]. 2021, 35(4): 55-63.
唐永发, 张宝军, 熊东红, 等. 雅江河谷防沙治沙生态工程实施年限对沙地持水性能的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):55-63. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.009.
TANG Yongfa, ZHANG Baojun, XIONG Donghong, et al. Effects of Different Implementation Period of the Vegetation Ecological Projects on the Water Holding Capacity of Aeolian Sandy Land in the Yarlung Zangbo River Valley[J]. 2021, 35(4): 55-63. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.009.
为探究雅鲁藏布江(下称"雅江")河谷阶地2种类型防沙治沙生态工程(砂生槐灌木林、杨树人工林)实施对沙地持水性能的影响,测定了该区6,12,30年生态工程样地0—30 cm土层沙地持水性能和土壤理化性质,采用模糊数学法计算了土壤质量指数,分析了沙地持水性能的影响因素,并采用多元逐步回归法确定了主要影响因素。结果表明:(1)研究区0—10 cm土层砂生槐和杨树人工林土壤饱和持水量、毛管持水量和田间持水量指标从6~30年增幅分别为5.81%~9.19%和51.47%~71.48%,杨树人工林上述持水量指标是砂生槐的1.02~1.60倍。(2)杨树人工林促进沙地0—10 cm土层机械组成、容重、孔隙度等结构变化和有机质、全氮等养分含量提高均优于砂生槐。随实施年限变化,砂生槐上述土壤指标变化整体为12年最好,杨树人工林则依次为30年>10年>6年。(3)2种生态工程0—30 cm土层土壤综合质量指数平均值随年限的增加呈增加趋势。相关分析和多元逐步回归分析结果表明,沙地持水性能与沙地机械组成、容重、孔隙度、有机质、全氮和全磷均呈极显著相关,其主要影响因素为毛管孔隙度、全氮和极细砂。综合可知,杨树人工林作为当地引进乔木种,其对沙地持水性能提升效果及持续作用均优于乡土种灌木砂生槐,能够很好地促进沙地恢复。研究结果可为认识区域沙地生态水文功能变化和生态工程建设提供数据参考。
In order to explore the effects of two types of ecological projects (Sophora moorcroftiana (Benth.) Baker shrub and Populus alba L. plantation) on the water holding capacity of sandy land in the Yarlung Zangbo River Valley terraces
the water holding capacity and soil physicochemical properties of 0—30 cm soil layer in 6
12 and 30 years ecological projects plots in this area were measured. The soil quality indexes of aeolian sandy lands in different projects areas were calculated by fuzzy mathematics method. The influencing factors of water holding capacity of aeolian sandy lands were analyzed
and the main influencing factors were determined by multiple stepwise regression method. The results showed that: (1) The saturated water holding capacity
capillary water holding capacity and field water holding capacity of 0—10 cm soil layer of S. moorcroftiana (Benth.) Baker shrub and P. alba L. plantation increased by 5.81% to 9.19% and 51.47% to 71.48% from 6 to 30 years
respectively
and each water holding index of P. alba L. plantation was 1.02 to 1.60 times of that of S. moorcroftiana (Benth.) Baker shrub. (2) P. alba L. plantation promoted better structural changes in mechanical particle
bulk density
porosity and had higher nutrient contents such as organic matter and total nitrogen in the 0—10 cm soil layer of aeolian sandy lands than S. moorcroftiana (Benth.) Baker shrub. With the increase of implementation years
the overall change of the above soil indicators in the 0—10 cm soil layer of S. moorcroftiana (Benth.) Baker shrub was best in 12 years
while that of P. alba L. plantation was 30 years>10 years>6 years. (3) The average value of soil quality index of the 0—30 cm soil layer of the two ecological projects showed an increasing trend with the increasing of implementation years. The results of correlation analysis and multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the water holding capacity of sand lands was significantly correlated with the mechanical particle
bulk density
porosity
organic matter
total nitrogen and total phosphorus
and the main influencing factors were capillary porosity
total nitrogen and very fine sand. In conclusion
P. alba L. plantation
as a local introduced tree species
had better effect on improving water holding capacity and sustainability than native shrub of S. moorcroftiana (Benth.) Baker
which could promote the restoration of aeolian sandy lands. The research results could provide data reference for understanding the change of regional sand ecohydrological function and ecological projects construction.
常海涛,刘任涛,刘佳楠,等.草方格造林固沙过程中土壤性质变化及分形特征:以腾格里沙漠东南缘为例[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):58-65.
Wei W, Guo Z C, Shi P J, et al. Spatiotemporal changes of land desertification sensitivity in northwest China from 2000 to 2017[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2021,31(1):46-68.
Deng J F, Li J H, Deng G, et al. Fractal scaling of particle-size distribution and associations with soil properties of Mongolian pine plantations in the Mu Us Desert, China[J].Scientific Reports,2017,7(1):6742.
Zhang T H, Zhao H L, Li S G, et al. A comparison of different measures for stabilizing moving sand dunes in the Horqin Sandy Land of Inner Mongolia, China[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2004,58(2):203-214.
赵丹阳,毕华兴,侯贵荣,等.晋西黄土区典型林地土壤水分变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):181-187.
高亮,高永,韩彦隆,等.不同治理措施下科尔沁沙地南缘土壤质地与持水特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(4):1-6.
李凤英,张露,何小武,等.鄱阳湖滨不同植被类型沙地土壤有效持水能力研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):107-111.
姬生勋,刘玉涛,董智,等.黄泛平原风沙区不同造林年限林地土壤风蚀与理化性质的变化[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):158-161.
李永涛,李宗泰,王振猛,等.滨海盐碱区不同林龄柽柳人工林土壤水分物理性质差异性[J].东北林业大学学报,2018,46(9):75-79.
韩路,王海珍,彭杰,等.塔里木荒漠河岸林植物群落演替下的土壤理化性质研究[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(12):2808-2814.
赵栋,屠彩芸,李丹春.封育年限对干旱河谷灌丛土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):39-44.
Shen W S, Li H D, Sun M, et al. Dynamics of aeolian sandy land in the Yarlung Zangbo River basin of Tibet, China from 1975 to 2008[J].Global and Planetary Change,2012,86/87:37-44.
王小丹,程根伟,赵涛,等.西藏生态安全屏障保护与建设成效评估[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(1):29-34.
赵银兵,何政伟,倪忠云,等.雅鲁藏布江曲水-乃东段沙化空间特征研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(8):135-140.
袁磊,沈渭寿,李海东,等.雅鲁藏布江中游河谷区域风沙化土地演变趋势及驱动因素[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(4):301-305.
廖承锐,吕国屏,王涛,等.西藏河滩流动沙地植被恢复及物种多样性变化[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(2):89-96.
李海东,沈渭寿,林乃峰,等.雅鲁藏布江中游河岸交错带沙地土壤水分的空间异质性[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(6):150-155.
王涛,司万童,闫瑞强,等.花棒(
Hedysarum scoparium
)对雅鲁藏布江中游山坡流动沙地土壤理化性质的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(12):1619-1625.
李海东,沈渭寿,邹长新,等.西藏拉萨机场周边风沙源空间分布及演变趋势[J].生态学报,2010,30(21):5716-5727.
李森,王跃,哈斯,等.雅鲁藏布江河谷风沙地貌分类与发育问题[J].中国沙漠,1997(4):10-18.
李海东,沈渭寿,方颖,等.雅鲁藏布江中游河岸带几种主要沙生植物种群点格局分析[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(8):834-843.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
李清雪,贾志清.高寒沙地不同植被恢复类型土壤肥力质量差异及评价[J].土壤通报,2015,46(5):1145-1154.
谭学进,穆兴民,高鹏,等.黄土区植被恢复对土壤物理性质的影响[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(2):713-722.
王玮璐,贺康宁,张潭,等.青海高寒区水源涵养林土壤机械组成和理化性质对其饱和导水率和持水能力的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2020,29(2):69-77.
Werner W J, Sanderman J, Melillo J M. Decreased soil organic matter in a long-term soil warming experiment lowers soil water holding capacity and affects soil thermal and hydrological buffering[J/OL].Journal of Geophysical Research:Biogeosciences,2020,125(4). DOI:10.1029/2019jg005158.
张耀方,赵世伟,王子龙,等.黄土高原土壤团聚体胶结物质的分布及作用综述[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):145-150.
李从娟,雷加强,高培,等.人工防护林作用下风沙土成土过程的研究进展[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1227-1234.
许婷婷,董智,李红丽,等.不同设障年限沙丘土壤粒径和有机碳分布特征[J].环境科学研究,2014,27(6):628-634.
钱洲,俞元春,俞小鹏,等.毛乌素沙地飞播造林植被恢复特征及土壤性质变化[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2014,34(4):102-107.
Li X R, Xiao H L, He M Z, et al. Sand barriers of straw checkerboards for habitat restoration in extremely arid desert regions[J].Ecological Engineering,2006,28(2):149-157.
黄蓉,王辉,王蕙,等.围封年限对沙质草地土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):183-188.
徐丽恒,王继和,李毅,等.腾格里沙漠南缘沙漠化逆转过程中的土壤物理性质变化特征[J].中国沙漠,2008(4):690-695.
杨梅焕,朱志梅,曹明明,等.毛乌素沙地东南缘不同沙漠化阶段土壤-植被关系研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(5):181-187.
铁烈华,白文玉,冯茂松,等.柏木低效林5种改造措施对土壤动物和土壤理化性质的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(5):1053-1060.
张宁宁,谭凯亮,亢福仁,等.毛乌素沙地樟子松林恢复过程的土壤有机质含量变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):95-99.
马宁,李强,郭玉涛,等.神东矿区典型植被不同恢复年限对土壤质量的影响[J].中国水土保持,2019(11):59-62.
周凤艳.沙地樟子松人工林林木胸径、冠幅等生长指标与林龄相关性研究[J].防护林科技,2017(2):19-21.
0
浏览量
879
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621