1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 国家林业局水土保持与荒漠化防治重点实验室,北京,100083
[ "朱方方(1993-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:Fangf0506@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
朱方方, 程金花, 王书韬, 等. 湖北低山丘陵区侵蚀泥沙颗粒特征及其与地形因子的关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):27-33.
ZHU Fangfang, CHENG Jinhua, WANG Shutao, et al. Characteristics of Eroded Sediment Particles and Their Relationship with Topographical Factors in the Low Mountain and Hilly Area of Hubei Province[J]. 2021, 35(4): 27-33.
朱方方, 程金花, 王书韬, 等. 湖北低山丘陵区侵蚀泥沙颗粒特征及其与地形因子的关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):27-33. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.005.
ZHU Fangfang, CHENG Jinhua, WANG Shutao, et al. Characteristics of Eroded Sediment Particles and Their Relationship with Topographical Factors in the Low Mountain and Hilly Area of Hubei Province[J]. 2021, 35(4): 27-33. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.005.
坡面地形变化是影响侵蚀泥沙颗粒特征的重要因素,深入理解地形因子与侵蚀泥沙颗粒粒径组成及分选特征的关系是研究坡面土壤侵蚀动力学的基础。采用野外降雨试验和粒径分析试验,结合ArcGIS系统识别和提取得到地形因子数据,研究低山丘陵地区侵蚀泥沙颗粒特征及其与地形因子的关系。结果表明:(1)在试验条件下,侵蚀泥沙中黏粒和粉粒总含量远高于砂粒,粗颗粒含量与坡度因子呈显著正相关关系(p<0.01),粗颗粒与洼地蓄积量呈显著负相关关系(p<0.05)。(2)试验样地平均质量直径MWD变化范围为0.031~0.164 mm,分形维数D的变化范围为2.021~2.778,MWD和D的决定因素是粗颗粒含量多少。从整体来看,雨强对泥沙颗粒分选特征参数影响显著,MWD随雨强的增大而增大,D随雨强的增大而减小,二者与坡度因子呈显著相关关系(p<0.05)。(3)回归分析表明,MWD、D与坡度因子、洼地蓄积量呈显著幂函数关系(R2>0.5),结合相关性研究结果,将坡度因子作为侵蚀泥沙粒径模型研究的优先选择。研究结果旨在揭示地形因子对坡面侵蚀泥沙颗粒的作用机理,为土壤侵蚀模型的构建提供科学参考。
Slope topography changes are the important factors that affect the characteristics of eroded sediment particles. A deep understanding of the relationship between topographic factors and eroded sediment particle size composition and sorting characteristics is the basis for studying slope soil erosion dynamics. In this study
field rainfall experiments and particle size analysis experiments were used
combined with ArcGIS system identification and extraction to obtain topographic factor data
to study the characteristics of erosion and sediment particles in the low mountain and hilly areas and their relationship with topographic factors. The results showed that: (1) Under the test conditions
the total contents of clay and silt particles in the eroded sediment were much higher than that of sand particles. The content of coarse particles had a significant positive correlation with the slope factor (p<0.01)
and a significantly negative correlation (p<0.05) with the accumulation of depressions. (2) In this study
the average mass diameter (MWD) of the test plot varied from 0.031 to 0.164 mm
and the fractal dimension (D) varied from 2.021 to 2.778. The determining factor of the MWD and D size was the content of coarse particles. From an overall point of view
rain intensity had a significant impact on the sediment particle sorting characteristic parameters. MWD increased with the increase of rain intensities
and D decreased with the increase of rain intensities. The two have a significant correlation with the slope factor (p<0.05). (3) The regression results show that the MWD and D had the significant power function relationships with the slope factor and the accumulation of depressions (R2>0.5). Combining the results of the correlation study
the slope factor was suggested as the preferred choice for the study of erosion and sediment particle size models. This study aimed to reveal the effect mechanism of topographical factors on slope erosion and sediment particles
and provide a scientific reference for the construction of soil erosion models.
Morgan R P C. A simple approach to soil loss prediction:A revised Morgan-Morgan-Finney model[J].Catena,2001,44(4):305-322.
周柱栋,程金花,杨帆,等.北方土石山区植株密度对坡面流粒径分选的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):96-102.
黄坤.红壤侵蚀区植被因子提取及小流域水土流失快速监测方法[D].福州:福建师范大学,2011.
Wu X L, Wei Z Y, Wei Y J, et al. Effects of soil type and rainfall intensity on sheet erosion processes and sediment characteristics along the climatic gradient in central-south China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,621:54-66.
周梦玲,郭建斌,崔明,等.喀斯特坡地侵蚀泥沙养分流失与粒径分布的关系[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):54-60,71.
Kiani H M, Sadeghi S H, Asadi H. Comparing grain size distribution of sediment and original soil under raindrop detachment and raindrop-induced and flow transport mechanism[J].Hydrological Sciences Journal,2018,63(2):312-323.
Warrington D N, Mamedov A I, Bhardwaj A K, et al. primary particle size distribution of eroded material affected by degree of aggregate slaking and seal development[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2009,60(1):84-93.
张怡,丁迎盈,王大安,等.坡度对侵蚀产沙及其粒径分布的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):25-29.
Gilley J E, Finkner S C, Spomer R G, et al. Size distribution of sediment as affected by corn residue[J].Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers,1986,29(5):1273-1277.
朱秀迪.地表粗糙度对坡面侵蚀过程及泥沙分选搬运过程的影响[D].武汉:长江科学院,2017.
Vrieling A, Sterk G, Beaulieu N. Erosion risk mapping:A methodological case study in the Colombian Eastern Plains[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,57(3):158-163.
Darboux F, Huang C H. Does soil surface roughness increase or decrease water and particle transfers?[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2005,69(3):748-756.
薛孟君,马岚,张栋,等.雨强对华北土石山区坡面侵蚀及其颗粒富集过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):11-17.
庞延杰,丁文峰,李清溪,等.粗糙度对坡面侵蚀及泥沙分选性影响试验研究[J].人民长江,2017,48(17):28-33.
杨帆,程金花,张洪江,等.坡面草本植物对土壤分离及侵蚀动力的影响研究[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(5):129-137.
郝燕芳,刘宝元,杨扬,等.中国5种典型土壤的侵蚀泥沙粒径分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):150-159.
张秦岭,李占斌,徐国策,等.丹江鹦鹉沟小流域不同土地利用类型的粒径特征及土壤颗粒分形维数[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(2):244-249.
吴凤至,史志华,岳本江,等.坡面侵蚀过程中泥沙颗粒特性研究[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1235-1240.
唐辉,李占斌,李鹏,等.模拟降雨下坡面微地形量化及其与产流产沙的关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):127-133.
Jenson S K, Domingue J O. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis[J].Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,1988,54(11):1593-1600.
刘宝元,史培军.WEPP水蚀预报流域模型[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(5):6-12.
Wang L, Shi Z H, Wang J, et al. Rainfall kinetic energy controlling erosion processes and sediment sorting on steep hillslopes:A case study of clay loam soil from the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,512(5):168-176.
陈永宗,朱同新,张勋昌,等.晋西离石县王家沟流域坝地淤积物岩性特征分析[C]//山西省水土保持研究所.中国-加拿大晋西黄土高原土壤侵蚀实验规律研究文集.北京:水利电力出版社,1990:126-133.
李清溪,丁文峰,朱秀迪,等.雨强和地表糙度对坡面微地形及侵蚀的影响[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(1):41-47.
张晖,王晓峰,余正军.基于ArcGIS的坡面复杂度因子提取与分析:以黄土高原为例[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009,43(2):323-326.
0
浏览量
956
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621