1. 北京林业大学林学院,北京,100083
2. 吉林省汪清县林业局, 吉林 汪清,133200
[ "杜雪(1996—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤学研究。E-mail:duxue_my@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
杜雪, 王海燕, 耿琦, 等. 云冷杉针阔混交林枯落物持水性能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):361-368.
DU Xue, WANG Haiyan, GENG Qi, et al. Water Holding Capacity of Litter in Spruce-fir Coniferous and Broad-leaved Mixed Forest[J]. 2021, 35(2): 361-368.
杜雪, 王海燕, 耿琦, 等. 云冷杉针阔混交林枯落物持水性能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):361-368. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.048.
DU Xue, WANG Haiyan, GENG Qi, et al. Water Holding Capacity of Litter in Spruce-fir Coniferous and Broad-leaved Mixed Forest[J]. 2021, 35(2): 361-368. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.048.
以吉林省汪清县林业局天然云冷杉针阔混交林为研究对象,选取4块具有代表性的1 hm2方形固定样地分别设置0,6.29%,11.22%和21.21% 4种采伐强度,测定了各采伐强度下枯落物的现存量,并采用室内浸水法对不同分解阶段枯落物持水能力(最大持水量、最大持水率、有效拦蓄量等)进行研究。结果表明:(1)4种采伐强度的枯落物总现存量为29.04~35.26 t/hm2。(2)随采伐强度增加,新鲜层和完全分解层枯落物最大持水量和有效拦蓄量均呈现先降低再增加随后又降低的规律,而半分解层枯落物则表现为先增加再降低随后又增加的趋势。(3)采伐强度对枯落物的持水能力无显著影响,而分解阶段对其影响极显著;双因素方差分析表明,采伐强度和分解阶段的交互作用对枯落物持水性能影响显著。(4)回归拟合分析表明,在枯落物持水达到饱和状态前,不同采伐强度下各分解阶段枯落物的持水量、持水率与浸泡时间存在对数函数关系,吸水速率与浸泡时间存在幂函数关系。因此,适度的采伐不会对枯落物的持水性能产生显著的负面影响,分解阶段则是影响云冷杉针阔混交林枯落物持水性能的重要因素,而二者的交互作用能够显著影响枯落物的持水性能。
The natural spruce-fir coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests in Wangqing Forestry Bureau of Jilin Province were taken as the research object
and four representative square fixed plots of 1 hm2 were set up with a cutting intensity of 0
6.29%
11.22% and 21.21%. The standing crop of litter under various cutting intensities was measured
and the water holding capacity (maximum water holding capacity
maximum water holding rate
effective retention capacity
etc.) of litter at different decomposition stages was studied using an indoor immersion method. The results showed that:(1) The total standing crop of litter in the four cutting intensities was between 29.04 and 35.26 t/hm2. (2) With the increase of cutting intensities
the maximum water holding capacity and effective interception capacity of litter in the fresh horizon and complete decomposed horizon decreased first
then increased and decreased again
whereas the opposite trend was found for the litter in the semi-decomposed horizon. (3) The cutting intensity had no significant effect on the water holding capacity of litter
but the decomposition stage had a significant impact on it. The two-way analysis of variance showed that the interaction between the cutting intensity and the decomposition stage had a significant influence on the water holding capacity of litter. (4) The regression fitting indicated that there was a logarithmic function relationship between the water holding capacity
water holding rate and immersion time of litter in each decomposition stage under different cutting intensities
and there was a power function relationship between water absorption rate and immersion time before the litter reached the saturation state. Therefore
moderate cutting would not have a significant negative impact on the water holding capacity of the litter
the decomposition stage was an important factor affecting the water holding capacity of the litter in the spruce-fir coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest
and the interaction of decomposition stage and cutting intensity could significantly affect the water holding capacity of litter.
Wang C, Zhao C Y, Xu Z L, et al. Effect of vegetation on soil water retention and storage in a semi-arid alpine forest catchment[J].Journal of Arid Land,2013,5(2):207-219.
Walter J, Buchmann C M, Schurr F M. Shifts in plant functional community composition under hydrological stress strongly decelerate litter decomposition[J].Ecology and Evolution,2020,10(12):5712-5724.
管惠文,董希斌,张甜,等.间伐强度对大兴安岭落叶松天然次生林水文性能的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(6):68-76.
邹奕巧,孙欧文,刘海英,等.浙江省天台县不同森林类型枯落物及土壤水文特性[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(3):170-174.
秦倩倩,王海燕,李翔,等.长白山云冷杉针阔混交林半分解层凋落物生态功能[J].林业科学研究,2019,32(1):147-152.
Perry C H, Walters B F, Woodall C W, et al. Estimating litter carbon stocks on forest land in the United States[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,557/558:469-478.
Palacios P G, McKie B G, Handa I T, et al. The importance of litter traits and decomposers for litter decomposition:A comparison of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems within and across biomes[J].Functional Ecology,2016,30(5):819-829.
Gong S H, Xiao Y, Xiao Y, et al. Driving forces and their effects on water conservation services in forest ecosystems in China[J].Chinese Geographical Science,2017,27(2):216-228.
李明鲁,吴兆飞,邱华,等.采伐对吉林蛟河阔叶红松林生态功能的短期影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(9):40-49.
魏安然,张雨秋,谭凌照,等.抚育采伐对针阔混交林林分结构及物种多样性的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(5):148-158.
朱喜,何志斌,杜军,等.间伐对祁连山青海云杉人工林土壤水分的影响[J].林业科学研究,2015,28(1):55-60.
Mahayani N P D, Slik F J W, Savini T, et al. Rapid recovery of phylogenetic diversity, community structure and composition of Bornean tropical forest a decade after logging and post-logging silvicultural interventions.Forest Ecology and Management,2020,476. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118467.
赵瑛琳,郭亚芬,崔晓阳.东北林区红松土壤及针叶中钙、镁、硫质量分数[J].东北林业大学学报,2015,43(4):57-61.
杨丽,张秋良.大兴安岭兴安落叶松林下植被多样性及土壤养分季节分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):124-130.
夏祥友.森林经营对东北林区主要森林类型蓄水保土功能的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2016.
秦倩倩,王海燕,李翔,等.东北天然针阔混交林凋落物磷素空间异质性及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4519-4529.
刘一霖,温娅檬,李巧玉,等.川西高山峡谷区6种森林枯落物的持水与失水特性[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):151-156,162.
孟庆权,葛露露,杨馨邈,等.滨海沙地不同人工林凋落物现存量及其持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):146-152.
敖特根其木格,秦富仓,周佳宁,等.内蒙古自治区多伦县不同林地枯落物持水性能研究[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(4):114-118.
Papa S, Cembrola E, Pellegrino A, et al. Microbial enzyme activities, fungal biomass and quality of the litter and upper soil layer in a beech forest of south Italy[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2014,65(2):274-285.
李翔,王海燕,秦倩倩,等.采伐对天然云冷杉针阔混交林半分解层凋落物现存量、含水率及林分郁闭度空间异质性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2018,31(6):114-120.
曹旭平,于世川,张文辉,等.间伐对黄龙山辽东栎林下枯落物持水性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(6):247-251,257.
王梓璇,周梅,赵鹏武,等.不同火烧木管理方式火烧迹地林下物种多样性及地上生物量研究:以寒温带兴安落叶松林为例[J].林业资源管理,2018(4):28-33.
白英辰,朱江,程小琴,等.密度调控对华北落叶松人工林枯落物水文特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):128-133.
贾秀红,毕俊亮,周志翔,等.鄂中低丘区主要纯林凋落物持水与土壤贮水能力研究[J].华中农业大学学报,2013,32(3):39-44.
杨家慧,谭伟,卯光宪,等.黔中不同龄组柳杉人工林枯落物水源涵养能力综合评价[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):296-301,308.
杨霞,陈丽华,康影丽,等.辽东低山区5种典型水源涵养林枯落物持水特性[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(9):2662-2670.
宝虎,赵鹏武,周梅,等.大兴安岭南段典型天然林枯枝落叶层及土壤层持水特性研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(2):175-181.
0
浏览量
1141
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621