1. 南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院,南京,210095
2. 江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 农业农村部江苏耕地保育科学观测站,南京,210014
3. 福建省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所,福州,350013
[ "王静(1995—),女,在读硕士生,主要从事农田土壤微生物与养分元素循环研究。E-mail:2018103149@njau.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
王静, 王磊, 刘耀斌, 等. 长期施用不同有机肥对甘薯产量和土壤生物性状的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):184-192.
WANG Jing, WANG Lei, LIU Yaobin, et al. Effects of Long-term Different Types of Organic Fertilizer Application on Sweet Potato Yield and Soil Biological Traits[J]. 2021, 35(2): 184-192.
王静, 王磊, 刘耀斌, 等. 长期施用不同有机肥对甘薯产量和土壤生物性状的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):184-192. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.025.
WANG Jing, WANG Lei, LIU Yaobin, et al. Effects of Long-term Different Types of Organic Fertilizer Application on Sweet Potato Yield and Soil Biological Traits[J]. 2021, 35(2): 184-192. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.025.
以花生—甘薯轮作的长期定位试验为研究对象,研究不同(类)有机肥对甘薯产量、土壤微生物丰度和酶活性的影响,为选取合适的有机肥在提高作物产量和改善土壤生物性状方面提供依据。共选取5个施肥处理:(1)CK,空白对照;(2)NPK,单施化肥;(3)NPK+SR,化肥+稻草;(4)NPK+M,化肥+商品有机肥;(5)NPK+P,化肥+猪粪。结果表明:与CK相比,NPK、NPK+SR、NPK+M和NPK+P处理均显著增加鲜薯产量和地上部生物量(P<0.05),其中NPK+P处理效果最好。与CK比较,NPK处理显著降低土壤细菌、真菌、固氮菌和活化有机磷微生物的丰度(P<0.05),而NPK+SR、NPK+M和NPK+P处理在不同程度上缓解了NPK处理对土壤微生物丰度的抑制作用。土壤酶的加权平均值(GMea)在一定程度上可用来评价土壤酶的总体活性。与CK相比,NPK、NPK+SR和NPK+M处理的土壤酶活性显著降低(P<0.05),而NPK+P处理的土壤酶活性有所提高;对于土壤单一酶活性,NPK+P处理与CK比较显著降低土壤脲酶活性(P<0.05),但显著提高酸性磷酸酶、碱性磷酸酶和过氧化氢酶活性。此外,主成分和相关性分析表明,土壤养分和土壤有机碳与鲜薯产量和地上部生物量显著正相关,土壤pH是驱动土壤微生物丰度和土壤酶活性变化的主要因素。因此,长期有机无机肥配施通过提高土壤养分、有机碳含量以及调节土壤pH变化在提高甘薯产量和改善土壤生物性状方面取得良好效果。总体来说,化肥配施猪粪在培肥地力和增产增收方面效果最佳。
A long-term localization experiment of peanut-sweet potato rotation system was studied to investigate the effect of different types of organic fertilizer on sweet potato yield
soil microbial abundance
and enzyme activities. This study aimed to provide the basis for selecting appropriate organic fertilizers to increase crop yield and improve soil biological characteristics. Five fertilization treatments were selected:(1) CK
no fertilization control; (2) NPK
chemical fertilizers treatment; (3) NPK + SR
chemical fertilizers + straw return treatment; (4) NPK + M
chemical fertilizers + manure treatment; (5) NPK + P
chemical fertilizers + pig manure treatment. The results showed that the yield and aboveground biomass of sweet potato increased significantly under NPK
NPK+SR
NPK+M
and NPK+P treatments compared with CK treatment
while NPK+P treatment had an optimal effect among NPK
NPK+SR
NPK+M
and NPK+P treatments. In comparison with CK treatment
the abundances of bacteria
fungi
diazotrophic
and microorganism associated with soil organic phosphorus transformation decreased significantly under NPK treatment
while NPK+SR
NPK+M
and NPK+P treatment had mitigatory suppression effect on abundance of these microorganisms mentioned above in different degree. The geometric mean of the assayed enzyme activities (GMea) could be used to evaluate the overall activity of soil enzymes to some extent. The GMea decreased significantly under NPK
NPK+SR
and NPK+M treatments compared with CK treatment
whereas NPK+P treatment improved the geometric mean of the assayed enzyme activities. For single enzyme activity
NPK+P treatment significantly reduced soil urease activity compared with CK treatment (P<0.05)
however
NPK+P treatment significantly increased acid phosphatase
alkaline phosphatase
and catalase activities
respectively. In addition
the results of principal component and pearson correlation analysis suggested that soil nutrients and soil organic carbon content were significantly positively correlated with yield and aboveground biomass of sweet potato. Soil pH was the main factor that drives the change of soil microbial abundance and soil enzyme activities. Therefore
long-term combined with organic and inorganic fertilization has achieved a good efficiency on increasing sweet potato yield and improving soil biological properties through increasing soil nutrients
organic carbon content as well as influencing soil pH. Among all the fertilization treatments as we selected
chemical fertilizers plus pig manure had the best effect on enriching the soil fertility and improving crop production.
梁国华,李荣华,丘清燕,等.南亚热带两种优势树种叶凋落物分解对模拟酸雨的响应[J].生态学报,2014,34(20):5728-5735.
刘佳欢,王倩,罗人杰,等.黄腐酸肥料对小麦根际土壤微生物多样性和酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(10):1808-1816.
潘根兴,陆海飞,李恋卿,等.土壤碳固定与生物活性:面向可持续土壤管理的新前沿[J].地球科学进展,2015,30(8):940-951.
于伟伟,陈媛媛,汪旭明,等.硬化地表对不同树种土壤微生物群落结构和功能的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3575-3585.
钟书堂,沈宗专,孙逸飞,等.生物有机肥对连作蕉园香蕉生产和土壤可培养微生物区系的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(2):481-489.
朱敏,郭志彬,曹承富,等.不同施肥模式对砂姜黑土微生物群落丰度和土壤酶活性的影响[J].核农学报,2014,28(9):1693-170.
周崇峻,李凤巧,李明静,等.有机肥和化肥配施对温室黄瓜土壤酶活性的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2013,44(5):634-638.
宋震震,李絮花,李娟,等.有机肥和化肥长期施用对土壤活性有机氮组分及酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(3):525-533.
陶磊,褚贵新,刘涛等.有机肥替代部分化肥对长期连作棉田产量、土壤微生物数量及酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(21):6137-6146.
Carlos W N, William E O, et al. Design of 16S rRNA gene primers for 454 pyrosequencing of the human foregut microbiome[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(33):4135-4144.
Fierer N, Jackson J A, Vilgalys R, et al. Assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specifific quantitative PCR assays[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2005,30(4):4117-4120.
Poly F, Monrozier L J, Bally R. Improvement in the RFLP procedure for studying the diversity of nifH genes in communities of nitrogen fxers in soil[J].Research in Microbiology,2001,152:95-103.
Ragot S, Kertesz M, Bünemann E.
phoD
alkaline phosphatase gene diversity in soil[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2015,81(20):7281-7289.
关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
Roberto G R, Victoria O, Hinojosa M B, et al. Suitability of enzyme activities for the monitoring of soil quality improvement in organic agricultural systems[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,40(9):2137-2145.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
魏猛,张爱君,诸葛玉平,等.长期不同施肥对黄潮土区冬小麦产量及土壤养分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(2):304-312.
郁洁,蒋益,徐春淼,等.不同有机物及其堆肥与化肥配施对小麦生长及氮素吸收的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(6):1293-1302.
袁嫚嫚,邬刚,胡润,等.秸秆还田配施化肥对稻油轮作土壤有机碳组分及产量影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(1):27-35.
魏猛,张爱君,诸葛玉平,等.长期施肥下甘薯产量稳定性及品质特性研究[J].西北农业学报,2017,26(4):588-595.
张秀芝,高洪军,彭畅,等.长期有机培肥黑土有机碳、全氮及玉米产量稳定性的变化特征[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(9):1473-1481.
赵帅翔,张卫峰,姜远茂,等.黄土高原苹果过量施氮因素分析[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(2):484-491.
Wang Q F, Jiang X, Guan D W, et al. Long-term fertilization changes bacterial diversity and bacterial communities in the maize rhizosphere of Chinese Mollisols[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2018,125:88-96.
Hu X J, Liu J J, Wei D, et al. Soil Bacterial communities under different long-term fertilization regimes in three locations across the black soil region of northeast China[J].Pedosphere,2018,28(5):751-763.
Ye G, Lin Y, Liu D, et al. Long-term application of manure over plant residues mitigates acidification, builds soil organic carbon and shifts prokaryotic diversity in acidic ultisols[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2019,133:24-33.
Sun R, Zhang X X, Guo X, et al. Bacterial diversity in soils subjected to long-term chemical fertilization can be more stably maintained with the addition of livestock manure than wheat straw[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2015,88:9-18.
柳开楼,李大明,黄庆海,等.红壤稻田长期施用猪粪的生态效益及承载力评估[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(2):303-313.
沈冰涛,张孝倩,陈红,等.有机肥替代化肥对小麦产量及土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2019,16(5):46-52.
柯蓓.有机肥替代部分化肥对甘薯产量及土壤养分含量的影响[J].福建农业科技,2019(9):67-70.
赵鹏,陈阜,李莉.秸秆还田对冬小麦农田土壤无机氮和土壤脲酶的影响[J].华北农学报,2010,25(3):165-169.
0
浏览量
901
下载量
13
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621