西南林业大学生态与环境学院,昆明,650224
[ "李源(1996—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事森林水文学研究。E-mail:18562312938@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
李源, 宋维峰, 马建刚. 中国西南水梯田土壤水分特性研究——以哈尼梯田为例[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):160-169.
LI Yuan, SONG Weifeng, MA Jiangang. Soil Moisture Characteristics of Water Terrace in Southwest China—A Case Study of Hani Terraces[J]. 2021, 35(2): 160-169.
李源, 宋维峰, 马建刚. 中国西南水梯田土壤水分特性研究——以哈尼梯田为例[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):160-169. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.022.
LI Yuan, SONG Weifeng, MA Jiangang. Soil Moisture Characteristics of Water Terrace in Southwest China—A Case Study of Hani Terraces[J]. 2021, 35(2): 160-169. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.022.
为了研究中国西南水梯田的土壤水分特性,以云南哈尼梯田为例,选取哈尼梯田核心区全福庄小流域内林地、荒草地、旱地和水田4种土地利用类型,分层取0—10,10—20,20—40,40—60,60—80,80—100 cm深度土样测其主要土壤理化指标和土壤水分特征曲线,分析其土壤的持水性和水分有效性。结果表明:(1)哈尼梯田4种不同土地利用类型土壤容重变化范围为0.61~1.41 g/cm3,且0—40 cm与40—100 cm差异性显著,土壤有机质含量为1.17%~9.65%;土壤总孔隙度和非毛管孔隙度变化与容重一致,土壤毛管孔隙度总体呈现林地>旱地和水田>荒草地;(2)土壤质地以粉砂壤土为主,粉粒含量最高(52.74%~82.55%),砂粒含量次之(14.44%~45.31%),黏粒含量极少(0~3.68%);(3)相同土壤水吸力下,林地各土层土壤水分特征曲线相对较高,土壤持水性最强,旱地和水田次之,荒草地最低;土壤有效水含量则表现为水田>林地>旱地>荒草地;(4)影响哈尼梯田土壤水分特性的关键因素是土壤颗粒组成和毛管孔隙度,其中土壤持水性与颗粒组成呈显著正相关,土壤有效水含量与土壤毛管孔隙度呈显著正相关。总体而言,哈尼梯田生态系统中林地具有良好的蓄排能力,而梯田在保蓄水分的同时进行水分再分配,二者在维持生态系统可持续发展上具有十分显著的作用。研究结果为进一步研究西南水梯田土壤水分和梯田灌溉管理提供了科学依据。
In order to research soil water characteristics of water terrace in southwestern China
the Hani terraces were taken for example
4 kinds of land use types(woodland
grassland
dry land
and paddy field) in the Hani terraced fields core (Quanfuzhuang watershed) were selected
the main soil physical and chemical index
soil water characteristic curve
water holding capacity
and moisture availability were measured in 0—10 cm
10—20 cm
20—40 cm
40—60 cm
60—80 cm
and 80—100 cm soil layers. The results showed that:(1) The soil bulk density varied from 0.61~1.41 g/cm3
and showed significant difference between 0—40 cm and 40—100 cm
and the content of soil organic matter was 1.17%~9.65%. The changes of soil total porosity and non capillary porosity were consistent with bulk density
and the soil capillary porosity was woodland>dryland and paddy field>grassland. (2) The soil texture was mainly silt loam
with the highest silt content (52.74%~82.55%)
followed by sand content (14.44%~45.31%)
and clay content (0~3.68%). (3) Under the same soil water suction
the soil water characteristic curve of each soil layer in woodland was relatively higher
and the soil water holding capacity was the strongest
followed by dry land and paddy field
and the lowest in grassland. Soil available water content was paddy field>woodland>dry land>grassland. (4) Soil particle composition and capillary porosity were the key factors affecting soil water characteristics in the Hani terrace. Soil water holding capacity was significantly positively correlated with particle composition
and soil available water content was significantly positively correlated with soil capillary porosity. Generally speaking
woodland in Hani terrace ecosystem has a good capacity of storing and discharging water
while terrace can retain water and redistribute water. Both of them play a very significant role in maintaining the sustainable development of the ecosystem. The results provide a reference for further research on soil moisture and irrigation management of terrace in southwest China.
王清华.梯田文化论:哈尼生态农业[M].昆明:云南大学出版社,1999:11-52.
谭宁.龙脊古梯田稳定性及水循环系统研究[D].湖北宜昌:三峡大学,2012.
许玉凤,陈宸,陈洪升.2001-2013年云贵高原土地利用动态变化分析[J].中国水土保持,2018(11):50-54.
曹伟超,陶和平,孔博,等.利用最佳地形特征空间进行地貌形态自动识别:以西南地区为例[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2011(11):1376-1380.
杨崇广.元阳哈尼梯田:天人合一的农业景观[J].地理教育,2011(11):23.
段兴凤,宋维峰,曾珣,等.湖南紫鹊界梯田区森林改良土壤作用研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):127-130,136.
姚敏,崔保山.哈尼梯田湿地生态系统的垂直特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(7):2115-2124.
段兴凤,宋维峰,李健,等.云南省元阳梯田水源区森林土壤入渗特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(4):47-52.
张小娟,宋维峰,吴锦奎,等.元阳梯田水源区土壤水氢氧同位素特征[J].环境科学,2015,36(6):2102-2108.
宗路平,角媛梅,李石华,等.哈尼梯田景观水源区土壤水分时空变异性[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(6):180-189.
张娟,宋维峰,彭永刚,等.元阳梯田水源区林地土壤水分时空变异性研究[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(2):49-53.
Ma J, Song W F, Wu J K, et al. Identifying the mean residence time of soil water for different vegetation types in a water source area of the Yuanyang Terrace, southwestern China[J].Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies,2019,55(3):272-289.
李阳芳,宋维峰,和俊,等.元阳梯田核心区不同土地利用类型土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(6):54-57.
李静,闵庆文,杨伦,等.哈尼稻作梯田系统森林雨季水源涵养能力研究:以勐龙河流域为例[J].中央民族大学学报(自然科学版),2015,24(4):48-57.
白艳莹,闵庆文,李静.哈尼梯田生态系统森林土壤水源涵养功能分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(2):166-170.
马菁,宋维峰.元阳梯田水源区土壤水分动态变化规律研究[J].生态科学,2016,35(2):33-43.
马菁,宋维峰,吴锦奎,等.元阳梯田水源区林地降水与土壤水同位素特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(2):243-248.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:266-292.
程东娟,张亚丽.土壤物理实验指导[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2012:94-96.
仵峰,张凯,宰松梅,等.小麦玉米秸秆掺土还田量对土壤水分运动特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):101-105.
邵明安,王全九,黄明斌.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:48-76.
李航,严方晨,焦菊英,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被类型土壤有效水和持水能力[J].生态学报,2018,38(11):3889-3898.
林莎,王莉,李远航,等.青藏高原东北缘黄土区典型立地人工林分土壤水分特性研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(18):6610-6621.
吴华山,陈效民,叶民标,等.太湖地区主要水稻土水力特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):181-183,187.
张君,易军,刘目兴,等.不同水耕年限稻田土壤水分渗漏与保持特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):90-95.
蔡晨,李谷,朱建强,等.稻虾轮作模式下江汉平原土壤理化性状特征研究[J].土壤学报,2019,56(1):217-226.
方露,李晓宁,唐香君,等.岷江上游杂谷脑河流域林树下线土壤持水性及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):95-102.
宁婷,郭忠升,李耀林.黄土丘陵区撂荒坡地土壤水分特征曲线及水分常数的垂直变异[J]. 水土保持学报,2014,28(3):166-170.
潘春翔,李裕元,彭亿,等.湖南乌云界自然保护区典型生态系统的土壤持水性能[J].生态学报,2012,32(2):538-547.
刘继龙,李佳文,周延,等.秸秆覆盖与耕作方式对土壤水分特性的影响[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(7):333-339.
吕文强,王立,党宏忠,等.黄土高原坡面带状植被土壤水分有效性的空间分异特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):233-240.
张永旺,王俊,屈亚潭,等.黄土高原植被恢复过程中土壤水分有效性评价[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(6):79-85,114.
王修康,戚兴超,刘艳丽,等.泰山山前平原三种土地利用方式下土壤结构特征及其对土壤持水性的影响[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(1):63-74.
王辉,杨小宝,田大作,等.紫鹊界梯田区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2012,31(5):123-126,139.
唐敏,赵西宁,高晓东,等.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤水分变化特征[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(3):765-774.
马富亮,符素华,罗广惠.东北典型黑土区坡耕地涝渍地土壤持水性和导水性研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(6):222-226.
邹文秀,韩晓增,李良皓,等.黑土区不同土地利用方式土壤水分动态变化特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):236-239.
0
浏览量
881
下载量
9
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621