1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室,北京,100101
2. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
4. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京,100049
5. 陕西省神木县生态协会, 陕西 神木,719399
[ "李荣磊(1995—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤物理研究。E-mail:rongleil@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
李荣磊, 黄来明, 裴艳武, 等. 毛乌素沙地圪丑沟小流域沙柳水分利用来源研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):122-130.
LI Ronglei, HUANG Laiming, PEI Yanwu, et al. Water Use Source of[J]. 2021, 35(2): 122-130.
李荣磊, 黄来明, 裴艳武, 等. 毛乌素沙地圪丑沟小流域沙柳水分利用来源研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):122-130. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.017.
LI Ronglei, HUANG Laiming, PEI Yanwu, et al. Water Use Source of[J]. 2021, 35(2): 122-130. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.017.
为探究毛乌素沙地典型治沙植物根系吸水来源及其影响因素,通过测定毛乌素沙地圪丑沟小流域沙柳(Salix psammophila)(18~20年)木质部水及其各种潜在水源(降水、土壤水和地下水)的氢氧同位素组成(δD和δ18O),利用多元线性混合模型(IsoSource)研究沙柳水分来源的季节变化特征及其影响因素。结果表明,监测期间(6-11月)沙柳木质部水、降水、土壤水和地下水的δD值变化范围分别为-82.41‰~-52.91‰,-144.81‰~-6.60‰,-96.94‰~-42.65‰和-86.42‰~-71.82‰,δ18O值变化范围分别为-10.77‰~-7.29‰,-18.86‰~-2.07‰,-12.85‰~-0.79‰和-10.86‰~-9.74‰。雨季(7-9月)降雨量和土壤含水量分别高于旱季(6,10,11月)24.80~90.10 mm和0.95%~1.84%,但6-9月地下水位却低于10-11月2~7 cm。沙柳根系在旱季6月主要利用深层土壤水(>200 cm)(33.70%)和地下水(26.20%),雨季(7-9月)逐渐转变为以吸收浅层土壤水(<200 cm)为主(50.70%~54.00%),10-11月由于气温降低、降水减少及沙柳生命活动减弱,浅层土壤水(<200 cm)对沙柳根系吸水的贡献高于雨季(7-9月)35.20%~40.00%,而地下水对沙柳根系吸水的贡献显著降低(<5.00%)。因此,沙柳根系对于毛乌素沙地季节性干旱具有较强的适应和调节能力,其吸水来源随降雨量、土壤含水量和地下水位季节波动而变化。
The hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions (δD and δ18O) of stem water and its potential sources (rain water
soil water
and groundwater) were measured monthly from June to November
2018 in a Salix psammophila forest (18~20 years) in Gechougou watershed of Mu Us Sandy Land. The dynamic changes and controls of root water source were studied by the multiple linear mixed model (IsoSource). Results showed that the variation range of δD were -82.41‰~-52.91‰
-144.81‰~-6.60‰
-96.94‰~-42.65‰
and -86.42 ‰~-71.82‰ for stem water
rain water
soil water
and groundwater
respectively. The variation range of δ18O were -10.77‰~-7.29‰
-18.86‰~-2.07‰
-12.85‰~-0.79‰
and -10.86‰~-9.74‰
respectively
during the monitored period (June-November). Rainfall amount and soil water content in the rainy season (July-September) were 24.80~90.10 mm and 0.95%~1.84% higher than that in the dry season (June
October
and November). However
the groundwater level during June to September were 2~7 cm lower than that in October and November. In June
S. psammophila mainly used deep soil water (>200 cm) (33.70%) and groundwater (26.20%). From July to September
the root water source mainly came from shallow soil water (<200 cm) (50.70%~54.00%). Compared with the rainy season (July-September)
the contribution of shallow soil water (<200 cm) to root water source remarkably increased by 35.20%~40.00% in October and November due to the low air temperature
rainfall amount
and weak life activity of S. psammophila. There was a significant reduction in the use of groundwater in October and November (<5.00%). Therefore
S. psammophilais adaptable to the seasonal drought and is suitable for desertification control in the Mu Us Sandy Land. The root water source of S. psammophila changed with seasonal variations of rainfall amount
soil profile water content
and groundwater level.
Wang P, Song X F, Han D M, et al. A study of root water uptake of crops indicated by hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes:A case in Shanxi Province, China[J].Agricultural Water Management,2010,97(3):475-482.
Beyer M, Hamutoko J T, Wanke H, et al. Examination of deep root water uptake using anomalies of soil water stable isotopes, depth-controlled isotopic labeling and mixing models[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,566:122-136.
Penna D, Geris J, Hopp L, et al. Water sources for root water uptake:Using stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen as a research tool in agricultural and agroforestry systems.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2019,291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106790.
巩国丽.利用稳定氢氧同位素定量区分白刺水分来源的方法比较[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7533-7541.
张玉翠,孙宏勇,沈彦俊,等.氢氧稳定同位素技术在生态系统水分耗散中的应用研究进展[J].地理科学,2012,32(3):289-293.
Wershaw R L, Friedman I, Heller S J, et al. Hydrogen isotope fractionation of water passing through trees[J].Advances in Organic Geochemistry,1970,3:55-67.
Gat J R. Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in the hydrologic cycle[J].Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences,24(1):225-262.
周海,赵文智,何志斌.两种荒漠生境条件下泡泡刺水分来源及其对降水的响应[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(7):2083-2092.
朱林,许兴,毛桂莲.宁夏平原北部地下水埋深浅地区不同灌木的水分来源[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(7):618-628.
邢丹,肖玖军,韩世玉,等.基于稳定同位素的石漠化地区桑树根系水来源研究[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(15):77-84.
郝宝宝,艾宁,贾艳梅,等.毛乌素沙地南缘不同植被类型土壤水分特征[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(5):196-200.
温国胜,王林和,吉川贤.毛乌素沙地臭柏群落地下水位的变化[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(2):111-116.
Wang L, Mu Y, Zhang Q F, et al. Groundwater use by plants in a semi-arid coal-mining area at the Mu Us Desert frontier[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2013,69(3):1015-1024.
Chen Y P, Chen Y N, Xu C C, et al. The effects of groundwater depth on water uptake of
Populus euphratica
and
Tamarix ramosissima
in the hyperarid region of Northwestern China[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2016,23(17):17404-17412.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:农业出版社,1981.
Craig H. Isotopic variations in meteoric waters[J].Science,1961,133(3465):1702-1703.
马致远,范基娇,苏艳,等.关中南部地下热水氢氧同位素组成的水文地质意义[J].地球科学与环境学报,2006,28(1):41-46.
王贺,李占斌,马波,等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区流域不同水体氢氧同位素特征:以纸坊沟流域为例[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):85-90.
王勇,赵成义,王丹丹,等.塔里木河流域不同林龄胡杨与柽柳的水分利用策略研究[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):157-163.
曾帝,吴锦奎,李洪源,等.西北干旱区降水中氢氧同位素研究进展[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(4):1-13.
冯蕴,贾德彬,李雪松,等.基于稳定同位素的干旱半干旱地区杨树水分来源研究[J].节水灌溉,2019,27(4):27-31.
王锐,刘文兆,宋献方.黄土塬区土壤水分运动的氢氧稳定同位素特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):134-137.
解倩,王莹,齐瑞鹏,等.毛乌素沙区退化湿地土壤剖面水分和养分特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):150-155.
王玉阳,陈亚鹏,李卫红,等.塔里木河下游典型荒漠河岸植物水分来源[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(6):1150-1157.
张景文,陈报章.基于同位素分析研究山东禹城夏玉米水分来源[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):99-104.
Busch D E, Ingraham N L, Smith S D. Water uptake in woody riparian phreatophytes of the southwestern United States:A stable isotope study[J].Ecological Applications,1992,2(4):450-459.
樊自立,马英杰,张宏,等.塔里木河流域生态地下水位及其合理深度确定[J].干旱区地理,2004,27(1):8-13.
刘媖心.中国沙漠植物志编写梗概[J].中国沙漠,1993,13(3):14-17.
苏鹏燕,张明军,王圣杰,等.基于氢氧稳定同位素的黄河兰州段河岸植物水分来源[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(6):1835-1843.
Sun S J, Meng P, Zhang J S, et al. Variation in soil water uptake and its effect on plant water status in
Juglans regia
L. during dry and wet seasons[J].Tree Physiology,2011,31(12):1378-1389.
Chang E H, Li P, Li Z B, et al. Using water isotopes to analyze water uptake during vegetation succession on abandoned cropland on the Loess Plateau, China.Catena,2019,181.DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104095.
杨国敏,王爱,王力.六道沟流域2种典型灌木不同季节水分来源及利用效率[J].西北植物学报,2018,38(1):140-149.
苏文旭,贾德彬,冯蕴,等.浑善达克沙地杨树水分利用特征[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(2):357-363.
Brinkmann N, Seeger S, Weiler M, et al. Employing stable isotopes to determine the residence times of soil water and the temporal origin of water taken up by
Fagus sylvatica
and
Picea abies
in a temperate forest.New Phytologist,2018,219. DOI:10.1111/nph.15255.
Wang J, Fu B J, Lu N, et al. Seasonal variation in water uptake patterns of three plant species based on stable isotopes in the semi-arid Loess Plateau[J].Science of the Total Environment,2017,609:27-37.
Wu H W, Li X Y, Jiang Z Y, et al. Contrasting water use pattern of introduced and native plants in an alpine desert ecosystem, Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,542:182-191.
Dawson T E, Pate J. Seasonal water uptake and movement in root systems of Australian phraeatophytic plants of dimorphic root morphology:A stable isotope investigation[J].Oecologia,1996,107(1):13-20.
Yang B, Wen X F, Sun X M. Seasonal variations in depth of water uptake for a subtropical coniferous plantation subjected to drought in an East Asian monsoon region[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2015,201:218-228.
0
浏览量
1038
下载量
10
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621