1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院,兰州,730070
2. 甘肃水务节水科技发展有限责任公司,兰州,730000
3. 定西市水土保持科学研究所,甘肃,定西,743000
[ "赵武成(1996—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事半干旱区节水集雨与饲草栽培研究。E-mail:2505537631@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
赵武成, 王琦, 王小赟, 等. 基于修正SCS-CN模型集雨垄径流预测[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):96-105.
ZHAO Wucheng, WANG Qi, WANG Xiaoyun, et al. Runoff Prediction of Rainwater Harvesting Ridge Based on Modified SCS-CN Model[J]. 2021, 35(2): 96-105.
赵武成, 王琦, 王小赟, 等. 基于修正SCS-CN模型集雨垄径流预测[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):96-105. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.014.
ZHAO Wucheng, WANG Qi, WANG Xiaoyun, et al. Runoff Prediction of Rainwater Harvesting Ridge Based on Modified SCS-CN Model[J]. 2021, 35(2): 96-105. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.014.
为了探寻半干旱区垄沟集雨种植控制水土流失和增产的机理,利用前2年(2012—2013年)日降雨量、实测径流和修正SCS—CN模型,率定集雨垄的径流模型参数CN、λ和α,然后利用后3年(2014—2016年)日降雨量和实测径流资料检验该模型有效性,预测不同覆盖材料(土壤结皮、生物可降解地膜和塑料地膜)和不同垄宽(30,45,60 cm)集雨垄的径流量。结果表明,土壤结皮覆盖集雨垄、生物可降解膜覆盖集雨垄和塑料地膜覆盖集雨垄的CN取值范围分别为82.0~82.9,97.9~98.8,98.3~99.9,λ取值范围分别为0.045~0.071,0.251~0.327,0.189~0.213,α取值范围分别为2.35~2.89,4.21~4.82,3.32~3.99。通过对模型有效性进行评价,土壤结皮覆盖集雨垄、生物可降解膜覆盖集雨垄和塑料地膜覆盖集雨垄的平均相对误差取值范围分别为1.36%~3.41%,1.21%~3.42%,2.48%~5.42%,纳什效率取值范围分别为0.97~0.98,0.97~0.98,0.96~0.98。日降雨量等级对修正SCS—CN模型参数CN、λ和α的影响不明显,不同覆盖材料之间的CN、λ和α差异远大于不同垄宽之间的CN、λ和α差异。修正SCS—CN模型集雨垄径流预测的相对误差满足要求(≤ 20%),可信度较高(纳什效率 ≥ 0.95),可以用于半干旱区集雨垄的径流预测,为控制水土流失和提高降水利用效率提供科学方法。
In order to find the mechanism of soil erosion control and crop yield increase in ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting production in semi-arid regions of China
a modified SCS-CN model was used to estimate the runoff for ridges with 3 widths (30
45
and 60 cm) and 3 different materials (soil crust
biodegradable film
and plastic film) based on the rainfall and runoff from 2012 to 2016. The parameters of CN
λ
and α in the modified SCS-CN model were calibrated according to the rainfall and runoff from 2012 to 2013
and the applicability of the modified SCS-CN model to rainwater harvesting ridges was evaluated using rainfall and runoff from 2014 to 2016. The results indicated that for ridges mulched with soil crust
biodegradable film
and plastic film
CN in the modified SCS-CN model ranged from 82.0 to 82.9
from 97.9 to 98.8
and from 98.3 to 99.9
respectively; The parameter of λ ranged from 0.045 to 0.071
from 0.251 to 0.327
and from 0.189 to 0.213
respectively; The parameter of α ranged from 2.35 to 2.89
from 4.21 to 4.82
and from 3.32 to 3.99
respectively; Mean relative error ranged from 1.36% to 3.41%
from 1.21% to 3.42%
and from 2.48% to 5.42%
respectively; the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency ranged from 0.97 to 0.98
from 0.97 to 0.98
and from 0.96 to 0.98
respectively. Effects of classification of daily rainfall were not obvious on the parameters of CN
λ
and α in the modified SCS-CN model. The difference of CN
λ
and α between 3 different materials was greatly larger than that between 3 ridge widths. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency was higher than 0.95 and the relative error was lower than 10%. The results indicated that the modified SCS-CN model was applicable to runoff estimation for rainwater harvesting ridges and the model performance was acceptable. These findings may be helpful in controlling soil erosion and increasing rainwater use efficiency.
Jia Y, Li F M, Wang X L. Soil quality responses to alfalfa watered with a field micro-catchment technique in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Field Crops Research,2006,95(1):64-74.
Bo X, Hai W Q, Jun F, et al. Application of the SCS-CN model to runoff estimation in a small watershed with high spatial heterogeneity[J].Pedosphere,2011,21(6):738-749.
Mao X Y, Meng J J, Xiang Y Y. Cellular automata-based model for developing land use ecological security patterns in semi-arid areas:A case study of Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China[J].Environmental Earth,2013,70(1):269-279.
Wei L H, Zhang B, Wang M Z. Effects of antecedent soil moisture on runoff and soil erosion in alley cropping systems[J].Agricultural Water Management,2007,94(1/3):54-62.
Hamdan J, Burnham C P, Ruhana B. Degradation effect of slope terracing on soil quality for oil palm. cultivation[J].Land Degradation & Development,2015,11(2):181-193.
李富春,王琦,张登奎,等.坡地打结垄沟集雨对水土流失、紫花苜蓿干草产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):147-156.
胡广荣,王琦,宋兴阳,等.沟覆盖材料对垄沟集雨种植土壤温度、作物产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(5):590-599.
Zheng F L. Effect of vegetation changes on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau[J].Pedosphere,2006,16(4):420-427.
Han E, Merwade V, Heathman G C. Implementation of surface soil moisture data assimilation with watershed scale distributed hydrological model[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,416(1):98-117.
Soulis K X, Valiantzas J D. Identification of the SCS-CN parameter spatial distribution using rainfall-runoff data in Heterogeneous Watersheds[J].Water Resources Management,2013,27(6):1737-1749.
何杨洋,王晓燕,段淑怀.密云水库上游流域径流曲线模型的参数修订[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):134-138.
Rawat K S, Singh S K. Estimation of surface runoff from semi-arid ungauged agricultural watershed using SCS-CN method and earth observation data sets[J].Water Conservation Science & Engineering,2017,1(4):233-247.
Hawkins R H. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data[J].Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers,1993,119(2):334-345.
Mishra S K, Pandey R P, Jain M K, et al. A rain duration and modified AMC-dependent SCS-CN procedure for long duration rainfall-runoff events[J].Water Resources Management,2008,22(7):861-876.
Chen F J. Water erosion response to rainfall and land use in different drought-level years in a loess hilly area of China[J].Catena,2010,81:24-31.
Surendra K M, Vijay P S. Validity and extension of the SCS-CN method for computing infiltration and rainfall-excess rates[J].Hydrological Processes,2010,18(17):3323-3345.
张钰娴,穆兴民,王飞.径流曲线数模型(SCS-CN)参数
λ
在黄土丘陵区的率定[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(5):124-128.
Ponce V M, Hawkins R H. Runoff curve number:Has it reached maturity?[J]Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,1996,1(1):11-19.
尹鑫卫,李晓玲,康燕霞,等.基于SCS-CN模型的沟垄微型集雨系统径流预测[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(12):3502-3508.
陈正维,刘兴年,朱波.基于SCS-CN模型的紫色土坡地径流预测[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(7):72-81.
Wang X, Shang S, Yang W, et al. Simulation of an agricultural watershed using an improved curve number method in SWAT[J].Transactions of the ASABE,2008,51(4):1323-1339.
Verma S, Mishra S K, Singh A, et al. An enhanced SMA based SCS-CN inspired model for watershed runoff prediction.Environmental Earth Sciences,2017,76(21).DOI:10.1007/s12665-017-7062-2.
Lin F, Chen X W, Yao H X. Evaluating the use of Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient in goodness-of-fit measures for daily runoff simulation with SWAT[J].Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2017,22(11):231-239.
Duraisamy K, Balasubramanian A, Subramani T, et al. Rainfall-surface runoff estimation for the Lower Bhavani basin in south India using SCS-CN model and geospatial techniques[J].Environmental Earth Science,2020,79(13):335-354.
Soulis K X, Valiantzas J D. SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds:The two-CN system approach[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2012,16(3):1001-1015.
许秀泉,范昊明,李刚.径流曲线法在东北半干旱区几种土地利用方式径流估算中的应用与改正[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):52-57.
刘贤赵,康绍忠,刘德林,等.基于地理信息的SCS模型及其在黄土高原小流域降雨-径流关系中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(5):93-97.
郭宇,张娜,程冀文,等.降雨因子对黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被毯措施径流小区产流产沙量的影响[J].内蒙古林业科技,2019,45(2):30-34.
Ziadat F M, Taimeh A Y. Effect of rainfall intensity, slope, land use and antecedent soil moisture on soil erosion in an arid environment[J].Land Degradation & Development,2013,24(6):582-590.
Sahu R K, Mishra S K, Eldho T I. Comparative evaluation of SCS-CN-inspired models in applications to classified datasets[J].Agricultural Water Management,2010,97(5):749-756.
Huang M B, Gallichand J, Wang Z L, et al. A modification to the soil conservation service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Hydrology Process,2006,20(3):579-589.
0
浏览量
963
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621