1. 山西农业大学资源环境学院, 山西农业大学农业资源与环境国家级实验教学示范中心, 山西 太谷,030801
2. 山西省汾河上游水生态环境管理站,太原,030012
[ "马耘秀(1979—),女,硕士,讲师,主要从事资源环境与可持续发展和土地利用研究。E-mail:myx01_01@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
马耘秀, 夏露, 范毅, 等. 土地利用和气候变化对黄土区典型流域水沙变化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):38-46.
MA Yunxiu, XIA Lu, FAN Yi, et al. Effects of Land-use and Climate Change on Runoff and Sediment Variation in Typical Watershed of the Loess Region[J]. 2021, 35(2): 38-46.
马耘秀, 夏露, 范毅, 等. 土地利用和气候变化对黄土区典型流域水沙变化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):38-46. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.006.
MA Yunxiu, XIA Lu, FAN Yi, et al. Effects of Land-use and Climate Change on Runoff and Sediment Variation in Typical Watershed of the Loess Region[J]. 2021, 35(2): 38-46. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.006.
为了探究土地利用和气候变化对黄土高原地区水沙情势的影响,选择生态恢复效果非常显著的汾河上游岚河流域为研究区域,采用Mann-Kendall非参数检验法、滑动t检验法和YAMAMOTO指数法对该流域1955—2018年的年降水量、年径流量和年输沙量进行变化趋势分析和突变检验,在此基础上,利用径流/输沙历时曲线分析黄土高原生态恢复背景下流域水沙的演变规律,并根据双累积曲线法定量评价土地利用和气候变化对流域水沙变化的贡献程度。结果表明:岚河流域年降水量在1955—2018年期间呈现不显著的增加趋势,而同时期年径流量、年输沙量均呈现极显著的减少趋势,年均减少率分别为0.65 mm和38.95 t/km2,并均在1983年和1999年附近发生突变,具有较好的水沙变化同步性。与基准期(1955—1982年)相比,水土保持效应期(1983—1998年)的年均径流量减少29.07 mm,年均输沙量减少5 917.88 t/km2,退耕还林效应期(1999—2018年)两者相应减少33.18 mm和6 967.34 t/km2,而分析径流和输沙历时曲线发现流域丰水期、平水期和枯水期径流量和输沙量均呈现减少趋势,且输沙量的减少程度大于径流量的减少程度。流域水土保持效应期土地利用变化对减水减沙的贡献率分别为83.21%和83.52%,退耕还林效应期土地利用变化对减水减沙的贡献率分别为117.88%和103.48%。由此可见,各时期土地利用变化是流域水沙变化的主导因素,而气候变化对流域水沙变化影响较小。在全球气候变化的大背景下,通过调整流域土地利用结构、优化土地利用方式,开展以植被恢复为主的水土保持措施,是实现黄土高原水土流失治理及生态保护的根本途径。
In order to explore the effects of land-use and climate change on the runoff and sediment of the area in Loess Plateau
the Lanhe River basin in the upper reaches of Fenhe River was selected as the study area
where the ecological restoration effect was very significant. Based on the annual precipitation data
the annual runoff data and the annual sediment data of the Lanhe River from 1955 to 2018
the hydrological trend and the abrupt change were studied by Mann-Kendall test
Sliding t-test
and YAMAMOTO Index method. The law of the runoff and sediment change was analyzed by flow and sediment duration curve method
and the contribution of land-use and climate change to the runoff and sediment variation was quantitatively researched by double accumulation curve method. The results indicated that:From 1955 to 2018
precipitation had insignificant increasing trend
while both runoff and sediment load had significant reduction trends
with average annual change rates of —0.65 mm and —38.95 t/km2
respectively. Both of the runoff and sediment changed abruptly in 1983 and 1999 synchronously. Compared to the period 1 of base (1955-1982)
the average annual runoff and sediment load in the period 2 of soil and water conservation (1983-1998) decreased by 29.07 mm and 5 917.88 t/km2 respectively
and in the period 3 of Grain for Green project (1999-2018)
the amount of runoff and sediment load decreased by 33.18 mm and 6 967.34 t/km2 respectively. The runoff and sediment load were analyzed by the duration curves
it was found that both of the runoff and sediment load showed a decreasing trend no matter in flood period
mean-flow period or in drought period
and the decreasing degree of sediment load was much greater than the changing degree of runoff. The contribution rates of land-use change to runoff and sediment reduction in the period 2 of soil and water conservation were 83.21% and 83.52% respectively in the basin
and they were 117.88% and 103.48% respectively in the period 3 of Grain for Green project. It can be seen that the change of land-use was the dominant factor of the variation of runoff and sediment in different periods
while climate change had little effect in the basin. Under the background of global climate change
soil and water conservation measures based on vegetation restoration should be carried out by adjusting the land-use structure and optimizing the land use mode in the basin
which is the fundamental approach to soil erosion control and ecological protection on the Loess Plateau.
刘国彬,上官周平,姚文艺,等.黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(1):11-19.
姚玉璧,王毅荣,李耀辉,等.中国黄土高原气候暖干化及其对生态环境的影响[J].资源科学,2005,27(5):146-152.
徐宗学,隋彩虹.黄河流域平均气温变化趋势分析[J].气象,2005,31(11):7-10.
刘晓清,赵景波,于学峰.黄土高原气候暖干化趋势及适应对策[J].干旱区研究,2006,23(4):627-631.
冯家豪,赵广举,穆兴民,等.黄河中游区间干支流径流变化特征与归因分析[J].水利水电学报,2020,39(8):90-103.
刘二佳,张晓萍,谢名礼,等.生态恢复对流域水沙演变趋势的影响:以北洛河上游为例[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):622-629.
赵广举,穆兴民,温仲明,等.皇甫川流域降水和人类活动对水沙变化的定量分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(4):1-8.
蒋凯鑫,于坤霞,曹文洪,等.黄土高原典型流域水沙变化归因对比分析[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(4):143-149.
姜泓旭,田鹏,穆兴民,等.不同时间尺度孤山川流域水沙关系变化及驱动因素[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):86-92,215.
马静,顾志刚,孙一,等.秃尾河流域水沙突变及其驱动因素[J].中国农村水利水电,2020(2):11-15,22.
孙倩,于坤霞,李占斌,等.黄河中游多沙粗沙区水沙变化趋势及其主控因素的贡献率[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):945-956.
赵阳,胡春宏,张晓明,等.近70年黄河流域水沙情势及其成因分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(21):112-119.
郭军庭,张志强,王盛萍,等.气候和土地利用变化对潮河流域产流产沙的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(14):236-243.
唐丽霞,张志强,王新杰,等.晋西黄土高原丘陵沟壑区清水河流域径流对土地利用与气候变化的响应[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(7):800-810.
王登,荐圣淇,胡彩虹.气候变化和人类活动对汾河流域径流情势影响分析[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(1):25-31.
张盛霖,邓高燕,黄勇奇.Mann-Kendall检验法在Excel中的实现与应用.(2014-06-27).http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201406-448.
陈立华,冷刚,王焰,等.西江流域控制站洪峰洪量极值特征变化分析[J].水利水电技术,2020,51(6):30-39.
夏露,宋孝玉,符娜,等.黄土高塬沟壑区绿水对土地利用和气候变化的响应研究:以南小河沟流域为例[J].水利学报,2017,48(6):678-688.
胡彩虹,管新建,吴泽宁,等.水土保持措施和气候变化对汾河水库入库径流贡献定量分析[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):12-16.
王国庆,张建云,鲍振鑫,等.人类活动和气候变化对岚河流域河川径流的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(6):113-118.
亢小语,张志强,陈立欣,等.黄土高原中尺度流域基流变化驱动因素分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(3):563-572.
冷曼曼,张志强,于洋,等.昕水河流域径流变化及其对气候和人类活动的响应[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):113-119,128.
0
浏览量
1305
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621