基于CSLE模型的巴基斯坦土壤侵蚀评价

朱浩楠; 杨勤科; 杜朝正; 黄晨璐; 庞国伟; 王春梅; 朱梦阳

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于CSLE模型的巴基斯坦土壤侵蚀评价

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 基于CSLE模型的巴基斯坦土壤侵蚀评价
- Assessment of Soil Erosion in Pakistan Based on CSLE Model
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第2期页码：22-30
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北大学城市与环境学院,西安,710127
  2. 旱区生态水文与灾害防治国家林业局重点实验室,西安,710127
  3. 陕西土地集团研究院,西安,710127
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "朱浩楠(1995—),男,山东菏泽人,在读硕士,主要从事区域土壤侵蚀调查与定量评价研究。E-mail:zhuhn@stumail.nwu.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  中国科学院战略性先导科技专项子课题“土壤侵蚀定量评价与分区防控对策”（XDA20040202）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.004
  中图分类号： S157
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱浩楠, 杨勤科, 杜朝正, 等. 基于CSLE模型的巴基斯坦土壤侵蚀评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):22-30.

ZHU Haonan, YANG Qinke, DU Chaozheng, et al. Assessment of Soil Erosion in Pakistan Based on CSLE Model[J]. 2021, 35(2): 22-30.
朱浩楠, 杨勤科, 杜朝正, 等. 基于CSLE模型的巴基斯坦土壤侵蚀评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(2):22-30. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.004.

ZHU Haonan, YANG Qinke, DU Chaozheng, et al. Assessment of Soil Erosion in Pakistan Based on CSLE Model[J]. 2021, 35(2): 22-30. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.004.

摘要

通过制作土壤侵蚀图，分析土壤侵蚀主控因子，为巴基斯坦水土流失与保护提供合理的科学依据及治理参考。以土壤侵蚀抽样调查单元数据和土壤侵蚀因子数据为数据源，基于CSLE模型分别以空间插值法和地图代数法定量计算巴基斯坦水蚀区土壤侵蚀图，以空间插值结果为参照对地图代数计算结果做直方图匹配得到巴基斯坦水蚀速率图；采用水利部SL 190—2007标准对巴基斯坦风蚀强度进行了定性评价；使用分类决策树分析土壤侵蚀的主控因子。结果表明，空间插值法制图具有空间预测的准确性，地图代数法制图可以表现良好的局地变异特征；直方图匹配土壤侵蚀图兼具这2种方法的优点，土壤水蚀速率平均值为972.9 t/（km2·a），水蚀区土壤侵蚀比较严重，风蚀区以剧烈风蚀和极强烈风蚀为主，大部分地区生物措施因子是影响土壤侵蚀的主控因子，耕作区和山区的主控因子分别是R因子和LS因子。

Abstract

To provide reasonable scientific basis and control reference for soil erosion conservation in Pakistan

soil erosion map was made

and the dominant factors of soil erosion was analyzed. Based on the Chinese Soil Loss Equation (CSLE)

taking soil erosion sampling survey units and soil erosion factor datasets such as rainfall erosivity factor (R factor)

soil erodibility factor (K factor)

slope steepness and slope length factor (LS factor)

biological measure factor (B factor)

engineering-control practices factor (E factor)

and tillage practices factor (T factor) as data sources

spatial interpolation and map algebra method were used to make soil erosion maps for water erosion area

the spatial interpolation result was then used as a reference to update the map algebra calculation result with histogram matching to obtain the Pakistan water erosion rate map. The standards for classification and gradation of soil erosion (SL 190—2007) proposed by the Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China was adopted for qualitative evaluation the wind erosion intensity in Pakistan. Meanwhile

classification decision tree was used to analyze the dominant influence factors of soil erosion. The results showed that the spatial interpolation method has good accuracy of spatial prediction while the map algebra method can express good local variation characteristics. The soil erosion map matched by histogram had the advantages of the two methods. Average value of soil water erosion rate was 972.9 t/(km2·a)

and the grade of soil erosion was serious. The wind erosion area was dominated by severe and extremely strong wind erosion. Biological measures factor was the dominant influence factor for soil erosion in most areas

while the R factor and LS factor were the dominant influence factors in agricultural area and mountainous area respectively.

关键词

Keywords

references

Berthelin J, Valentin C, Munch J C. Soils as a key component of the critical zone 1:Functions and services[M].USA:John Wiley & Sons Inc.,2018.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Soil erosion:The greatest challenge for sustainable soil management. Rome. Licence:CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO,2019.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Outcome document of the global symposium on soil erosion. Rome. Licence:CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO,2019.

杨勤科.区域水土流失监测与评价[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2015.

Panagos P, Borrelli P, Poesen J, et al. The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe[J].Environmental Science and Policy,2015,54:438-447.

刘宝元,郭索彦,李智广,等.中国水力侵蚀抽样调查[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):26-34.

Borrelli P, Robinson D A, Fleischer L R, et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion[J].Nature Communications,2017,8(1):1-13.

杜朝正,杨勤科,王春梅,等.基于CSLE模型的全球抽样单元土壤水蚀速率计算方法初探[J].土壤通报,2020,51(1):50-57.

郝姗姗,李梦华,马永强,等.黄土丘陵区土壤侵蚀因子敏感性分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(2):77-86.

张康生.巴基斯坦的自然环境及存在问题[J].环境科学进展,1997,5(6):66-72.

Saleem U, Amjad A, Muhammad I, et al. Geospatial assessment of soil erosion intensity and sediment yield:A case study of Potohar Region, Pakistan[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2018,77(19):1-13.

Abuzar M K, Shakir U, Ashraf M A, et al. GIS based risk modeling of soil erosion under different scenarios of land use change in Simly watershed of Pakistan[J].Journal of Himalayan Earth Science,2018,51(2):132-143.

Arshad A, Muhammad K A, Bashir A, et al. Modeling risk of soil erosion in high and medium rainfall zones of Pothwar Region, Pakistan[J].Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences:B. Life and Environmental Sciences,2017,54(2):67-77.

陈同德,朱梦阳,焦菊英,等.巴基斯坦波特瓦尔高原土壤侵蚀调查报告[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(3):297-306.

中华人民共和国水利部水土保持司.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准(SL 190-2007)[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.

Shah Z U H, Arshad M. Land degradation in Pakistan:A serious threat to environments and economic sustainability.(2007-05-27). https://eco-web.com/edi/060715.html.

朱梦阳,杨勤科,王春梅,等.区域土壤侵蚀遥感抽样调查方法[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):64-71.

殷水清,薛筱婵,岳天雨,等.中国降雨侵蚀力的时空分布及重现期研究[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(9):105-113.

梁音,刘宪春,曹龙熹,等.中国水蚀区土壤可蚀性

值计算与宏观分布[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):35-40,79.

杨勤科,郭明航,李智广,等.全国土壤侵蚀地形因子提取与初步分析[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):17-21.

水利部水土保持监测中心.水土流失普查技术规定[M].北京:水利部,2017.

John T. User guide for the MODIS vegetation continuous fields product collection[M]. Version 1. University of Maryland, College Park:USA,2017.

Fischer G, Velthuizen V H, Shah M. Global agro-ecological assessment for agriculture in the 21st century:Methodology and results[M].Laxenburg:International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2002.

丁思洋,朱文泉,江源,等.基于RS与GIS的中巴经济走廊生态现状评价[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,53(3):358-365.

程琳,杨勤科,谢红霞,等.基于GIS和CSLE的陕西省土壤侵蚀定量评价方法研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):61-66.

Teng H F, Hu J, Zhou Y, et al. Modelling and mapping soil erosion potential in China[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2019,18(2):251-264.

Yin S Q, Zhu Z Y, Wang L, et al. Regional soil erosion assessment based on a sample survey and geostatistics[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2018,22(3):1695-1712.

Hengl T, Mendes D J J, Heuvelink G B M, et al. Soil Grids 250 m:Global gridded soil information based on machine learning[J].PLoS One,2017,12(2):e0169748.

Amanda R, Tomislav H, Travis N, et al. Soil property and class maps of the conterminous United States at 100-meter spatial resolution[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2018,82(1):186-201.

浏览量

1334

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于普查样点的贵州省潜在水土流失空间插值方法比较

小流域土壤侵蚀模型（SWEM）

秦岭水源地生态恢复下土壤全氮分布对侵蚀的响应

人工模拟降雨下高寒区坡面径流水动力特性对砾石覆盖的响应

水力条件对不同地表粗糙度土壤分离能力的影响