1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 山西吉县森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 山西 吉县,042200
3. 北京林果业生态环境功能提升协同创新中心,北京,102206
4. 水土保持国家林业局重点实验室(北京林业大学),北京,100083
5. 北京市水土保持工程技术研究中心(北京林业大学),北京,100083
6. 林业生态工程教育部工程研究中心(北京林业大学),北京,100083
7. 四川农业大学林学院,成都,611130
8. 山西吉县林业发展中心, 山西 吉县,042200
[ "赵丹阳(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事林业生态工程研究。E-mail:zhaody0224@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
赵丹阳, 毕华兴, 侯贵荣, 等. 晋西黄土区典型林地土壤水分变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):181-187.
ZHAO Danyang, BI Huaxing, HOU Guirong, et al. Soil Moisture Dynamics of Typical Plantation in Loess Region of West Shanxi[J]. 2021, 35(1): 181-187.
赵丹阳, 毕华兴, 侯贵荣, 等. 晋西黄土区典型林地土壤水分变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):181-187. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.027.
ZHAO Danyang, BI Huaxing, HOU Guirong, et al. Soil Moisture Dynamics of Typical Plantation in Loess Region of West Shanxi[J]. 2021, 35(1): 181-187. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.027.
选择晋西黄土区蔡家川流域5种典型林地(山杨×辽东栎天然次生林、人工油松×刺槐混交林、人工油松林、人工刺槐林、人工侧柏林)作为研究对象,在每块样地中心布设1个土壤水分观测点,采用TRIME-TDR土壤水分测定仪定位观测2016—2018年1—12月的土壤体积含水量,测定深度为200 cm,每20 cm为1个测层,每月分上、中、下旬进行土壤水分含量观测,分析不同林地类型土壤水分年内变化规律和土壤水分垂直变化规律。结果表明:(1)研究区不同林地土壤水分年内变化可以划分为稳定期(1—3月)、波动期(4—6月)、增长期(7—9月)和消耗期(10—12月)4个时期,5种林分类型的年平均土壤储水量按照从大到小的排序为天然次生林地(338.68 mm) > 人工油松林地(319.74 mm) > 人工侧柏林地(314.15 mm) > 人工油松×刺槐混交林地(303.37 mm) > 人工刺槐林地(292.03 mm),刺槐林地耗水量最大。(2)在雨季末,研究区5种林分类型林地土壤水分均得到了正向补充,且土壤水分的恢复能力大小排序为次生林地 > 针叶林地 > 混交林地 > 刺槐纯林。(3)研究区土壤水分垂直变化可划分为土壤水分含量速变层和土壤水分含量相对稳定层2个层次;随着土层深度增加,不同林地类型剖面平均含水量总体上先增大后减小。不同林地类型表层土壤水分含量为侧柏林地 > 次生林地 > 油松林地 > 油松×刺槐混交林地 > 刺槐林地;土壤水分的补充深度为天然林地 > 针叶林地 > 油松×刺槐混交林地 > 刺槐纯林。
In this study
five typical forest lands (Poplar Populus×Quercus liaotungensis natural secondary forest
Pinus tabulaeformis×Robinia pseudoacacia mixed forest
artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forest
artificial Robinia pseudoacacia forest
and artificial Platycladus orientalis forest) in the Caijiachuan watershed of the loess area in west Shanxi were selected as the research object. A soil moisture observation point was placed in the center of each plot
and the soil volumetric water content from January 2016 to December 2018 were determined by the TRIME-TDR soil moisture analyzer
and the soil moisture in 0-200 cm soil layer was determined stratified with every 20 cm respectively in the early
middle and late of each month. Then the annual variation and the vertical variation of soil moisture in different forest types were analyzed. The results showed that (1) annual variation of soil moisture in different forest lands in this study area could be divided into four periods
including stationary period (January-March)
fluctuation period (April-June)
growth period (July-September) and consumption period (October-December)
and the average soil water storage of the five forest types during the year followed the order of the natural secondary forest land (338.68 mm) > artificial P. tabulaeformis forest (319.74 mm) > artificial P. orientalis forest (314.15 mm) > the mixed forest land(303.37 mm) > the R. pseudoacacia forest (292.03 mm)
and the water consumption of R. pseudoacacia forest land was the highest. (2) At the end of the rainy season
the soil moisture of the five forest types in the study area was positively supplemented
and the soil water recovery capacity followed the order of natural secondary forest land > coniferous forest land > mixed forest land > R. pseudoacacia forest land. (3) The vertical change of soil moisture in the study area could be divided into two layers
including the rapid change layer of soil moisture content and the relatively stable layer of soil moisture content. As the soil layer depth increasing
the average water content of different forest profiles generally increased first and then decreased. Surface soil moisture content of different forest types followed the order of P. orientalis forest > natural secondary forest land > P. tabulaeformis forest > mixed forest land > R. pseudoacacia plantations. Replenishment depth of soil moisture followed the order of natural secondary forest land > coniferous forest land > mixed forest land > R. pseudoacacia forest land.
侯贵荣,毕华兴,魏曦,等.黄土残塬沟壑区3种林地枯落物和土壤水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):357-363,371.
王国梁,刘国彬,党小虎.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式对土壤含水率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(2):31-35.
王舒,马岚,张栋,等.晋西黄土区不同林龄人工刺槐林下植被及土壤水分特征[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016,52(3):253-258.
于洋,卫伟,陈利顶,等.黄土丘陵区坡面整地和植被耦合下的土壤水分特征[J].生态学报,2016,36(11):3441-3449.
赵忠,李鹏.渭北黄土高原主要造林树种根系分布特征及抗旱性研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(1):96-99,107.
陕芮,孙虎,刘月星.不同植被类型下的土壤水分特征研究:以陕西省神木县中鸡镇为例[J].河南科学,2018,36(1):65-69.
孔凌霄,毕华兴,周巧稚,等.晋西黄土区不同立地刺槐林土壤水分动态特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):163-169.
常译方,毕华兴,许华森,等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林对土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):227-232.
易亮,李凯荣,张冠华,等.黄土高原人工林地土壤水分亏缺研究[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(5):5-9,49.
黄肖勇,李生宝.半干旱黄土丘陵区土壤水分动态变化研究综述[J].农业科学研究,2009,30(3):69-72.
胡静霞,杨新兵.清水河流域典型林分类型土壤水分特征研究[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(1):118-125.
张建军,张岩,张波.晋西黄土区水土保持林地的土壤水分[J].林业科学,2009,45(11):63-69.
李笑吟.晋西黄土区土壤水分时空变化规律研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2006.
霍嘉仪,陈丽华,及金楠,等.晋西黄土区不同林地类型对土壤水分特性的影响[J].山地学报,2018,36(3):364-371.
张佳楠,张建军,张海博,等.晋西黄土区典型林分水源涵养能力评价[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(8):105-114.
郭宝妮.晋西黄土区主要水土保持树种耗水特性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.
Bates J D, Svejcar T S, Miller R F. Litter decomposition in cut and uncut western juniper woodlands[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2007,70(2):222-236.
马菁,宋维峰.元阳梯田水源区土壤水分动态变化规律研究[J].生态科学,2016,35(2):33-43.
张万儒,庞鸿宾,杨承栋,等.卧龙自然保护区植物生长季节森林土壤水分状况[J].林业科学研究,1990(2):103-112.
宁婷,郭忠升.半干旱黄土丘陵区撂荒坡地土壤水分循环特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(15):5168-5174.
王军,傅伯杰.黄土丘陵小流域土地利用结构对土壤水分时空分布的影响[J].地理学报,2000,55(1):84-91.
邱扬,傅伯杰,王军,等.黄土丘陵小流域土壤水分的空间异质性及其影响因子[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(5):715-720.
朱悦.晋西黄土区土壤水分特性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012.
0
浏览量
1036
下载量
28
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621