黄土丘陵沟壑区不同退耕模式的土壤水文性质影响对比

葛俸池; 许明祥

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.023

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黄土丘陵沟壑区不同退耕模式的土壤水文性质影响对比

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同退耕模式的土壤水文性质影响对比
- Comparison of Soil Hydrologic Properties Under Different Conversion Patterns in the Hilly-gully Region of the Loess Plateau
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第1期页码：154-160
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 西北农林科技大学黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "葛俸池(1994-),男,博士研究生,主要从事生态系统水源涵养功能评价研究。E-mail:gefc@nwafu.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41771318，41830758）国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0506503）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.023
  中图分类号： S714.2
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
葛俸池, 许明祥. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同退耕模式的土壤水文性质影响对比[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):154-160.

GE Fengchi, XU Mingxiang. Comparison of Soil Hydrologic Properties Under Different Conversion Patterns in the Hilly-gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J]. 2021, 35(1): 154-160.
葛俸池, 许明祥. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同退耕模式的土壤水文性质影响对比[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):154-160. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.023.

GE Fengchi, XU Mingxiang. Comparison of Soil Hydrologic Properties Under Different Conversion Patterns in the Hilly-gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J]. 2021, 35(1): 154-160. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.023.

摘要

为系统评价黄土丘陵沟壑区在"退耕还林（草）"工程实施后不同退耕模式下的土壤水分涵养功能，选取0-200 cm土层的蓄水量、土壤含水量分层比、土壤水吸力和土壤含水量年际变化率作为土壤层水分蓄存、渗透、保持和稳定性的表征指标，分别对比了不同退耕模式下的土壤水文性质。结果表明：（1）各退耕模式下土壤蓄水量差异显著，撂荒模式的土壤蓄水量最高，为还灌和还乔模式下的1.6，1.7倍；（2）还乔模式下表层土壤水分的渗透性最优，深层土壤水分的渗透潜力最大；（3）各退耕模式的土壤持水性差异显著，还乔模式下土壤水分的保持能力突出；（4）撂荒模式土壤水分的稳定性最佳，各模式0-200 cm内土壤水分的稳定性在30年前后出现拐点，土壤含水量的年际变化率由负转正，并在120 cm以下土层较为稳定。

Abstract

In order to systemically evaluate soil water conservation function under the different conversion patterns after implementation of "The Grain For Green" program in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau. This study selected 0-200 cm soil water storage

stratification ratio of soil water content

soil moisture suction

and inter-annual change rate of soil water content as the representative indicator of storage

infiltration

maintenance and stability of soil

which is to compare soil hydrologic properties separately in different patterns. The results showed that: (1) Soil water storage (SWS) under different conversion patterns was significantly different. The maximum SWS of grassland model was about 1.6 and 1.7 times of that under shrub and arbor model; (2) The arbor forest pattern had the best permeability of surface soil water and the biggest permeability potential of deep soil water; (3) Soil water retention under different conversion patterns was significantly different. The arbor forest pattern had the best soil water retention capacity; (4) The grassland pattern had the best stability of SWC

and the stability of SWC within 0-200 cm of each model had an inflection point around 30 years. The annual change rate of SWC changed from negative to positive

and the soil layer below 120 cm was more stable.

关键词

Keywords

references

李志,赵西宁.1961-2009年黄土高原气象要素的时空变化分析[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(2):287-299.

Zhang B Q, He C S, Burnham M, et al. Evaluating the coupling effects of climate aridity and vegetation restoration on soil erosion over the Loess Plateau in China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,539:436-449.

Lv Y H, Fu B J, Feng X M, et al. A poolicy-priven large scale ecological restoration:Quantifying ecosystem services changes in the loess plateau of China[J].PLoS One,2012,7(2):e31782.

Yang L, Chen L D, Wei W, et al. Comparison of deep soil moisture in two re-vegetation watersheds in semi-arid regions[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,513(1):314-321.

Wang S, Fu B J, Gao G Y, et al. Responses of soil moisture in different land cover types to rainfall events in a re-vegetation catchment area of the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena,2013,101:122-128.

梁海斌,薛亚永,安文明,等.黄土高原不同退耕还林植被土壤干燥化效应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):77-85.

杨文治.黄土高原土壤水资源与植树造林[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(5):433-438.

梅雪梅.晋西黄土区坡地土壤水分时空分布及影响机制研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2019.

Gunton R M, Asperen E N, Basden A, et al. Beyond ecosystem services:Valuing the invaluable[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2017,32(4):249-257.

Thevs N, Beckmann V, Akimalieva A, et al. Assessment of ecosystem services of the wetlands in the Ili River Delta, Kazakhstan[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2017,76(1):e30.

郝梦雅,任志远,孙艺杰,等.关中盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同关系动态分析[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):592-602.

周佳雯,高吉喜,高志球,等.森林生态系统水源涵养服务功能解析[J].生态学报,2018,38(5):1679-1686.

吕一河,胡健,孙飞翔,等.水源涵养与水文调节:和而不同的陆地生态系统水文服务[J].生态学报,2015,35(15):5191-5196.

唐玉芝,邵全琴.乌江上游地区森林生态系统水源涵养功能评估及其空间差异探究[J].地球信息科学学报,2016,18(7):987-999.

莫菲,李叙勇,贺淑霞,等.东灵山林区不同森林植被水源涵养功能评价[J].生态学报,2010,31(17):5009-5016.

包玉斌,李婷,柳辉,等.基于InVEST模型的陕北黄土高原水源涵养功能时空变化[J].地理研究,2016,35(4):664-676.

王玉纯,赵军,付杰文,等.石羊河流域水源涵养功能定量评估及空间差异[J].生态学报,2017,38(13):4637-4648.

Bonell M, Purandara B K, Venkatesh B, et al. The impact of forest use and reforestation on soil hydraulic conductivity in the Western Ghats of India:Implications for surface and sub-surface hydrology[J].Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam),2010,391(1/2):47-62.

Julian J P, Gardner R H. Land cover effects on runoff patterns in eastern Piedmont (USA) watersheds[J].Hydrological Processes,2014,28(3):1525-1538.

杨文治,邵明安.黄土高原土壤水分研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:67-81.

徐孝庆,胡沐钦.林地综合效益计量评价[M].北京:科学出版社,1992:32-93.

刘娜娜,赵世伟,杨永辉,等.云雾山封育草原对表土持水性的影响[J].草地学报,2006,14(4):338-342.

刘光崧.土壤理化分析与剖面描述[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1996:130-133.

郭美丽.延河流域退耕植被恢复过程中土壤蓄水性能变化研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学(中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2017.

郭建设.黄土高原与黄土地貌[J].地理教育,2007(5):32.

廖超林,傅灵艺,盛浩,等.紫色丘陵区旱地撂荒自然恢复提高土壤蓄水性能[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(21):111-119.

Wang C, Zhao C Y, Xu Z L, et al. Effect of vegetation on soil water retention and storage in a semi-arid alpine forest catchment[J].Journal of Arid Land,2013,5(2):207-219.

吕渡,杨亚辉,赵文慧,等.黄土高原沟壑区不同植被对土壤水分分布特征影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):60-64.

Jobbagy E G, Jackson R B. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation[J].Ecological Applications,2000,10(2):423-436.

Jin T T, Fu B J, Liu G H, et al. Hydrologic feasibility of artificial forestation in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2011,15(8):2519-2530.

尹秋龙,焦菊英,寇萌.极端强降雨条件下黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被类型土壤水分特征[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(3):459-469.

梁海斌.晋西北黄土丘陵区不同林龄柠条林地土壤水分特征研究[D].太原:山西大学,2014.

Xu M X, Wang Z, Zhao Y G. Stratification ratio of soil organic carbon as an indicator of carbon sequestration and soil quality in ecological restoration[J].Restoration Ecology,2017,26(3):555-562.

苏杨,朱健,王平,等.土壤持水能力研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(14):140-145.

吴彦,刘世全,付秀琴,等.植物根系提高土壤水稳性团粒含量的研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1997,3(1):45-49.

李航,严方晨,焦菊英,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被类型土壤有效水和持水能力[J].生态学报,2018,38(11):3889-3898.

温仲明,焦峰,赫晓慧,等.黄土高原森林边缘区退耕地植被自然恢复及其对土壤养分变化的影响[J].草业学报,2007,16(1):16-23.

王凯博,陈美玲,秦娟,等.子午岭植被自然演替中植物多样性变化及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(10):2089-2096.

Vachaud G A, Silans A P D, Balabanis P, et al. Temporal stability of spatially measured soil water probability density function1[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1985,49(4):822-828.

Coppola A, Comegna A, Dragonetti G, et al. Average moisture saturation effects on temporal stability of soil water spatial distribution at field scale[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2011,114(2):155-164.

刘江华,刘国彬,陈淑芸.刺槐林地土壤水分与林下植物生物量的关系[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):57-60.

浏览量

967

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据