1. 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都,610041
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
3. 西华师范大学国土资源学院,四川,南充,637000
4. 中央民族大学生命与环境科学学院,北京,100081
5. 四川农业大学水利水电学院,四川,雅安,625014
[ "戴佳栋(1991-),男,博士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:jd_dai@outlook.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
戴佳栋, 张泽洪, 张建辉, 等. 干热河谷区耕作侵蚀作用下坡面水力侵蚀特性[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):116-124.
DAI Jiadong, ZHANG Zehong, ZHANG Jianhui, et al. Effect of Tillage Erosion on Characteristics of Hydraulic Erosion in the Dry-hot Valley Region[J]. 2021, 35(1): 116-124.
戴佳栋, 张泽洪, 张建辉, 等. 干热河谷区耕作侵蚀作用下坡面水力侵蚀特性[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):116-124. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.017.
DAI Jiadong, ZHANG Zehong, ZHANG Jianhui, et al. Effect of Tillage Erosion on Characteristics of Hydraulic Erosion in the Dry-hot Valley Region[J]. 2021, 35(1): 116-124. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.017.
为了研究耕作侵蚀对坡面水动力学特性的影响,选择金沙江干热河谷地区的坡耕地作为研究对象,采用放水冲刷的试验方法,探讨耕作侵蚀影响侵蚀区土层厚度和作为侵蚀物源传输纽带这2种耕作侵蚀形式作用下坡面水动力参数的变化与分布规律,并分析坡面水动力参数与坡面产流和土壤剥离速率之间的关系。结果表明:耕作侵蚀区不同耕作侵蚀强度处理中,随着耕作侵蚀强度的增大,坡面产流速率和土壤剥离速率均呈现增大趋势;0~35年耕作侵蚀强度处理下坡面水流流态主要表现为紊状缓流,耕作侵蚀强度达到40年时则为紊状急流;阻力系数呈现随耕作侵蚀强度增大而减小的趋势,剪切力则呈增大的趋势。在耕作沉积区不同耕作位移处理中,随着耕作位移量的增大,坡面产流速率呈减小趋势,而土壤剥离速率呈增大趋势;0,12 kg/m的耕作位移处理下坡面水流流态主要表现为紊状急流,当耕作位移量达到21 kg/m,即下坡部位的细沟因土壤耕作位移被完全填充时,水流流态则为紊状缓流;随着耕作位移量的增大,阻力系数表现为增大趋势,剪切力则呈减小趋势。将坡面产流速率、土壤剥离速率与水动力参数进行相关性分析后,发现雷诺数能够较好的描述耕作侵蚀作用下坡面水力侵蚀状态。研究结果为干热河谷区坡耕地土壤侵蚀机理及治理方法提供了科学依据。
This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the effect of tillage erosion on runoff yield
sediment yield as well as hydraulic characteristics in the hilly croplands in the Dry-hot Valley Region by the simulated tillage and scouring experiments. Two forms of tillage erosion were adopted that one was the simulated tillage duration (10-
20-
30-
35-
40-year tillage) which caused the attenuation of soil thickness at the upper slope positions
and the other was the simulated soil flux (0
12
21 kg/m) which occurred in rills at the lower slope positions. Results showed that under the influence of tillage duration
both runoff yield and soil detachment rate displayed an increasing trend with the increase of tillage duration. Runoff stayed in the pattern of rapid laminar-flow for the treatment of 40-year tillage
while the slow laminar-flow for the other treatments. The drag coefficient and shear stress exhibited a decreasing and increasing trend as the tillage duration increased
respectively. Under the influence of soil flux
runoff yield rate was in a decreasing trend with the increase of soil flux while soil detachment rate was in an increasing trend. Runoff changed from the pattern of rapid laminar-flow to slow laminar-flow when the soil flux reached 21 kg/m. As the soil flux increased
drag coefficient presented an increasing trend and shear stress was in a decreasing trend. Reynolds number was the best hydrodynamic parameter which could explain the characteristics of hydraulic erosion under the influence of tillage erosion by correlation analysis. These results could provide scientific guidance for the exploration of soil erosion mechanism and treatment methods in the hilly croplands of Dry-hot Valley Region.
聂小军,张建辉,刘刚才,等.金沙江干热河谷侵蚀陡坡植被恢复对土壤质量的影响[J].生态环境,2008,17(4):1636-1640.
黄成敏,何毓蓉,张丹,等.金沙江干热河谷典型区(云南省)土壤退化机理研究Ⅱ土壤水分与土壤退化[J].长江流域资源与环境,2001,10(6):95-101.
钟祥浩.干热河谷区生态系统退化及恢复与重建途径[J].长江流域资源与环境,2000,9(3):109-116.
第宝锋,崔鹏,黄胜,等.近50年金沙江干热河谷区泥沙变化及影响因素分析:以云南省元谋县为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(5):23-27,37.
陈奇伯,王克勤,李金洪,等.元谋干热河谷坡耕地土壤侵蚀造成的土地退化[J].山地学报,2004,22(5):528-532.
Su Z A, Xiong D H, Dong Y F, et al. Hydraulic properties of concentrated flow of a bank gully in the dry-hot valley region of Southwest China[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2015,40(10):1351-1363.
何毓蓉,沈南,王艳强,等.金沙江干热河谷元谋强侵蚀区土壤裂隙形成与侵蚀机制[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):33-36,42.
杨鸿琨,苏正安,朱大鹏,等.干热河谷区冲沟地貌演化动力机制及其生态治理模式[J].中国水土保持,2019(3):41-45,75.
Jia L Z, Zhang J H, Zhang Z H, et al. Assessment of gravelly soil redistribution caused by a two-tooth harrow in mountainous landscapes of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2017,168:11-19.
Zhang J H, Jia L Z, Zhang Z H, et al. Effect of the soil-implement contact area on soil translocation under hoeing tillage[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2018,183:42-50.
Xu H C, Jia L Z, Zhang J H, et al. Combined effects of tillage direction and slope gradient on soil translocation by hoeing[J].Catena,2019,175:421-429.
Van Oost K, Govers G, de Alba S, et al. Tillage erosion:A review of controlling factors and implications for soil quality[J].2006,30(4):443-466.
许海超,张建辉,戴佳栋,等.耕作侵蚀研究回顾和展望[J].地球科学进展,2019,34(12):1288-1300
贾立志.横断山区耕作侵蚀强度分级及主要影响因子临界值确定[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2017.
Lobb D A, Kachanoski R G, Miller M H. Tillage translocation and tillage erosion on shoulder slope landscape positions measured using
137
Cs as a tracer[J].Canadian Journal of Soil Science,1995,75(2):211-218.
Van Oost K, Van Muysen W, Govers G, et al. From water to tillage erosion dominated landform evolution[J].Geomorphology,2005,72(1):193-203.
Zhang J H, Ni S J, Su Z A. Dual roles of tillage erosion in lateral SOC movement in the landscape[J]. European Journal of Soil Science,2012,63(2):165-176.
Quine T A, Walling D E, Chakela Q K, et al. Rates and patterns of tillage and water erosion on terraces and contour strips:evidence from caesium-137 measurements[J].Catena,1999,36:115-142.
Li S, Lobb D A, Lindstrom M J, et al. Tillage and water erosion on different landscapes in the northern North American Great Plains evaluated using Cs technique and soil erosion models[J]. Catena,2007,70:493-505.
Wang Y, Zhang J H, Zhang Z H, et al.Impact of tillage erosion on water erosion in a hilly landscape[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,551/552:522-532.
张泽洪.干热河谷区坡面水蚀与耕作侵蚀的交互作用机制[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2017.
An J, Zheng F L, Lu j, et al. Investigating the role of raindrop impact on hydrodynamic mechanism of soil erosion under simulated rainfall conditions[J].Soil Science,2012,177(8):517-526.
张光辉,卫海燕,刘宝元.坡面流水动力学特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):58-61.
田凯,李小青,鲁帆,等.坡面流侵蚀水动力学特性研究综述[J].中国水土保持,2010(4):44-47.
Jia L Z, Zhang J H, Wang Y, et al. Effect of tillage erosion on the distribution of CaCO
3
, phosphorus and the ratio of CaCO
3
/available phosphorus in the slope landscape[J].Soil Research,2017,55(7):630-639.
Li F C, Zhang J H, Su Z A. Changes in SOC and nutrients under intensive tillage in two types of slope landscapes[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2012,9:67-76.
王勇.耕作侵蚀对紫色土坡耕地水蚀的作用机制[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2015.
李艳梅,王克勤,崔吉林,等.云南干热河谷不同坡面整地方式强化降雨入渗的效益[J].中国水土保持,2008(11):25-29.
杨丹,熊东红,刘守江,等.土壤理化及力学性质对干热河谷台地边坡沟蚀发育的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(4):170-176.
Ran H, Deng Q C, Zhang B, et al. Morphology and influencing factors of rills in the steep slope in Yuanmou Dry-Hot Valley (SW China)[J].Catena,2018,165:54-62.
Buttle J M, Creed I F, Pomeroy J W. Advances in Canadian forset hydrology,1995-1998[J].Hydrological Processes,2000,14(9):1551-1578.
Buttle J M, Dillon P J, Eerkes G R. Hydrologic coupling of slopes, riparian zones and streams:An example from the Canadian Shield[J].Journal of Hydrology,2004,287(1/4):161-177.
Meerveld T V, Weiler M. Hillslope dynamics modeled with increasing complexity[J].Journal of Hydrology,2008,361(1/2):24-40.
Fu Z Y, Li Z X, Cai C F, et al. Soil thickness effect on hydrological and erosion characteristics under sloping lands:A hydropedological perspective[J].Geoderma,2011,167/168:41-53.
Zhang J H, Jia L Z, Wang Y, et al. Tillage erosion effect on soil hydrological properties in a hilly landscape[J].Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2017,22(9):1-9.
Foster G R, Huggins L F, Meyer L D. A laboratory study of rill hydraulics:I.Velocity relationships[J]. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers,1984,27(3):790-796.
Govers G.Relationship between discharge, velocity and flow area for rills eroding loose, non-layered materials[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1992,17(5):515-528.
Qin C, Zheng F L, Zhang X J, et al. A simulation of rill bed incision processes in upland concentrated flows[J].Catena,2018,165:310-319.
Nearing M A, Norton L D, Bulgakov D A, et al. Hydraulics and erosion in eroding rills[J].Water Resources Research,1997,33(4):865-876.
Bryan R B, Poesen J. Laboratory experiment on the influence of slope length on runoff, percolation and rill development[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1989,14(3):211-231.
0
浏览量
994
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621