间歇降雨对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响

李霞; 金鑫; 谢斯琴; 宋颖; 王春振; 赵华荣; 汤珊珊

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.014

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

间歇降雨对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 间歇降雨对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响
- Slope Erosion and Its Changes in Red Soil Under Intermittent Rainfall
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第1期页码：96-102
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 桂林理工大学广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室,广西,桂林,541004
  2. 桂林理工大学岩溶地区水污染控制与用水安全保障协同创新中心,广西,桂林,541004
  3. 广西壮族自治区区域地质调查研究院,广西,桂林,541003
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "李霞(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水文物理规律研究。E-mail:glli18@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（51369009）广西自然科学基金项目（2016GXNSFAA380116）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.014
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李霞, 金鑫, 谢斯琴, 等. 间歇降雨对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):96-102.

LI Xia, JIN Xin, XIE Siqin, et al. Slope Erosion and Its Changes in Red Soil Under Intermittent Rainfall[J]. 2021, 35(1): 96-102.
李霞, 金鑫, 谢斯琴, 等. 间歇降雨对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):96-102. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.014.

LI Xia, JIN Xin, XIE Siqin, et al. Slope Erosion and Its Changes in Red Soil Under Intermittent Rainfall[J]. 2021, 35(1): 96-102. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.014.

摘要

自然条件下降雨多以间歇形式出现，而坡面土壤侵蚀又是一个渐变发育的复杂过程。通过3个雨强（60，90，120 mm/h）、5个坡度（5°，10°，15°，20°，25°）下的15场室内模拟降雨，研究一、二次降雨条件下不同雨强、坡度及降雨量对红壤坡面径流和侵蚀过程的影响，探讨间歇降雨条件下坡面侵蚀发育过程及其主要影响因素的变化。结果表明：（1）二次降雨的产流时间相比一次降雨均提前，一次降雨径流总量受到雨强、坡度和降雨量的共同影响，15°坡度是径流总量变化的一个转折点，二次降雨时降雨量的作用减弱，各雨强下的最大相差倍数减小，各坡度之间的倍数差距也减小。（2）一次降雨发生细沟侵蚀最主要的动力是降雨强度，大雨强、陡坡情况下细沟侵蚀更容易产生，而15°坡度对细沟侵蚀的产生具有重要作用，此时若发生细沟侵蚀，坡面侵蚀则多以细沟侵蚀为主，二者侵蚀量呈正比例函数关系，二次降雨的细沟侵蚀量和一次降雨过程中细沟发育情况相关，一次降雨的细沟发育越剧烈，二次降雨的细沟侵蚀量越少，此时细沟侵蚀量和总侵蚀量呈一次函数关系。总体来说，侵蚀总量的变化和细沟发育所处阶段紧密相关。（3）间歇降雨条件下，不同雨强、坡度、降雨量对坡面土壤径流和侵蚀过程的影响存在差异；同时，一次降雨土壤径流和侵蚀的变化对后期二次降雨径流和侵蚀的发展具有重要影响，使得在不同土壤侵蚀发展阶段，雨强、坡度、降雨量等因子对坡面土壤径流和侵蚀影响的程度也随之改变。

Abstract

Under natural conditions

rainfall mostly occurs intermittently

and slope soil erosion is a gradual and complex process. Through 15 indoor simulated rainfall experiments

including three rain intensities (60

120 mm/h) and five slopes (5°

10°

15°

20°

25°)

the runoff and erosion process were studied under the conditions of primary and secondary rainfall. The slope erosion development process and the changes of main influencing factors under intermittent rainfall conditions were discussed. The results showed that: (1) The runoff time of the second rainfall was earlier than that of the first rainfall. The total runoff of the first rainfall was affected by rain intensity

slope

and rainfall. The slope of 15° was a turning point for the change of the total runoff. The effect of rainfall was weakened during a single rainfall

the maximum difference multiple under each rainfall intensity was reduced

and the multiple gap between the slopes was also reduced. (2) The main driving force for rill erosion in a single rainfall was the rainfall intensity. Rill erosion was more likely to occur in the case of steep slopes

and the 15° slope was of great significance to the generation of rill erosion. At this time

if rill erosion occurred

the slope erosion was mostly dominated by rill erosion

and both erosion showed a positive proportional function relationship. The amount of rill erosion caused by the secondary rainfall was related to the development of the rill during the primary rainfall. The more intense the rill development of the primary rainfall

the less the amount of rill erosion caused by the secondary rainfall. The amount of rill erosion had a linear function relationship with the total erosion amount. In general

the change in the total erosion amount was closely related to the stage of rill development. (3) Under intermittent rainfall conditions

there were differences in the influences of different rainfall intensity

slope

and rainfall on the slope soil runoff. At the same time

the change of soil runoff and erosion in the primary rainfall had an important impact on the development of secondary rainfall runoff and erosion in the later period

so that at different stages of soil erosion development

the influencing extent of rain intensity

slope

rainfall and other factors on the slope soil runoff and erosion also changed accordingly.

关键词

Keywords

references

史志华,刘前进,张含玉,等.近十年土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展与展望[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1117-1127.

Chen J, Xiao H B, Li Z W, et al. How effective are soil and water conservation measures (SWCMs) in reducing soil and water losses in the red soil hilly region of China? A meta-analysis of field plot data[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,735:139517.

Parsons A J, Stone P M. Effects of intra-storm variations in rainfall intensity on interrill runoff and erosion[J].Catena,2006,67:68-78.

马良,左长清.基于水蚀预测模型的红壤坡面侵蚀主要影响因素研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):26-29,33.

杨凯,赵军,赵允格,等.生物结皮坡面不同降雨历时的产流特征[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(23):135-141.

Xu Q X, Wu P, Dai J F, et al. The effects of rainfall regimes and terracing on runoff and erosion in the Three Gorges area, China[J].Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2018,25(10):9474-9484.

Fox D M, Bryan R B. The relationship of soil loss by interrill erosion to slope gradient[J].Catena,2000,38:211-222.

Wu S B, Yu M H, Chen L. Nonmonotonic and spatial-temporal dynamic slope effects on soil erosion during rainfall-runoff processes[J].Water Resources Research,2017,53(2):1369-1389.

王洪德,徐小明,佘冬立.砾石覆盖对海涂围垦区粉砂土坡面土壤可蚀性影响试验研究[J].排灌机械工程学报,2019,37(6):498-503.

Kouselou M, Hashemi S, Eskandari I, et al. Quantifying soil displacement and tillage erosion rate by different tillage systems in dryland northwestern Iran[J].Soil Use and Management,2018,34(1):48-59.

Zhao X N, Wu P T, Chen X L, et al. Runoff and sediment yield under simulated rainfall on hillslopes in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Soil Research,2013,51(1):50-58.

郑粉莉,徐锡蒙,覃超.沟蚀过程研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):48-59,116.

蔡强国,朱远达,王石英.几种土壤的细沟侵蚀过程及其影响因素[J].水科学进展,2004,15(1):12-18.

陈俊杰,孙莉英,蔡崇法,等.不同土壤坡面细沟侵蚀差异与其影响因素[J].土壤学报,2013,50(2):281-288.

倪世民,冯舒悦,王军光,等.不同质地重塑土坡面细沟侵蚀形态与水力特性及产沙的关系[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):149-156.

Shen H O, Zheng F L, Wen L L, et al. Impacts of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on rill erosion processes at loessial hillslope[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2016,155:429-436.

郝好鑫,郭忠录,王先舟,等.降雨和径流条件下红壤坡面细沟侵蚀过程[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(8):134-140.

郑良勇,李占斌,李鹏,等.稀土元素示踪坡面次降雨条件的侵蚀过程[J],农业工程学报,2010,26(3):87-91.

章文波,谢云,刘宝元.降雨侵蚀力研究进展[J].水士保持学报,2002,16(5):43-46.

刘金涛,李晓鹏,陈喜,等.间歇降雨中土壤含水量分布及其对入渗的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):96-100.

李毅,邵明安.间歇降雨和多场次降雨条件下黄土坡面土壤水分入渗特性[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(7):1511-1516.

张亚丽,李怀恩,张兴昌,等.间歇降雨条件下黄土坡面土壤溶质的迁移特征[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(4):1299-1305.

彭遥,周蓓蓓,陈晓鹏,等.间歇性降雨对黄土坡地水土养分流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):54-60.

王辉,平李娜,潘景副,等.溶质施放部位对红壤坡面溶质迁移特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):7-11.

Zhang Y, Zhao D F, Lin J S, et al. Impacts of collapsing gullies on the dynamics of soil organic carbon in the red soil hilly region of southeast China[J].Catena,2020,190:104547.

Zhao Q H, Li D Q, Mu N, et al. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on erosion characteristics of the red soil slope[J].Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2015,229(2):609-621.

耿晓东,郑粉莉,张会茹.红壤坡面降雨入渗及产流产沙特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):39-43.

张会茹,郑粉莉.不同降雨强度下地面坡度对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):40-43.

梁志权,张思毅,卓慕宁,等.不同雨强及坡度对华南红壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):1-6.

姚冲,查瑞波,黄少燕,等.模拟降雨条件下第四纪红黏土坡面侵蚀过程[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):10-15.

王丽园,查轩,黄少燕,等.不同雨强条件下坡度对红壤坡面侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):40-44.

张会茹,郑粉莉,耿晓东.地面坡度对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(4):52-54,59.

秦伟,左长清,晏清洪,等.红壤裸露坡地次降雨土壤侵蚀规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(2):124-132.

金鑫,谢斯琴,宋颖,等.人工红壤坡面对超大雨强降雨的响应过程[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):19-24.

浏览量

1058

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土和红壤坡面侵蚀差异及其与土壤性质的关系

模拟降雨条件下第四纪红黏土坡面侵蚀过程

冻融作用下高寒土细沟侵蚀过程与输沙能力经验模型

光伏板配置对坡面产流产沙的影响

川西高山峡谷区不同种植模式坡面微地形变化及其对细沟发育的响应