广西大学农学院,南宁,530004
[ "杨任翔(1994-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:yrx340121@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
杨任翔, 邱凡, 王坚桦, 等. 雨型和甘蔗种植对赤红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):65-70.
YANG Renxiang, QIU Fan, WANG Jianhua, et al. Effects of Rainfall Pattern and Sugarcane Planting on Soil Erosion Characteristics of Lateritic Red Soil Slope[J]. 2021, 35(1): 65-70.
杨任翔, 邱凡, 王坚桦, 等. 雨型和甘蔗种植对赤红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):65-70. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.009.
YANG Renxiang, QIU Fan, WANG Jianhua, et al. Effects of Rainfall Pattern and Sugarcane Planting on Soil Erosion Characteristics of Lateritic Red Soil Slope[J]. 2021, 35(1): 65-70. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.009.
为探究南方高强度、高频次降雨下甘蔗种植对赤红壤坡面土壤侵蚀的影响,基于径流小区原位观测试验,分析不同种植方式下(顺坡和横坡)蔗地和裸坡坡面径流和侵蚀泥沙特征,探讨甘蔗种植方式对坡面侵蚀产沙的影响,获得影响赤红壤坡面侵蚀的主要雨型。结果表明:(1)坡面径流量和侵蚀量均表现为裸坡 > 顺坡蔗地 > 横坡蔗地,裸坡坡面径流量和侵蚀量是顺坡蔗地和横坡蔗地的1.7~5.3倍;顺坡蔗地坡面径流量和侵蚀量是横坡蔗地的1.9,2.3倍。(2)次降雨条件下,裸坡坡面径流量与侵蚀量均整体高于蔗地处理,而顺坡蔗地整体上大于横坡蔗地,但二者差异随甘蔗生长逐渐缩小。(3)A型雨(中历时、小雨强、小雨量)发生频次最高,但B型雨(短历时、大雨强、中雨量)是引起裸坡和顺坡蔗地坡面产流产沙的主要雨型,径流量和侵蚀量分别占总量的49.9%,57.6%和62.3%,64.2%;D型雨(长历时、极大雨强、极大雨量)是造成横坡蔗地坡面水土流失严重的主要雨型,由其产生的坡面径流量和侵蚀量分别占总量的49.5%和72.2%。研究结果可为明晰南方赤红壤区蔗地土壤侵蚀特征及防治提供理论依据。
In order to explore the influence of sugarcane planting on the soil erosion of lateritic red soil slope under high intensity and high frequency rainfall in southern China
we based on the in-situ observation test of runoff plot
analyzed runoff and erosion characteristics of bare slope and sugarcane land that under different planting methods (down-slope and cross-slope)
and discussed the effects of sugarcane planting on slope erosion. At the same time
we obtained the main rainfall patterns that affecting the slope erosion of lateritic red soil. The results showed that: (1) The runoff amounts and sediment yields were both showed that bare slope > down-slope sugarcane planting slope > cross-slope sugarcane planting slope. The runoff amounts and sediment yields of bare slope were 1.7 ~ 5.3 times of the down-slope and cross-slope sugarcane planting slope. The runoff amount and sediment yield of down-slope sugarcane planting slope were 1.9 and 2.3 times of the cross-slope sugarcane planting slope. (2) Under different rainfall events
runoff amount and sediment yield of bare slope were higher than all sugarcane planting slopes
and the runoff amount and sediment yield of down-slope were larger than that of the cross-slope. However
the difference between the two sugarcane lands decreased with the sugarcane growth. (3) The highest frequency rainfall pattern was type A (mid duration
low rainfall intensity
low rainfall depth). However
type B (short duration
strong rainfall intensity and medium rainfall depth) was the main rainfall pattern that caused runoff and erosion in bare slope and down-slope sugarcane planting slope
the runoff and erosion accounted for 49.9%
57.6% and 62.3%
64.2%
respectively. Type D (long duration
extremely strong rainfall intensity and extremely great rainfall depth) was the main type that caused the soil and water loss in cross-slope sugarcane planting slope
and the runoff amount and sediment yield caused by the rain of type D accounted for 49.5% and 72.2% respectively. The results can provide a theoretical basis for clarifying the mechanism and control of soil erosion on the sugarcane land in the lateritic red soil region of southern China.
秦伟,左长清,晏清洪,等.红壤裸露坡地次降雨土壤侵蚀规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(2):124-132.
谢颂华,曾建玲,杨洁,等.南方红壤坡地不同耕作措施的水土保持效应[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(9):81-86.
周怡雯,戴翠婷,刘窑军,等.耕作措施及雨强对南方红壤坡耕地侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):51-56.
Zhang Q W, Liu D H, Cheng S H, et al. Combined effects of runoff and soil erodibility on available nitrogen losses from sloping farmland affected by agricultural practices[J].Agricultural Water Management,2016,176:1-8.
安娟,于妍,吴元芝.降雨类型对褐土横垄坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):150-156.
Hao H X, Wang J G, Guo Z L, et al. Water erosion processes and dynamic changes of sediment size distribution under the combined effects of rainfall and overland flow[J].Catena,2019,173:494-504.
Dunkerley D. Effects of rainfall intensity fluctuations on infiltration and runoff:Rainfall simulations on dryland soils, Fowlers Gap, Australia[J].Hydrological Processes,2012,26(15):2211-2224.
Fang N F, Shi Z H, Li L, et al. The effects of rainfall regimes and land use changes on runoff and soil loss in a small mountainous watershed[J].Catena,2012,99:1-8.
Peng T, Wang S J. Effects of land use, land cover and rainfall regimes on the surface runoff and soil loss on karts slopes in southwest China[J].Catena,2012,90:53-62.
杨帅,尹忠,郑子成,等.四川黄壤区玉米季坡耕地自然降雨及其侵蚀产沙特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):7-12.
Wu X L, Wei Y J, Wang J G, et al. Effects of soil physicochemical properties on aggregate stability along a weathering gradient[J].Catena,2017,156:205-215.
Patin J, Mouche E, Ribolzi O, et al. Effect of land use on interrill erosion in a montane catchment of Northern Laos:An analysis based on a pluri-annual runoff and soil loss database[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,563:480-494.
王双,叶良惠,郑子成,等.玉米成熟期黄壤坡耕地径流及其氮素流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):30-35.
朱燕琴,赵志斌,齐广平,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被类型次降雨产流产沙特征[J].草地学报,2019,27(1):28-34.
Zu Q, Mi C R, Liu D L, et al. Spatio-temporal distribution of sugarcane potential yields and yield gaps in Southern China[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2018,92:72-83.
中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2019.
杜懿,麻荣永.1961-2016年南宁市年降雨量变化特征分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2017,136(6):53-58.
水利部水土保持监测中心.径流小区和小流域水土保持监测手册[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2015.
马星,郑江坤,王文武,等.不同雨型下紫色土区坡耕地产流产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):17-21.
高磊,饶良懿,崔飞波,等.太行山土石山区侵蚀性降雨对典型植物措施产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):8-14.
王小博,朱永清,吴宜进,等.不同植被下降雨类型对红壤坡地土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):6-11.
肖继兵,孙占祥,刘志,等.降雨侵蚀因子和植被类型及覆盖度对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):159-166.
沈紫燕,王辉,平李娜,等.前期土壤含水量对粘性红壤产流产沙及溶质运移的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):58-62.
邱学礼,段宗颜,胡万里,等.降水特征与农作处理对坡耕地水土流失的动态研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):85-88.
0
浏览量
903
下载量
10
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621