长江中下游平原单季稻田氮素径流损失风险评估

文想成; 张泰; 董世杰; 姚瑶; 程钶强; 李祥; 王凤文; 程志庆; 马友华; 杨书运

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

长江中下游平原单季稻田氮素径流损失风险评估

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 长江中下游平原单季稻田氮素径流损失风险评估
- Risk Assessment of Nitrogen Runoff Loss in Single Cropping Paddy Field in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Plain
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第1期页码：24-35
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 安徽农业大学资源与环境学院,合肥,230036
  2. 安徽省六安市气象局,安徽,六安,237000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "文想成(1996-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事应用气象研究。E-mail:wenxch1996@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFD0301301）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.004
  中图分类号： X52;S511
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
文想成, 张泰, 董世杰, 等. 长江中下游平原单季稻田氮素径流损失风险评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):24-35.

WEN Xiangcheng, ZHANG Tai, DONG Shijie, et al. Risk Assessment of Nitrogen Runoff Loss in Single Cropping Paddy Field in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Plain[J]. 2021, 35(1): 24-35.
文想成, 张泰, 董世杰, 等. 长江中下游平原单季稻田氮素径流损失风险评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):24-35. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.004.

WEN Xiangcheng, ZHANG Tai, DONG Shijie, et al. Risk Assessment of Nitrogen Runoff Loss in Single Cropping Paddy Field in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Plain[J]. 2021, 35(1): 24-35. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.004.

摘要

稻田氮素径流损失是农业面源污染主要来源之一，以巢湖地区单季稻田为研究对象，利用该地区1957—2019年的历史气象数据，通过设定插秧区间（6月6—25日）及施肥期水位（3，10，20 cm），建立SMNRL模型，模拟不同插秧时间和田面水水位稻田氮素流失，研究降低长江中下游平原气候区单季稻田氮素径流损失风险的插秧时间与水位控制模式。结果表明：（1）施肥后，稻田田面水氮素浓度呈指数衰减，基肥期田面水氮素衰减期为9天，分蘖肥和穗肥期为7天。（2）在LW、HW组合中，各施肥期占全生育的氮素径流损失为基肥期 > 分蘖肥期 > 穗肥期。在LW组合中，基肥期为氮素径流损失高发期，基肥、分蘖肥、穗肥的氮素流失为72.4%~98.4%，1.9%~27.6%，0~8.3%。（3）控制水位比选择插秧时间对降低氮素径流损失更有效。相同水位下，适宜的插秧期氮素径流损失在全生育期施肥中合计能减少0.4~4.5 kg/hm2，降低32.8%~80.3%；相同插秧时间下，LW、MW组合相比HW组合氮素径流损失能减少8.8~13.1 kg/hm2，降低92.1%~98.8%。（4）在LW、MW、HW 3种组合中，插秧期分别以6月19日、6月11日、6月17日为界，将6月6—25日分为前后2个阶段，前1阶段插秧产生氮素径流损失均值显著低于后1阶段，分别低37.0%，25.0%，21.7%。（5）降低巢湖地区稻田氮素径流损失有效措施为施肥期水位控制为3 cm，并选择6月6-19日期间进行水稻插秧。

Abstract

Nitrogen runoff loss from paddy fields is one of the main sources of agricultural non-point source pollution. In order to reduce the risk of nitrogen runoff loss from single-crop paddy fields in the climatic zone of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River

a suitable fertilization and water level control model for this region was sought and the model of the SMNRL was built. This article used the historical meteorological data from 1957 to 2019 in the Chaohu Lake area by setting the rice transplanting interval (June 6 to 25) and the water level (3

20 cm) to simulate nitrogen loss in paddy fields. The result showed that: (1) After fertilization

the nitrogen concentration in the paddy field surface decreased exponentially. Nitrogen decay time of field water was 9 days at base fertilizer stage

and 7 days at tillering and earing fertilizer stage. (2) According to the order of nitrogen runoff loss that accounts for the whole growth in each fertilization period

in the combination of LW and HW

it was the basal fertilizer stage

the tiller fertilizer stage

and the panicle fertilizer stage. The nitrogen loss of basal fertilizer

tiller fertilizer

and panicle fertilizer was respectively 72.4% to 98.4%

1.9% to 27.6%

and 0 to 8.3% in the combination of LW

and the basal fertilizer period was the period of high nitrogen runoff loss. (3) Controlling water level was more effective than reducing planting time to reduce nitrogen runoff loss. Under the same water level

the total nitrogen runoff loss during the transplanting period were reduced by 0.4 to 4.5 kg/hm2 and 32.8% to 80.3% during the whole growth period. Under the same transplanting time

the nitrogen runoff loss of the LW and MW combinations were reduced by 8.8 to 13.1 kg/hm2 and 92.1% to 98.8% compared with the HW combination. (4) In the three combinations of LW

and HW

June 6 to 25 was divided into the early and late stages of rice transplanting

with June 19

June 11

and June 17 as the boundaries respectively. The average nitrogen runoff loss in the early stage could be reduced by 37.0%

25.0%

and 21.7% compared with the later stage. (5) The effective measures to reduce nitrogen runoff loss in rice fields in Chaohu Lake region were to control the water level during the fertilization period to 3 cm and choose a rice transplanting time between June 6th and June 19th.

关键词

Keywords

references

中华人民共和国统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2019:385-391.

方福平,程式华.水稻科技与产业发展[J].农学学报,2018,8(1):92-98.

Yan W J, Huang M X, Zhang S, et al. Phosphorus export by runoff from agricultural field plots with different crop cover in Lake Taihu watershed[J].Journal of Environmental Science,2001,13:502-507.

Liu R M, Wang J W, Shi J H, et al. Runoff characteristics and nutrient loss mechanism from plain farmland under simulated rainfall conditions[J].Science of the Total Environment,2014,468/469:1069-1077.

Zhang G S, Li J C, Hu X B, et al. On-farm assessment of soil erosion and non-point source pollution in a rain-fed vegetable production system at Dianchi lake's catchment, southwestern China[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2013,96(1):67-77.

张福锁,王激清,张卫峰,等.中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):915-924.

李喜喜,王昌全,杨娟,等.猪粪施用对水稻田面水养分动态变化特征及流失风险的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):130-136.

吴俊,樊剑波,何园球,等.不同减量施肥条件下稻田田面水氮素动态变化及径流损失研究[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(9):1561-1566.

张雪丽,董文怡,刘勤,等.有机肥替代化肥氮对水稻田面水和土壤中氮素含量的影响[J].中国农业气象,2018,39(4):256-266.

王桂良,崔振岭,陈新平,等.南方稻田活性氮损失途径及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(8):104-112.

梁新强,田光明,李华,等.天然降雨条件下水稻田氮磷径流流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):59-63.

薛鹏程,庞燕,项颂,等.模拟降雨条件下农田氮素径流流失特征研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(7):1362-1368.

陈颖,赵磊,杨勇,等.海河流域水稻田氮磷地表径流流失特征初探[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(2):328-333.

田平,陈英旭,田光明,等.杭嘉湖地区淹水稻田氮素径流流失负荷估算[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(10):1911-1917.

田玉华,尹斌,贺发云,等.太湖地区稻季的氮素径流损失研究[J].土壤学报,2007,44(6):1070-1075.

王静,郭熙盛,王允青,等.保护性耕作与平衡施肥对巢湖流域稻田氮素径流损失及水稻产量的影响研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(6):1164-1171.

Hou X K, Zhou F, Leip A, et al. Spatial patterns of nitrogen runoff from Chinese paddy fields[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2016,231:246-254.

侯朋福,薛利祥,俞映倞,等.稻田径流易发期不同类型肥料的氮素流失风险[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(7):1353-1361.

梅方权,吴宪章,姚长溪,等.中国水稻种植区划[J].中国水稻科学,1988(3):97-110.

Allen R G. Using the fao-56 dual crop coefficient method over an irrigation region as part of an evapotranspiration inter comparison study[J].Journal of Hydrology,2000,229(1/2):27-41.

魏凤英.现代气候统计诊断与预测技术[M].2版.北京:气象出版社,2007:43-44.

吕亚敏,吴玉红,李洪达,等.减肥措施对稻田田面水氮、磷动态变化特征的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(4):349-355.

杨坤宇,王美慧,王毅,等.不同农艺管理措施下双季稻田氮磷径流流失特征及其主控因子研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(8):1723-1734.

张富林,吴茂前,夏颖,等.江汉平原稻田田面水氮磷变化特征研究[J].土壤学报,2019,56(5):1190-1200.

董世杰,鲁屹,唐婉莹,等.聚天门冬氨酸钙盐对水稻田面水中三氮动态变化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):208-213.

朱利群,田一丹,李慧,等.不同农艺措施条件下稻田田面水总氮动态变化特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(6):85-89.

Shi X R, Hu K, Batchelor W D, et al. Exploring optimal nitrogen management strategies to mitigate nitrogen losses from paddy soil in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J].Agricultural Water Management,2020,228:1-12.

刘红江,郭智,郑建初,等.不同类型缓控释肥对水稻产量形成和稻田氮素流失的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2018,34(4):783-789.

王强,姜丽娜,潘建清,等.一次性施肥稻田田面水氮素变化特征和流失风险评估[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(1):168-175.

薛利红,杨林章,施卫明,等.农村面源污染治理的"4R"理论与工程实践:源头减量技术[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(5):881-888.

浏览量

1205

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据