1. 西南大学资源环境学院,重庆,400715
2. 中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都,610041
[ "崔璨(1997-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与生态环境研究。E-mail:870476701@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
崔璨, 王小燕, 孙宁婷, 等. 三峡库区典型农业小流域次降雨产沙过程及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):17-23.
CUI Can, WANG Xiaoyan, SUN Ningting, et al. Sediment Yield Process and Its Influencing Factors Under Sub-rainfall in Typical Agricultural Small Watershed, Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. 2021, 35(1): 17-23.
崔璨, 王小燕, 孙宁婷, 等. 三峡库区典型农业小流域次降雨产沙过程及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):17-23. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.003.
CUI Can, WANG Xiaoyan, SUN Ningting, et al. Sediment Yield Process and Its Influencing Factors Under Sub-rainfall in Typical Agricultural Small Watershed, Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. 2021, 35(1): 17-23. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.003.
为探究引起三峡库区农业小流域土壤侵蚀的主要次降雨因子,通过天然降雨观测资料,分析忠县石盘丘小流域2019年侵蚀性降雨年内分布特征和典型次降雨条件下A和B 2个集水区产沙过程的变化规律,采用相关性分析方法,揭示次降雨产沙的主要影响因素。结果表明:(1)全年119场降雨资料中,有19场为侵蚀性降雨。全年侵蚀性中雨共发生10次,是侵蚀性降雨中最常见的降雨类型。暴雨及以上降雨是造成研究区产沙量最大的降雨类型。(2)在典型中雨、大雨和暴雨产沙事件中,B集水区产沙量分别是A集水区的5.13,1.66,7.56倍。对3场典型次降雨产沙过程进行分析发现,B集水区产沙过程线随降雨历时的延长,变化程度更剧烈。(3)各PIn因子与研究区产沙量的相关性系数大小排序为PI30 > PI10 > PI15 > PI60 > PI5 > PI90 > PI。对各类降雨因子与研究区的产沙量进行相关性分析,系数大小排序为P > PIn > In > I > T。A、B集水区产沙量与次降雨量P和PI30均存在极显著正相关性。总之,在三峡库区开展水土保持工作时,要加强对暴雨及以上降雨造成农业小流域水土流失的监测与预警响应能力;P和PI30能较好地反映三峡库区天然次降雨对农业小流域侵蚀产沙的影响;对天然降雨条件下的次降雨侵蚀力进行估算时,可将PI30作为主要参考因子;农林水复合生态系统与结构简单的传统农耕模式相比,具有更丰富多元的层次结构,不仅能全面开发利用小流域的农业资源,更有利于保持水土,且其对降雨环境变化的适应性也更强。
In order to explore the main sub-rainfall factors that cause soil erosion in the agricultural small watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir area
the study selected the Shipanqiu small watershed located in the heart of the Three Gorges Reservoir area as the research area
and analyzed the distribution characteristics of erosive rainfall in 2019 and the variation law of sediment yield process in catchment A and catchment B under typical sub-rainfall
and the correlation analysis method was used to explore the main influencing factors of sediment erosion caused by sub-rainfall. The results showed that: (1) Of the 119 rainfall events for the whole year
19 were erosive events
including 10 erosive moderate rainfall events. The erosive moderate rainfall was the most common type in erosive rainfall events. Rainstorm and above is the type that caused the largest amount of sediment in the study area. (2) In the typical moderate rain
heavy rain and rainstorm sediment yield events
the amount of sediment yield in catchment B was 5.13
1.66 and 7.56 times that of catchment A respectively. The analysis of the sediment yield process of three typical sub-rains showed that the variation of sediment yield line in catchment B was more dramatic with the extension of rainfall duration. (3) The correlation coefficient of PIn factors and the amount of sediment yield in the study area ranked as PI30 > PI10 > PI15 > PI60 > PI5 > PI90 > PI. Correlation analysis of various rainfall factors and the amount of sediment yield in the study area ranked as P > PIn > In > I > T. There was a very significant positive correlation between the amount of sediment yield and the indicators P and PI30 in catchment A and B. To sum up
when carrying out soil and water conservation work in the three Gorges reservoir area
it is necessary to strengthen the ability of monitoring and early warning response to soil and water loss in agricultural small watershed caused by rainstorm and above. P and PI30 can reflect the impact of natural sub-rainfall on sediment yield in small watersheds of Three Gorges reservoir well. When estimating the rainfall erosivity of natural sub-rainfall
PI30 can be used as the main reference factor. Compared with the traditional farming mode with simple structure
agroforestry-water complex ecosystem has a richer and more diverse structure
which can not only fully develop and utilize agricultural resources in small watershed
but also be more conducive to soil and water conservation
and it is also more adaptable to the changes of rainfall environment.
曹瑞霞,刘京,邓开开,等.三峡库区典型紫色土小流域径流及氮磷流失特征[J].环境科学,2019,40(12):5330-5339.
王宏,徐娅玲,张奇,等.沱江流域典型农业小流域氮和磷排放特征[J].环境科学,2020,41(10):4547-4554.
Seeger M, Errea M P, Begueria S, et al. Catchment soil moisture and rainfall characteristics as determinant factors for discharge/suspended sediment hysteretic loops in a small headwater catchment in the Spanish Pyrenees[J].Journal of Hydrology,2004,288(3):299-311.
李桂芳,杨任翔,谢福倩,等.不同土地利用方式下赤红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):101-107,230.
许海超,李子君,林锦阔,等.燕山土石山区降雨和下垫面条件对坡面侵蚀产沙的影响[J].山地学报,2016,34(1):46-53.
郑江坤,杨帆,王文武,等.不同降雨等级下耕作措施对坡地产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(1):38-45.
Wu X L, Wei Y J, Wang J G, et al. Effects of soil type and rainfall intensity on sheet erosion processes and sediment characteristics along the climatic gradient in central-south China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,621:54-66.
张兴刚,王春红,程甜甜,等.山东省药乡小流域侵蚀性降雨分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(1):128-133.
Bellocchi G, Diodato N. Rainfall erosivity in soil erosion processes[J].Water,2020,12(3):e722.
余长洪,李就好,陈凯,等.砖红壤区降雨因子对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):17-20.
史东梅,卢喜平,蒋光毅.紫色丘陵区降雨侵蚀力简易算法的模拟[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(2):116-122.
Kinnell P I A. The influence of time and other factors on soil loss produced by rain-impacted flow under artificial rainfall[J].Journal of Hydrology,2020,587:e125004.
张晶玲,周丽丽,马仁明,等.天然降雨条件下横垄与顺垄坡面产流产沙过程[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):114-119.
马鹏.降雨因素对坡面产流产沙影响的研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2013.
付友行,廖晓勇.三峡库区紫色小流域侵蚀性降雨特征[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(1):184-188.
魏静,马洪超.降雨对红黏土区土壤侵蚀的影响[J].西部大开发,2019,4(7):52-55,60.
王改玲,王青杵,石生新.晋北黄土区降雨特征及其对坡地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):1-5.
王军,钟莉娜.生态系统服务理论与山水林田湖草生态保护修复的应用[J].生态学报,2019,39(23):8702-8708.
谢云,刘宝元,章文波.侵蚀性降雨标准研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(4):6-11.
Nouhou-Bako A, Darboux F, James F, et al. Rainfall erosivity in interrill areas:Insights about the choice of an erosive factor[J].Catena,2019,180:24-31.
史东梅,江东,卢喜平,等.重庆涪陵区降雨侵蚀力时间分布特征[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(9):16-21.
周文洁,魏天兴,刘广全,等.陕北典型退耕地沙棘群落与土壤因子的耦合关系[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(2):1-9.
李毅,邵明安.间歇降雨和多场次降雨条件下黄土坡面土壤水分入渗特性[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(7):1511-1516.
马好.迁西县经济林坡地水土流失治理技术及效果[J].河北林业科技,2019(4):12-16.
杨帆,张洪江,程金花,等.基于模拟降雨的北京褐土坡地土壤团粒流失特征试验[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):137-145,215.
宗桦.森林乔木冠层雨水再分配特征及机制研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2019,32(1):28-35.
张利超,谢颂华,喻荣岗,等.小流域治理中蓄水池工程设计探讨[J].人民长江,2019,50(1):148-152.
孟志华,孟阵.黄河内蒙古段十大孔兑产沙量估算模型分析[J].水电能源科学,2015,33(10):76-78.
Wischmeier W H. A rainfall erosion index for a universal soil loss equation[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1959,23(3):246-249.
Serio M A, Carollo F G, Ferro V. Raindrop size distribution and terminal velocity for rainfall erosivity studies:A review[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,576:210-228.
王万忠,焦菊英,赫小品,等.中国降雨侵蚀力
R
值的计算与分布(Ⅰ)[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(4):5-18.
0
浏览量
1081
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621