黔西喀斯特区秸秆覆盖对坡耕地产流产沙特征的响应

盘礼东; 李瑞; 黎庆贵; 黄凯; 张琳卿

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黔西喀斯特区秸秆覆盖对坡耕地产流产沙特征的响应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 黔西喀斯特区秸秆覆盖对坡耕地产流产沙特征的响应
- Effects of Straw Mulching on Runoff and Sediment Characteristics of Sloping Farmland in the Karst Area of Western Guizhou
- 水土保持学报 2021年35卷第1期页码：9-16
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院,贵阳,550001
  2. 国家喀斯特石漠化防治工程技术研究中心,贵阳,550001
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "盘礼东(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:948678723@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（31760243）贵州省科技计划项目（黔科合支撑[2019]2847号，黔科合基础[2018]1112号）贵州省水利厅科研项目（KT201806）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.002
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
盘礼东, 李瑞, 黎庆贵, 等. 黔西喀斯特区秸秆覆盖对坡耕地产流产沙特征的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):9-16.

PAN Lidong, LI Rui, LI Qinggui, et al. Effects of Straw Mulching on Runoff and Sediment Characteristics of Sloping Farmland in the Karst Area of Western Guizhou[J]. 2021, 35(1): 9-16.
盘礼东, 李瑞, 黎庆贵, 等. 黔西喀斯特区秸秆覆盖对坡耕地产流产沙特征的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(1):9-16. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.002.

PAN Lidong, LI Rui, LI Qinggui, et al. Effects of Straw Mulching on Runoff and Sediment Characteristics of Sloping Farmland in the Karst Area of Western Guizhou[J]. 2021, 35(1): 9-16. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.002.

摘要

基于2018-2019年野外径流小区定位观测资料，以玉米单作无秸秆覆盖处理（M0）为对照，探索了玉米单作处理和不同秸秆覆盖量（M1~M5，1 111，2 222，3 889，5 556，6 944 kg/hm2）对贵州省黔西喀斯特区坡耕地产流产沙特征的影响。结果表明：（1）不同降雨等级下，秸秆覆盖具有较好的水土保持效果，并随覆盖量的增加，产流、产沙总量逐渐减少，但M4与M5处理之间无显著差异（p>0.05）；（2）玉米苗期—拔节期各处理产流和产沙量大于后2个阶段，并且各阶段各覆盖处理产流产沙均低于对照；（3）秸秆覆盖对地表产流产沙影响显著，与对照相比，年均径流深减少21.85%~50.46%，土壤侵蚀模数减少50.10%~85.87%；（4）随着秸秆覆盖量的增加，各处理产流、产沙呈下降趋势，但当秸秆覆盖量超过5 556 kg/hm2后，继续增加秸秆至6 944 kg/hm2时，水土保持效果变化不明显。秸秆覆盖是控制喀斯特地区坡耕地水土流失的有效途径，6 000 kg/hm2左右的覆盖量即可起到较好的水土保持效果。

Abstract

Based on the location observation data of the wild outflow plots from 2018 to 2019

taking the corn monoculture treatment without straw mulch (M0) as the control

this study was aimed to explore the effects of maize monocropping treatment and different straw coverage (M1~M5

1 111

2 222

3 889

5 556

6 944 kg/hm2) on runoff and sediment yield characteristics of sloping farmland in the karst area of Guizhou Province. The results showed that: (1) Under different rainfall levels

straw mulching had better soil and water conservation effect

and with the increase of mulching amount

the total runoff and sediment yield decreased gradually

but there was no significant difference between M4 and M5 treatments (p > 0.05); (2) The runoff and sediment yield of each treatment from seedling stage to jointing stage were greater than those of the latter two stages

and the runoff and sediment yield of each mulching treatment in each stage were lower than that of the control; (3) Compared with the control

the annual average runoff depth decreased by 21.85%~50.46%

and soil erosion modulus decreased by 50.10%~85.87%; (4) As the amount of straw mulching and the amount of straw buried in the soil increased

the runoff and sand production of each treatment showed a downward trend. However

when the straw mulching amount exceeded 5 556 kg/hm2 and continued to increase to 6 944 kg/hm2

the soil and water conservation did not change significantly. Straw mulching was an effective way to control soil and water loss of sloping farmland in karst area

and the coverage amount of about 6 000 kg/hm2 was recommended in the soil and water conservation.

关键词

Keywords

references

陈美淇,魏欣,张科利,等.基于CSLE模型的贵州省水土流失规律分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):16-21,26.

国家林业局.中国石漠化状况公报.中国绿色时报,2012-06-18(3).

甘艺贤,戴全厚,伏文兵,等.基于模拟降雨试验的喀斯特坡耕地土壤侵蚀特征[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(9):2754-2760.

王治国,肖娟,魏忠义,等.黄土残塬区人工降雨条件下坡耕地水蚀研究:Ⅲ.坡耕地小麦休闲期秸秆覆盖的防蚀效应[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(2):14-18.

严坤,王玉宽,徐佩,等.秸秆覆盖对三峡库区坡面侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(1):6-10.

王安,郝明德,王荚文.人工降雨条件下秸秆覆盖及留茬的水土保持效应[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(2):26-28,34.

赵君范,黄高宝,辛平,等.保护性耕作对地表径流及土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(6):16-19.

林超文,罗春燕,庞良玉,等.不同耕作和覆盖方式对紫色丘陵区坡耕地水土及养分流失的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(22):6091-6101.

唐涛,郝明德,单凤霞.人工降雨条件下秸秆覆盖减少水土流失的效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(1):9-11,40.

张瑜,刘肃,徐子棋,等.秸秆覆盖对黑土区侵蚀沟植被恢复和固土的作用[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):157-161,169.

Beggy H M, Fehmi J S. Effect of surface roughness and mulch on semi-arid revegetation success, soil chemistry and soil movement[J].Catena,2016,143:215-220.

Alliaume F, Escudero J G, Dogliotti S. Impact of minimum tillage, oat straw management, and chicken manure on soil water content, runoff, erosion and tomato production[J].Agrociencia,2012,16(3):199-207.

Prosdocimi M, Jordán A, Tarolli P, et al. The immediate effectiveness of barley straw mulch in reducing soil erodibility and surface runoff generation in Mediterranean vineyards[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,547:323-330.

裴峥,段喜明.翻耕和覆盖对坡耕地产流产沙的影响[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,36(6):412-416.

Zhang S L, Li P R, Yang X Y, et al. Effects of tillage and plastic mulch on soil water, growth and yield of spring-sown maize[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2011,112(1):92-97.

辛艳,王瑄,邱野,等.辽宁省不同耕作方式对坡耕地水土及氮磷养分流失的影响效果[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):27-30.

杨青森,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.秸秆覆盖对东北黑土区土壤侵蚀及养分流失的影响[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(2):1-5.

黄新君,陈尚洪,刘定辉,等.秸秆覆盖和有机质输入对紫色土土壤可蚀性的影响[J].中国农业气象,2016,37(3):289-296.

白永会,查轩,查瑞波,等.秸秆覆盖红壤径流养分流失效益及径流剪切力影响研究[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):94-99.

陈洪松,冯腾,李成志,等.西南喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀特征研究现状与展望[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):10-16.

刘柳松,任红艳,史学正,等.秸秆覆盖对不同初始含水率土壤产沙过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):108-112.

王万中,焦菊英,郝小品,等.中国降雨侵蚀力

值的计算与分布(Ⅰ)[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(4):5-18.

科迪.降雨强度标准划分[J].北京水利,1995(4):49.

宫崇栋.贵州高原山区玉米种植管理技术探析[J].农技服务,2015,32(1):39.

罗键,郑子成,秦凤,等.玉米生长期坡耕地地表径流及侵蚀产沙特征[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):11-15.

郑子成,张锡洲,李廷轩,等.玉米生长期土壤抗蚀性特征及其影响因素分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(4):100-108.

张翼夫,李洪文,何进,等.玉米秸秆覆盖对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(7):118-124.

王晓燕,高焕文,李洪文,等.保护性耕作对农田地表径流与土壤水蚀影响的试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2000,18(3):66-69.

白怡婧,李渝,黄兴成,等.保护性耕作对黄壤坡耕地水土流失及作物产量的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(6):16-20,34.

Li R, Li Q G, Pan L D. Review of organic mulching effects on soil and water loss.Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science.2020,https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2020.1718111.

张萍,李其昀,于磊,等.秸秆覆盖对冬小麦生长状况及产量的影响[J].山东理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,22(5):48-51.

刘玉含,张展羽,伊德里萨,等.农田秸秆覆盖技术及其发展趋势分析[J].水利经济,2007(2):53-56,83.

员学锋,吴普特,汪有科.秸秆覆盖桃树地生态效应及桃树的生长状况[J].农业工程学报,2007,25(1):91-94.

肖继兵,杨久廷,辛宗绪.辽西地区秸秆覆盖试验研究[J].节水灌溉,2008(2):8-10,13.

Rahma A E, Wang W, Tang Z J, et al. Straw mulch can induce greater soil losses from loess slopes than no mulch under extreme rainfall conditions[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2017,232:141-151.

孙力,盖志佳,王谦玉,等.中国秸秆覆盖研究现状及展望[J].安徽农学通报,2015,21(7):96-98.

王世学,高焕文,李洪文.冷寒风沙区保护性耕作种植试验[J].农业工程学报,2003,21(3):120-123.

赵平伟,郭萍,李成武,等.云南不同量级降雨下的降雨侵蚀力特征分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(12):2135-2141.

陈美淇,张卓栋,王晓岚,等.西南黄壤和西北黄土坡面侵蚀产沙规律比较研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(6):53-60.

熊康宁,李晋,龙明忠.典型喀斯特石漠化治理区水土流失特征与关键问题[J].地理学报,2012,67(7):878-888.

张信宝,王世杰,曹建华,等.西南喀斯特山地水土流失特点及有关石漠化的几个科学问题[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(3):274-279.

吕凯,段颖丹,吴伯志.秸秆覆盖对种植烤烟坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].南方农业学报,2019,50(11):2450-2458.

Lattanzi A R, Meyer L D, Baumgardner M F. Influences of muleh rate and slope steepness on interrill erosion[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1974,38(6):946-950.

Robichaud P R, Wagenbrenner J W, Lewis S A, et al. Post-fire mulching for runoff and erosion mitigation Part II:Effectiveness in reducing runoff and sediment yields from small catchments[J].Catena,2013,105:93-111.

Ruy S, Findeling A, Chadoeaf J. Effect of mulching techniques on plot scale runoff:FDTF modeling and sensitivity analysis[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2006,326(1/4):277-294.

Jordán A, Zavala L M, Gil J. Effects of mulching on soil physical properties and runoff under semi-arid conditions in southern Spain[J].Catena,2010,81(1):77-85.

Montenegro A A A, Abrantes J R C B, De Lima J L M P, et al. Impact of mulching on soil and water dynamics under intermittent simulated rainfall[J].Catena,2013,109:139-149.

Tesfuhuney W A, Rensburg L D V, Walker S. In-field runoff as affected by runoff strip length and mulch cover[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 2013,131(7):47-54.

Gholami L, Sadeghi S H, Homaee M. Straw mulching effect on splash erosion, runoff, and sediment yield from eroded plots[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2013,77(1):268-278.

Sadeghi S H R, Gholami L, Sharifi E, et al. Scale effect on runoff and soil loss control using rice straw mulch under laboratory conditions[J].Solid Earth,2015,6(1):1-8.

李瑞,陈康,刘瑞禄,等.基于小流域尺度的黔北喀斯特地区产流产沙特征[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(11):139-147.

姚宇卿,吕军杰,王育红,等.保持耕作技术对旱区坡耕地水土流失的影响[J].西北农业学报,2003,12(2):41-43.

郑子成,李廷轩,张锡洲,等.玉米植株冠层截留分异特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):208-211,215.

浏览量

1174

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

小流域土壤侵蚀模型（SWEM）

秦岭水源地生态恢复下土壤全氮分布对侵蚀的响应

人工模拟降雨下高寒区坡面径流水动力特性对砾石覆盖的响应

水力条件对不同地表粗糙度土壤分离能力的影响

三峡库区生态屏障区土壤侵蚀时空变化特征与驱动因素