氮负载生物炭对干湿交替稻田水土生态环境的调控效应

杨依; 焦艳婷; 王延智; 夏桂敏; 陈涛涛; 吴奇; 迟道才; 史鸿儒

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.032

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

氮负载生物炭对干湿交替稻田水土生态环境的调控效应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 氮负载生物炭对干湿交替稻田水土生态环境的调控效应
- Effects of Nitrogen-loaded Biochar on Ecological Environment of Water and Soil in an Alternate Wet-dry Irrigated Paddy Field
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第6期页码：226-234
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 沈阳农业大学水利学院,沈阳,110866
  2. 辽宁省农业发展服务中心,沈阳,110034
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "杨依(1997-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事节水灌溉技术研究。E-mail:2316583652@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  辽宁省教育厅科研项目（LSNJC201918）国家自然科学基金项目（52009078）国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFD0300300）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.032
  中图分类号： S278
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨依, 焦艳婷, 王延智, 等. 氮负载生物炭对干湿交替稻田水土生态环境的调控效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):226-234.

YANG Yi, JIAO Yanting, WANG Yanzhi, et al. Effects of Nitrogen-loaded Biochar on Ecological Environment of Water and Soil in an Alternate Wet-dry Irrigated Paddy Field[J]. 2020, 34(6): 226-234.
杨依, 焦艳婷, 王延智, 等. 氮负载生物炭对干湿交替稻田水土生态环境的调控效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):226-234. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.032.

YANG Yi, JIAO Yanting, WANG Yanzhi, et al. Effects of Nitrogen-loaded Biochar on Ecological Environment of Water and Soil in an Alternate Wet-dry Irrigated Paddy Field[J]. 2020, 34(6): 226-234. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.032.

摘要

农田面源污染已成为引起水体富营养化的主要原因之一。为了减少稻田氮素流失、改善稻田局部水体养分负载过重的问题，采用盆栽试验，通过生物炭吸附富营养水中的养分后再利用于盆栽水稻，设置主区为持续淹水灌溉（IF）与干湿交替灌溉（IA），副区为1个对照（常规施氮，N1C0）与4种不同用量的氮肥与氮负载生物炭处理（N3/4C1、N3/4C2、N1/2C1、N1/2C2），其中N3/4、N1/2表示氮肥施入量为当地传统施氮量（N1）的3/4，1/2倍；C1、C2分别为10 t/hm2和20 t/hm2氮负载生物炭。结果表明：（1）减少氮肥施入配施氮负载生物炭显著提高了常规施氮处理田面水的pH；（2）常规施氮肥处理下，干湿交替灌溉（IA）田面水NH4+—N平均浓度较持续淹水灌溉（IF）高8.0%，但是添加20 t/hm2氮负载生物炭后，干湿交替灌溉田面水NH4+—N平均浓度低于持续淹水灌溉处理；（3）水稻生育后期，氮负载生物炭对NH4+—N具有明显的缓释作用，而在干湿交替灌溉中，减施氮肥配合添加氮负载生物炭处理较N1C0处理降低了田面水NO3-—N浓度；（4）减施氮肥配合添加氮负载生物炭可提高水稻分蘖率，而添加20 t/hm2氮负载生物炭在氮肥施用量较少时，有利于提高水稻的有效分蘖率。综上，氮负载生物炭不仅可以降低富营养水中30.8%含氮量，还能显著降低施肥初期水稻田面水中NH4+—N浓度，降低流失风险，延长NH4+—N的释放时间而减少1/4的施氮量和保证水稻生育末期的氮素需求，从而有利于水稻生长。

Abstract

Farmland non-point source pollution has become one of the main causes of water eutrophication. In order to reduce nitrogen loss and relieve the over loading of nutrients in the local water body of rice field

a pot experiment was carried out. The main plots were continuous flooding irrigation (IF) and alternate wet and dry irrigation (IA)

and the subplots were a control (conventional nitrogen application

N1C0) and four different nitrogen and nitrogen-loaded biochar treatments (N3/4C1

N3/4C2

N1/2C1

N1/2C2)

in which N3/4 and N1/2 represented that the nitrogen application amount was 3/4 times and 1/2 times of the local traditional nitrogen application amount (N1); C1 and C2 were respectively 10 t/hm2 and 20 t/hm2 nitrogen-loaded biochar. Results showed that: (1) The pH value of the surface water with the conventional nitrogen treatment was significantly increased by reducing the application of nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen-loaded biochar; (2) The average concentration of NH4+—N in the surface water of IA was 8.0% higher than that of IF

but the average concentration of NH4+—N in the surface water of IA was lower than that of IF after adding 20 t/hm2 nitrogen-loaded biochar; (3) In the later growth stage of rice

the nitrogen-loaded biochar had a significant slow-release effect on NH4+—N

while in IA

the reduction of nitrogen fertilizer combined with nitrogen-loaded biochar reduced the concentration of NO3-—N in the surface water compared with the treatment of N1C0. (4) The tillering rate of rice could be increased by reducing nitrogen application and adding nitrogen-loaded biochar

while the effective tillering rate of rice could be improved by adding 20 t/hm2 nitrogen-loaded biochar when the amount of nitrogen application was less. In summary

reducing nitrogen application combined with adding nitrogen-loaded biochar could not only reduce the nitrogen content by about 30.8% in eutrophic water

but also significantly reduced the NH4+—N concentration in surface water at the early stage of fertilization

reduced the risk of loss

prolonged the release time of NH4+—N

reduced the nitrogen application amount by 25% and ensured the nitrogen demand at the end of rice growth

which was conducive to rice growth.

关键词

Keywords

references

戴曹培.优化施肥对农业面源污染控制研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2017.

张蔚文,石敏俊,黄祖辉.控制非点源污染的政策情景模拟:以太湖流域的平湖市为例[J].中国农村经济,2006(3):40-47.

李海鹏.中国农业面源污染的经济分析与政策研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2007.

郑春风,任伟,车军,等.氮肥减量施用对冬小麦产量及经济效益的影响[J].山西农业科学,2019,47(1):56-60.

曹涤环.稻田中氮肥损失的原因与对策[J].农业知识(乡村季风),2014(1):42-43.

蒋旭涛.生物炭对水中氨氮和磷酸盐吸附性能研究[D].天津:天津大学,2013.

姚旭.生物炭基本性质与氮素吸附特征研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2016.

张伟明,陈温福,孟军,等.东北地区秸秆生物炭利用潜力、产业模式及发展战略研究[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(14):2406-2424.

Zhu K R, Fu H, Zhang J H, et al. Studies on removal of NH

-N from aqueous solution by using the activated carbons derived from rice husk[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2012,43:18-25.

高菲.生物炭吸附去除氨氮试验研究.武汉大学党委研究生工作部.武汉大学第九届研究生学术科技节系列活动之"第八届湖北省给水排水工程与环境工程研究生学术论坛"论文集.武汉大学党委研究生工作部:武汉大学土木建筑工程学院,2014:14-48.

钱忠龙.连年氮肥减量对水稻产量的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2007(4):428-429.

周江明,余华波,毛建芬.水稻减氮施肥综合效益研究[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(9):260-263.

黄巧义,唐拴虎,张发宝,等.减氮配施控释尿素对水稻产量和氮肥利用的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(6):829-838.

Markou G, Vandamme D, Muylaert K. Using natural zeolite for ammonia sorption from wastewater and as nitrogen releaser for the cultivation of Arthrospira platensis[J].Bioresource Technology,2014,155:373-378.

谢淘.生物炭的特性分析及其在黄水资源化中的应用[D].北京:清华大学,2015.

王镇.水稻新品种东研稻18选育及主要栽培技术[J].农业科技通讯,2016(5):175-176.

龚伟,颜晓元,王景燕.长期施肥对土壤肥力的影响[J].土壤,2011,43(3):336-342.

彭卫福.土壤肥力对水稻氮素利用效率和氮循环相关微生物的影响[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2017.

张雅洁.小麦-水稻连续还田对土壤有机质化学结构及不同氮素形态含量的研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2016.

Peng S, Buresh R J, Huang J, et al. Improving nitrogen fertilization in rice by site-specific N management[J].Agronomy for Sustainable Development,2010,30(3):649-656.

Wu Q, Chi D, Xia G, et al. Effects of zeolite on drought resistance and water-nitrogen use efficiency in paddy rice[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2019,145(11):04019024.

Wu Q, Wang Y Z, Chen T T, et al. Soil nitrogen regulation using clinoptilolite for grain filling and grain quality improvements in rice[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 2020,199:104547.

吴奇.斜发沸石对水稻节水增产及控氮机理研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2017.

Sah R N, Mikkelsen D S. Availability and utilization of fertilizer nitrogen by rice under alternate flooding[J].Plant and Soil,1983,75(2):221-226.

彭少兵,黄见良,钟旭华,等.提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略[J].中国农业科学,2002(9):1095-1103.

张聪智.生物炭对设施菜地土壤氮素缓控效应研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2015.

张星,张晴雯,刘杏认,等.施用生物炭对农田土壤氮素转化关键过程的影响[J].中国农业气象,2015,36(6):709-716.

Wang M M, Zhou Q X. Environmental effects and their mechanisms of biochar applied to soils[J].Environmental Chemistry,2013,32(5):768-780.

Deluca T H, Mackenzie M D, Gundale M J, et al. Wildfire-produced charcoal directly influences nitrogen cycling in ponderosa pine forests[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2006,70(2):448-453.

王思源,申健,李盟军,等.不同改性生物炭功能结构特征及其对铵氮吸附的影响[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(5):1037-1045.

Chu J, Xue J H, Jin M J, et al. Review of researches on effects of biochar in reducing nitrogen and phosphorus losses with agricultural non point source pollution[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2014,30(4):409-415.

高海英.一种生物炭基氮肥的特征及其对土壤作物的效应研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.

Khan M A, Kim K W, Mingzhi W, et al. Nutrient-impregnated charcoal: An environmentally friendly slow-release fertilizer[J].The Environmentalist,2008,28(3):231-235.

浏览量

1126

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

减氮配施缓释氮肥对棉田土壤酶活性和氮素吸收利用的影响

稻田水资源利用效用的灌排模式响应

植被缓冲带对乌梁素海区域农业面源污染的削减效果

灌溉与施肥对稻田氮磷径流流失的影响

大量沼液施灌稻田的氨挥发特征