黄河口生态恢复工程对湿地土壤不同形态无机硫动态变化的影响

武慧慧; 孙志高; 孙文广; 李新华

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.022

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黄河口生态恢复工程对湿地土壤不同形态无机硫动态变化的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 黄河口生态恢复工程对湿地土壤不同形态无机硫动态变化的影响
- Effects of Ecological Restoration Projects on Dynamic Variations of Inorganic Sulfur Fractions in Marsh Solis of the Yellow River Estuary
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第6期页码：150-158
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 福建师范大学湿润亚热带生态地理过程教育部重点实验室,福州,350007
  2. 福建师范大学地理研究所,福州,350007
  3. 福建师范大学福建省亚热带资源与环境重点实验室,福州,350007
  4. 路易斯安那州立大学植物、环境与土壤科学系,巴吞鲁日,700803
  5. 山东省农业科学院可持续发展研究所,济南,250000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "武慧慧(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事河口湿地生物地球化学研究。E-mail:huihuiwu97@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金面上项目（41371104，41971128）山东农业科学院农业科技创新工程项目（CXGC2016A08）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.022
  中图分类号： S153.6
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
武慧慧, 孙志高, 孙文广, 等. 黄河口生态恢复工程对湿地土壤不同形态无机硫动态变化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):150-158.

WU Huihui, SUN Zhigao, SUN Wenguang, et al. Effects of Ecological Restoration Projects on Dynamic Variations of Inorganic Sulfur Fractions in Marsh Solis of the Yellow River Estuary[J]. 2020, 34(6): 150-158.
武慧慧, 孙志高, 孙文广, 等. 黄河口生态恢复工程对湿地土壤不同形态无机硫动态变化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):150-158. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.022.

WU Huihui, SUN Zhigao, SUN Wenguang, et al. Effects of Ecological Restoration Projects on Dynamic Variations of Inorganic Sulfur Fractions in Marsh Solis of the Yellow River Estuary[J]. 2020, 34(6): 150-158. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.022.

摘要

选择黄河口生态恢复前后的未恢复区（R0）、2007年恢复区（R2007）和2002年恢复区（R2002）的芦苇湿地为研究对象，探讨了生态恢复工程对生长季湿地土壤无机硫形态变化的影响。结果表明，生态恢复工程不同程度地改变了湿地土壤中各形态无机硫含量。相对于R0，R2002和R2007土壤中的水溶性硫（H2O—S）含量分别降低46.7%和44.7%，吸附性硫（Adsorbed—S）和盐酸可溶性硫（HCl—Soluble—S）含量分别增加0.4%，116.0%和50.1%，29.1%，而盐酸挥发性硫（HCl—Volatile—S）含量在R2002下降8.0%，在R2007增加19.7%。不同恢复阶段湿地土壤中各形态无机硫含量在生长季呈不同的变化特征，这一方面与不同湿地植物生长节律以及地上与地下之间的硫养分供给关系密切相关；另一方面则与不同生态补水方式导致的环境因子，尤其是pH、EC和氮养分的变化有关。随着恢复年限的增加，湿地土壤的总无机硫（TIS）含量以及其占全硫（TS）含量的比例均呈降低趋势。湿地土壤的TIS储量整体随恢复年限的增加而降低，而这种降低主要取决于H2O—S、Adsorbed—S和HCl—Soluble—S的贡献，且以H2O—S占优（78%~80%）。研究发现，随着黄河口湿地的逐渐恢复以及每年冬季芦苇收割活动的进行，恢复湿地土壤中的无机硫养分逐渐趋于缺乏状态，长期来看将不利于维持湿地的稳定与健康。

Abstract

To investigate the effects of ecological restoration project on variations of inorganic sulfur fractions in marsh soils during the growing season

the Phragmites australis marshes in un-restoration plot (R0)

restoration plot since 2007 (R2007)

and restoration plot since 2002 (R2002) of the Yellow River estuary were studied. Results showed that the contents of inorganic sulfur fractions in marsh soils were greatly altered by the ecological restoration project. Compared with R0

the levels of Water—soluble—sulfur (H2O—S) in soils of R2002 and R2007 decreased by 46.7% and 44.7%

whereas those of Adsorbed—sulfur (Adsorbed—S) and HCl—Soluble—sulfur (HCl—Soluble—S) increased by 0.4%

116.0% and 50.1%

29.1%

respectively. By comparison

the contents of HCl—Volatile—sulfur (HCl—Volatile—S) in soils of R2002 decreased by 8.0% while those of R2007 increased by 19.7% compared to R0. The contents of inorganic sulfur fractions in marsh soils of different restoration stages showed different variations during the growing season. There were two probable reasons. First

it was closely related to the growth rhythm of different marsh plants and the sulfur supply relationships between aboveground and belowground parts; Second

it was dependent on the variations of environmental factors (especially pH

and nitrogen nutrient) caused by different ecological water supplement patterns. With increasing restoration years

both the total inorganic sulfur (TIS) content and its proportion in total sulfur (TS) content in marsh soils decreased greatly. Also

the TIS stocks in marsh soils generally decreased with increasing restoration years. The decline of TIS stock in marsh soils mainly rested with the contributions of H2O—S

Adsorbed—S and HCl—Soluble—S

and H2O—S was dominant (78%~80%). This study found that

with the gradual restoration of marshes in the Yellow River estuary and the implementation of reed harvest in winter every year

the inorganic sulfur nutrient in restoration marsh soils would gradually tend to be deficient

which might be unfavorable for the maintenance of stability and health of marshes in the long term.

关键词

Keywords

references

陆景陵.植物营养学[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003:72-76.

王华,孙志高,李家兵,等.闽江口芦苇与短叶茳芏湿地土壤无机硫形态分布特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2019,39(13):4921-4932.

何涛,孙志高,李家兵,等.闽江河口不同淹水环境下典型湿地植物-土壤系统全硫含量空间分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):246-254.

Krairapanond N, Delaune R D, Patrick W H. Seasonal distribution of sulfur fractions in Louisiana salt marsh soils[J].Estuaries,1991,14(1):17-28.

Zopfi J, Böttcher M E, Bo B J. Biogeochemistry of sulfur and iron in Thioploca-colonized surface sediments in the upwelling area central chile[J].Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta,2008,72(3):827-843.

Attri K, Kerkar S, Lokabharathi P A. Ambient iron concentration regulates the sulfate reduce in activity in the mangrove swampa of Diwar, Goa, India[J].Estuarinr Coastal&Shelf Science,2011,95(1):156-164.

Ronald B, Thomas G C. Environmental VOSCs-formation and degradation of dimethyl sulfide, methanethiol and related materials[J].Chemosphere,2004,55(3):291-317.

Küsel K, Roth U, Trinkwalter T, et al. Effect of pH on the anaerobic microbial cycling of sulfur in mining-impacted freshwater lake sediments[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2001,46(3):213-223.

Akerblom S, Bishop K, Bjorn E, et al. Significant interaction effects from sulfate deposition and climate on sulfur concentrations constitute major controls on methylmercury production in peatlands[J].Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta,2013,102(2):1-11.

何涛,孙志高,李家兵,等.闽江河口互花米草与短叶茳芏湿地土壤无机硫形态分布特征及其影响因素[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(12):4747-4756.

林慧娜,傅娇艳,吴浩,等.中国主要红树林湿地沉积物中硫的分布特征及影响因素[J].海洋科学,2009,33(12):79-82.

张恒阳.外来种互花米草入侵对九段沙湿地土壤硫库的影响研究[D].上海:上海大学,2018.

李新华,孙志高,杨丽萍.黄河三角洲柽柳盐沼硫化氢和羰基硫通量特征[J].湿地科学,2015,13(6):708-713.

李萍.胶州湾互花米草潮滩土壤无机硫形态时空分布特征及其影响因素[D].山东青岛:青岛大学,2019.

孙志高,孙文广.黄河口不同恢复阶段湿地土壤N

O产生过程对氮输入的响应[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1135-1144.

孙文广.黄河口生态恢复工程对湿地氮循环关键过程的影响[D].山东烟台:中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所,2015.

Cui B S, Yang Q C, Yang Z F, et al. Evaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China[J].Ecological Engineering,2009,35(7):1090-1103.

郑立地,肖蓉,姚新颖,等.黄河三角洲潮汐区和生态恢复区湿地土壤特征和重金属分布[J].湿地科学,2015,13(5):535-542.

姜欢欢,孙志高,王玲玲,等.黄河口潮滩湿地土壤甲烷产生潜力及其对有机物和氮输入响应的初步研究[J].湿地科学,2012,10(4):451-458.

郝庆菊,王起超,王跃思.三江平原典型湿地土壤中硫的分布特征[J].土壤通报,2004,35(3):331-335.

李新华,刘景双,孙志高,等.三江平原小叶章湿地生态系统硫的生物地球化学循环[J].生态学报,2007,27(6):2199-2207.

Zhang J M, Chi F Q, Zhou B K, et al. Sulfur bioavailability of black soil in Northeast China[J].Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science,2014,63(2):172-179.

李书田,林葆,周卫.土壤有机硫矿化动力学特征及影响因素[J].土壤学报,2001,38(2):184-192.

周丽娜.不同立地红壤对大气硫沉降的反应[D].南京:南京林业大学,2005.

陈冰冰,孙志高,孙文广,等.外源氮持续输入对相应氮梯度下碱蓬残体分解及硫养分释放的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(8):2872-2882.

Johnston S G, Burton E D, Aaso T, et al. Sulfur, iron and carbon cycling following hydrological restoration of acidic freshwater wetlands[J].Chemical Geology,2014,371(5):9-26.

赵宇华,叶央芳,刘学东.硫酸盐还原菌及其影响因子[J].环境污染与防治,1997,19(5):41-43.

李新华,郭洪海,杨丽萍,等.黄河三角洲翅碱篷湿地硫化氢和羰基硫排放动态研究[J].环境科学,2014,35(2):786-791.

张雪雯,莫熠,张博雅,等.干湿交替及凋落物对若尔盖泥炭土可溶性有机碳的影响[J].湿地科学,2014,12(2):134-140.

Ghani A, Mclaren R G, Swift R S. Sulphur mineralization and transformation in soil as influnenced by additions of carbon, nitrogen and sulphur[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1992,24(4):331-341.

徐成凯,胡正义,章钢娅,等.石灰性土壤中硫形态组分及其影响因素[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2001,7(4):416-423.

张太平,王奎锋,王强,等.黄河三角洲水盐演化及补给来源:基于水化学与同位素分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(4):231-239.

Zhao Q Q, Bai J H, Gao Y C, et al. Effects of freshwater inputs on soil quality in the Yellow River Delta, China[J].Ecological Indicators,2019,98:619-626.

Yamane I. Reduction of nitrate and sulfate in submerged soils with special reference to redox potential and water-soluble sugar content of soils[J].Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2012,15(4):139-148.

Liu F Q, Zhang Y P, Liang H, et al. Long-term harvesting of reeds affects greenhouse gas emissions and microbial functional genes in alkaline wetlands[J].Water Research,2019,164:114936.

赵亚杰,张建霞.黄河三角洲湿地恢复区芦苇复壮[J].山东林业科技,2015,45(6):66-68.

马华,陈秀芝,潘卉,等.持续收割对上海九段沙湿地芦苇生长特征、生物量和土壤全氮含量的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2013,29(2):209-213.

浏览量

1332

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

三峡水库消落带不同植被类型和坡位的土壤性状分异特征

秦岭水源地生态恢复下土壤全氮分布对侵蚀的响应

根土复合体力学效应及其模型构建研究进展与展望

黄土丘陵区人工移植生物结皮集雨面的集雨效率及其抗侵蚀破损能力