黑土区坡耕地不同秸秆还田方式的水土保持效果分析

贺云锋; 沈海鸥; 张月; 赵占军; 牟廷森

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.014

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黑土区坡耕地不同秸秆还田方式的水土保持效果分析

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 黑土区坡耕地不同秸秆还田方式的水土保持效果分析
- Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Straw Returning Patterns in Sloping Farmland in the Chinese Black Soil Region
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第6期页码：89-94
- 作者机构：
  
  吉林农业大学资源与环境学院,长春,130118
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "贺云锋(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持措施有效性评价研究。E-mail:dt130929@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFE0202900）国家自然科学基金项目（U19A2061，41601281）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.014
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
贺云锋, 沈海鸥, 张月, 等. 黑土区坡耕地不同秸秆还田方式的水土保持效果分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):89-94.

HE Yunfeng, SHEN Haiou, ZHANG Yue, et al. Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Straw Returning Patterns in Sloping Farmland in the Chinese Black Soil Region[J]. 2020, 34(6): 89-94.
贺云锋, 沈海鸥, 张月, 等. 黑土区坡耕地不同秸秆还田方式的水土保持效果分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):89-94. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.014.

HE Yunfeng, SHEN Haiou, ZHANG Yue, et al. Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Straw Returning Patterns in Sloping Farmland in the Chinese Black Soil Region[J]. 2020, 34(6): 89-94. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.014.

摘要

为了揭示黑土区坡耕地不同秸秆还田方式的水土保持效果，基于野外原位坡耕地人工模拟降雨试验，以传统顺坡垄作处理为对照，分析50，100 mm/h降雨强度下3种具有代表性的秸秆还田方式（秸秆深还、秸秆碎混和免耕+残茬覆盖）对坡耕地产流产沙过程、径流量、侵蚀量及其减流减沙效益的影响。结果表明：（1）不同秸秆还田方式的产流率皆随降雨量的增加而增大，产流率和产沙率大小均表现为顺坡垄作 > 秸秆深还 > 秸秆碎混 > 免耕+残茬覆盖。（2）与顺坡垄作相比，50，100 mm/h降雨强度下，秸秆还田处理分别延缓产流时间14.0，4.8 min，产流时间的滞后可以体现秸秆还田措施的水土保持效果。（3）秸秆深还、秸秆碎混、免耕+残茬覆盖处理的平均减流效益分别为36.8%，53.9%，65.8%，平均减沙效益分别为84.9%，90.3%，96.8%。可见，免耕+残茬覆盖方式的水土保持效果最好，其次为秸秆碎混和秸秆深还。

Abstract

The objective of this study was to reveal the soil and water conservation effects of different straw returning patterns at croplands in the black soil region of China. Based on simulated rainfall experiments at field croplands in situ

effects of three representative straw returning patterns (deep application of straw

smashed straw turnover

and no-tillage with straw mulching) on the processes of runoff rates and soil loss rates

total runoff and soil erosion amount

runoff and sediment reduction benefits at 50 and 100 mm/h rainfall intensities were analyzed. The traditional up- and down slope tillage was used as the control treatment. The results showed that: (1) The runoff rates for treatments of different straw returning patterns increased as the rainfall amount increased. Both the runoff rates and soil loss rates decreased in the order of up- and down slope tillage (CK) > deep application of straw > smashed straw turnover > no-tillage with straw mulching. (2) The straw returning treatments delayed the runoff yield time for 14.0 min at 50 mm/h and 4.8 min at 100 mm/h compared with the traditional up-and down slope tillage treatment

which could reflect the soil and water conservation effects of these straw returning measures. (3) The mean runoff reduction benefits for deep application of straw

smashed straw turnover

and no-tillage with straw mulching treatments were 36.8%

53.9%

and 65.8%

and their mean sediment reduction benefits were 84.9%

90.3%

and 96.8%

respectively. Therefore

the pattern of no-tillage with straw mulching had the best soil and water conservation effect in this study

which was followed in descending order by the patterns of smashed straw turnover and deep application of straw.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘宝元,阎百兴,沈波,等.东北黑土区农地水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008(1):1-8.

Nearing M A, Xie Y, Liu B Y, et al. Natural and anthropogenic rates of soil erosion[J].International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2017,5:77-84.

Cui M, Cai Q G, Zhu A X, et al. Soil erosion along a long slope in the gentle hilly areas of black soil region in Northeast China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2007,17(3):375-383.

陆继龙.我国黑土的退化问题及可持续农业[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(2):53-55,67.

Yao Q, Liu J J, Yu Z H, et al. Three years of biochar amendment alters soil physiochemical properties and fungal community composition in a black soil of northeast China[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,110:56-67.

龚振平,杜婷婷,闫超,等.玉米秸秆还田及施磷量对黑土磷吸附与解吸特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(22):161-169.

高洪军,彭畅,张秀芝,等.不同秸秆还田模式对黑钙土团聚体特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):75-79.

王珍,冯浩.秸秆不同还田方式对土壤结构及土壤蒸发特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(6):224-228,251.

汪军,王德建,张刚,等.连续全量秸秆还田与氮肥用量对农田土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(5):40-44,62.

杨青森,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.秸秆覆盖对东北黑土区土壤侵蚀及养分流失的影响[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(2):1-5.

许晓鸿,隋媛媛,张瑜,等.黑土区不同耕作措施的水土保持效益[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(3):12-16.

张少良,张兴义,刘晓冰,等.典型黑土侵蚀区不同耕作措施的水土保持功效研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):11-15.

温磊磊,郑粉莉,沈海鸥,等.沟头秸秆覆盖对东北黑土区坡耕地沟蚀发育影响的试验研究[J].泥沙研究,2014(6):73-80.

朱姝,窦森,陈丽珍.秸秆深还对土壤团聚体中胡敏酸结构特征的影响[J].土壤学报,2015,52(4):747-758.

胡伟,郑粉莉,边锋.降雨能量对东北典型黑土区土壤溅蚀的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(15):4708-4717.

边锋,郑粉莉,徐锡蒙,等.东北黑土区顺坡垄作和无垄作坡面侵蚀过程对比[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(1):11-16.

Xu X Z, Xu Y, Chen S C, et al. Soil loss and conservation in the black soil region of Northeast China:A retrospective study[J].Environmental Science and Policy,2010,13(8):793-800.

姜义亮,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.降雨和汇流对黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响试验研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(24):8207-8215.

刘志生,张莉,杨志东,等.长春市新一代暴雨强度公式的推求研究[J].中国给水排水,2014,30(9):147-150.

沈海鸥,肖培青,李洪丽,等.黑土坡面不同粒级泥沙流失特征分析[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(20):111-117.

苏鹏,贾燕峰,曹馨月,等.东北黑土区不同坡段等间距植物篱减流减沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):22-35.

闫雷,纪晓楠,孟庆峰,等.免耕措施下黑土区坡耕地土壤肥力质量评价[J].东北农业大学学报,2019,50(5):43-54.

沈海鸥,刘健,王宇,等.降雨强度和坡度对黑土区土质道路路面侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):123-126.

沈海鸥,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.雨滴打击对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀特征的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(8):104-112.

王安,郝明德,王荚文.人工降雨条件下秸秆覆盖及留茬的水土保持效应[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(2):26-28,34.

车明轩,宫渊波,Muhammad N K,等.不同雨强、坡度对秸秆覆盖保持水土效果的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(2):131-135,142.

Parsons A J, Stone P M. Effects of intra-storm variations in rainfall intensity on interrill runoff and erosion[J].Catena,2006,67:68-78.

Jourgholami M, Abari M E. Effectiveness of sawdust and straw mulching on postharvest runoff and soil erosion of a skid trail in a mixed forest[J].Ecological Engineering,2017,109:15-24.

唐涛,郝明德,单凤霞.人工降雨条件下秸秆覆盖减少水土流失的效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,22(1):9-11,40.

张翼夫,李洪文,何进,等.玉米秸秆覆盖对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(7):118-124.

徐勤学,朱晓锋,方荣杰,等.秸秆覆盖对岩溶区坡耕地产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):22-26,32.

浏览量

1408

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

秸秆还田方式对川南紫色土坡地水沙及氮磷流失的影响

耦合气候与土地利用变化的洱海流域径流预测及影响机制

生物炭配施硝化/脲酶抑制剂及秸秆覆盖对红壤茶园氮磷淋失影响

1950—2020年黄河上游干流水沙时空变化与周期特征

覆盖与灌溉条件下农田耕层土壤养分含量的动态变化