1. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,长沙,410125
2. 中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站, 广西 环江,547100
3. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
4. 广西大学农学院,南宁,530005
[ "周春衡(1997-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事喀斯特土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:zhouchunheng@foxmail.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
周春衡, 陈洪松, 付智勇, 等. 土壤大孔隙形态对喀斯特区水土漏失过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):70-76.
ZHOU Chunheng, CHEN Hongsong, FU Zhiyong, et al. Effect of Soil Macropore Structures on Soil and Water Loss Progress in Karst Areas[J]. 2020, 34(6): 70-76.
周春衡, 陈洪松, 付智勇, 等. 土壤大孔隙形态对喀斯特区水土漏失过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):70-76. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.011.
ZHOU Chunheng, CHEN Hongsong, FU Zhiyong, et al. Effect of Soil Macropore Structures on Soil and Water Loss Progress in Karst Areas[J]. 2020, 34(6): 70-76. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.011.
在岩溶作用下,喀斯特土壤—表层岩溶带耦合发育,上覆土壤中大孔隙与下伏表层岩溶带中裂隙、管道存在密切的水力联系,然而土壤大孔隙影响土壤—表层岩溶带系统中水土漏失的过程机理尚不清楚。通过人工模拟降雨试验,采用试验微区模拟不同土壤大孔隙形态(出露型、浅埋型、深埋型),并以全土微区为对照,探讨了土壤大孔隙对喀斯特地区水土漏失过程的影响。结果表明:与全土微区相比,土壤大孔隙的存在明显加速了水分的垂直渗漏,其对水分渗漏量的影响表现在峰值不同(出露型 > 浅埋型 > 深埋型 > 全土)。土壤大孔隙也给土壤漏失带来风险性,不同形态土壤大孔隙间土壤漏失存在显著差异,表现为出露型 > 浅埋型 > 深埋型 > 全土。本研究中土壤漏失量总体较少(<10 g),土壤强烈漏失现象只在极端状况下发生(雨强为120 mm/h的出露型土壤大孔隙微区)。漏失泥沙主要以粒径<2 mm的小颗粒为主, > 5 mm的大颗粒仅出现在出露型土壤大孔隙微区。土壤漏失因子(土壤漏失量、漏失土壤细颗粒含量)与水分渗漏因子(水分垂直渗漏出流时间、水分渗漏量)存在显著相关关系,说明土壤漏失主要受到水文过程的驱动。土壤大孔隙形态和降雨强度控制了水分渗漏过程,进而影响到土壤漏失过程。研究结果可为该区石漠化治理和地下水污染防控提供科技支撑。
Through simulated rainfall experiments
the experimental micro-plots were used to simulate different soil macropore structures (exposed type
shallow-buried type
and deep-buried type)
and the totally soil filled micro-plots were used as a control to discuss the effects of soil macropore structure on karst soil and water loss processes. The results showed that: Compared with the totally soil filled micro-plots
the presence of soil macropore significantly accelerated the vertical water leakage
and different soil macropore structures had distinction runoff peaks (exposed > shallow-buried > deep-buried > totally soil filled). The soil macropores also exacerbated soil loss risk
and there were significant differences in soil loss between different soil macropore structure treatments (exposed > shallow-buried > deep-buried > totally soil filled). The soil loss amounts were relatively small (less than 10 g)
and larger soil loss amounts only occurred under extreme conditions (exposed soil micropores with a rain intensity of 120 mm/h). Small-sized sediments less than 2 mm were dominated during soil loss processes for all treatments
and the sediments larger than 5 mm mostly occurred in the exposed soil macropore treatments. There were significant correlations between soil loss factors (soil loss amount and fine sediment content) and water leakage factors (water leakage initiation time and water leakage amount).The water leakage process was mainly affected by rainfall intensity
and the soil loss process was mainly affected by the soil macropore structures. The results of this study can provide scientific and technological support for the prevention and control of rocky desertification and groundwater pollution in karst areas.
苏亚军.岩溶地区土洞发育机制的水力学解析及治理原则[J].中国水运,2012,12(10):191-192.
白云星,周运超,周鑫伟,等.喀斯特土壤与喀斯特区域土壤关系的探讨:以贵州省普定县后寨和小流域为例[J].土壤,2020,52(2):414-420.
何忠明,杨煜,曾新发,等.土洞演化过程中路基变形的响应分析[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,49(12):3068-3076.
蒋小珍,雷明堂,管振德.单层土体结构岩溶土洞的县城机理[J].中国岩溶,2012,31(4):426-432.
康彦仁.岩溶塌陷的形成机制[J].南方国土资源,1989(2):83-90.
刘之葵.岩溶地区溶洞及土洞对建筑地基影响的研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2004.
Beven K, Germann P. Water flow in soil macropores Ⅱ. A combines flow model[J].Journal of Soil Science,1981,32(1):15-29.
周运超,潘根兴.茂兰森林生态系统对岩溶环境的适应于调节[J].中国岩溶,2001,20(1):47-52.
邓艳,蒋忠诚,曹建华.弄拉典型峰丛岩溶区青冈栎叶片形态特征及对环境的适应[J].广西植物,2004,24(4):317-322.
王发,付智勇,陈洪松,等.喀斯特洼地退耕和耕作土壤优先流特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):111-116.
张静举.广西喀斯特区甘蔗地土壤大孔隙流特征研究[D].桂林:桂林理工大学,2018.
Šimůunek J, Jarvis N J, van Genuchten M T, et al. Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone[J].Journal of Hydrology,2003,272(1/4):14-35.
Lottes W S, Hester E T. Filling the void:The effect of stream bank soil pipes on transient hyporheic exchange during a peak flow event[J].Water Resources Research,2020,56(2):e2019WR025959.
付智勇,陈洪松,王克林,等.一种适宜高异质性喀斯特坡地的可升降便携式模拟降雨器:中国,湖南:CN:103691594A[P].2014-04-02.
张伟,陈洪松,苏以荣,等.一种适用于喀斯特地区的土壤侵蚀与养分迁移模拟装置:中国,湖南:CN:103454403A[P].2013-12-18.
郭伟,史志华,陈利顶,等.红壤表土团聚体粒径对坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(6):2516-2522.
甘艺贤.人工模拟降雨下喀斯特裸露坡耕地溶质迁移特征试验研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2018.
吴继强.非饱和土壤中大孔隙流及溶质优先迁移基本特性试验研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2010.
胡奕,戴全厚,王佩将.喀斯特坡耕地产流特征及影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(6):46-51.
张长保.降雨条件下黄土坡面土壤养分迁移特征试验研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008.
常颖.内蒙古希拉穆仁草原产流产沙试验过程研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2014.
蔡雄飞,王济,雷丽,等.不同雨强对我国西南喀斯特山区土壤侵蚀影响的模拟研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(6):5-8.
彭旭东,戴全厚,李昌兰,等.模拟雨强和地下裂隙对喀斯特地区坡耕地养分流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(2):131-140.
吴丽萍,陈洪松,付智勇,等.喀斯特岩溶裂隙对地下径流和氮素垂直渗漏的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):64-71.
张志才,陈喜,程勤波,等.喀斯特山体表层岩溶带水文地质特征分析:以陈旗小流域为例[J].地球与环境,2011,39(1):19-25.
Wells R, DiCarlo D, Steenhuis T, et al. Infiltration and surface geometry features of a swelling soil following successive simulated rainstorms[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2003,67(5):1344-1351.
耿晓东,郑粉莉,张会茹.红壤坡面降雨入渗及产流产沙特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):39-43.
魏兴萍,谢德体,倪九派,等.重庆岩溶槽谷区山坡土壤的漏失研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2015,23(3):462-473.
冯腾,陈洪松,张伟,等.桂西北喀斯特坡地土壤
137
Cs的剖面分布特征及其指示意义[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(3):593-599.
彭旭东.喀斯特高原坡地浅层孔(裂)隙水土漏失过程及特征研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2018.
Serrano-Muela M P, Nadal-Romero E, Lana-Renault N, et al. An exceptional rainfall event in the central western pyrenees:Spatial patterns in discharge and impact[J].Land Degradation and Development,2015,26(3):249-262.
刘正堂,倪九派,杨智.喀斯特地区裸坡面土壤侵蚀的人工模拟降雨试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(5):12-16.
杨智,戴全厚,黄启鸿,等.典型喀斯特坡面产流过程试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(4):78-81.
Nearing M A, Foster G R, Lane L J, et al. A process-based soil erosion model for USDA-water erosion prediction project technology[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1989,32(5):1587-1593.
0
浏览量
1178
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621