间歇性与连续性降雨对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀影响的比较

何育聪; 郑浩杰; 韩剑桥

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

间歇性与连续性降雨对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀影响的比较

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 间歇性与连续性降雨对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀影响的比较
- Comparative Study on the Influence of Intermittent and Continuous Rainfall on Rill Erosion of Loess Slope
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第6期页码：8-13
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "何育聪(1999-),男,在读本科生,主要从事泥沙运动力学研究。E-mail:18188425393@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41807067，41907061）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.002
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
何育聪, 郑浩杰, 韩剑桥. 间歇性与连续性降雨对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀影响的比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):8-13.

HE Yucong, ZHENG Haojie, HAN Jianqiao. Comparative Study on the Influence of Intermittent and Continuous Rainfall on Rill Erosion of Loess Slope[J]. 2020, 34(6): 8-13.
何育聪, 郑浩杰, 韩剑桥. 间歇性与连续性降雨对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀影响的比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(6):8-13. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.002.

HE Yucong, ZHENG Haojie, HAN Jianqiao. Comparative Study on the Influence of Intermittent and Continuous Rainfall on Rill Erosion of Loess Slope[J]. 2020, 34(6): 8-13. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.002.

摘要

采用室内模拟降雨试验，对比了间歇性降雨与连续性降雨对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀的影响差异，量化了间歇性降雨相对于连续性降雨条件的试验误差，并评估该试验方法在坡面侵蚀模拟中的适宜性。结果表明：（1）低雨强（≤60 mm/h）时，对于间歇性降雨试验，坡面细沟产沙大幅降低，误差达-40.8%，伴随着沟宽、沟深和割裂度等形态指标的减小，误差介于-33%~-45%；产流误差较小，为0.4%。（2）高雨强（≥90 mm/h）时，产流产沙、细沟形态的各项指标误差均不大，为3%~12%，对试验结果影响相对较小。（3）在采用间歇性降雨试验方法时，建议采用高雨强试验条件（≥90 mm/h），才能准确模拟天然降雨的细沟侵蚀过程，且在高雨强时应控制间歇性降雨试验每一阶段的降雨历时，避免累积产沙量的持续快速增长而导致细沟侵蚀剧烈发展，误差进一步增大。由于土壤性质的区别，该试验结果在其他区域的适用性还有待深入研究。研究结果可为坡面细沟侵蚀的过程与机理研究提供技术支撑。

Abstract

Based on indoor simulated rainfall test

this study compared the influence of intermittent rainfall and continuous rainfall on rill erosion on loess slope

quantified and compared the experimental errors of intermittent rainfall relative to continuous rainfall conditions

and evaluated the suitability of this experimental method in slope erosion simulation. The results showed that: (1) At low rainfall intensity (≤60 mm/h)

for the intermittent rainfall test

the rill sediment production on the slope was significantly reduced with an error of -40.8%

and the error was between -33% ~ -45% along with the decreasing of ditch width

ditch depth and cleavage degree. The error of runoff production was small (0.4%). (2) When the rainfall intensity was high at 90 mm/h and 120 mm/h

the errors of various indexes of sediment and runoff production and rill morphology were all small

ranging from 3% to 12%

which had relatively little impact on the test results. (3) When the intermittent rainfall test method was used

it was suggested to adopt the high rainfall intensity test conditions (≥90 mm/h) to accurately simulate the rill erosion process of natural rainfall

and the rainfall duration of each stage of intermittent rainfall test should be controlled in case of high rain intensity

so as to avoid the continuous and rapid growth of accumulated sediment yield which leaded to the sharp development of rill erosion and further increase of error. Because of the difference of soil properties

the applicability of the test results in other areas needed further study. The results could provide technical support for the study of rill erosion process and mechanism.

关键词

Keywords

references

盛贺伟,孙莉英,蔡强国.黄土坡面细沟发育形态对侵蚀特征的影响[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2017,25(4):679-688.

Wang X, Zhao X L, Zhang Z X, et al. Assessment of soil erosion change and its relationships with land use/cover change in China from the end of the 1980s to 2010[J].Catena,2016,137:256-268.

He J J, Sun L Y, Gong H L, et al. Laboratory studies on the influence of rainfall pattern on rill erosion and its runoff and sediment characteristics[J].Land Degradation and Development,2017,28:1615-1625.

Wirtz S, Seeger M, Ries J B. Field experiments for understanding and quantification of rill erosion process[J].Catena,2012,91:21-34.

Sun L, Fang H, Deli Q I, et al. A review on rill erosion process and its influencing factors[J].Chinese Geographical Science,2013,23(4):389-402.

Chen X Y, Huang Y H, Zhao Y, et al.Analytical method for determining rill detachment rate of purple soil as compared with that of loess soil[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017,549:236-243.

裴冠博,龚冬琴,付兴涛.晋西黄绵土坡面细沟形态及其对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):79-84,182.

和继军,宫辉力,李小娟,等.细沟形成对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水科学进展,2014,25(1):90-97.

陈俊杰,孙莉英,蔡崇法,等.不同土壤坡面细沟侵蚀差异与其影响因素[J].土壤学报,2013,50(2):281-288.

沈海鸥,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.雨滴打击对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀特征的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(8):104-112,89.

沈海鸥,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.降雨强度和坡度对细沟形态特征的综合影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(7):162-170.

王洁,胡少伟,周跃.人工模拟降雨装置在水土保持方面的应用[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(4):188-190,194.

柯奇画,张科利.人工降雨模拟试验的相似性和应用性探究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):16-20.

赵玉丽,牛健植.人工模拟降雨试验降雨特性及问题分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):278-283.

吴淑芳,张永东,卜崇峰.黄土细沟侵蚀演化过程及其水力学特性试验研究[J].泥沙研究,2015,40(6):72-80.

吴淑芳,刘政鸿,霍云云,等.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀发育过程与模拟[J].土壤学报,2015,52(1):48-56.

郭慧莉,孙立全,吴淑芳,等.黄土高原地区鱼鳞坑坡面侵蚀演化过程及水力学特征[J].土壤学报,2017,54(5):1125-1135.

孙立全,吴淑芳,郭慧莉,等.人工掏挖坡面侵蚀微地貌演化及其水力学特性分析[J].水科学进展,2017,28(5):720-728.

张光辉,刘宝元,李平康.槽式人工模拟降雨机的工作原理与特性[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(6):56-60.

白清俊,马树升.细沟侵蚀过程中水流跌坑的发生机理探讨[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(6):62-65.

乔宇,徐先英.干旱荒漠区物理结皮的土壤水文效应[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(7):206-211.

晏清洪,原翠萍,雷廷武,等.降雨类型和水土保持对黄土区小流域水土流失的影响[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(2):169-175.

程琴娟,蔡强国,李家永.表土结皮发育过程及其侵蚀响应研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(4):114-122.

吴发启,范文波.土壤结皮对降雨入渗和产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(2):97-101.

浏览量

1233

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

晋西黄绵土坡面细沟形态及其对产流产沙的影响

岩面附着苔藓生物膜对石芽-溶沟坡地产流产沙过程影响的模拟试验

间歇性降雨条件对黑土表层孔隙结构和团聚体周转的影响

土壤结皮对乌拉山矿山废弃地客土坡面侵蚀特征的影响

水土保持措施对密云板栗林坡面产流产沙的影响