亚热带湿润区樟树吸水的土层来源及研究方法对比

王锐; 章新平; 戴军杰; 罗紫东; 贺新光; 关华德

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.037

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

亚热带湿润区樟树吸水的土层来源及研究方法对比

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 亚热带湿润区樟树吸水的土层来源及研究方法对比
- Study on Water Uptake Layers of the
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第5期页码：267-276
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院,长沙,410081
  2. 湖南师范大学地理空间大数据挖掘与应用湖南省重点实验室,长沙,410081
  3. National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, Flinders University,SA,Adelaide,5001
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "王锐(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事植被与生态水文研究。E-mail:2869299935@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41571021）湖南省人影办自立项科研项目（201901）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.037
  中图分类号： S175
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王锐, 章新平, 戴军杰, 等. 亚热带湿润区樟树吸水的土层来源及研究方法对比[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):267-276.

WANG Rui, ZHANG Xinping, DAI Junjie, et al. Study on Water Uptake Layers of the[J]. 2020, 34(5): 267-276.
王锐, 章新平, 戴军杰, 等. 亚热带湿润区樟树吸水的土层来源及研究方法对比[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):267-276. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.037.

WANG Rui, ZHANG Xinping, DAI Junjie, et al. Study on Water Uptake Layers of the[J]. 2020, 34(5): 267-276. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.037.

摘要

以长沙地区针阔混交林内的樟树为对象，基于2017年3月至2019年9月降水、土壤水和樟树茎杆水稳定同位素观测数据，利用直接比较法、水线法（δ2H和δ18O的线性关系）、Iso-Source模型和MixSIR模型，分析了樟树吸收水分的土层来源的季节变化，并比较4种方法的优缺点，旨在为植物水分利用来源研究提供新思路。结果表明：在判别樟树吸收水分的土层来源中，4种方法的判别结果基本一致。观测期内，樟树吸水层位存在明显季节变化。在2017年3—6月、2017年10月至2018年6月、2018年10月至2019年6月的湿润期，樟树分别主要利用0—20，0—40，0—20 cm土层的土壤水。在2017年、2018年、2019年的干旱期（7—9月），樟树分别主要利用20—60，0—60，60—100 cm土层的土壤水。在各层土壤水稳定同位素组成不存在明显差异时，水线法可很好地揭示樟树吸收水分的土层来源，而其他方法均无法判别樟树吸水层位。Iso-Source模型分别基于δ2H和δ18O计算得到的樟树主要吸水层位及其利用比例均存在一定差异，相比之下，MixSIR模型分别根据δ2H和δ18O计算得到的樟树主要吸水层位基本一致，且利用比例较接近。综上，在植物水分利用来源的定性判别中，适宜将直接比较法和水线法相结合进行分析；而在植物水分利用来源的定量研究中，MixSIR模型较Iso-Source模型更优。

Abstract

The typical plant species Cinnamomum camphora in the Needle-broad leaf mixed forest in Changsha was used as research object. Based on the stable isotopic composition of precipitation

bulk soil water

and twig xylem water from March 2017 to September 2019

the seasonal variations of water uptake layers of C. camphora was analyzed by the graphical inference

water-line inference

Iso-Source model and MixSIR model. In addition

the advantages and disadvantages of four methods in determining plant water use are compared

in order to provide new perspectives for the following analysis of plant water use. The results show that: four methods of determining the water uptake layers of C. camphora are basically identical. Pronounced seasonal variation of water use of C. camphora is observed during the observation period. During the wet period consisting of March to June 2017

October 2017 to June 2018 and October 2018 to June 2019

C. camphora mainly uses the soil water at 0—20

0—40 and 0—20 cm depth

respectively. During the dry periods (July to September) in 2017

2018 and 2019

C. camphora mostly uptakes the soil water at 20—60

0—60 and 60—100 cm depth

respectively. If there is no obvious difference of the stable isotopic composition of soil water at each depth

the water-line inference could determine the water uptake layers of C. camphora other than others. The main water uptake layers and utilization ratios of C. camphora calculated by Iso-Source model based on different isotopic composition are both different

however

calculated by the MixSIR model based on different isotopic composition are both largely identical. In conclusion

it is appropriate to combine graphical inference and water-line inference in the qualitative analysis of plant water use

and MixSIR model is more reliable than Iso-Source model in the quantitative research of plant water use.

关键词

Keywords

references

Xu Q, Li H B, Chen J Q, et al. Water use patterns of three species in subalpine forest, Southwest China:The deuterium isotope approach[J].Ecohydrology,2011,4(2):236-244.

Coleman N T. Isotopes and radiation in soil-plant nutrition studies[J].Immunogenetics,1967,31(1):67-69.

邓文平,余新晓,贾国栋,等.利用稳定氢氧同位素定量区分栓皮栎旱季水分来源的方法比较[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2013,21(3):412-422.

Wang P, Song X F, Han D M, et al. A study of root water uptake of crops indicated by hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes:A case in Shanxi Province,China[J].Agricultural Water Management,2010,97(3):475-482.

寿文凯,胡飞龙,阿拉木萨,等.基于SPAC系统干旱区水分循环和水分来源研究方法综述[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(8):2194-2202.

Ehleringer J R, Dawson T E. Water uptake by plants:Perspectives from stable isotope composition[J].Plant, Cell & Environment,1992,15(9):1073-1082.

Brunel J, Walker G R, Kennett-Smith A K. Field validation of isotopic procedures for determining sources of water used by plants in a semi-arid environment[J].Journal of Hydrology,1995,167(1):351-368.

Phillips D L, Gregg J W. Source partitioning using stable isotopes:Coping with too many sources[J].Oecologia,2003,136(2):261-269.

Moore J W, Semmens B X. Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models[J].Ecology Letters,2008,11(5):470-480.

李楠.基于稳定氧同位素的黄土丘陵区不同树龄枣树土壤水分利用研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.

Wang J, Lu N, Fu B J. Inter-comparison of stable isotope mixing models for determining plant water source partitioning[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,666:683-693.

Oerter E, Finstad K, Schaefer J, et al. Oxygen isotope fractionation effects in soil water via interaction with cations (Mg, Ca, K, Na) adsorbed to phyllosilicate clay minerals[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,515:1-9.

马小军,靳静静,司炳成,等.提取方法对土壤水同位素和植物水源分割的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(6):1840-1846.

黄一民,宋献方,章新平,等.洞庭湖流域不同水体中同位素研究[J].地理科学,2016,6(8):1252-1260.

戴军杰,章新平,罗紫东,等.长沙地区樟树林土壤水稳定同位素特征及其对土壤水分运动的指示[J].环境科学研究,2019,32(6):974-983.

Evaristo J, Jasechko S, Mcdonnell J J. Global separation of plant transpiration from groundwater and streamflow[J].Nature,2015,525(7567):91-94.

Yang B, Wen X, Sun X. Irrigation depth far exceeds water uptake depth in an oasis cropland in the middle reaches of Heihe River Basin[J].Scientific Reports,2015,5(5):289-296.

Nie Y P, Chen H S, Wang K L, et al. Seasonal water use patterns of woody species growing on the continuous dolostone outcrops and nearby thin soils in subtropical China[J].Plant and Soil,2011,341(1/2):399-412.

姚天次,章新平,谢宇龙,等.长沙地区近地面水汽中氢氧稳定同位素的变化特征[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(2):545-553.

刘文茹,彭新华,沈业杰,等.激光同位素分析仪测定液态水的氢氧同位素及其光谱污染修正[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(5):1181-1186.

Yang B, Wen X F, Sun X M, et al. Seasonal variations in depth of water uptake for a subtropical coniferous plantation subjected to drought in an East Asian monsoon region[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2015,201:218-228.

吴华武,章新平,关华德,等.不同水汽来源对湖南长沙地区降水中

D、

O的影响[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(8):1404-1414.

Craig H. Isotopic variations in meteoric water[J].Science,1961,133(3465):1702-1703.

Leng X, Cui J, Zhang S, et al. Differential water uptake among plant species in humid alpine meadows[J].Journal of Vegetation Science,2013,24(1):138-147.

Brett M T. Resource polygon geometry predicts Bayesian stable isotope mixing model bias[J].Marine Ecology Progress Series,2014,514:1-12.

Sun S J, Meng P, Zhang J S, et al.Variation in soil water uptake and its effect on plant water status in

Juglans regia L

. during dry and wet seasons[J].Tree Physiology,2011,31(12):1378-1389.

罗紫东,关华德,章新平,等.亚热带樟树树干液流通量变化规律[J].热带地理,2016,36(4):658-665.

刘自强,余新晓,贾国栋,等.北京山区侧柏和栓皮栎的水分利用特征[J].林业科学,2016,52(9):22-30.

Liu Y H, Xu Z, Duffy R, et al. Analyzing relationships among water uptake patterns,rootlet biomass distribution and soil water content profile in a subalpine shrubland using water isotopes[J].European Journal of Soil Biology,2011,47(6):380-386.

Wang J, Lu N, Fu B. Seasonal variation in water uptake patterns of three plant species based on stable isotopes in the semi-arid Loess Plateau[J].Science of the Total Environment,2017,607:27-37.

浏览量

915

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

亚热带典型植物水分利用来源变化的水稳定同位素分析