1. 宁夏大学农学院,银川,750021
2. 西北退化生态系统恢复与重建国家重点实验室培育基地,银川,750021
[ "张昊(1997-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态与模型构建研究。E-mail:zhanghlqq@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
张昊, 李建平, 王誉陶, 等. 封育与放牧对黄土高原天然草地土壤化学计量特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):251-258.
ZHANG Hao, LI Jianping, WANG Yutao, et al. Effect of Enclosure and Grazing on the Soil Stoichiometry Characteristics of Natural Grassland on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2020, 34(5): 251-258.
张昊, 李建平, 王誉陶, 等. 封育与放牧对黄土高原天然草地土壤化学计量特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):251-258. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.035.
ZHANG Hao, LI Jianping, WANG Yutao, et al. Effect of Enclosure and Grazing on the Soil Stoichiometry Characteristics of Natural Grassland on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2020, 34(5): 251-258. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.035.
为揭示封育与放牧2种草地利用方式下土壤化学计量特征及其驱动因素,以宁夏固原云雾山封育草地和放牧草地为研究对象,定量分析了0—30 cm土壤化学计量特征及其影响因子。结果表明:(1)封育降低了土壤紧实度、容重和含水率,土壤孔隙度略有上升。(2)封育草地0—10 cm土层以>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体为主,其中>5 mm团聚体达到了46%,平均重量直径(MWD)和几何平均直径(GWD)分别为3.78,1.70,显著高于放牧草地(P<0.05),但两者分形维数并无差异,封育草地土壤团聚体稳定性有所提高。(3)封育草地0—10 cm土层土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)、全磷(TP)分别为17.714,2.018,0.659 g/kg,均高于放牧草地,其中土壤TN含量达到显著水平(P<0.05)。(4)封育草地0—20 cm土层碳氮比(C/N)、碳磷比(C/P)、氮磷比(N/P)均高于放牧草地。(5)封育草地土壤SOC、TN、C/P和N/P与土壤容重和分形维数呈显著性负相关(P<0.05),并且SOC和TN与MWD和GWD呈显著性正相关(P<0.05),放牧草地土壤化学计量特征与物理特性相关性低于封育草地。封育与放牧相比,改善了土壤物理特性和团聚体结构,土壤养分有所提升,土壤化学计量特征与土壤物理特性密切相关,土壤物理结构可能是影响土壤化学计量特征的主控因子。
In order to reveal the soil stoichiometric characteristics and their driving factors under the two grassland utilization modes of enclosure and grazing
the enclosed and grazing grassland of the Ningxia Yunwushan in Guyuan were used as the research object
the soil stoichiometric characteristics of 0-30 cm layer and the influencing factors were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that: (1) Enclosure decreased the soil penetration resistance
bulk density and moisture content
while increased the soil porosity. (2) In the 0-10 cm soil layer of the enclosed grassland
the main water stable aggregates were > 0.25 mm
and of which >5 mm water-stable aggregates accounted for 46%
the mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GWD) was 3.78 and 1.70
respectively
which were significantly higher than those of grazing grassland (P<0.05)
but there was not significant in fractal dimension between enclosed and grazing grassland. The soil stability of enclosed grassland was improved. (3) The content of soil organic carbon (SOC)
total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) of the 0-10 cm soil layer in enclosed grassland was 17.714
2.018 and 0.659 g/kg
respectively
which were all higher than those of grazing grassland
and the difference in TN was significant (P<0.05). (4) The soil carbon and nitrogen ratio (C/N)
carbon and phosphorus ratio (C/P)
and nitrogen and phosphorus ratio (N/P) of the 0-20 cm soil layer were all higher in enclosed grassland than those in grazing grassland. (5) SOC
TN
C/P and N/P were all significantly negative related to the soil bulk density and fractal dimension (P<0.05)
and SOC and TN were significantly positive related to MWD and GWD in enclosed grassland (P<0.05). The correlation between soil stoichiometry and physical characteristics of grazing grassland was lower than that of enclosed grassland. Enclosure ameliorated soil physical properties and aggregate structure
improved soil nutrients. Soil stoichiometry was closely related to soil physical properties
and the soil physical structure might be the main control factor affecting soil stoichiometric characteristics.
易浪,任志远,张翀,等.黄土高原植被覆盖变化与气候和人类活动的关系[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):166-174.
陈婧,王誉陶,张娟,等.黄土高原半干旱区不同土地利用方式下土壤结构特征[J].农业科学研究,2019,40(3):27-31.
Li J P, Zheng Z R, Xie H T, et al. Increased soil nutrition and decreased light intensity drive species loss after eight years grassland enclosures[J].Scientific Reports,2017,7:e44525.
吴雨晴,田赟,周建琴,等.不同放牧制度草地土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(4):801-807.
陶冶,刘耀斌,吴甘霖,等.准噶尔荒漠区域尺度浅层土壤化学计量特征及其空间分布格局[J].草业学报,2016,25(7):13-23.
Dise N B, Matzner E, Forsius M. Evaluation of organic horizon C:N ratio as an indicator of nitrate leaching in conifer forests across Europe[J].Environmental Pollution,1998,102(1):453-456.
张海鑫,曾全超,安韶山,等.子午岭典型植被凋落叶-土壤养分与酶活性特征[J].生态学报,2018,38(7):2262-2270.
刘旭阳,陈晓旋,陈优阳,等.福州不同农田土地利用类型土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):348-355.
曾全超,李鑫,董扬红,等.黄土高原延河流域不同植被类型下土壤生态化学计量学特征[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(11):1881-1891.
李建平,谢应忠.封育对黄土高原天然草地深层土壤碳、氮储量的影响[J].草业科学,2016,33(10):1981-1988.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,1999:30-74.
王婷,李建平,张翼,等.不同降水下天然草地土壤水稳定性团聚体分布特征[J].草业科学,2019,36(8):1935-1943.
Bai W M, Fang Y, Zhou M, et al. Heavily intensified grazing reduces root production in an Inner Mongolia temperate steppe[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2015,200:143-150.
赵妮,金晶炜,程光庆,等.渭北旱塬区不同坡向土地利用类型对土壤性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):271-279,288.
赵艳云,胡相明,程积民,等.自然封育对云雾山草地群落的影响[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(5):95-98.
李侠.封育对宁夏荒漠草原土壤有机碳及团聚体稳定性的影响[D].银川:宁夏大学,2014.
Keesstra S, Pereira P, Novara A, et al. Effects of soil management techniques on soil water erosion in apricot orchards[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,551/552:357-366.
Hafner S, Unteregelsbacher S, Seeber E, et al. Effect of grazing on carbon stocks and assimilate partitioning in a Tibetan montane pasture revealed by
13
CO
2
pulse labeling[J].Global Change Biology,2012,18(2):528-538.
Harris W N, Moretto A S, Distel R A, et al. Fire and grazing in grasslands of the Argentine Caldenal:Effects on plant and soil carbon and nitrogen[J].Acta Oecologica,2007,32(2):207-214.
赵如梦,张炳学,王晓霞,等.黄土高原不同种植年限苜蓿草地土壤与植物化学计量特征[J].草业科学,2019,36(5):1189-1199.
尹亚丽,王玉琴,李世雄,等.围封对退化高寒草甸土壤微生物群落多样性及土壤化学计量特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(1):127-136.
Prescott C E, Chappell H N, Vesterdal L. Nitrogen turnover in forest floors of coastal douglas-fir at sites differing in soil nitrogen capital[J].Ecology,2000,81(7):1878-1886.
Agren G I. Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities[J].Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics,2008,39:153-170.
杨宁,邹冬生,付美云,等.紫色土丘陵坡地恢复中土壤团聚体特征及其与土壤性质的关系[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(9):2361-2368.
曹叶飞.长期围封对山地草原生物多样性及土壤酶活性的影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2008.
0
浏览量
1060
下载量
14
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621