1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 山西吉县森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,北京,100083
3. 水土保持国家林业局重点实验室(北京林业大学),北京,100083
4. 北京市水土保持工程技术研究中心(北京林业大学),北京,100083
5. 林业生态工程教育部工程研究中心(北京林业大学),北京,100083
6. 北京林果业生态环境功能提升协同创新中心,北京,102206
7. 国家林业和草原局华东调查规划设计院,杭州,310019
[ "王珊珊(1997-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与林业生态工程研究。E-mail:wangshanshan0809@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
王珊珊, 毕华兴, 刘俊, 等. 晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):231-237.
WANG Shanshan, BI Huaxing, LIU Jun, et al. Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Influencing Factors of[J]. 2020, 34(5): 231-237.
王珊珊, 毕华兴, 刘俊, 等. 晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):231-237. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.032.
WANG Shanshan, BI Huaxing, LIU Jun, et al. Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Influencing Factors of[J]. 2020, 34(5): 231-237. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.032.
为研究林分密度对土壤入渗性能的影响,以晋西黄土区5种密度(1 075,1 300,1 575,1 800,2 150株/hm2)刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia Linn.)林为研究对象,采用双环入渗法测定其土壤入渗过程,并对入渗特征指标与土壤理化性质的相关性进行分析。结果表明:(1)不同密度刺槐林土壤入渗过程的变化规律一致,均经过瞬间入渗(0~5 min)、缓慢入渗(5~40 min)和稳定入渗(40 min后)阶段。(2)土壤初始入渗速率、稳定入渗速率、平均入渗速率和累积入渗量在不同林分密度下差异显著(P<0.05),不同密度刺槐林土壤入渗能力表现为1 075~1 800株/hm2,随林分密度增大,土壤入渗能力增强,在密度>1 800株/hm2后有减弱的趋势。故从林地土壤入渗能力角度,建议今后研究区刺槐林的经营密度以1 800株/hm2为宜。(3)采用Kostiakov模型、Horton模型、Philip模型和通用经验模型对不同密度刺槐林的土壤入渗过程进行模拟,从决定系数R2来看,通用经验模型的R2最大(0.990),故拟合效果最好,可作为晋西黄土区刺槐林土壤入渗过程的预测模型。(4)土壤入渗与土壤理化性质密切相关,不同密度刺槐林的土壤入渗性能与土壤容重呈极显著负相关(P<0.01),与有机质和>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与孔隙状况和质量含水率也有一定正相关性。
In order to study the influence of stand density on soil infiltration performance
five kinds of Robinia pseudoacacia Linn. stands (1 075
1 300
1 575
1 800
2 150 trees/hm2) in Loess region of Western Shanxi Province were selected as the research object. The soil infiltration process was determined by double-loop infiltration method
and the correlation of infiltration characteristic index and soil physicochemical properties were also analyzed. The results showed that: (1) The process of soil infiltration in Robinia pseudoacacia Linn. with different densities was the same
all of them went through the stages of transient infiltration
gradual infiltration
and stable infiltration. (2) There were significant differences in initial infiltration rates
stable infiltration rates
average infiltration rates and cumulative infiltration amount under different stand densities (P<0.05). With the increase of stand densities (1 075~1 800 trees/hm2)
soil infiltration capability increased. After the stand density of Robinia pseudoacacia Linn. was more than 1 800 trees/hm2
there was a trend of weakening in soil infiltration. Therefore
it was suggested that the management density of Robinia pseudoacacia Linn. in Loess region of Western Shanxi Province should be 1 800 trees/hm2. (3) The soil infiltration process of Robinia pseudoacacia Linn. with different densities was simulated by Kostiakov model
Horton model
Philip model and Universal Empirical model. In terms of R2
the Universal Empirical model had the largest R2(0.990)
and could be used as a predictive model for the soil infiltration process of Robinia pseudoacacia Linn. in Loess region of Western Shanxi Province. (4) Soil infiltration capability was negatively correlated with soil bulk density (P<0.01)
positively correlated with organic matter and > 0.25 mm water-stable aggregate (P<0.01)
and positively correlated with pore condition and water content.
张洪江,王礼先.长江三峡花岗岩坡面土壤流失特性及其系统动力学仿真[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997.
赵西宁,吴发启.土壤水分入渗的研究进展和评述[J].西北林学院学报,2004,19(1):42-45.
刘芝芹,黄新会,王克勤.金沙江干热河谷不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):57-62.
莫斌,陈晓燕,杨以翠,等.不同土地利用类型土壤入渗性能及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):13-17.
李平,王冬梅,丁聪,等.黄土高寒区典型植被类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2020,40(5):1-11.
陈娟,陈林,宋乃平,等.荒漠草原不同土壤类型水分入渗特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):18-23.
邵英男,刘延坤,李云红,等.不同林分密度长白落叶松人工林土壤养分特征[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(9):27-31.
侯贵荣,毕华兴,魏曦,等.黄土残塬沟壑区3种林地枯落物和土壤水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):357-363,371.
常译方,毕华兴,许华森,等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林对土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):227-232.
阿茹·苏里坦,常顺利,张毓涛.天山林区不同群落土壤水分入渗特性的对比分析与模拟[J].生态学报,2019,39(24):1-8.
陈文嫒,张少妮,华瑞,等.黄土丘陵区林草恢复进程中土壤入渗特征研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2017,39(1):62-69.
宋爱云,董林水,刘世荣,等.不同亚高山草甸群落类型的土壤入渗特征及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):41-45.
周健民,沈仁芳.土壤学大辞典[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
周巧稚,毕华兴,孔凌霄,等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林枯落物层水文生态功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):115-121.
刘骏,杨清培,余定坤,等.细根对竹林-阔叶林界面两侧土壤养分异质性形成的贡献[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(8):739-749.
赵小婵.华北土石山区不同密度人工油松林地土壤水分入渗研究[D].河北保定:华北电力大学,2016.
王琛,吴云飞,李甜江,等.金沙江不同林分的土壤入渗特征研究[J].西部林业科学,2019,48(3):69-77.
林代杰,郑子成,张锡洲,等.不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):33-36.
刘目兴,聂艳,于婧.不同初始含水率下粘质土壤的入渗过程[J].生态学报,2012,32(3):871-878.
查同刚.土壤理化分析[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2017.
Abid M, Lal R. Tillage and drainage impact on soil quality:Ⅱ.Tensile strength of aggregates, moisture retention and water infiltration[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2009,103(2):364-372.
郑凯利,邓东周.若尔盖湿地土壤入渗性能及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):179-191.
0
浏览量
931
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621