太行山典型区域不同林分类型枯落物水文效应

赵鹏; 马佳明; 李艳茹; 马梓琪; 谷建才; 黄冬梅

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.025

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

太行山典型区域不同林分类型枯落物水文效应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 太行山典型区域不同林分类型枯落物水文效应
- Hydrological Effects of Litter in Different Forest Types in the Typical Areas of Taihang Mountains
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第5期页码：176-185
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河北农业大学林学院,河北,保定,071000
  2. 河北农业大学理学院,河北,保定,071000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "赵鹏(1992-),男,河北蔚县人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事森林可持续经营研究。E-mail:237965849@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  流域综合经营技术研究与示范项目（1905005）国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0500802）2015年河北省高等学校科学研究计划项目（Z2015079）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.025
  中图分类号： S715
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵鹏, 马佳明, 李艳茹, 等. 太行山典型区域不同林分类型枯落物水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):176-185.

ZHAO Peng, MA Jiaming, LI Yanru, et al. Hydrological Effects of Litter in Different Forest Types in the Typical Areas of Taihang Mountains[J]. 2020, 34(5): 176-185.
赵鹏, 马佳明, 李艳茹, 等. 太行山典型区域不同林分类型枯落物水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):176-185. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.025.

ZHAO Peng, MA Jiaming, LI Yanru, et al. Hydrological Effects of Litter in Different Forest Types in the Typical Areas of Taihang Mountains[J]. 2020, 34(5): 176-185. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.025.

摘要

采用样地调查和室内浸泡法，对河北易县洪崖山自然保护区葫芦峪林场6种不同林分类型枯落物的水文效应进行研究。结果表明：6种林分类型枯落物的蓄积量范围为5.25~15.70 t/hm2，蓄积量总体为阔叶林刺槐最大，针阔混交林次之，针叶林最小，各林分半分解层蓄积量总体大于未分解层（油松纯林、黑枣和油松混交林未分解层大于半分解层）；最大持水量范围为10.55~25.04 t/hm2，阔叶林栓皮栎（25.04 t/hm2）最大，刺槐纯林（23.66 t/hm2）次之，针叶林油松（10.55 t/hm2）最小；最大持水率范围是171.19%~260.20%，针叶林油松最大，侧柏最小；有效拦蓄量范围为6.25~17.60 t/hm2，阔叶林栓皮栎（17.60 t/hm2）最大，刺槐纯林次之（17.30 t/hm2），针叶林侧柏（6.25 t/hm2）最小；有效拦蓄率略有不同，针叶林油松最大，其值为180.29%，阔叶林栓皮栎（162.98%）次之，针阔混交林黑枣和油松最小，其值为77.22%。综合研究分析表明，栓皮栎和刺槐的枯落物层持水能力较佳，该地区栓皮栎林和刺槐林枯落物层水源涵养能力优于其他4种林分类型的枯落物。

Abstract

The soil sample survey and indoor soaking method were used to study the hydrological effects of six different stand types in Huluyu Forest Farm

Hongya mountain nature reserve

Yixian County

Hebei Province. The results showed that the accumulations of litter in 6 stand types ranged from 5.25 to 15.70 t/hm2

and the accumulations were the largest in broad-leaved robinia pseudoacacia

followed by mixed needle-width forest

and the smallest in coniferous forest. The total volume of semi-decomposed layer of each forest was larger than that of non-decomposed layer (the non-decomposed layer of pure Pinus tabulaeformis

Diospyros Iotus and Pinus tabulaeformis mixed forest was larger than that of semi-decomposed layer). The maximum water capacity range was 10.55~25.04 t/hm2

among which Quercus variabilis (25.04 t/hm2) was the largest

Robinia pseudoacacia (23.66 t/hm2) was the second largest

and Pinus tabuliformis (10.55 t/hm2) was the smallest. The range of maximum water holding rate was 171.19%~260.20%

among which Pinus tabulaeformis of coniferous forest was the largest and Platycladus orientalis was the smallest. The range of effective storage was 6.25~17.60 t/hm2

among which Quercus variabilis (17.60 t/hm2) was the largest in broad-leaved forest

Robinia pseudoacacia (17.30 t/hm2) was the second largest

Platycladus orientalis (6.25 t/hm2) was the smallest. The effective retention rates were slightly different. The coniferous Pinus tabuliformis forest was the largest with the value of 180.29%

followed by the broad-leaved Quercus variabilis forest (162.98%)

the needle and broad mixed forest Diospyros Iotus and Pinus tabulaeformis was the smallest with the value of 77.22%.The comprehensive analysis showed that the water holding capacity of the litter layer of Quercus variabilis and robinia pseudoacacia was better than those of the litter layer of other four stand types.

关键词

Keywords

references

魏强,凌雷,柴春山,等.甘肃兴隆山不同演替阶段典型森林群落的凋落物动态[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(5):27-34.

Shen W J, Peng S L, Zhou G Y, et al. Ecohydrological functions of litter in man-made Acacia Mangium and Pinus elliotii plantations[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2001,5(5):846-850.

王伟伟.栓皮栎林分枯落物对土壤-植物系统水分运动的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(3):105-111.

Freschet G T, Cornelissen J H C. Linking litter decomposition of above and below ground organs to plant-soil feedbacks worldwide[J].Journal of Ecology,2013,101(4):943-952.

Gholami L, Banasik K, Sadeghi S H, et al. Effectiveness of straw mulch on infiltration,splash erosion,runoff and sediment in laboratory conditions[J]. Journal of Water and Land Development,2014,22(1):51-60.

兰亚男,孙旭,秦富仓,等.阴山北麓不同林分类型枯落物层持水性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):151-157.

庞梦丽,朱辰光,翟博超,等.河北省太行山区3种人工水土保持林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(1):52-56.

王会京,王红霞,谢宇光.太行山不同林型枯落物持水性及生态水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(6):136-139,144.

宣立辉,康凡,谷建才,等.冀北地区典型林分枯落物层与土壤层的水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):86-91.

彭云莲,金兆梁,吕刚,等.浑河源头水源涵养林枯落物持水能力研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2018,49(5):107-114.

饶良懿,朱金兆,毕华兴.重庆四面山森林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(1):33-37.

牛勇,刘洪禄,张志强.北京地区典型树种及非生物因子对枯落物水文效应的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2015,31(8):183-189.

涂志华,范志平,孙学凯,等.大伙房水库流域不同植被类型枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):129-135.

郝弯弯,赵鹏,李思维,等.御道口牧场不同类型防护林的枯落物水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):197-204.

卢振启,黄秋娴,杨新兵.河北雾灵山不同海拔油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):112-116.

杨荣,杨宏伟,刘丽英,等.不同林分山杏灌木林枯落物持水性能研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(2):96-102,110.

王安宁,蔺鑫,穆枫,等.冀北木兰围场沙荒坡地不同坡位黄柳沙障内枯落物的持水性能[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(1):98-107.

王美莲,王飞,姚晓娟,等.不同林龄兴安落叶松枯落物及土壤水文效应研究[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(6):925-931.

公博,师忱,何会宾,等.冀北山区6种人工林的林地水源涵养能力[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(3):165-170.

侯贵荣,毕华兴,魏曦,等.黄土残塬沟壑区3种林地枯落物和土壤水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):357-363,371.

赵阳,余新晓,吴海龙,等.华北土石山区典型森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(6):148-152.

鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同海拔人工油松林枯落物及其土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(6):54-58,70.

李阳,万福绪.黄浦江中游5种典型林分枯落物和土壤水源涵养能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):264-271.

胡淑萍,余新晓,岳永杰.北京百花山森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):146-150.

张振明,余新晓,牛健植,等.不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):139-143.

金雅琴,李冬林,孙丽娟,等.南京近郊人工林地表枯落物的累积量及持水性[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(5):95-104.

浏览量

967

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

御道口牧场不同类型防护林的枯落物水文效应

黄土丘陵沟壑区典型植物群落切沟系统植被生长特性

子午岭地区植被演替的土壤碳汇效应

多因素干扰下森林公园枯落物水文效应