南亚热带5种典型人工林凋落物水文效应

王金悦; 邓羽松; 林立文; 黄娟; 蒋代华; 黄智刚

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.024

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

南亚热带5种典型人工林凋落物水文效应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 南亚热带5种典型人工林凋落物水文效应
- Study on the Hydrological Effects of the Litters Layer from Five Typical Plantations in South Subtropics of China
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第5期页码：169-175
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广西大学林学院,南宁,530004
  2. 广西大学农学院,南宁,530004
  3. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所,北京,100081
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "王金悦(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事森林水土保持研究。E-mail:wangjinyue2020@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  广西科技重大专项（AA17204078-4）广西自然科学基金项目（2016JJA130212）国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0505402）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.024
  中图分类号： S715
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王金悦, 邓羽松, 林立文, 等. 南亚热带5种典型人工林凋落物水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):169-175.

WANG Jinyue, DENG Yusong, LIN Liwen, et al. Study on the Hydrological Effects of the Litters Layer from Five Typical Plantations in South Subtropics of China[J]. 2020, 34(5): 169-175.
王金悦, 邓羽松, 林立文, 等. 南亚热带5种典型人工林凋落物水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):169-175. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.024.

WANG Jinyue, DENG Yusong, LIN Liwen, et al. Study on the Hydrological Effects of the Litters Layer from Five Typical Plantations in South Subtropics of China[J]. 2020, 34(5): 169-175. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.024.

摘要

以广西国有高峰林场的5种不同人工林（马尾松林、杉木林、桉树林、米老排林、红锥林）为研究对象，结合野外调查和室内浸水法，对各人工林凋落物层的水文效应进行定量分析。结果表明：（1）5种林分凋落物蓄积量范围在1.96~9.05 t/hm2，大小顺序为红锥林 > 杉木林 > 马尾松林 > 桉树林 > 米老排林。（2）5种林分凋落物中，杉木林最大持水量最大，为14.23 t/hm2，马尾松林最小，为6.26 t/hm2；米老排林凋落物最大持水率最大，为577.98%，红锥林最小，为135.46%。（3）杉木林凋落物的有效拦蓄量最大，为10.18 t/hm2，马尾松林最小，为4.07 t/hm2；米老排林凋落物有效拦蓄率最大，为463.35%，红锥林最小，为92.38%。（4）回归分析表明，凋落物持水量与浸水时间的关系符合对数函数关系（Q=aln t+b（R2>0.773）），凋落物吸水速率和浸水时间的关系符合幂函数关系（V=ktn（R2>0.997））。持水过程中，各林分凋落物均表现为在1 h内持水量迅速增加，1 h后增加速度变慢，在10~12 h之后，吸水基本停止。综上，杉木林、米老排林凋落物层水源涵养功能较强。

Abstract

Taking five kinds of plantations (Pinus massoniana forest

Cunninghamia lanceolata forest

Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis forest

Mytilaria laosensis forest and Castanopsis hystrix forest) in Nanning State-owned Gaofeng Forest Farm of Guangxi as research objects

using field investigation and indoor soaking method

the hydrological effects of the litter layers were quantitatively compared and studied. The results showed as the following: (1) The litter accumulations of five kinds of plantations was about 1.96~9.05 t/hm2

and the order of litter accumulation was Castanopsis hystrix forest > Cunninghamia lanceolata forest > Pinus massoniana forest > Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis forest > Mytilaria laosensis forest. (2) Among the five stand litters

the Cunninghamia lanceolata forest had the largest maximum water-holding capacity (14.23 t/hm2)

and the Pinus massoniana forest had the smallest maximum water-holding capacity (6.26 t/hm2). The maximum water-holding rate of litter in Mytilaria laosensis forest was the largest(577.98%)

with that in Castanopsis hystrix forest was the smallest(135.46%). (3) The effective water storage capacity of litters in Cunninghamia lanceolata forest was the largest (10.18 t/hm2)

while that in Pinus massoniana forest was the smallest (4.07 t/hm2). The most effective interception rate of litter was 436.35% in the Mytilaria laosensis forest and the smallest was 92.38% in the Castanopsis hystrix forest. (4) The regression analysis showed that the relationship between the water-holding capacity of litters and the soaking time conformed to the logarithmic function (Q=aln t+b(R2>0.773))

and the relationship between litter water absorption rate and soaking time conformed to the power function (V=ktn(R2>0.997)). In the water-holding process

the litters in all stands showed that the water-holding capacity increased rapidly with in 1 hour

and the increasing speed slowed down after 1 hour. After 10~12 hours

the litter basically stopped absorbing water. In conclusion

the litters layer of Cunninghamia lanceolata forest and Mytilaria laosensis forest had strong water conservation function.

关键词

Keywords

references

韦小茶,周秋文,崔兴芬,等.喀斯特针叶林枯落物层水文效应[J].生态科学,2017,36(4):120-127.

陈更艳,王槐岳,宿少锋,等.海南典型人工林枯落物持水特征[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(17):117-121,164.

富丽,赵锦梅,李永宁,等.陇东黄土高原不同林龄苹果林地枯落物及土壤的水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(5):40-45.

Neris J, Tejedor M, Fuentes J. Effect of forest floor characteristics on water repellency infiltration runoff and soil loss in and isols of Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)[J].Catena,2013,29:50-57.

Yang L, Liang Y R, Bai T W. Research on litter hydrological properties of inefficient forest in Jinyun Mountain[J].Energy Procedia,2011,11:2624-2628.

Li X, Niu J Z, Xie B Y. Study on hydrological functions of litter layers in North China[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(7):e70328.

张志兰,郑云泽,于秀娟.重庆市几种常见经济林凋落物持水性能研究[J].中国水土保持,2019(2):59-62.

曲炳鹏,王咏嘉,李素艳,等.生态景观林10种林分枯落物的水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(2):65-70,74.

张甜,董希斌,唐国华,等.大兴安岭不同类型低质林土壤和枯落物的水文性能[J].东北林业大学学报,2017,45(10):1-5.

时忠杰,张宁南,何常清,等.桉树人工林冠层、凋落物及土壤水文生态效应[J].生态学报,2010,30(7):1932-1939.

陈波,孟成生,赵耀新,等.冀北山地不同海拔华北落叶松人工林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):216-221.

邓继峰,丁国栋,吴斌,等.宁夏盐池地区3种林分枯落物层和土壤水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2014,36(2):108-114.

杨霞,陈丽华,康影丽,等.辽东低山区5种典型水源涵养林枯落物持水特性[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(9):2662-2670.

彭云莲,金兆梁,吕刚,等.浑河源头水源涵养林枯落物持水能力研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2018,49(5):613-620.

宣立辉,康凡,谷建才,等.冀北地区典型林分枯落物层与土壤层的水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):86-91.

贾剑波,刘文娜,余新晓,等.半城子流域3种林地枯落物的持水能力[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(6):26-32.

涂志华,范志平,孙学凯,等.大伙房水库流域不同植被类型枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):127-133.

刘斌,鲁绍伟,李少宁,等.北京西山6种天然纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):73-78,137.

张峰,彭祚登,安永兴,等.北京西山主要造林树种林下枯落物的持水特性[J].林业科学,2010,46(10):6-14.

韩友志,邢兆凯,顾宇书,等.浑河上游白桦冷杉等4种林分枯落物储量及持水特性[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(11):15-18.

鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同海拔人工油松林枯落物及其土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(6):54-58,70.

李海星.桂西南四种人工林水源涵养功能的研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2017.

兰亚男,孙旭,秦富仓,等.阴山北麓不同林分类型枯落物层持水性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):151-157.

赵阳,余新晓,吴海龙,等.华北土石山区典型森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(6):148-152.

郭宇嘉,牛庆花,陆贵巧,等.承德市第三乡林场不同林分类型枯落物和土壤的持水特性[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):38-44.

浏览量

1194

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

油松人工林重度火烧后凋落物分解及水文效应

冻融时期库布齐沙柳人工林土壤呼吸对降雪的响应

三种阔叶林凋落物的持水特性

红壤恢复林地微团聚体形成与稳定的影响机制研究进展

华北土石山区典型森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应