秸秆覆盖下桂北岩溶区水稻田土壤优先流特征

陈晓冰; 韦灵; 吴晗; 姜波; 李振东

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.018

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

秸秆覆盖下桂北岩溶区水稻田土壤优先流特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 秸秆覆盖下桂北岩溶区水稻田土壤优先流特征
- The Characteristics of Preferential Flow on Straw Mulching of Paddy Field in the Karst Region of North Guangxi
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第5期页码：124-130
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 桂林理工大学, 广西岩溶地区水污染控制与用水安全保障协同创新中心,广西,桂林,541004
  2. 桂林理工大学, 广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室,广西,桂林,541004
  3. 广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室科教结合科技创新基地,广西,桂林,541004
  4. 桂林理工大学环境科学与工程学院,广西,桂林,541004
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "陈晓冰(1988-),男,博士,讲师,主要从事土壤水分运动与模拟研究。E-mail:jayvision_chen@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  广西中青年教师基础能力提升项目（2017KY0270）广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室研究基金项目（桂科能1701K009）桂林理工大学博士科研启动基金项目（GUTQDJJ2017001）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.018
  中图分类号： S152.7
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈晓冰, 韦灵, 吴晗, 等. 秸秆覆盖下桂北岩溶区水稻田土壤优先流特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):124-130.

CHEN Xiaobing, WEI Ling, WU Han, et al. The Characteristics of Preferential Flow on Straw Mulching of Paddy Field in the Karst Region of North Guangxi[J]. 2020, 34(5): 124-130.
陈晓冰, 韦灵, 吴晗, 等. 秸秆覆盖下桂北岩溶区水稻田土壤优先流特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):124-130. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.018.

CHEN Xiaobing, WEI Ling, WU Han, et al. The Characteristics of Preferential Flow on Straw Mulching of Paddy Field in the Karst Region of North Guangxi[J]. 2020, 34(5): 124-130. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.018.

摘要

优先流作为一种土壤水分的快速入渗形式，广泛发生于水稻田内。通过进行野外土壤染色示踪试验，结合形态学图像解析技术，开展秸秆覆盖与非覆盖条件下的广西岩溶区水稻田土壤优先流特征研究。结果表明：在相同的外部供水条件下，秸秆覆盖水稻田土壤染色形态以整体均匀分布形式为主，而非秸秆覆盖水稻田呈明显枝状染色形态分化现象并贯穿整个土壤空间，其平均染色斑块形状系数为13.96，染色形态表现为显著不规则分化状况，且土壤空间中染色水流平均分布密度达0.117，相比秸秆覆盖水稻田更大，呈现染色水流集中分布状态。秸秆覆盖水稻田土壤入渗量相比非秸秆覆盖水稻田较高，平均总染色面积比达46.69%，二者之间差异显著（P<0.05），但田间优先流发生时间相对较晚，对应的平均基质流深度为16.92 cm，优先流比显著小于非秸秆覆盖水稻田（49.55%）（P<0.05），仅为27.47%。秸秆覆盖措施可影响田间土壤水分运动过程，在一定程度上提高田间水分的入渗量，降低土壤优先流发生程度，促进稻田土壤水分的保持，减少田间水肥流失。

Abstract

Preferential flow is a rapid infiltration form of soil moisture which occurs widely in paddy fields. This paper concentrated on typical farmland of paddy fields with straw mulching and non-cover conditions in the Karst region of Guangxi

using the methods of brilliant blue dye and the morphological image analysis technology to present the soil preferential flow features of two tillage types. The results showed that under the same water supply condition

the soil dyeing morphology of straw mulching paddy fields was mainly uniformly distributed

while the non-mulching conditions paddy fields showed obvious branch-like dyeing morphological and throughout the soil space. The average dyed patch shape coefficient of non-mulching conditions paddy field was 13.96

and the dyeing morphology showed a significant irregular differentiation. The average distribution density of dyeing water in soil space was 0.117

which was larger than that straw mulching paddy field

showing a concentrated distribution condition of dyeing water. The soil infiltration capacity of straw mulching field was higher than that of non-cover conditions paddy field

with its the average total dyeing area ratio was 46.69%. There was significant difference between them (P<0.05). But the time rate of preferential flow of straw mulching paddy field was later than the non-mulching conditions paddy field

which the average matrix flow depth was 16.92 cm. The preferential flow fraction of straw mulching paddy field was 27.47% less than the straw mulching rice paddy (49.55%). There was significant difference between them (P<0.05). Straw mulching method can affect the process of soil water movement in the field. At the same time

its increase the amount of water infiltration in the field to a certain extent and reduce the occurrence of preferential flow. Compared with the non-cover conditions of paddy field

the straw mulching method also promote the maintenance of soil water in the paddy field

and reduce the loss of water and fertilizer in the field.

关键词

Keywords

references

Worthington S R H. Diagnostic tests for conceptualizing transport in bedrock aquifers[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,529:365-372.

Hamoud Y A, Guo X, Wang Z, et al. Effects of irrigation water regime,soil clay content and their combination on growth,yield,and water use efficiency of rice grown in South China[J].International Journal of Agricultural&Biological Engineering,2018,11(4):144-155.

付佑胜,刘伟中,张凯,等.麦秸秆高留茬条件下不同秸秆覆盖量对稻田杂草及水稻产量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(10):2313-2318.

靳苗苗,胡正锟,朱柏菁,等.环境胁迫对不同水分管理措施下稻田土壤功能稳定性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(11):3795-3803.

Zhang Z B, Zhou H, Zhao Q G, et al. Characteristics of cracks in two paddy soils and their impacts on preferential flow[J].Geoderma,2014,228/229:114-121.

张展羽,陈于,孔莉莉,等.土壤干缩裂缝几何特征对入渗的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(10):192-197.

Qi W, Zhang Z Y, Wang C, et al. Crack closure and flow regimes in cracked clay loam subjected to different irrigation methods[J].Geoderma,2020,358:1-11.

Zhao Y, De Maio M, Vidotto F, et al. Influence of wet-dry cycles on the temporal infiltration dynamic in temperate rice paddies[J].Soil&Tillage Research,2015,154:14-21.

Anyusheva M, Lamers M, La N, et al. Persistence and leaching of two pesticides in a paddy soil in Northern Vietnam[J].Clean-Soil,Air,Water,2016,44(7):858-866.

Fuhrmann I, Maarastawi S, Neumann J, et al. Preferential flow pathways in paddy rice soils as hot spots for nutrient cycling[J].Geoderma,2019,337:594-606.

Flury M, Flühler H, Jury W A, et al. Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water:A field study[J].Water Resources Research,1994,30(7):1945-1954.

Van Schaik N. Spatial variability of infiltration patterns related to site characteristics in a semi-arid watershed[J].Catena,2009,78:36-47.

Bettinger P, Bradshaw G A, Weaver G W. Effects of geographic information system vector-raster-vector data conversion on landscape indices[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1996,26(8):1416-1425.

Wang C, Zhang Z Y, Fan S M, et al. Effects of straw incorporation on desiccation cracking patterns and horizontal flow in cracked clay loam[J].Soil&Tillage Research,2018,182:130-143.

张欣,张洪江,张福明,等.西南山区农地土壤前期含水量对优先流的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):4-10,17.

蒋小金,王恩妲,陈祥伟,等.典型黑土耕地土壤优先流环绕特征[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(12):3127-3132.

Lahue G T, Linquist B A. The magnitude and variability of lateral seepage in California rice fields[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,574:202-210.

李向东,陈源泉,隋鹏,等.中国南方集约多熟稻田保护性耕作制度[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(10):1653-1656.

陈晓冰,严磊,陈廷速,等.西南岩溶区粉垄耕作和免耕方式下甘蔗地土壤优先流特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):58-66.

李振东,朱彦光,陈晓冰,等.桂北岩溶区典型农地土壤优先流特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):68-74.

浏览量

1040

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土丘陵沟壑区植物根系对土壤优先流的影响机理

喀斯特地区林草地植被根系分布对优先流特征的影响

桂东南崩岗侵蚀区崩壁龛穴的形态及空间分布特征

黄土高塬沟壑区不同植被恢复方式对降雨入渗的影响

荒漠草原不同退化程度土壤优先流发育特征